NORMAN J CLEMENT RPH., DDS, NORMAN L. CLEMENT PHARM-TECH, MALACHI F. MACKANDAL PHARMD, BELINDA BROWN-PARKER, IN THE SPIRIT OF JOSEPH SOLVO ESQ., INC.T. SPIRIT OF REV. IN THE SPIRIT OF WALTER R. CLEMENT BS., MS, MBA. HARVEY JENKINS MD, PH.D., IN THE SPIRIT OF C.T. VIVIAN, JELANI ZIMBABWE CLEMENT, BS., MBA., IN THE SPIRIT OF THE HON. PATRICE LUMUMBA, IN THE SPIRIT OF ERLIN CLEMENT SR., EVELYN J. CLEMENT, WALTER F. WRENN III., MD., JULIE KILLINGSWORTH, RENEE BLARE, RPH, DR. TERENCE SASAKI, MD LESLY POMPY MD., CHRISTOPHER RUSSO, MD., NANCY SEEFELDT, WILLIE GUINYARD BS., JOSEPH WEBSTER MD., MBA, BEVERLY C. PRINCE MD., FACS., NEIL ARNAND, MD., RICHARD KAUL, MD., IN THE SPIRIT OF LEROY BAYLOR, JAY K. JOSHI MD., MBA, AISHA GARDNER, ADRIENNE EDMUNDSON, ESTER HYATT PH.D., WALTER L. SMITH BS., IN THE SPIRIT OF BRAHM FISHER ESQ., MICHELE ALEXANDER MD., CUDJOE WILDING BS, MARTIN NJOKU, BS., RPH., IN THE SPIRIT OF DEBRA LYNN SHEPHERD, BERES E. MUSCHETT, STRATEGIC ADVISORS
BALANCING SECURITY AND PRIVACY
In an era where the need for national security often collides with individual privacy, it is essential to strike a balance. AI and advanced technology have undoubtedly revolutionized how information is collected and analyzed.
Still, it should be done within the boundaries of the law and with respect for individual rights. As technology advances, legal frameworks must adapt to ensure privacy rights are not eroded.
The legal landscape surrounding healthcare fraud investigations has been thrust into the spotlight with the ongoing case of United States v Anand and Dr. Neil Anand.
Dr. Anand, a Pennsylvania-based practitioner, finds himself at the center of a debate that raises significant questions about using artificial intelligence (AI) and data analytics in law enforcement.
This legal battle underscores the broader context of how the federal government, specifically the Departments of Justice (DOJ) and Health and Human Services (HHS), has been harnessing the power of artificial intelligence and data mining in its efforts to combat healthcare fraud.
While digital solutions and data analytics in the fight against healthcare fraud is not new, recent developments have seen a significant increase in the government’s reliance on these technologies.
It is the findings of multiple researchers that “medical experts” in many courts or Medical Board proceedings are “hired guns” – clinical predators hired for large sums of money to tell stories whose details they do not themselves understand.
Most judges, juries, and media reporters understand even less. No lawyer likes to ask questions they don’t know the answers to, but sometimes, one must rigorously explore a witness’s and the judge’s qualifications. Many published papers, for instance, ignore the quality of studies combined for “meta-analysis.”
And if you write about health care and don’t know what meta-analysis is, you might be part of the problem.
Without probing the actual knowledge of “expert” witnesses, judges and juries cannot know whether they are hearing generally accepted principles and practices—even when clinical literature is quoted. Neither can journalists.
For a doctor who treats pain with opioid pain relievers, these errors can result in profound miscarriages of justice.
U.S. physicians have reported being targeted by drug enforcement agencies and medical boards for prescribing opioids, even when they have done so legitimately for chronic pain management.
The dire situation of the violations of human and civil rights of doctors and patients simply for doing what they are supposed to do—for doctors, manage patients pain, for patients—consult our physicians and take the medications they prescribe, is one which history will not forget.
The current policies of DEA and CDC are causing Torte Harm to both doctors and patients.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
OR SEND
TO CASH APP:$docnorm
ZELLE 3135103378
ALL WATCHED OVER BY MACHINES OF LOVING GRACE
BE SURE TO DONATE TO THE MARK IBSEN GOFUNDME DEFENSE FUND, WHERE THE SON ALWAYS RISES!!!
FOR NOW YOU ARE WITHIN THE NORMS
