THIS PRESENTATION IS A VIDEOS NARRATIVE THAT SUPPORTS THE FOUNDATION OF THIS ARTICLE
BY
NORMAN J CLEMENT RPH., DDS, NORMAN L.CLEMENT PHARM-TECH, MALACHI F. MACKANDAL PHARMD, BELINDA BROWN-PARKER, IN THE SPIRIT OF JOSEPH SOLVO ESQ., IN THE SPIRIT OF REV. C.T. VIVIAN, JELANI ZIMBABWE CLEMENT, BS., MBA., IN THE SPIRIT OF THE HON. PATRICE LUMUMBA, IN THE SPIRIT OF ERLIN CLEMENT SR., WILLIE GUINYARD BS., JOSEPH WEBSTER MD., MBA, BEVERLY C. PRINCE MD., FACS., LEROY BAYLOR, JAY K. JOSHI MD., MBA, ADRIENNE EDMUNDSON, ESTER HYATT PH.D., WALTER L. SMITH BS., IN THE SPIRIT OF BRAHM FISHER ESQ., MICHELE ALEXANDER MD., CUDJOE WILDING BS, MARTIN NDJOU, BS., RPH., IN THE SPIRIT OF DEBRA LYNN SHEPHERD, BERES E. MUSCHETT, STRATEGIC ADVISORS
“THE IMPORTANCE OF DEPRIVING ONE OF KNOWLEDGE IS AN UNEDUCATED POPULATION IS MORE EASIER TO CONTROL”
THE FOUNDATION OF CORRUPTION
John Beerbower Esq is a United States Attorney for the DEA. His activities are the center of deception, corruption, and fraud within the Justice Department which are both profound as well as unconstitutional, requiring Congressional Oversight and investigation. Mr. Beerbower operates with a unique judicial court system that acts as both Civil or Criminal and abides by no Federal Rules of Criminal and Civil Rules of procedures. John Beerbower’s power comes solely from this court, which operates outside Federal Civil rules and further acts as a Federal Criminal court without six amendment protection and a Civil Court without fourth amendment protections.
CHRISTOPHER COLLINS; A COMMON MAN
“THE COWARD NEVER STARTED
THE WEAK DIED ALONG THE WAY
ONLY THE STRONG SURVIVED”
Yet, John Beerbowers, a sworn United States Attorney, supported by a small cadre of government lawyers, regional office Supervisors, Diversion Investigators, DEA Agents, and further supported by a cadre of dishonest so-called pharmacists experts who have successfully conducted a mass campaign of disinformation which are ingrained in their sadistic inhumanity toward the patient in pain and their healthcare providers. (1) John Beerbower, along with his cohorts Katherine L. Steele, Esq., Paul A Dean, so-called pharmacist experts such as Don Sullivan, Professor The Ohio State University all operate in the DEA Tribunal of Judicial Corruption.
Linda Cheek MD:
“Opioids are just the current drug being attacked for jobs and money by the Dept of Justice. The Drug War has always been simply an attack on minorities. Now, by forfeiture, they are going after doctors. We need to get the Controlled Substance Act repealed and exonerate all those who have been made felons by it. Drugs don’t cause addiction. Learn the entire truth and what needs to be done on www.doctorsofcourage.org“
Pronto Pharmacy, LLC Docket No. 19-42 EXPOSES A TRIBUNAL OF CORRUPTION
In the case of Pronto Pharmacy LLC, Tampa, Florida Mr. Beerbower, presented no evidence of diversion or where any prescriptions medications control or non-control was exchanged for sale for non-medical use. Diversion Investigator for DEA Richard James Albert’s testimony was fraudulent, but the DEA is able to sustain Alpert’s misrepresentation of both facts and through a system of corruption.
The DEA’s separate judicial tribunal system has gone unregulated and avoided the scrutiny of the Congress of the United States. A tribunal of corruption led by corrupt Judges and supported by corrupt United States federal prosecutors from the US Department of Justices (DOJ) who are permitted to operate outside the rule of Federal Rules of Evidence and Procedures. The corruption is as deep as it is wide and extends all to the United States Attorney General and the General offices throughout America and its territories.
WE ARE VOID OF HUMAN VOID EXISTENCE
The question I always ask myself every morning when I wake is. “Why Did They Attack me,” “Why are They Attacking us,” our families and our Pharmacy businesses?
EXAMINING THE DEA TRIBUNAL
DEA Litigation & Compliance Advertisement
!!!WARNING!!!
DEA litigation can be intricate, expensive, and fraught with risk. It is essential that companies in the health care and pharmaceutical industries rely on the counsel of attorneys with the skill set and expertise to navigate these dangerous waters. As important, health care organizations need an attorney to craft an effective compliance strategy that will help to avoid litigation in the first place. On both counts, Cote Law PLLC provides the experienced legal representation that health care companies and organizations need. Led by a former senior-level DEA attorney, Cote Law PLLC’s expertise and commitment to delivering for our clients is a combination that leads to real solutions in both litigation and compliance matt.
THE COURT OF UNCONSTITUTIONAL DESIGN
The DEA Court as designed is unconstitutional, and any decisions that have been ever handed down by this tribunal are all unconstitutional. The DEA tribunal operates outside Federal Rules of Evidence and Civil procedures and whose final decision is made by the DEA administrator who is confirmed by the United States Senate. In most cases is 99% of the time held in Arlington, Va. So now the Clients and their witnesses must travel all the way to Virginia to seek so-called justice. The DEA level of corruption goes all the way to the top of the political chain in the Justice Department and political structure in America. The House Committee on Judiciary and the House Committee on Government Operation must give oversight.
“WE ARE PHARMACISTS NOT DRUG DEALERS“
The DEA enforces two sets of laws. They enforce federal laws and DEA laws. Under federal laws, there are constitutional protections and guidelines. Under the DEA laws, there are tacit laws. Yes, the DEA has its own court system. The DEA court serves the certified federal officers as an administrative court. What is so unique about the DEA courts are criminal search warrants are signed by the DEA judge. When the items are seized, the hearing is an administrative hearing. What makes this so confusing is, there is no clear distinction between the enforcement of criminal laws and DEA laws. All DEA cases in these courts proceeding are solely based on the “numbers of Pills” received and filled.
- DEA Diversion Investigators often interview no patients or prescribing practioners and violate patients right to seek care by tracking their travel to seek medical using google maps.
2. These Courts never address the disease states of the Patient receiving the narcotic analgesic medications, this important information and facts are excluded from Court Testimony.
3. The DEA created a law called Pharmacist corresponding responsibility “under the Controlled Substances which compels the Pharmacist to practice medicine by withholding medical treatment from a patient based on MME unscientific guidelines, without reviewing radiographs, physicians progress notes or conducting a physical examination of the patient.
4. The DEA has set arbitrary prescription limits on the amounts of medications Black Owned, Hispanic, Asian Pharmacies are permitted to fill and the distance their patients can travel. While predominately white own pharmacies allowed to fill narcotic medication into the millions of tablets, capsules, liquids without being questioned by DEA Diversion.
The DEA System is blatantly biased and unfair. Blacks, Asians, Hispanic Pharmacist, and owners are frequently targetted charged, and prosecuted for being involved with the diversion of narcotics of specific patients, for a specific prescription from a so-called ” pill mill doctor”, only to see the same patients with the same prescription and same doctor who is no longer vilified as a “pill mill doctor” get their prescription filled at a white own pharmacy and that is ok with the DEA.****
5. The Court is designed to violate the Human Right of the patient to seek medical care and acts arbitrarily and capriciously to violate all constitutional rights of both patients, pharmacists, and practitioners. Further DEA has relied on fear and bullying, rest and seizure of property to silence most black pharmacists and owners.
“IF YOU EVER THINK YOU ARE TOO SMALL TO MAKE A CHANGE, THEN YOU HAVE NEVER SLEPT WITH A MOSQUITO”
THE KANGAROO TRIBUNALS OF THE DEA AND ITS RULING FORCES PHARMACISTS TO PRACTICE MEDICINE BY ORDERING THEM TO SECOND GUESS THE PRESCRIBING PRACTITIONERS DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT IN VIOLATION OF THE DOCTOR-PATIENT RELATIONSHIP
This agency alone has created many unseen problems. When this matter becomes public, officers and administration would be prosecuted. The courts would classify the DEA system as dishonest and deceitful. Criminal attorneys would file complaints under Giglio, and every drug arrestee would be released from prison. The ignorance of the DEA will one day come to light.
These pharmacists are public health threat imminent dangers certificate of registration suspended for ignoring “red flag” in filling narcotic analgesic medication. prescribed for treatment of depending you’re of narcotics analgesic medication only watch the very patient who was a red flag at the black own pharmacies get the same prescription from the prescriber using the same payment filled at white-owned pharmacies and the DEA SAY NOTHING THIS IS AN AMAZING DOUBLE STANDARD ****
WALMART VS UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
This is in reality why Walmart has filed this preemptive strike against both DOJ/ DEA because it fears disruption of commerce it fears extortion, injustice it fears injury to its brand it attorneys know it must thwart the corrupt actions of the DEA kangaroo tribunals in which the pathology of diseases, disease states will never take the stand and the physician-patient relationships ( healthcare practitioners) becomes eviscerated in support of the ill-gotten gains of DEA and DOJ.
According to the United States Chamber of Commerce Amicus Curiae brief:
This is a case where a company did not acquiesce and has not settled. This gives the Court an all-too-rare opportunity to stop the otherwise inexorable trend toward regulation by post-hoc enforcement.
Compliance programs are frustrated, not furthered when agencies enforce sub-regulatory guidance, created without notice as if it were binding law. When burdensome obligations stem from loose policymaking, even businesses with robust compliance programs are left guessing. Facing potentially crushing liability, many companies acquiesce and settle, seeming to validate the sub-regulatory guidance and encouraging further aggrandizement by the government. This is why courts demand that agencies observe basic procedural requirements and fundamental fairness in the creation, interpretation, and enforcement of substantive obligations on regulated entities.
On December 22, 2020, Walmart Pharmacy writes in response to the United States Justice lawsuit stating:
“The Justice Department’s investigation is tainted by historical ethics violations, and this lawsuit invents a legal theory that unlawfully forces pharmacists to come between patients and their doctors and is riddled with factual inaccuracies and cherry-picked documents taken out of context. Blaming pharmacists for not second-guessing the very doctors the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) approved to prescribe opioids is a transparent attempt to shift blame from DEA’s well-documented failures in keeping bad doctors from prescribing opioids in the first place.
In contrast to DEA’s own failures, Walmart always empowered our pharmacists to refuse to fill problematic opioids prescriptions, and they refused to fill hundreds of thousands of such prescriptions. Walmart sent DEA tens of thousands of investigative leads, and we blocked thousands of questionable doctors from having their opioid prescriptions filled at our pharmacies.
According to Walmart Pharmacy’s legal team, when a patient brings an opioid prescription from a doctor into a pharmacy to fill:
“Pharmacists aren’t doctors and don’t write opioid prescriptions. Instead, when a patient hands an opioid prescription written by a DEA-approved doctor to a pharmacist, a pharmacist has to decide whether to fill it. No one disputes that if a pharmacist knows a prescription is fake or forged, she shouldn’t fill it.
The Department’s lawsuit raises a different issue: what a pharmacist should do with a prescription that is valid on its face and written by a state-licensed and DEA-approved doctor.
For a prescription like that, should a pharmacist accept the doctor’s medical judgment and fill the prescription? Or should a pharmacist second-guess the doctor and not fill it, leaving the patient without the medicine prescribed by her doctor? Remember, a pharmacist must make this decision without the benefit of a medical degree, without examining the patient, and without access to the patient’s medical records.
This single-focused act by the DEA and its court systems should fear every American. The constitution was not intended to be used to identify and attack particular groups of people. The DEA and its court system have created an unrestricted bias whereby this organization has yielded the power to act as they please.
“We are but low-hanging fruit being harvested for a prison to be conveniently exterminated, and their Probity enforces their belief there is no one bit of educational achievement Black Folk have attained that any Institution is bound to respect.”
ALL COURTS IN AMERICA ARE SET UP CONSTITUTIONALLY EXCEPT THE DEA’s COURT TRIBUNAL
All Courts in America are set up constitutionally where each Justice or Judge of the United States;
” shall take the following oath or affirmation before performing the duties of his/her office: I,____, do solemnly swear(or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as____under the Constitution and laws of the United States, So help me God.”
AUTHORITY FOR PROMULGATION OF RULES TITLE 28, UNITED STATES CODE
§ 2072. Rules of procedure and evidence; power to prescribe
(a) The Supreme Court shall have the power to prescribe general rules of practice and procedure and rules of evidence for cases in the United States district courts (including proceedings before magistrate judges thereof) and courts of appeals.
(b) Such rules shall not abridge, enlarge, or modify any substantive right. All laws in conflict with such rules shall be of no further force or effect after such rules have taken effect.
(c) Such rules may define when a ruling of a district court is final for the purposes of appeal under section 1291 of this title.
(Added Pub. L. 100–702, title IV, § 401(a), Nov. 19, 1988, 102 Stat. 4648, eff. Dec. 1, 1988; amended Pub. L. 101–650, title III, §§315, 321, Dec. 1, 1990, 104 Stat. 5115, 5117.)
§ 2073. Rules of procedure and evidence; method of prescribing
(a)(1) The Judicial Conference shall prescribe and publish the procedures for the consideration of proposed rules under this section.
(2) The Judicial Conference may authorize the appointment of committees to assist the Conference by recommending rules to be prescribed under sections 2072 and 2075 of this title. Each such committee shall consist of members of the bench and the professional bar and trial and appellate judges.
(b) The Judicial Conference shall authorize the appointment of a standing committee on rules of practice, procedure, and evidence under subsection (a) of this section. Such standing committee shall review each recommendation of any other committees so appointed and recommend to the Judicial Conference rules of practice, procedure, and evidence and such changes in rules proposed by a committee appointed under subsection (a)(2) of this section as may be necessary to maintain consistency and otherwise promote the interest of justice.
(c)(1) Each meeting for the transaction of business under this chapter by any committee appointed under this section shall be open to the public, except when the committee so meeting, in open session and with a majority present, determines that it is in the public interest that all or part of the remainder of the meeting on that day shall be closed to the public, and states the reason for so closing the meeting. Minutes of each meeting for the transaction of business under this chapter shall be maintained by the committee and made available to the public, except that any portion of such minutes, relating to a closed meeting and made available to the public, may contain such deletions as may be necessary to avoid frustrating the purposes of closing the meeting.
However, the DEA’s tribunal, whose rulings having the overall effect of any Civil Court (civil), conducts all proceedings outside of Federal Civil Rules and Procedures. However, there is not one law in America the DEA or its Court System is bound to respect;
- Federal RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURES ARE NOT PERMITTED.
- Jenks’s rulings or procedures are not allowed.
- Giglio rulings or protections are not allowed.
- Federal rules of evidence are not allowed.
- The Judge of a DEA Court works for the DEA Administrator (DRUG CZAR), and he/she has final say so in all hearing decisions.
- If the DEA administrator does not agree with the Administrative Judges’ recommendations, the Judge is terminated.
- Attorneys who practice before this Court, describe rules as arcane, stealthy, very bizarre.
- Most of All cases are heard in Virginia, putting the Respondents from around the Country and their Attorneys at a logistical disadvantage and nightmare.
- Until recently, the DEA Administrator has the final decision on all recommendations, he/she has can sit on a recommended order as long as 3 years.
- CONGRESS MUST INVESTIGATE DEA AND THEIR COURT SYSTEM.
THE CONDUCT OF DEA’S COURT NEEDS SERIOUS JUDICIAL REVIEW
The Court System of the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA), which has slipped through both Judicial review and Congressional oversite, operates outside the Federal Rules of Civil and Criminal Procedures and is in contempt and violation of those protections of the Constitution of The United States of America needs serious Judicial/ Congressional Review
As officers of the Court, their mission is not to seek out the truth and but to promote injustice by eliminating the truth and supporting bias. disguising their racism with the use of enablers (filter negroes), The DEA has thus gained the powers over the entire field of medicine(healthcare science) to redefine medical procedures medical science which are. The judges make their own rule own proceeding which permitted DEA Agents, and diversion investigators act as rogues to which no federal or constitutional protection they are bound to respect or abide.. in Associate Supreme Court Justice Gorsuch wrote “
NEARLY All DECISIONS HANDED DOWN BY THE DEA COURT APPEAR UNCONSTITUTIONAL
So what is this court is is it supposedly a Civil Court or Criminal Court but doesn’t function under Federal civil rules and procedure? It further operates as a Federal Criminal without six amendment constitutional protections. This belongs to Congressional, and it behaves as both a non-court outside federal civil procedure and rules that fall under Judicial scrutiny. Through this exclusion, THE DEA COURT OF THE KANGAROO is designed to make the scientific foundation of the medical procedures and opinions inconsequential. both civil and criminal law its officers (SEE Ramos V Louisiana Supreme Court April 20, 2020)
BY THE NORTH STAR GROUP OF PHARMACISTS
For any law enforcement organization, enforcing the law can present difficult challenges. Each day of the week and with each raid, the DEA officers make choices as to what laws to enforce.
Agents of the DEA, who are permitted to operate as rogue predatory police over the entire medical profession having redefined medical procedure and protocols armed with badges, guns, and profound stupidity an unconstitutional Judicial Tribunal with court reporters, a Judge presides in the Office of Administrative Law Judge, at the following address: DEA.Registration.Litigation#usdoj.gov.
“Correspondence concerning a specific matter, including request referenced, should be addressed to the Hearing Clerk, Office of Administrative Law Judge, Drug Enforcement Administration, at the said below address. a Prosecutor, whose titled as wholes Assistant United States Attorney United States Attorney’s Counsel for United States of America and the language of a Civil Court whereby the Defendant is referred to as the Respondent and the State thus referred as the Petitioner and who are held in a Federal Court Room yet whose Jurisdiction preside at 8071 Morrissette Drive, Springfield Virginia, 22152,”
RAMOS v. LOUISIANA Opinion of THE United STATES SUPREME COURT
Perhaps all legal decisions derived from judicial proceedings are all unconstitutional based on a recent Supreme Court decision majority 6-3 opinion written by Supreme Court Justice Gorsuch SEE PARAGRAPH -4
April 20, 2020, Ramos v Louisianna how it may affect physicians, pharmacists,s and the conduct of the DEA Civil Court:
Gorsuch, (1)otherwise, there would have been no reason to write it down. Nor would it have made any sense to spell out the places from which jurors should be drawn if their powers as jurors could be freely abridged by statute. Imagine a constitution that allowed a “jury trial” to mean nothing but a single person rubberstamping convictions without hearing any evidence but simultaneously insisting that the lone juror come from a specific judicial district “previously ascertained by law.” And if that’s not enough, imagine a constitution that included the same hollow guarantee twice—not only in the Sixth Amendment but also in Article III.8 No: The text and structure of the Constitution clearly suggest that the term “trial by an impartial jury” carried with it some meaning about the content and requirements of a jury trial.
One of these requirements was unanimity. Wherever we might look to determine what the term “trial by an impartial jury trial” meant at the time of the Sixth Amendment’s adoption, whether it’s a common law, state practices in the founding era or opinions and treatises were written soon afterward the answer is unmistakable. A jury must reach a unanimous verdict in order to convict.
The requirement of juror unanimity emerged in 14th- century England and was soon accepted as a vital right protected by the common law.9 As Blackstone explained, no person could be found guilty of a serious crime unless “the truth of every accusation . . . should . . . be confirmed by the unanimous suffrage of twelve of his equals and neighbors, indifferently chosen, and superior to all suspicion.”10 A
WHAT IS INTERESTING ABOUT THE LANGUAGE OF THIS CASE
A violation of Federal regulations is a violation of federal law and of which could result in a person coming before this tribunal their liberty. Yet this Court tribunal serves under the Administrator of the Drug Enforcement Administration who is the final arbitrator under this court system which operates outside the FEDERAL RULE of Civil Court Procedure which we contend such DEA Court System is violating the Constitution of the United States of America by violating both patient and practitioners right.
Thus people like US DEA AttoneyJohn Beerbower can operate their misguided dangerous legal craft by dealing in the abstract under these riggings where he is able to eviscerate both the Physician and patient relations, from court presentation, the diseases, and disease of the patients, including diagnosis, treatment, and treatment plan. Further, this court system excludes radiographic (MRI’s) from court presentations.
Who better would know the relation and disease and treatment for the patients than the practitioner providers(physician dentist, etc) Yet this unique Judicial system excludes this evidence from testimony? What Gorsuch, Ginsberg, Thomas Kavanaugh hadn’t realized in Ramos v Louusina or imagine is the DEA’s Court, is a tribunal in which …….where the one jurist is the single person rubberstamping convictions without hearing any evidence but simultaneously insisting that the lone juror come from a specific judicial district “previously ascertained by law.” And if that’s not enough, imagine a constitution that included the same hollow guarantee twice—not only in the Sixth Amendment but also in Article III.8 No And most importantly, can exclude testimony and evidence pertain, outside of the jurisdiction. The DEA Court is a tribunal that takes the hue of a camillion operates as a pseudo- civil court operate outside the Federal Rules of Civil Procedures one and a Criminal Court without six amendment protections.
THE PIG LAWS
The origin of the DEA court System comes out of pre-reconstruction pig laws
The DEA law 1306 is an outcrop of The Black Codes whose idea is to make criminal that which is not criminal. or origin of the Pig laws written by the white southern legislatures which occur after the Civil War. rules are so subjective now, that any healthcare practitioner can find themselves on the wrong side of the DEA for doing what they are supposed to do — treat patients. Currently, algorithms, averages, “norms” and traditions are more important than the individual patient, prescriber, or dispenser.
Pig laws, black codes, drug courts; the DEA courts are modern-day courts grossly out of portion when no crimes have ever been committed. All of these laws and courts are design to reenslave black people who are educated and to return them back in their place so much as to laws to control voting.
THE BLACK CODES
This makes this practice by the government even more sinister because the net result is the pharmacist Is convicted of a felony and in many cases will be denied the right to vote. This is another clever design government tacked to suppress voting and diversity by exclusion
SPEAKING TRUTH TO POWER
TAMPA IS TULSA AND SPEAKING TRUTH TO POWER
The DEA whenever they see Black Pharmacist owners progress they find a way to destroy it. The societal norm agent of the ultimate goal is to keep us in a state of servitude. They no the most effective this way undermine our business is to groom another black person, someone of color, to bring us into line. This was the mission of Richard Alpert.
The DEA Diversion Investigators like Richard James Alpert, Aimee Hickman, Leanne Koziol, Lakkarsha Corbin, who attended a 12-week training academy at Quantico, Virginia to become diversion investigators, are permitted to lie, cheat, distort, the medical science, and criminalize addiction in direct conflict to the United States Surgeon General and those who treat legal and illicit drug addiction related pain control medication and sends those who are suffering from this disease and those who both treat this disease to prison and loss of licensure.
All that we have documented, verified, and reported means nothing simply put black folk has accepted their status as inferior people. Who are these guys these Judges, US Attorneys, DEA authorities, who wear nice clothing, drive nice cars, and sleep in fluffy beds who make a claim that opioids, that’s despotic tyrants want to make them all slaves, addicts the word slave was a condition on the tips of their tongues all the time, the word drug addict is on the tips of all their tongues all the time cleansing of America from the dangers drugs
from Boukman the trouble maker
” the evil of the authorities of the Department Of Justice has been to manufacture a pretext in order to undermine then attack and criminalize our knowledge and training of medical,… Our God asks only good works of us but this God who is so good orders us learned souls to take a stance, to fight and he will direct our hands, he will aide us to throw away the image of the enemies who thirst for our tears a the images of helplessness and inferiority, listen to the voice of liberty who speaks in the heart of all of us.”
There have been historical events where black people and authorities worked together which put a halt to black empowerment. We are seeing actual slaves rising up against actual tyranny from slavery rebellions to the civil rights movement, black people have had a lot of setbacks with the assistance of Informants. Informants come from all places, yet under the guidance of authority, they are effective in compromising black progress.
March 31st, 2019, a well-known Los Angeles rapper Nipsey Hussle was gunned down in front of his Marathon Clothing Store, which was located in a strip mall for which he and his family-owned in Crenshaw. Nipsey Hussle was not only a rapper but an established businessman that was doing a great service to his community. He was killed by a man named Eric Holder aka “Shitty Cuz”. Shitty Cuz was a none informant and has a record of cooperating with police officers.
There were claims that the strip mall that Nipsey Hussle and his family owned was “prime real estate” and he refused to sell the property because it meant a lot to the community.
Going back to other informants in the 1960’s we can take a look at William O’Neal, who gave the floor plans, from the Illinois chapter of the Black Panther Party house where Fred Hampton stayed. This led to the Chicago Police Department killing Hampton in his sleep along with Mark Clark.
William Oneal provided the logistics to Fred Hampton. In our goal rectify the process of stigmatizing Black-owned Pharmacies as the common street dealer. We see this in Houston, Turkey leg Hut. Watchful eyes on Malcolm X, Muhammed Ali,
THE MISSION OF SAMBO
Now comes, Richard James Albert so-called Diversion Investigator they are even more detrimental in the communities they are agents of suppression. A study of policing in communities
The Diversion Investigator (Richard James Albert)from the transcript of his court testimony on January 28, 2020, Tampa Florida did absolutely No investigation had no understanding of Pharmacy.
Neither did he have to do any investigation or have knowledge or for that matter need knowledge of anything. Richard James Albert’s mission was that of The Sambo, the one who is kept ignorant to keep watch over the others, especially those, are learned and knowledgeable in their trade.
His mission is to watch them, report on them, and destroy them. Failing all investigative procedures and protocols in consulting with the prescribing physicians, or the patients, and Judge Dowd knew that because he was asking the questions. (see pg 124 through 135)
WASTING TAXPAYER FUNDS
The DEA is the central player in the failed war on drugs. When the DEA was created in 1973, it started with less than $75 million. In the fiscal year, 2020 U.S. taxpayers spent more than $3.1 billion on the DEA. President Trump asked for even more for the fiscal year 2021 – a staggering $3.5 billion, with more than $520 million specifically for its international programs.
Jeremy Goulka and Leo Beletsky, Esq of Northeastern University School of Law wrote in the New York Times September 2018
“We urgently need to rethink how our nation regulates drugs. What should our goals be? How can we design institutions and performance metrics to achieve them?
The answers lie at the local and state levels. In Rhode Island, opioid overdoses are declining because people behind bars have access to effective treatment. Massachusetts has deployed drop-in centers offering treatment, naloxone, and other services. San Francisco and Seattle are planning to open safe consumption spaces that show tremendous promise as a tool to reduce overdose deaths and other drug-related harm. But the D.E.A. and its institutional parent, the Justice Department, stand in the way of some of these experiments.”
The DEA s has systematically criminalizing long-held medical procedures of so call justice in direct contradiction to science and medical experts. It is imperative the Judicial authority of the DEA Court be eliminated. Further, The United States Judicial Committees of both House and Senate must investigate and recommend disbarment, prosecution, and imprisoned for many of these DEA bad actors activities outside the constitution of the United States of America which have resulted in manifestations of harm and death. And Mr. John Beerbower should be disbarred.
Thus the DEA court in the United States of America operates clearly outside the constitution and its goal is not to hear the truth. This tribunal is not constitutional and can no longer escape Judicial review.
CHRISTOPHER COLLINS; A COMMON MAN
“GIVE IN GIVE OUT
BUT NEVER GIVE UP”
FOR NOW, YOU ARE WITHIN
THE NORMS
ENDNOTES
- American Agony; The Opioid War Against Patients in Pain, by Helen Borel, RN, PhD
3. https://www.facebook.com/ red.lawhern
