“..you cannot set a boundary and simultaneously take care of someone else’s feelings..”
…dr. mark ibsen, md“
reported by
youarewithinthenorms.com
NORMAN J CLEMENT RPH., DDS, NORMAN L. CLEMENT PHARM-TECH, MALACHI F. MACKANDAL PHARMD, BELINDA BROWN-PARKER, IN THE SPIRIT OF JOSEPH SOLVO ESQ., INC., SPIRIT OF REV. IN THE SPIRIT OF WALTER R. CLEMENT BS., MS, MBA. HARVEY JENKINS, MD, PH.D., IN THE SPIRIT OF C.T. VIVIAN, JELANI ZIMBABWE CLEMENT, BS., M.B.A., IN THE SPIRIT OF THE HON. PATRICE LUMUMBA, IN THE SPIRIT OF ERLIN CLEMENT SR., EVELYN J. CLEMENT, IN THE SPIRIT OF WALTER F. WRENN III., MD., JULIE KILLINGSWORTH, RENEE BLARE, RPH, DR. TERENCE SASAKI, MD LESLY POMPY MD., CHRISTOPHER RUSSO, MD., NANCY SEEFELDT, IN THE SPIRIT OF WILLIE GUINYARD BS., JOSEPH WEBSTER MD., MBA, BEVERLY C. PRINCE MD., FACS., NEIL ARNAND, MD., RICHARD KAUL, MD., IN THE SPIRIT OF LEROY BAYLOR, JAY K. JOSHI MD., MBA, AISHA GARDNER, ADRIENNE EDMUNDSON, ESTER HYATT PH.D., WALTER L. SMITH BS., IN THE SPIRIT OF BRAHM FISHER ESQ., MICHELE ALEXANDER MD., CUDJOE WILDING BS, MARTIN NJOKU, BS., RPH., IN THE SPIRIT OF DEBRA LYNN SHEPHERD, BERES E. MUSCHETT, STRATEGIC ADVISORS
“SEIZE THE BLOOD”
emergency motion to quash a DEA administrative subpoena
This legal document is an emergency motion to quash a DEA administrative subpoena filed on behalf of Dr. Mark Ibsen, asserting that the government’s request is unreasonable, oppressive, and a form of harassment. Counsel John P. Flannery argues that the subpoena is fatally defective because it demands patient records that were already produced during a previous grand jury investigation and was served improperly without adhering to personal service requirements.
pattern of misconduct
and selective investigation
Beyond these procedural failures, the motion details a pattern of misconduct and selective investigation, specifically highlighting a “sting” operation involving a chronic pain patient that resulted in felony charges later dismissed for lack of probable cause. Ultimately, the article seeks to protect patient confidentiality under HIPAA and stop what it characterizes as a vindictive “fishing expedition” by federal agents who are allegedly disregarding prior agreements and legal standards.
argues that the subpoena is fatally defective
practice relies significantly on alternative treatments for pain, including cannabis
Dr. Mark S. Ibsen, M.D., is a physician based in Helena, Montana, whose medical practice focuses heavily on treating patients suffering from “unremitting, mind-numbing, chronic pain”. His practice relies significantly on alternative treatments for pain, including cannabis, while highly supervised opioid therapy accounts for approximately 7% of his patient base.
Dr. Ibsen is currently the subject of an investigation by the DEA and the U.S. Attorney’s Office, which his legal counsel has characterized as a “selective and vindictive investigation” and a form of harassment.
Key aspects of Dr. Ibsen’s situation as detailed in the sources include:
- Broad Legal Demands: Federal authorities initially issued a grand jury subpoena seeking medical records for any and all patients treated by Dr. Ibsen, a request estimated to encompass 200,000 patients and dating back to 1980. His legal team argued this was a “fishing expedition” and successfully narrowed the scope to 22 specific patientsfor the period starting in December 2022.
- Compliance and New Subpoenas: After a lengthy process from April to September 2025, Dr. Ibsen produced the requested files for these 22 patients. Despite this compliance, the DEA issued a new administrative subpoena on May 8, 2026, seeking the same documents already provided to the grand jury.
- Emergency Motion to Quash: Dr. Ibsen’s attorney, John P. Flannery, filed an emergency motion to quash the May 2026 subpoena, labeling it “fatally defective, unreasonable & oppressive”. The motion cites several errors, including failed personal service and a return date set for a Sunday.
- Clearance by Medical Board: The sources note that the Montana Board of Medical Examiners found no charges against Dr. Ibsen; the federal subpoena was filed only days after the board’s screening panel reached this conclusion.
- Impact on Patients (The David Fenn Case): The investigation into Dr. Ibsen has extended to his patients. One chronic pain patient, David Fenn, was arrested in California in what Dr. Ibsen’s counsel describes as a “sting” operation intended to find evidence against the doctor. During the arrest, authorities seized Fenn’s prescribed pain medication, which his legal team argued put him at risk of severe health consequences, including death.
Dr. Ibsen maintains that he provides necessary care for desperate chronic pain patients within a “hostile regulatory environment”. He has expressed a desire to appear before the grand jury to explain how his patients suffer and how his treatments have redressed their pain.
According to Attorney Ronald Chapman, by rigorously applying these tests, the legal strategist ensures that the courtroom remains a sanctuary for truth rather than a stage for methodologically unvalidated advocacy.
🔓 🔓 🔓
ALL WATCHED OVER BY MACHINES OF LOVING GRACE
OUR TREE OF KNOWLEDGE SHALL NEVER BE SUPPRESSED
FOR NOW
THE NORMS
REFERENCES:
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1Eii1TikFg
So it was that the bison came upon a family of mice who were all sick, but they had nothing with which to pay for the doctor’s aid. “But without my care, your children will die. I must help, it is my duty,” he said.
Without a thought, the doctor gave them his aid, one after the other, and each mouse he healed was grateful. Soon, however, he began to tire and eventually became exhausted, yet still more mice came. “Surely, though, this deed will be worth it in the end,” he thought, and strengthened his resolve.
Keep DEA out of healthcare this is violating the rights of countless Americans. End the war on the sick and chronically I’ll
Wow, Great Article, Doc Norman!