COMPANIES MADE MILLIONS TO PERPETRATE FRAUD
NORMAN J CLEMENT, RPH, DDS, NORMAN L. CLEMENT PHARM-TECH, MALACHI F. MACKANDAL PHARMD, BELINDA BROWN-PARKER, IN THE SPIRIT OF JOSEPH SOLVO ESQ., INC.T. SPIRIT OF REV. IN THE SPIRIT OF WALTER R. CLEMENT BS., MS, MBA. HARVEY JENKINS MD, PH.D., DAVID STEIN, MD IN THE SPIRIT OF C.T. VIVIAN, JELANI ZIMBABWE CLEMENT, BS., MBA., IN THE SPIRIT OF THE HON. PATRICE LUMUMBA, IN THE SPIRIT OF ERLIN CLEMENT SR., EVELYN J. CLEMENT, WALTER F. WRENN III., MD., JULIE KILLINGSWORTH, RENEE BLARE, RPH, DR. TERENCE SASAKI, MD LESLY POMPY MD., CHRISTOPHER RUSSO, MD., NANCY SEEFELDT, WILLIE GUINYARD BS., JOSEPH WEBSTER MD., MBA, BEVERLY C. PRINCE MD., FACS., NEIL ARNAND, MD., RICHARD KAUL, MD., LEROY BAYLOR, JAY K. JOSHI MD., MBA, ADRIENNE EDMUNDSON, ESTER HYATT PH.D., WALTER L. SMITH BS., IN THE SPIRIT OF BRAHM FISHER ESQ., MICHELE ALEXANDER MD., CUDJOE WILDING BS, MARTIN NJOKU, BS., RPH., IN THE SPIRIT OF DEBRA LYNN SHEPHERD, BERES E. MUSCHETT, STRATEGIC ADVISORS
Attn: 60 minutes investigation Dept.
HELP US 60 MINUTES
DANGER!!! UNDERMINING HEALTHCARE TREATMENTS AND PROTOCOLS THROUGH DATA ANALYTIC ABUSES DANGER!!!
Qlarant, a Maryland-based technology company, gets paid millions of dollars by state/federal agencies and private insurance companies such as Blue Cross Blue Shield Association for providing defective data analytics to accuse many innocent doctors and pharmacists criminally. Qlarant NBI medics use data analytics and “red flags” as criminal forensic tools to identify healthcare fraud and controlled substance medication violations.
According to Dan Martin JD, a partner in Jones Walker’s Litigation Practice Group, article, “Federal agencies using generative AI(Artificial Intelligence), computer data analytics to search for Health Care Fraud,” Medical Economics Sept.12, 2023: “Data analytics is a good tool to suggest the need for further investigation, but it should not be used to determine misconduct conclusively.
The Department of Justice and Health and Human Services boast a yield of $4 or greater return on investment for every $1 spent on Health Care Fraud (HCF) detection and enforcement. They point specifically to their reliance on data analytics as a key driver of this return.”
VAGINAL PELVIC RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGEON WALKED AWAY FROM MEDICINE; “I WONT BE A DOC IN THE BOX, PUSHING ALGORITHMS”
COMPANIES PUSHING ALGORITHMS TO CUT OFF PATIENTS’ CARE
” Qlarant Health Integrity (NBI Medic) advertises that they use specialized data analysis, which helps law enforcement locate buried targets and “speed conviction,”
OR SEND
$175.00 OR MORE TO CASH APP:$docnorm ZELLE 3135103378
So, Donate to the “Pharmacist For Healthcare Legal Defense Fund
US PROSECUTORS HAVE ATTACKED
Unfortunately, the government’s rush to use its new tools in such a sweeping manner has resulted in many innocent physicians, clinics, and pharmacists being accused of wrongdoing. Most(>90%) of the accused and criminally indicted doctors and pharmacists are blacks, colored Asians, Hispanics, and Jews.
Many innocent providers have spent millions on legal defense after being targeted through Qlarant’s erroneous conclusions drawn from defective data analytics.
WARNING!!! A PATHWAY BACKWARD: UNREGULATED CLINICAL DECISION SOFTWARE
According to Michele J. Buonora MD, MS, MHS, Sydney A. Axson,PhD.,MPH., Shawn M. Cohen, MD and William Becker, MD;
“…Amidst the US overdose epidemic, policymakers, law enforcement agencies, and healthcare institutions have contributed to a decrease in opioid prescribing, assuming reduced mortality would result-an assumption we now understand was oversimplified. At this intersection between public health and public safety domains as they relate to opioid prescribing, unregulated and proprietary clinical decision support tools have emerged without rigorous external validation or public data sharing.
In the following piece, we discuss challenges facing clinicians practicing medicine amidst unregulated clinical decision support tools, using the case of Bamboo Health’s NarxCare-a prescription drug monitoring program-based analytics platform marketed as a clinical decision support tool that is already positioned to impact over 1 billion patient encounters annually.
We argue that sufficient evidence does not yet exist to support NarxCare’s wide implementation and that clinical decision-support tools like NarxCare have flourished in recent years due to a lack of federal regulatory oversight and shielding…”
***
However, Qlarant, on their website, states that it “has the knowledge, skills and abilities derived from many years of fraud investigations using data analytics” to aid DEA, US Dept. of Health and Human Services, the Office of Inspector General (OIG), Centers of Medicare and Medicaid and private Insurance Companies like Blue Cross Blue Shield with the medical records they have acquired from doctor’s offices and pharmacy records from pharmacies as evidence of violations of Health Care Fraud (HCF) and the Controlled Substance Act.
“…Qlarant, by maximizing false data to the DEA, is maximizing their pockets…”
On its website, Qlarant advertises that it is an expert in detecting fraud, waste, and abuse (FWA). In partnership with HHS/OIG, FBI, DEA, and private insurance companies such as BCBS, they can sift through medical records and provide the information necessary to maximize the DEA, HHS/ OIG, FBI law enforcement efforts to maximize criminalization of medical providers and pharmacists.
In actuality, Qlarant, by maximizing false data to the DEA, is maximizing their pockets. Qlarant gets a percentage of the restitution that is claimed from the providers.
Qlarant Health Integrity (NBI Medic) advertises that they use specialized data analysis, which helps law enforcement locate buried targets and “speed conviction,”
b) Data mine for trends and targets for “ coordinating for conviction” and for the “strength of convictions”,
c) perform “ pre-seizure identification of the most likely drug-seeking patients.”
d) engage in pre-indictment targeting and categorization of a physician’s property records, physician ownership/asset, and physician financial filings for purposes of maximizing criminal asset forfeiture and restitution for USDOJ, HHS, and private insurers like Blue Cross Blue Shield ( of course, the more money the doctor has, the more Qlarant can maximize its profits)
e) have customized program options where Qlarant can create a program around specific needs in each respective region, giving the US Attorney’s Office “great latitude to build upon specific issues known in their area based upon experiences and knowledge of the potential bad actors.” Attached is the Qlarant website advertising.
*https://youarewithinthenorms.com/2023/04/30/vendor-data-fraud-bamboozled-by-bamboo-study-shows-dea-has-operated-as-a-criminal-enterprise-resulting-in-thousand-of-deaths-and-false-imprisonment-of-doctors/
@bobsheerin.apdf @SnarkilyAndrew60 @Shirl @Ashley Clark ❤️ @AM to PM Pain [Steve] #chronicpainpatients #spooniesoftiktok #pain #apdf2020
♬ original sound – Bob Sheerin
QLARANT HAS NO SCIENTIFIC ORIGINS IN THEIR ANALYSIS
Qlarant advertises that their analytic experts and analytic tools are used to measure aberrant behavior and indicate the likelihood of diversion. 1) They will review Prescription Drug Monitoring data (PDMP). But the PDMP has errors. ( I can provide proof of 100s examples of PDMP errors that Pharmacists document upon request).
2) Patients who are prescribed more than 100 morphine equivalents per day ( there is no scientific origin of 90 MME maximum daily dose, nor any scientific evidence of it except it is an arbitrary number). Qlarant’s failure to discuss the disease and Disease state pathology demonstrates Qlarant as completely fraudulent. The pharmacology and unique properties of each opioid and patient individuality must be considered when a therapeutic opioid conversion is contemplated. Conversion should not simply rely on a mathematical formula embedded within the questionable CDC guidelines. In fact, the CDC issued a statement stating that the 90 MME maximum daily dose is a recommendation and is not to be used by law enforcement to attack physicians who prescribe more than that as it is based on a patient’s individual needs.
3) identifying patients ( through geo) traveling long distances to obtain narcotics. (I can provide proof upon request of patients that Qlarant has fraudulently added to their data for criminal asset forfeiture). Through these types of fraudulent analyses, Qlarant has investigated hundreds of Health Care Fraud providers and referred those investigations to law enforcement for criminal investigation.
QLARANT MANIPULATION OF DATA
Qlarant publicizes that it can refer cases to the USDOJ for criminal indictment and then assist USDOJ Prosecutors in the trial to ensure the conviction of the person whom they originally referred to the USDOJ.
Qlarant advertises that it can identify waste, fraud, abuse, and improper prescribing for referral to law enforcement and then ensure high conviction rates on those referrals. Qlarant ensures that the USDOJ can successfully obtain a conviction with recovery through criminal asset forfeiture or restitution.
Qlarant has not published a detailed analysis of the available mathematical and statistical methods used to ensure no large internal errors, significant bias, incorrect conclusions, etc., in its criminal forensic tools or data analytics algorithms. Qlarant has not published its algorithms’ and data analytics’ validity and reliability.
Qlarant has failed to answer general questions on the population, samples, and other questions concerning the descriptive and inferential statistics utilized. Qlarant has not published its criminal forensic tools regarding regression, correlation analysis, and predictive analytics.
Qlarant’s manipulation of data by its algorithm allows US Prosecutors to prosecute with a successful conviction, “Tell me the man, and I will show you the crime.” Once a US Prosecutor identifies a so-called lousy actor and provides information to Qlarant, It can manipulate the evidence to create a proof of the crime to help the US Prosecutor persecute the doctor and achieve a conviction.
In “Tell Me the Man, and I Will Show You the Crime,” Qlarant will help a US prosecutor build an indictment against a healthcare provider that the US Prosecutor wants to target. Qlarant provides personally identifiable information (PII) or protected health information(PHI)data to the Government that is essential to charge a doctor or pharmacist. Qlarant provides materially false and fabricated data to the Government to ensure convictions.
Qlarant NBI Medic’s mathematical equations, computer algorithms, and/or statistical methods have large internal errors, significant bias, incorrect conclusions, etc.
The computer algorithms, data analytic targeting packages of Qlarant NBI Medic, and the validity and reliability testing of Qlarant NBI Medic criminal forensic precrime criminal tools are questionable and not scientifically valid or peer-reviewed.
There are no published scientific explanations or validity reports describing how Qlarants computer algorithms endeavor to determine a physician’s quality of patient care or testify regarding the contents of a physician’s mind without seeing or speaking with the physician.
Qlarant website publicizes and emphasizes its ability to speed criminal convictions with a conveyor belt algorithm, coordinate for conviction with the US Attorney’s Office, and strengthen convictions through data manipulation.
https://www.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=339323762087169&id=1094599019&mibextid=qC1gEa
THE DEA’s PDMP DOSING DISCRIMINATION AND BIAS TARGETS HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS/PATIENTS BASED ON SKIN COLOR AND NATION OF ORIGIN
60 MINUTES: SAVE MY SONS AND DAUGHTER, ALL PHYSICIANS, FROM GOING TO FEDERAL PRISON!!!!!!
Qlarant NBI medic, through the utilization of novel criminal forensic tools, has prosecuted, incarcerated, searched, and seized the financial assets of thousands of doctors and pharmacists.
Based on Qlarant’s fabricated algorithms and data analytics, doctors/ pharmacists can face substantial penalties, including incarceration, as well as substantial fines and criminal restitution penalties.
Qlarants manipulation of data has resulted in many innocent physicians and pharmacists being accused of wrongdoing, losing their licenses, convicted, and incarcerated.
Qlarants manipulated data algorithms have resulted in many innocent providers spending millions on legal defense after being targeted through erroneous data mining and analytics. (Qlarant’s data analytics targeted Dr Pompey Leslie, who was recently found not guilty on all counts by a jury trial. He lost his medical license and ability to make a living. He lost five years of his life and all his money fighting for justice).
Qlarant NBI Medic has admitted that they manipulate data, are motivated and incentivized to manipulate data to fraudulently seek pecuniary gains via asset forfeitures of innocent health care providers- Dr Shiva Akula and many more doctors have been targeted by Qlarant’s faulty algorithms and indicted or incarcerated based on Qlarant’s manipulated data mining.
Qlarant’s chief technology officer, William Mapp, has said, “Qlarant’s algorithms are considered proprietary and intellectual property and have not been independently peer-reviewed.
“It sucks when we get it wrong.”
Yes, it sucks when an innocent person is indicted or incarcerated due to Qlarant’s manipulated data mining.
The federal government has long used digital analytics and data mining to search for instances of Health Care Fraud, even though we all agree that tackling fraud, waste, and abuse is important.
But the concern arises when Qlarant is falsely and with manipulated data accusing innocent physicians and pharmacists of pecuniary gains via asset forfeitures of health care providers.
FROM ONE BRAVE MOTHER
One brave mother of indicted physician, and my youngest son and daughter, who are physicians under attack.
Please investigate and get this story out. Too many innocent lives and families are being destroyed by Qlarant’s manipulated data algorithm.
HELP US 60 MINUTES THE TARGETING CRISIS IS A HOAX
FOR NOW, YOU ARE WITHIN
THE NORMS
OR SEND
$175.00 OR MORE TO CASH APP:$docnorm
ZELLE 3135103378
So, Donate to the “Pharmacist For Healthcare Legal Defense Fund
References:
1. Interview on Youtube.com of Dr. Anand Part 2 by Dr. Linda Cheek, President of Doctors of Courage
2. Norman Clement Pharm D Author– You are within the norms.com
3. Claudia Merandi – Founder of Don’t Punish Pain Rally Organization
4. Dr Lesly Pompy was indicted based on Qlarant’s faulty data algorithms. Acquitted after 5 years.
5. Belinda Parker Brown – Louisiana United International
6. On Point with Juandolyn Stokes – Radio Host – WAOK Radio Station. “ Criminalization of Black and Brown Doctors March 18, 2023 and Feb 16, 2023
United Healthcare cut both my husband and I from their Medicare plans this year. Yep. We are too “risky,” too “expensive,” or just too “painful,” to be patients that they cover.
They suddenly let us back on after I started complaining in public!
Great
It is time to lock out law enforcement from the PDMPs unless the have a subpoena and a specific LAWFUL REASON to need the data for a specific case. The individual’s healthcare data is PRIVATE as is the relationship between them and their provider. The government needs to lock down healthcare now. Protect it before they destroy it.