“AN AGENCY BORN OF A HISTORY OF SYSTEMIC FRAUD“
“youarewithinthenorms.com listen below“
NORMAN J CLEMENT RPH., DDS, NORMAN L. CLEMENT PHARM-TECH, MALACHI F. MACKANDAL PHARMD, BELINDA BROWN-PARKER, IN THE SPIRIT OF JOSEPH SOLVO ESQ., INC.T. SPIRIT OF REV. IN THE SPIRIT OF WALTER R. CLEMENT BS., MS, MBA. HARVEY JENKINS MD, PH.D., IN THE SPIRIT OF C.T. VIVIAN, JELANI ZIMBABWE CLEMENT, BS., MBA., IN THE SPIRIT OF THE HON. PATRICE LUMUMBA, IN THE SPIRIT OF ERLIN CLEMENT SR., EVELYN J. CLEMENT, WALTER F. WRENN III., MD., JULIE KILLINGSWORTH, RENEE BLARE, RPH, DR. TERENCE SASAKI, MD LESLY POMPY MD., CHRISTOPHER RUSSO, MD., NANCY SEEFELDT, WILLIE GUINYARD BS., JOSEPH WEBSTER MD., MBA, BEVERLY C. PRINCE MD., FACS., NEIL ARNAND, MD., RICHARD KAUL, MD., IN THE SPIRIT OF LEROY BAYLOR, JAY K. JOSHI MD., MBA,AISHA GARDNER, ADRIENNE EDMUNDSON, ESTER HYATT PH.D., WALTER L. SMITH BS., IN THE SPIRIT OF BRAHM FISHER ESQ., MICHELE ALEXANDER MD., CUDJOE WILDING BS, MARTIN NJOKU, BS., RPH., IN THE SPIRIT OF DEBRA LYNN SHEPHERD, BERES E. MUSCHETT, STRATEGIC ADVISORS

SUMMARY

a strategy riddled with flaws, half-truths, and unintended consequences
The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) is a powerful tool that has, time and again, unveiled the inner workings of government strategies that were otherwise shielded from public scrutiny.

In the case of Neil Anand v. United States, the FOIA document release has provided a rare glimpse into the machinations behind Hank Asher’s much-lauded artificial intelligence data analytics techniques.

However, rather than reinforcing the narrative of success, these documents reveal a different story—one that underscores the widespread fallacy of Asher’s approach. (1)

This FOIA document release from Neil Anand v. United States serves as a stark reminder that all is not as it seems in the world of financial or medical regulatory racism.
Far from being the unassailable force for good that Asher and his proponents would have us believe, these documents expose a strategy riddled with flaws, half-truths, and unintended consequences.

WHEN WE PEEL BACK THE LAYERS OF SECRECY
As we peel back the layers of secrecy, it becomes clear that the widespread fallacy of Asher’s techniques lies not just in their execution but in their very conception.
“A flawed approach that prioritizes spectacle over substance and sledgehammers over precision.”
The Neil Anand v. United States case also brought to light the limitations of the intelligence apparatus used to support Asher’s operations.

The FOIA documents suggest that much of the intelligence was sourced from dubious informants or based on outdated information, raising serious questions about the reliability of the data underpinning these high-stakes decisions.
This casts a long shadow over the legitimacy of Asher’s entire approach, suggesting that his so-called intelligence-led operations were, in reality, built on a foundation of sand.
FOR NOW, YOU ARE WITHIN THE NORMS
REFERENCE:
- Houghton, D. C., Merritt, C. R., Miller, S. N., Mitchell, J. M., Parker, D., Hommel, J. D., … Wilkes, D. M. (2024). Electronic Real-Time Monitoring Reveals Limited Adherence to Long-Term Opioid Prescriptions in Pain Patients. Journal of Pain Research, 17, 1815–1827. https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S436898