reported in youarewithinthenorms.com
NORMAN J CLEMENT , RPH, DDS, NORMAN L. CLEMENT PHARM-TECH, MALACHI F. MACKANDAL PHARMD, BELINDA BROWN-PARKER, IN THE SPIRIT OF JOSEPH SOLVO ESQ., INC.T. SPIRIT OF REV. IN THE SPIRIT OF WALTER R. CLEMENT BS., MS, MBA. HARVEY JENKINS MD, PH.D., IN THE SPIRIT OF C.T. VIVIAN, JELANI ZIMBABWE CLEMENT, BS., MBA., IN THE SPIRIT OF THE HON. PATRICE LUMUMBA, IN THE SPIRIT OF ERLIN CLEMENT SR., EVELYN J. CLEMENT, WALTER F. WRENN III., MD., JULIE KILLINGSWORTH, RENEE BLARE, RPH, DR. TERENCE SASAKI, MDLESLY POMPY MD., CHRISTOPHER RUSSO, MD., NANCY SEEFELDT, WILLIE GUINYARD BS., JOSEPH WEBSTER MD., MBA, BEVERLY C. PRINCE MD., FACS., NEIL ARNAND, MD., RICHARD KAUL, MD., LEROY BAYLOR, JAY K. JOSHI MD., MBA, ADRIENNE EDMUNDSON, ESTER HYATT PH.D., WALTER L. SMITH BS., IN THE SPIRIT OF BRAHM FISHER ESQ., MICHELE ALEXANDER MD., CUDJOE WILDING BS, MARTIN NJOKU, BS., RPH., IN THE SPIRIT OF DEBRA LYNN SHEPHERD, BERES E. MUSCHETT, STRATEGIC ADVISORS
“THE RAT KING”
THE DAVE STEIN, MD MEMOS
“this unholy alliance of fraud and deceit”
The core of this case revolves around the corruption of American medicine by profit-driven healthcare insurance corporations and corrupt physicians who willingly provide false testimony to further their personal gain, professional ego, and power within the medical community.
This unholy alliance began in the late 1990s and has resulted in racketeering schemes designed to increase corporate profits at the expense of innocent American physicians and their patients.
The key figure in perpetuating these malevolent schemes is Dr. Timothy King, a physician whose substantial income is derived from knowingly offering false testimony that has unjustly destroyed the lives of numerous healthcare professionals.
Think about it, People…On Kolodny and Prop…, the DOJ has adopted eugenics or Neo-Eugenics. As David SteinMD put it, they’ve resurrected and repackaged the old eugenic philosophy so that history doesn’t repeat itself, but it, sure enough, rhymes.….@marktwain
Furthermore, this case uncovers the intricate network of corruption and collusion involving rogue governmental agencies that have been coopted and controlled by for-profit healthcare insurance corporations.
Without King’s deceitful reports and testimony, these fraudulent schemes would crumble, leading to justice and restitution for the victims.
Without Defendant King’s false reports and testimony, the schemes would fail. At the heart of this case, lies Timothy E. King’s self-serving efforts to manipulate the human experience of pain, by proposing a knowingly fraudulent software patent that purports to calculate what opiate dose a physician is permitted to prescribe for his patients.
THE DAVE STEIN, MD MEMOS
“Unraveling the Web of Corruption”
This case exposes the racket being perpetrated by the Defendants, a racket aided and abetted by rogue governmental agencies, that have been coopted and are controlled by for-profit healthcare insurance corporations. Defendant King has on many occasions, used this fraudulent instrument to render legal testimony to cause the incarceration and loss of licenses of innocent physicians. Defendant King was and is motivated by money and a desire for self-aggrandizement.
This case seeks: (I) monetary compensation for Plaintiff Stein, consequent to the theft of his DEA license by Defendant King’s false testimony; (ii) and an order that finds Defendant King a not credible witness and bars him from providing testimony in any future cases against any physicians.
DEA should arrest mfrs/exporters (CCP)+ cartel chemists & transporters (Mexico) for the 1,000s OF AMERICANS MURDERED BY ORAL FENTANYL. But NO! These OxyMORONS tell MDs which Opioid & how many mgs to Rx for #PainPts. Which DEA police graduated med school? Is CONGRESS DEAF & BLIND?
STATEMENT OF FACTS
“The Fraudulent Patent Application”
In Summary on October 29, 2019, Timothy E. King, MD submitted to the United States Patent Office an application for a patent that purports to be a “forensic system and method, including a methodology, for analyzing medical and pharmacy data to determine the legitimacy of controlled substance prescription and use, and to detect fraud, abuse, and/or diversion of controlled substances.”
Dr. King, in submitting the application, did know that he was committing a fraud on the patent office and the United States. Timothy E. King knows that his system of attempting to quantify the opiate treatment of a qualitative element, i.e., that of pain, has no basis in the scientific or medical literature. Dr. King has used his knowingly fraudulent patent pending method to render false testimony in multiple civil and criminal proceedings against many physicians, including David Stein, MD who was compelled under duress to surrender his DEA license.
TIMOTHY E. KING, MD MASSIVE GRIFTING THROUGH THE SUBMISSION OF A FRAUDULENT PATENT
Dr. Timothy E. King’s patent application consists of two main sections, the ABSTRACT and the FORENSIC SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETECTING FRAUD, ABUSE, AND DIVERSION IN THE PRESCRIPTIVE USE OF CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES.
Within the ABSTRACT, Dr. King asserts with knowing falsity that his system will provide a legal conclusion to the question of whether a physician has deviated from two purported standards of care pertaining to the dispensation of opiates.
TIMOTHY KING, MD KNOWING INPUT OF FALSE DATA INTO PATENT APPLICATION
The two purported standards of care are: (i) “outside the usual course of medical practice”; (ii) “for other than legitimate medical purposes”. Dr. King knows that these purported standards have no foundation in the scientific or medical literature, and constitute an application of an arbitrary rule, as he knows there exists no specific definition in the medical or legal literature of these terms.
Defendant King knows that the categorization of his input data fails to incorporate all the variables of a typical pain patient history, examination, and diagnostic studies, and that the categorization produces false data. King knowing input of false data is purposed to produce a false outcome that concludes the subject physician did violate the purported and unsubstantiated standards.
Dr. King, in failing to incorporate all relevant variables, did recognize that his system was flawed but did simultaneously recognize that an incorporation of all conceivable variables would still render his system flawed, as it would be unable to calculate or otherwise objectify the subjective component of the human experience of pain.
King knows that the subjective nature of pain precludes the creation of any standard of care that rigidly determines the appropriateness or lack thereof of individualized patient opiate dispensation.
King knows that the subjective nature of pain precludes any determination by his system of so called “fraud, abuse, and/or diversion of controlled substances”, and that any determination that might be rendered by his system would be fraudulent, as that made in regard to David Stein, MD.
Former DEA agent: assets can determine whose office practice they raid
Calls for Scrutiny and Reform
The case of Dr. Timothy King, the self-proclaimed “Rat King,” underscores the need for a thorough examination of the role of expert witnesses in legal proceedings. Questions about bias, conflicts of interest, and adherence to scientific principles demand resolution to ensure that the pursuit of justice is not compromised by potentially unscrupulous practices.
A MASSIVE GRIFTER OF THE DOJ-DEA CALL FOR OVERSIGHT
Moreover, these allegations underscore the importance of fostering a robust culture of accountability within the medical community. Physicians who assume the role of expert witnesses bear a significant responsibility to provide accurate, impartial, and evidence-based testimony. Any deviation from this standard threatens the medical profession’s credibility and erodes patients’ trust in their healthcare providers.
The case of Dr. Timothy King, the “Rat King,” serves as a cautionary tale about the potential pitfalls of expert testimony within the legal system. As the allegations against him highlight, the pursuit of justice requires a steadfast commitment to integrity, transparency, and adherence to scientific principles. Only through rigorous scrutiny and reform can the integrity of expert testimony be preserved, ensuring that justice is served and the well-being of patients remains paramount.
FOR NOW, YOU ARE WITHIN