!!UHURU!!! FREE ALL IMPRISONED DOCTORS
from doctor-patient forum republished in youarewithinthenorms.com
NORMAN J CLEMENT RPH., DDS, NORMAN L. CLEMENT PHARM-TECH, MALACHI F. MACKANDAL PHARMD, BELINDA BROWN-PARKER, IN THE SPIRIT OF JOSEPH SOLVO ESQ., INC.T. SPIRIT OF REV. IN THE SPIRIT OF WALTER R. CLEMENT BS., MS, MBA. HARVEY JENKINS MD, PH.D., IN THE SPIRIT OF C.T. VIVIAN, JELANI ZIMBABWE CLEMENT, BS., MBA., IN THE SPIRIT OF THE HON. PATRICE LUMUMBA, IN THE SPIRIT OF ERLIN CLEMENT SR., EVELYN J. CLEMENT, WALTER F. WRENN III., MD., JULIE KILLINGSWORTH, RENEE BLARE, RPH, DR. TERENCE SASAKI, MD LESLY POMPY MD., CHRISTOPHER RUSSO, MD., NANCY SEEFELDT, WILLIE GUINYARD BS., JOSEPH WEBSTER MD., MBA, BEVERLY C. PRINCE MD., FACS., NEIL ARNAND, MD., RICHARD KAUL, MD., IN THE SPIRIT OF LEROY BAYLOR, JAY K. JOSHI MD., MBA, AISHA GARDNER, ADRIENNE EDMUNDSON, ESTER HYATT PH.D., WALTER L. SMITH BS., IN THE SPIRIT OF BRAHM FISHER ESQ., MICHELE ALEXANDER MD., CUDJOE WILDING BS, MARTIN NJOKU, BS., RPH., IN THE SPIRIT OF DEBRA LYNN SHEPHERD, BERES E. MUSCHETT, STRATEGIC ADVISORS
Thank you to all of you who wrote to him in prison. His story must be told.
DISCUSSION
from excerpts richard “red” lawhern
At the heart of this case lies the warrantless data mining of doctor-patient records, specifically within the electronic health records system.
Government agencies’ use of AI algorithms to sift through vast amounts of personal health information without explicit consent or a warrant has raised significant concerns about privacy and individual rights.
Doctors have experienced raids, had their medical records seized, and faced public scrutiny, which has led to the ruin of their practices and even patient suicides. Some have been denied adequate representation by law enforcement pre-trial asset seizures.
(read the entire transcript by clicking on this link).
It is the findings of multiple researchers that “medical experts” in many courts or Medical Board proceedings are “hired guns” – clinical predators hired for large sums of money to tell stories whose details they do not themselves understand.
Most judges, juries, and media reporters understand even less. No lawyer likes to ask questions they don’t know the answers to, but sometimes, one must rigorously explore a witness’s and the judge’s qualifications.
Many published papers, for instance, ignore the quality of studies combined for “meta-analysis.”
And if you write about health care and don’t know what meta-analysis is, you might be part of the problem.
Without probing the actual knowledge of “expert” witnesses, judges and juries cannot know whether they are hearing generally accepted principles and practices—even when clinical literature is quoted. Neither can journalists.
For a doctor who treats pain with opioid pain relievers, these errors can result in profound miscarriages of justice. U.S. physicians have reported being targeted by drug enforcement agencies and medical boards for prescribing opioids, even when they have done so legitimately for chronic pain management.
________________________________
1)
THIS IS THE DEFINITIVE ARTICLE DEMONSTRATING THE OPIOID CRISIS HAS BEEN A COMPLETE HOAX PERPETRATED BY THE DEA, CDC, AND DOJ:
THE ENABLING OF JUNK SCIENCE
Questions for medical experts and answers
Thus, there are a few pertinent questions for any “subject matter expert” who testifies against a doctor concerning prevailing practice on opioid pain relievers – and for judges and journalists as well.
Questions: How many patients have you treated for pain during your career? How many of them died from all causes while under your care?
Answers: Patients treated for severe chronic pain often face higher mortality rates compared to the general population. Chronic pain can be associated with an increased risk of death, particularly from causes such as cancer, diseases of the circulatory and respiratory systems, and suicide. None of these factors is a consequence of the use of prescription opioid drugs approved for use by the U.S. FDA.
Questions: How many patients have you discharged or referred to an addiction specialist after they complained of inadequate pain care? Is this typical of other practitioners in your field? How do you know? What is the nature of “opioid dependence?” Are you familiar with the term “pseudo-addiction?
Answers: Opioid dependence in medical practice is a purely physical reaction in which patients who have been treated with opioid pain relievers may experience withdrawal symptoms if they are tapered too rapidly off their medications. The concept reflects fundamental principles of pharmacology that were well-established in the 1970s.
Dependence is not addiction.
Pseudo-addiction is an affliction of doctors, not patients. It reflects a misinterpretationof patient requests for better pain control. This misperception is complicated by institutional bias introduced by legal counsels who are loathed to risk practice exposure to censure on the grounds of “violating” dose limits in poorly researched government prescribing guidelines.
Question: In your opinion, how frequently do patients treated for pain by a doctor die of a prescription drug overdose?
Answer: The incidence of overdose-related mortality in clinical patients is too low to confidently estimate within confounds imposed by poor doctor training and limited observation times in clinical encounters.
Moreover, definitive large-cohort studies indicate that combined near-term incidence of suicide events or hospitalization for overdose in clinical patients treated with opioids is on the order of 2 percent or less. In all probability, opioids are innocent bystanders in the causation of these tragedies.
As noted by the Director of the U.S. National Institute on Drug Abuse, “unlike tolerance and physical dependence, addiction is not a predictable result of opioid prescribing. Addiction occurs in only a small percentage of persons who are exposed to opioids — even among those with preexisting vulnerabilities.”
Dr. Volkow is also on record questioning the prevailing emphasis on “abstinence only” policies in the treatment of addiction.
Question: What are the best indicators in a patient’s medical records that they may experience bad outcomes from pain treatment using prescription opioids?
Answer: A history of attempted suicide, hospitalizations for overdose, or severe psychiatric disorders are four to twenty times more significant in risk of near-term overdose or suicide than treatment with opioids.
Question: Is there a widely accepted consensus standard of opioid prescribing that definitively limits dose levels due to patient risks?
Answer: No, there is not. The 2022 U.S. CDC Clinical Practice Guideline is not a “consensus” standard for pain treatment. The CDC itself indicates that its guidelines are “intended as recommendations to guide clinicians in making informed, patient-centered decisions about pain care, including opioid therapy…” Indeed, CDC guidelines are widely rejected by practicing clinicians on multiple grounds:
a) Weak medical evidence and gross over-emphasis on risk and non-consensual tapering of legacy patients, many of whom have been stable for years on high-dose opioid therapy.
b) Anti-opioid bias, cherry-picked research, and faulty methodology, including scientifically unjustifiable claims that non-opioid approaches, including non-pharmacological approaches, are “preferable” to opioids – in the absence of trials that demonstrate any such thing.
c) Failure to address or embrace the implications of highly variable opioid metabolism between individuals due to genetics – a failure reflected in almost all published drug trials.
OR SEND
TO CASH APP:$docnorm
ZELLE 3135103378
ALL WATCHED OVER BY MACHINES OF LOVING GRACE
BE SURE TO DONATE TO THE MARK IBSEN GOFUNDME DEFENSE FUND, WHERE THE SON ALWAYS RISES!!!
FOR NOW, YOU ARE WITHIN THE NORMS
