NORMAN J CLEMENT RPH., DDS, NORMAN L. CLEMENT PHARM-TECH, MALACHI F. MACKANDAL PHARMD, BELINDA BROWN-PARKER, IN THE SPIRIT OF JOSEPH SOLVO ESQ., INC.T. SPIRIT OF REV. IN THE SPIRIT OF WALTER R. CLEMENT BS., MS, MBA. HARVEY JENKINS MD, PH.D., IN THE SPIRIT OF C.T. VIVIAN, JELANI ZIMBABWE CLEMENT, BS., MBA., IN THE SPIRIT OF THE HON. PATRICE LUMUMBA, IN THE SPIRIT OF ERLIN CLEMENT SR., EVELYN J. CLEMENT, WALTER F. WRENN III., MD., JULIE KILLINGSWORTH, RENEE BLARE, RPH, DR. TERENCE SASAKI, MD LESLY POMPY MD., CHRISTOPHER RUSSO, MD., NANCY SEEFELDT, WILLIE GUINYARD BS., JOSEPH WEBSTER MD., MBA, BEVERLY C. PRINCE MD., FACS., NEIL ARNAND, MD., RICHARD KAUL, MD., IN THE SPIRIT OF LEROY BAYLOR, JAY K. JOSHI MD., MBA,AISHA GARDNER, ADRIENNE EDMUNDSON, ESTER HYATT PH.D., WALTER L. SMITH BS., IN THE SPIRIT OF BRAHM FISHER ESQ., MICHELE ALEXANDER MD., CUDJOE WILDING BS, MARTIN NJOKU, BS., RPH., IN THE SPIRIT OF DEBRA LYNN SHEPHERD, BERES E. MUSCHETT, STRATEGIC ADVISORS
MOZART’S REQUIEM MASS FOR THE D.E.A. DATA DISASTER
armed with his 8th-grade education “sophisticated” artificial intelligence tools and data strategies
INTRODUCTION
The False Pseudoscience of Drug Enforcement Agency Artificial Intelligence Expert Hank Asher and Money Balling Anne Milgram Has Now Been Consumed By Hume’s Fork: Why Bother With Facts When The Drug Enforcement Agency Can Swing a Sledgehammer?
Ah, Hank Asher—the self-proclaimed maestro of financial and medical disruption, armed with his 8th-grade education “sophisticated” artificial intelligence tools and data strategies.
We’re supposed to believe that this man, with his data analytics, forensic accounting, and undercover operations, is single-handedly saving the world from evil regimes and criminal enterprises. But let’s not kid ourselves. What Asher brings to the table is an old-fashioned sledgehammer in a world that needs scalpels.
HOW HANK ASHER SWINDLED D.O.J./D.E.A. OUT OF MORE THAN $150 MILLION: NO PERSON AT DOJ APPEARED TO HAVE EVER HAD DOUBLE CHECKED HIS MATH OR METHODOLOGIES
Let’s face it:
“when looking at thousands of transactions, it’s easy to draw connections between almost anything. It’s called confirmation bias, but Asher seems to have rebranded it as “network analysis.”
Let’s be clear—connecting the dots isn’t the same as proving guilt. But why bother with such nuances when you can label a foreign bank as a “money laundering concern” and watch it crumble? Who needs evidence when you have the power of suggestion?
The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) is a powerful tool that has repeatedly unveiled the inner workings of government strategies that were otherwise shielded from public scrutiny. In the case of Neil Anand v. United States, the FOIA document release has provided a rare glimpse into the machinations behind Hank Asher’s much-lauded artificial intelligence data analytics techniques.
However, rather than reinforcing the narrative of success, these documents reveal a different story—one that underscores the widespread fallacy of Asher’s approach.
DISCUSSION
INDIVIDUALS AND BUSINESSES CAUGHT IN THE CROSS FIRE OF ASHER’S DECEPTIVE ANALYSIS
According to the documents released under FOIA, much of the success attributed to Asher’s strategies is built on shaky ground. The Neil Anand v. United States case highlighted several instances where the metrics used to measure the success of medical disruptions by the DEA were, at best, misleading.
The FOIA documents also shed light on the unintended consequences of Asher’s aggressive tactics.
While the public narrative focuses on the disruption of criminal enterprises, many innocent businesses and individuals were caught in the crossfire.
The documents reveal instances where financial or medical institutions, wrongly designated as drug dealing or money laundering concerns, faced devastating consequences. These institutions, often in poor inner cities of the United States, were left with little recourse, as their reputations were tarnished and their access to the global financial system was severely restricted.
lack of due process
Moreover, the case of Neil Anand v. United States highlighted the lack of due process afforded to these entities. The FOIA documents indicate that decisions to designate medical institutions were often made based on incomplete or flawed intelligence, with little opportunity for those affected to challenge the findings.
This has led to a growing chorus of criticism that Asher’s strategies are less about precision and more about brute force, with little regard for the collateral damage left in their wake.
Perhaps most damning of all, the FOIA documents challenge the very premise that Asher’s strategies are grounded in solid intelligence.
Contrary to the public portrayal of meticulously planned operations, the documents reveal a chaotic process where intelligence was often cherry-picked to fit pre-existing narratives.
Hume, Part 1 (Lecture by Hammerud)
How a House-Painting, Drug-Running DEA Informant Built the Machine That Rules Our Lives
In the rush to achieve quick wins, critical pieces of information were either ignored or misinterpreted, leading to actions that were more about optics than effectiveness.
The Neil Anand v. United States case also brought to light the limitations of the intelligence apparatus used to support Asher’s operations.
The FOIA documents suggest that much of the intelligence was sourced from dubious informants or based on outdated information, raising serious questions about the reliability of the data underpinning these high-stakes decisions.
This casts a long shadow over the legitimacy of Asher’s entire approach, suggesting that his so-called intelligence-led operations were, in reality, built on a foundation of sand.
This FOIA document release from Neil Anand v. United States serves as a stark reminder that all is not as it seems in the world of financial or medical regulatory racism.
Far from being the unassailable force for good that Asher and his proponents would have us believe, these documents expose a strategy riddled with flaws, half-truths, and unintended consequences.
peel back the layers of secrecy, it becomes clear THE HANK SHOWN WAS A SCAM COSTING MILLIONS OF ACUTE/CHRONICALLY ILL PATIENTS THEIR LIVES
As we peel back the layers of secrecy, it becomes clear that the widespread fallacy of Asher’s techniques lies not just in their execution but in their very conception—a flawed approach that prioritizes spectacle over substance and sledgehammers over precision.
Asher’s intelligence gathering—particularly his use of undercover operations—sounds like something straight out of a spy novel. But here’s the problem: it is a spy novel, complete with all the fiction you’d expect.
A CAVEMAN WITH A NUCLEAR WEAPON
Undercover operations are risky and often produce dubious results. But let’s talk about strategic targeting and financial tools. Ah, the infamous Section 311 of the USA PATRIOT Act—the sledgehammer of all sledgehammers.
It’s like giving a caveman a nuclear weapon. Sure, you’ll get results, but at what cost? Shutting down banks, freezing assets, and blacklisting companies sounds effective until you consider the collateral damage.
What about the innocent businesses and individuals who get caught in the crossfire? What about the ripple effects in global markets? But why worry about such trivialities when you can swing away and call it a day?
ARGUMENT
However, Asher’s and the DEA’s damage could be catastrophic as the Supreme Court’s 2023 decision in Jones v. Hendrix has significant implications for the justice system, particularly concerning the balance between finality in legal decisions and the correction of judicial errors.
The Court ruled that federal prisoners convicted under laws later determined to be incorrect do not have the right to challenge their convictions under habeas corpus if they have already exhausted their initial post-conviction remedies. This means that even if a prisoner is factually innocent based on a subsequent change in law, they cannot seek relief if they have already used their one allowed motion under 28 U.S.C. §2255.
This decision emphasizes the principle that Congress has prioritized the finality of convictions over correcting errors in the judicial process. The ruling effectively closes the door to potentially innocent individuals who are barred from filing a successive motion, leaving them imprisoned despite changes in the law that might declare their actions non-criminal.
In her dissent, Justice Jackson argued that this decision raises serious constitutional concerns because it denies individuals a meaningful opportunity to hear their claims of innocence.
Critics, including the ACLU, argue that this ruling entrenches injustice within an already punitive system, as it allows individuals to remain incarcerated for conduct that is no longer considered criminal by law.
The decision in Jones v. Hendrix highlights a significant issue in the justice system: the tension between maintaining the finality of convictions and ensuring that justice is served, particularly in cases where the law has evolved in ways that could exonerate those previously convicted.
This ruling has far-reaching consequences, particularly for those who seek to challenge their convictions based on new legal interpretations or changes in the law based upon these revelations.
CONCLUSION
So, there you have it—the “science” behind Hank Asher’s strategies. It’s a mix of pseudoscience, overconfidence, and good old-fashioned luck. But why let facts get in the way of a good story? After all, everything looks like a nail when you’re wielding a sledgehammer. And in Hank Asher’s world, the only thing that matters is how many nails you can smash before the walls come tumbling down.
OR SEND
TO CASH APP:$docnorm
ZELLE 3135103378
So, Donate to the “Pharmacist For Healthcare Legal Defense Fund,
FOR NOW, YOU ARE WITHIN
THE NORMS
* Biography: Hank Asher was a pioneering figure in the field of data analytics whose work had a profound impact on modern society, even if his name isn’t widely recognized. Born in 1951, Asher’s career took a remarkable trajectory from a troubled past to becoming a major force in the data industry. He began as a young pilot in South Florida and the Caribbean, where he became entangled with a group of drug smugglers in the 1980s. Despite his associations, Asher was never convicted of a felony. Instead, he leveraged his knowledge of the smuggling world to assist the DEA, using his insight into their early computer systems to become an informant.
This experience provided Asher with a unique understanding of how to compile and utilize vast amounts of data—an understanding he would later monetize in groundbreaking ways. As described in McKenzie Funk’s book The Hank Show, Asher took his knowledge of computers and data collection and applied it to create comprehensive databases. He began in Florida, gathering public records on vehicle registrations, driver’s licenses, and more, and eventually sold access to these databases to police forces, insurance companies, and corporations. His database systems transformed how organizations could access detailed information on individuals, leading to what was considered a revolution in data fusion.
Asher’s most notable creation was the database system known as Accurint, which became widely used by law enforcement, including after the 9/11 attacks, when it helped in identifying several of the hijackers. However, the same system also falsely flagged over a thousand individuals as potential terrorists, leading to some being wrongfully deported. This raised significant concerns about the reliability of such systems and the ethical implications of their use.
While at Seisint, Hank Asher played a leading role in developing the Multistate Anti-Terrorism Information Exchange (MATRIX) data mining system for the Florida Department of Law Enforcement, described as a tool to help state law enforcement officials identify potential terrorists. The MATRIX program was shut down in June 2005 after federal funding was cut due to public concerns over privacy and state surveillance.
Seisint was later sold to Anglo-Dutch publishing giant Reed Elsevier in July 2004 for US$775 million and combined with its own data aggregation subsidiary, LexisNexis. Asher had retained a large stake in the company and said in an interview that he would earn more than $250 million from the sale.
Asher’s legacy is a complex one. On the one hand, he is credited with helping to shape the modern landscape of data analytics, earning him the title of the “father of data fusion.” On the other hand, his work has also been criticized for its role in creating systems that can perpetuate errors and invade privacy on a massive scale. Despite his death in 2013, the influence of Asher’s databases continues, with the information they contain remaining accessible, reflecting the lasting impact of his work on how data is used and understood in the digital age.
