” the evil of the authorities of the Department Of Justice has been to manufacture a pretext to undermine then attack and criminalize our knowledge and training of medical,… Our Father asks only good works of us, but this God who is so good orders us learned souls to take a stance, to fight, and he will direct our hands; he will aid us to throw away the image of the enemies who thirst for our tears a the images of helplessness and inferiority, listen to the voice of liberty which speaks in the heart of all of us.”
from youarewithinthenorms.com
NORMAN J CLEMENT RPH., DDS, NORMAN L. CLEMENT PHARM-TECH, MALACHI F. MACKANDAL PHARMD, BELINDA BROWN-PARKER, IN THE SPIRIT OF JOSEPH SOLVO ESQ., INC.T. SPIRIT OF REV. IN THE SPIRIT OF WALTER R. CLEMENT BS., MS, MBA. HARVEY JENKINS MD, PH.D., IN THE SPIRIT OF C.T. VIVIAN, JELANI ZIMBABWE CLEMENT, BS., MBA., IN THE SPIRIT OF THE HON. PATRICE LUMUMBA, IN THE SPIRIT OF ERLIN CLEMENT SR., @PACRISEUP, WALTER F. WRENN III., MD., JULIE KILLINGSWORTH, AISHA GARNER, RENEE BLARE, RPH, DR. TERENCE SASAKI, MD LESLY POMPY MD., CHRISTOPHER RUSSO, MD., NANCY SEEFELDT, WILLIE GUINYARD BS., JOSEPH WEBSTER MD., MBA, BEVERLY C. PRINCE MD., FACS., NEIL ARNAND, MD., RICHARD KAUL, MD., LEROY BAYLOR, JAY K. JOSHI MD., MBA, ADRIENNE EDMUNDSON, ESTER HYATT PH.D., WALTER L. SMITH BS., IN THE SPIRIT OF BRAHM FISHER ESQ., MICHELE ALEXANDER MD., CUDJOE WILDING BS, MARTIN NJOKU, BS., RPH., IN THE SPIRIT OF DEBRA LYNN SHEPHERD, BERES E. MUSCHETT, STRATEGIC ADVISORS
NDIKHOKHELE BAWO
BY
HOWARD ADELGLASS, MD
THE EVIL OF SILENCE: TAKE A LISTEN FROM “THE CASTE” ISABELLE WILKERSON
WHAT IS OUR GOVERNMENT CONCEALING?
DEA PSEUDOSCIENCE THE contemporary employment of NAZI data analytics
“…Richard Koherr sinisterly announced Nazi usage in accomplishing the Final Solution, that: “…in using statistics the government now has the road map to switch from knowledge to deeds…”
Dr. Howard Adelglass wrote before his sentencing of 12 years in Federal Prison;
“In the labyrinth of history, the truism that “history doesn’t repeat itself, but it often rhymes” resounds eerily as we uncover unsettling parallels between bygone eras and our contemporary reality.
One disconcerting echo, in particular, surfaces in the misuse of pseudoscience to justify reprehensible acts, drawing an alarming connection between the Nazi regime’s manipulation of pseudoscience and the contemporary employment of data analytics and criminal forensic tools against medical professionals.”
Adelglass pointed out:
“The historical annals bear witness to the grotesque perversion of science for malevolent purposes, and Nazi Germany serves as a chilling paradigm. Pseudoscience, characterized by unfalsifiable claims, confirmation bias, and a lack of openness to evaluation, played a pivotal role in shaping the draconian policies of the Nazi regime.
AT THE FOREFRONT
Phrenology, a pseudoscience measuring bumps on the skull to predict mental traits, epitomizes the distortion of scientific principles for ideological ends. At the forefront of the sinister Nazification of Germany’s legal system was Roland Freisler, a prominent Nazi jurist infamous for aggressively prosecuting political crimes.
Freisler, with legal acumen, implemented racist laws inspired by American Jim Crow legislation. His unwavering commitment to Nazi ideology reached its zenith during the Wannsee Conference, a watershed event that set the Holocaust in motion.”
NAZISM AND IBM TECHNOLOGY IN THE ERA OF THE JEWISH HOLOCAUST AND BEYOND
HITLER FASCINATED BY THE U.S., HOW JIM CROW SHAPED NUREMBERG, AND THE MASS MURDER OF JEWS
NAZI CLASSIFICATIONS
Medical Crimes in Nazi Germany: A Sinister Historical Parallel to the united states drug enforcement agency
Simultaneously, the field of medicine became a battleground for Nazi ideologies, with figures like Karl Brandt playing pivotal roles. Brandt, Hitler’s escort doctor and Reich Commissioner of Sanitation and Health, championed the Aktion T4 euthanasia program, targeting society’s weakest members for a so-called “merciful death.”
Brandt was later appointed the Reich Commissioner of Sanitation and Health (Bevollmächtigter für das Sanitäts- und Gesundheitswesen). Brandt came to believe that the health of society as a whole should take precedence over that of its individual members. Because society was viewed as an organism that had to be cured, its weakest, most invalid, and incurable members were the only parts that should be removed. Such hapless creatures should, therefore, be granted a “merciful death” (Gnadentod).
Karl Brandt (8 January 1904 – 2 June 1948) was a German physician and Schutzstaffel (SS) officer in Nazi Germany. Trained in surgery, Brandt joined the Nazi Party in 1932 and became Adolf Hitler’s escort doctor in August 1934. War crimes: performing medical experiments, without the subjects’ consent, on prisoners of war and civilians of occupied countries, in the course of which experiments the defendants committed murders, brutalities, cruelties, tortures, atrocities, and other inhuman acts.
In the context of the 1933 Nazi Germany law Gesetz zur Verhütung erbkranken Nachwuchses (Law for the Prevention of Hereditarily Diseased Offspring), Brandt was one of the medical scientists who performed abortions in great numbers on women deemed genetically disordered, mentally or physically handicapped or racially deficient, or whose unborn fetuses were expected to develop such genetic “defects.”
These abortions had been legalized as long as no healthy Aryan fetuses were aborted. Brandt’s subsequent conviction in the Nuremberg Trials laid bare his involvement in crimes against humanity, including human experimentation and forced sterilization.
OR SEND
$175.00 OR MORE TO CASH APP:$docnorm ZELLE 3135103378
So, Donate to the “Pharmacist For Healthcare Legal Defense Fund
Accused of involvement in human experimentation and other war crimes, Brandt was indicted in late 1946 and faced trial before a U.S. military tribunal along with 22 others in United States of America v. Karl Brandt et al. Brandt was tried along with twenty-two others at the Palace of Justice in Nuremberg, Germany.
The trial was officially titled United States of America v. Karl Brandt et al., but is more commonly referred to as the “Doctors’ Trial”; it began on 9 December 1946. He was charged with four counts, including crimes against humanity, participation in Freezing Malaria, LOST Gas Sulfanilamide, Bone, Muscle, and Nerve Regeneration and Bone Transplantation, Sea-Water, Epidemic Jaundice, Sterilization, and Typhus Experiments. He was convicted, sentenced to death, and later hanged on 2 June 1948.
DEA ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS FOLLOWS, ROLAND FREISLER, A GERMAN NAZI, JURIST, AND JUDGE
CONCISE HISTORY OF NAZI LAW
The Adelglass research identifies Roland Freisler was a German Nazi jurist, judge, and politician who served as the State Secretary of the Reich Ministry of Justice from 1934 to 1942 and President of the People’s Court from 1942 to 1945.
He was a prominent ideologist of Nazism who influenced the Nazification of Germany’s legal system as a jurist, and he attended the Wannsee Conference. This event set the Holocaust in motion. He was appointed President of the People’s Court in 1942, overseeing the prosecution of political crimes as a judge, becoming known for his aggressive personality and frequent sentencing with the death penalty.
Freisler’s mastery of legal texts, mental agility, dramatic courtroom verbal dexterity, and verbal force, in combination with his zealous conversion to Nazi ideology, made him the most feared judge in Nazi Germany and the personification of Nazism in domestic law. Freisler was a committed Nazi ideologist and used his legal skills to adapt his theories into practical law-making and judicature. He published a paper entitled Die rassebiologische Aufgabe bei der Neugestaltung des Jugendstrafrechts (“The racial-biological task involved in the reform of juvenile criminal law”).
In this document, he argued that “racially foreign, racially degenerate, racially incurable or seriously defective juveniles” should be sent to juvenile centers or correctional education centers and segregated from those who are “German and racially valuable.”
Freisler looked to racist laws in the United States as a model for Nazi legislation to target Jews in Germany. Freisler considered American Jim Crow racist legislation “primitive” for failing to provide a legal definition of the term black or negro person.
Nevertheless, while some more conservative Nazi lawyers objected to the lack of precision with which a person could be defined as a “Jew,” he argued that American judges were able to identify black people for purposes of laws in American states that prohibited “miscegenation” between black and white people, and laws that otherwise codified racial segregation, and, therefore, German laws could similarly target Jews even if the term “Jew” (OPIOID) could not be given a precise legal definition.
On 20 January 1942, Freisler, representing the Reich Minister Franz Schlegelberger, attended the Wannsee Conference of senior governmental officials in a villa on the southwestern outskirts of Berlin to provide expert legal advice for the planning of the destruction of European Jewry.
Contemporary Parallel: Data Analytics and Forensic Tools Against Doctors
Adelglass writes:
Fast forward to the 21st century, and an unsettling parallel emerges with the contemporary use of data analytics and forensic tools against medical professionals. While the goals and methods may differ, the underlying theme of misusing tools for oppressive purposes remains ominously constant.
In this modern context, the pseudoscience of data analytics and forensic tools is wielded to investigate and prosecute doctors. Instances of doctors facing legal scrutiny, reminiscent of the persecution in Nazi Germany, raise profound concerns about the ethical use of data in the medical field. The potential for confirmation bias and a lack of openness to expert evaluation mirrors the historical misuse of pseudoscience, necessitating urgent ethical considerations and safeguards.
The disconcerting parallels between historical atrocities and contemporary challenges underscore the critical importance of vigilance and ethical considerations in applying science and technology.
While the misuse of data analytics and forensic tools may not lead to atrocities on the scale of Nazi Germany, the echoes serve as a poignant warning. As we navigate the complexities of the modern world, the lessons of history should serve as a moral compass, ensuring that science and technology serve humanity rather than being exploited for nefarious purposes.
The dark chapters of the past must inform our commitment to ethical practices and the protection of human rights in the pursuit of justice and progress.
For now, you are within
the norms
OR SEND
$175.00 OR MORE TO CASH APP:$docnorm ZELLE 3135103378
So, Donate to the “Pharmacist For Healthcare Legal Defense Fund
