REPORTED BY
youarewithinthenorms.com
NORMAN J CLEMENT RPH., DDS, NORMAN L. CLEMENT PHARM-TECH, MALACHI F. MACKANDAL PHARMD, BELINDA BROWN-PARKER, IN THE SPIRIT OF JOSEPH SOLVO ESQ., INC.T. SPIRIT OF REV. IN THE SPIRIT OF WALTER R. CLEMENT BS., MS, MBA. HARVEY JENKINS MD, PH.D., C.T. VIVIAN, JELANI ZIMBABWE CLEMENT, BS., MBA., IN THE SPIRIT OF THE HON. PATRICE LUMUMBA, IN THE SPIRIT OF ERLIN CLEMENT SR., WALTER F. WRENN III., MD., JULIE KILLINGWORTH, LESLY POMPY MD., CHRISTOPHER RUSSO, MD., NANCY SEEFELDT, WILLIE GUINYARD BS., JOSEPH WEBSTER MD., MBA, BEVERLY C. PRINCE MD., FACS., NEIL ARNAND, MD., RICHARD KAUL, MD., LEROY BAYLOR, JAY K. JOSHI MD., MBA, ADRIENNE EDMUNDSON, ESTER HYATT PH.D., WALTER L. SMITH BS., IN THE SPIRIT OF BRAHM FISHER ESQ., MICHELE ALEXANDER MD., CUDJOE WILDING BS, MARTIN NJOKU, BS., RPH., IN THE SPIRIT OF DEBRA LYNN SHEPHERD, BERES E. MUSCHETT, STRATEGIC ADVISORS
“..if you ever think your to small to make a difference, then you have never slept with a mosquito..”
Case 22-6000 Norman Clement vs. the DEA before the Supreme Court of the United States Petition for Rehearing involves the life and death of millions of patients suffering pain and their healthcare providers treating the disease of pain. It asks questions:
- Weather “red flags” are guidelines created by the DEA in which the agency “lacks the authority to issue guidelines that constitute advice relating to the general practice of medicine and further lacks authority to promulgate new regulations regarding the treatment of pain?
- We further ask this Court to determine whether a Pharmacists refusal to fill a prescription for a “legitimate medical purpose” under the pharmacist “corresponding responsibility” provision constitutes and violates the Eight Amendment prohibition against cruel and usual punishment.
- Whether it was the intent of Congress for the DEA to regulate the field and practice of medicine and pharmacy auger deference awarded to administrative agencies?
RETIRED DETROIT POLICE SARGENT SUFFERED UNDER TREATMENT OF PAIN FROM ALS
MOVING THE GOALPOST BACKWARD AND FORWARD
Those pharmacists who merely question these DEA policies risk loss of employment and/or administrative sanctions. The DEA can impose these errant actions because they possess unchecked authority and weapons and the ability to intimidate by seizings property and assets.
Under this interpretation, a golf ball can become a football, and a baseball bat can be enforced as a hockey stick. The DEA Administrator need not determine the underlying legitimacy of the prescriptions a pharmacy filled, but rather, may use “red flags” as a proxy to presume a prescription was illegitimate.
GERALD KILEY FLORIDA UMBILICAL HERNIA 2019, TAMPA, FL, HOWEVER, LISTED BY DEA AS A DRUG SEEKER (SEE LINK)
The question we seek out as pharmacists here is when does a golf ball become a football, at what point in the game does a baseball bat become a hockey stick, and at what point does the umpire call a strike across the plate third down?
When does the referee call a prescription written for a “legitimate medical purpose” illegal so that a pharmacy violates its corresponding responsibility whether or not there is evidence of a prescription’s illegitimacy? At what point on the mile marker does a prescription written by a licensed, authorized provider to treat a medical disease of a disease state become illegal, or can the Umpire convert the rules of the game into scienter as a financial incentive to issue more fines and expand his/her authority?
DEA’S CAMPAIGN OF DIS-INFORMATION
The DEA has been waging a campaign of disinformation to sway the public to the point that prescribed narcotic analgesic medications are indeed drugs, dangerous drugs whose dosages are red flags indicating abuse and trafficking, contributing to the so-called Opioid crisis around America. Notably, DEA’s pieces of evidence always realize upon execration on the numbers of “pills” and street language such as “pill mills,” “Holy Grails,” and “Cocktails,” not on medical disease states or clinical conditions.
Prosecutors have found these forms of distortion, and redefinition of medical procedures effectively sells juries. Further, Judges often instruct the juries to ignore any clinical presentation or will not allow such testimony on the record. By 2006, federal regulatory agencies perceived what they called an “opioid crisis” and mistakenly attributed it to doctors “overprescribing” opioids and generating a growing population of opioid addicts.
This formed the basis for an even more massive intrusion of federal and state power into the privacy of medical records, patient-doctor confidentiality, and the very way in which doctors are allowed to use scientific and professional knowledge to practice medicine. Medical decision-making came increasingly under the purview of law enforcement, sparking a new wave of arrests and prosecutions.
Patients who had their pain controlled with long-term opioid treatment are being denied treatment or involuntarily tapered off their pain control, as doctors fear arrest and an end to their medical careers. A growing population of “pain refugees” has emerged, with some patients turning in desperation to the black market for opioids and some even turning to suicide.
As prescribing rates continue to plunge, overdoses from the non-medical use of opioids are skyrocketing- ing, now caused mainly by illicit fentanyl. These guidelines were disastrous for chronic pain patients. Many were driven to buy illegal drugs on the street, which were laced with poisonous fentanyl. In 2021 this led to 100,000 deaths in the United States.
Unfortunately, prosecutors and the DEA have learned when facts don’t support the charges, one just fabricates the facts. Thus the phrase garbage in is garbage out or the legal term false en Uno false en omnibus is applicable.
It would have been expected a higher level of scientific accuracy and integrity from an agency such as the DEA entrusted to protect citizens’ health and welfare.
“…Without the discipline of good science, nontransparent implementation produces poor public outcomes. These outcomes are pressed into service in the field, offer no benefit, and harm physicians, pharmacies, patients, and public policy at large…”
URGENT!!! HELP AND SUPPORT NORMAN CLEMENT vs. DEA IN US SUPREME COURT CASE NO: 22-6000
OR SEND
$100, $250, AND $500 DOLLARS SEND
TO ZELLE: 3135103378 OR CASH APP: $docnorm
THE NEEDLESS DEATH OF TRAVIS REYES
From Bob Sheerin, pain care advocate:
“Let me add another friend to my list of folks who had a long life ahead of him and died because of chronic pain! Travis Reyes is an athlete and a friend!
Travis and I had a lot in common. We both were stand-out athletes who were hurt at the heights of our glory! We were good at anything with a ball (big or small), running, jumping, and lifting weights, and both of us cared for the pain community because we both knew what torture was caused by chronic pain.
Travis had his dad’s undying love and support! His dad and I went to his defense and talked to his doctor, and his dad then would drive way out of his way to find a damn pharmacy that would fill his prescription medication once we got the doctor to call it in elsewhere.
Today an Arizona doctor called me and said, he would take Travis! I was so excited I left him a message that said, hey Travis, that doctor will see you… How are you, brother? Only to find out my friend is now gone on 12-11-2022 at such a young age!
This is such a common theme in this frigging community that I have grown personally tired of it. It makes me wonder how the hell I am still here when Travis was so damn young and strong!
That kid was the age of my own son, and his only mistake in life was being a chronic pain patient living in a country that hates chronic pain patients!
Another common theme I’m way too tired of is saying, Travis, you will be missed, my friend, and thank you for the fight you gave to this community! Love ya, Brother! RIP, and maybe tell the big guy we could use some help down here! And to his beloved father, I’m so damn sorry.”
CONCLUSION
Wherefore, For the foregoing reasons, we respectfully request this Petition for rehearing in Case number 22-6000 submitted in a timely manner be granted, and the revocation and the Court should further grant this Petitioner’s writ of certiorari as the decision in this case by this Court will have far-reaching effects on the professions of Medicine, and Pharmacy. The Petitioner is a Pharmacist, Not a Street Drug Dealer.
Respectfully submitted:
Norman J Clement, pro se
P.O. Box 280139
Tampa Fl. 33682
ywtn@umich.edu or prontopharmacy@aol.com
DECEMBER 12, 2022
Help
URGENT!!! HELP AND SUPPORT NORMAN CLEMENT vs. DEA IN US SUPREME COURT CASE NO: 22-6000
OR SEND
$100, $250, AND $500 DOLLARS SEND
TO ZELLE: 3135103378 OR CASH APP: $docnorm
FOR NOW, YOU ARE WITHIN
THE NORMS
