from youarewithinthenorms.com
NORMAN J CLEMENT RPH., DDS, NORMAN L. CLEMENT PHARM-TECH, MALACHI F. MACKANDAL PHARMD, BELINDA BROWN-PARKER, IN THE SPIRIT OF JOSEPH SOLVO ESQ., INC., SPIRIT OF REV. IN THE SPIRIT OF WALTER R. CLEMENT BS., MS, MBA. HARVEY JENKINS, MD, PH.D., IN THE SPIRIT OF C.T. VIVIAN, JELANI ZIMBABWE CLEMENT, BS., M.B.A., IN THE SPIRIT OF THE HON. PATRICE LUMUMBA, IN THE SPIRIT OF ERLIN CLEMENT SR., EVELYN J. CLEMENT, WALTER F. WRENN III., MD., JULIE KILLINGSWORTH, RENEE BLARE, RPH, DR. TERENCE SASAKI, MD LESLY POMPY MD., CHRISTOPHER RUSSO, MD., NANCY SEEFELDT, WILLIE GUINYARD BS., JOSEPH WEBSTER MD., MBA, BEVERLY C. PRINCE MD., FACS., NEIL ARNAND, MD., RICHARD KAUL, MD., IN THE SPIRIT OF LEROY BAYLOR, JAY K. JOSHI MD., MBA, AISHA GARDNER, ADRIENNE EDMUNDSON, ESTER HYATT PH.D., WALTER L. SMITH BS., IN THE SPIRIT OF BRAHM FISHER ESQ., MICHELE ALEXANDER MD., CUDJOE WILDING BS, MARTIN NJOKU, BS., RPH., IN THE SPIRIT OF DEBRA LYNN SHEPHERD, BERES E. MUSCHETT, STRATEGIC ADVISORS
THE TERMS & CONDITION APPLY CLICK HERE
The provided source details the controversial wrongful conviction of Dr. Terence Sasaki, a neurologist found guilty of conspiracy to distribute controlled substances and money laundering, centering on serious allegations of misconduct by the DOJ and DEA. A significant reward of up to $5 million USD is offered for information that leads to his full exoneration, highlighting the ongoing effort to overturn the verdict. Central to the controversy is a disputed confession that allegedly appeared only in a later, unverified version of interview notes, contradicting the DEA’s subsequent action of renewing Dr. Sasaki’s narcotics certificate. Furthermore, the text alleges a pattern of racial targeting by the prosecuting attorneys, who are accused of disproportionately pursuing medical professionals of color.
The Sasaki Case: DOJ and DEA Misconduct
In observance of the 150-year anniversary of the 1875 Civil Rights Act, we are offering a reward of up to $5 million USD and a bounty of $ 500,000 for any information or evidence that leads to my complete exoneration.
Terence Sasaki, M.D., is a Neurologist who received his Medical degree from the University of Hawaii and did a residency at New York University (NYU). Supposedly confessing to a 2005 crime in a 2007 interrogation, the DEA claimed was unrecorded, Dr. Sasaki was indicted (2010) and then convicted (2012) of conspiracy to distribute controlled substances and launder money.
This excerpt details the wrongful conviction saga of Dr. Terence Sasaki, a neurologist accused of conspiracy to distribute controlled substances and launder money, focusing heavily on alleged misconduct by the DOJ and DEA.
a pattern of judicial misconduct and racial targeting,
Although white men make up the majority of doctors in America, including those who treat pain, the vast majority of those persecuted by the DEA/DoJ are minorities.(6) Even white individuals who are homosexual, women, serve communities of color, or speak out against the establishment—actions that mainstream whites do not approve of—were targeted.
Those who were white were often the ones testifying against medical professionals of color, such as so-called experts who were not actually experts and, in many cases, were less qualified than the individuals they testified against.(7)
There have been ~2,000 medical professionals persecuted by the United States government.8 Meanwhile, while narcotics prescriptions have reduced dramatically, drug abuse, morbidity, & mortality have increased.9 Even though methadone was under complete control by the DEA & only 2% of all painkiller prescriptions, it was responsible for 1/3rd of all deaths.10
So, prescriptions by doctors were never responsible for the drug crisis. What has been responsible for the drug crisis is the tremendous amount of narcotics being stolen or lost, NOT the prescriptions written by doctors.11 Fentanyl has been responsible for many deaths for many years12, but the DEA has dragged its feet addressing it because each time abuse & deaths increase, so does their budget, seizures, & forfeitures.
The central issue involves DEA Special Agent Tyler Parkison, who reportedly created multiple versions of notes, with an unverified confession only appearing in a revised document weeks after an unrecorded interview.
The advocates involved express bewilderment at the apparent inconsistencies and lack of concrete evidence against Dr. Sasaki, especially since his DEA narcotics certificate was renewed even after the supposed confession.
Furthermore, the text suggests a pattern of judicial misconduct and racial targeting, noting that Assistant United States Attorneys have also pursued other medical professionals of color.
DEA BACKGROUND OF MISGUIDED ENFORCEMENT
According to the 2005 Libby Report,
Unlike Russia, America currently wages war against its citizens, particularly those of color.
This is not only those of low socioeconomic standing but also the United States’ most accomplished minorities. The DEA has been solely responsible for the drug crisis this entire time.
Why?
Because they have ultimate control over ALL legal drugs manufactured in the U.S., since 1973, the DEA has ultimate authority, guaranteed by statute, over how many legal narcotics are manufactured in the U.S. They regulate or are supposed to regulate every aspect of narcotics.14, 15 —-
David Minsky reported that a former U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration official testified Friday in a Florida state court trial in a lawsuit alleging that Walgreens, Walmart, and CVS conspired to overdispense prescription painkillers, saying that a federal law passed in 2016 made it harder to investigate the companies’ contribution to the opioid crisis.
COVERING ALL BASES: CONTEMPORARY USE OF NARXCARE
According to Neil Anand, MD, Mark Ibsen, MD, Richard A. Lawhern, PhD, an article published August 20, 2025, in World Journal of Pharmaceutical and Medical Research, called American-Style Secret ‘SKULDUGGERY ‘ Fatal Flaws of “NarcareRX®”;
“No competent doctor would decide upon a course of treatment for an individual without first doing a detailed workup and history assessment for that individual. AI-based algorithms like NarxCare do not apply to individuals and cannot incorporate individual nuances. Worse, these algorithms now incorporate hidden assumptions that are deeply contradicted by well-established science.”
DR. ANDREW KOLODNY: “A SADISTIC PSYCHOPATH WHO DOESN’T CARE ABOUT ANY LIVING THING”
JULIE KILLINGSWORTH:
On December 4, 2015, PROP member #DrMichealVonKloff orchestrated the COUP along with #DrAndrewKolodny, #DrGaryFranklin, and @SenToomey advisor #BradGrantz to get their “ ridiculous” and “embarrassing to the government” “shortsighted” and problematic “low or very low quality” prescription guidelines pushed through.
The plan was to distance themselves from the project (even though they were primary influencers) convince a non-protagonist respected leader (since they sure as f**k aren’t and know it) to take the lead and conceal their sinister intentions behind the guidelines.
PROP and their Cohorts all became multi-millionaires in Opioid litigation expert witnesses, speaking engagements, books, media appearances, and grant-grifting solely based on the guidelines. This is the Grift of the Century.
The media and lawmakers who conspired with the PROP Grift by recklessly putting them on a pedestal need to be shamed. Lastly, someone really needs to go to Prison!
I can’t post this enough. Andrew Kolodny admitted under oath that neither the @CDCgov nor his organization @supportprop had any evidence that prescription medication was the cause of any overdose fatalities.
They knew someone would eventually wise up, like John Carreyrou did with Elizabeth Holmes, finally asking,
Exploiting and concealing a deadly Illicit Manufactured Fentanyl crisis so they can blame fatalities on a tangible entity to sue to become multimillionaires, court grifters is a zillion times worse than Holmes’s Empty Box.
“What’s in the Box?”
Homes drove one man to commit suicide. @supportprop @CDCgov @CDCInjury have caused millions to turn to suicide after complete medical neglect based on their ruthless guidelines, while letting a containable illegal drug crisis become an uncontrollable raging epidemic.
They ever conspired a safety net for having no scientific evidence when @supportprop member and court grifter Jane Ballantyne, who’s been on two opioid litigation payrolls since 2013 (that she never disclosed), wrote a commentary, ‘Is Lack of Evidence the Problem’.
Yes, Jane’s lack of scientific evidence from Guidelines issued by the @CDCgov that are being enforced as law by the @DEAHQ @USAttorneys @DOJBJA @NatlAssnAttysGn is a big fucking problem.
DR. Andrew Kolodny, MD,
From:
Replying to:
@ChadDKollas @Pharmaciststeve and 18 others
“It means a lot coming from you, Dr. Kollas. This is psychologically affecting me. The deeper I go into their scheme the more unsettled I feel. They made up a prescription opioid epidemic that never existed, creating a moral panic. Their reason was to ferret out people with horrific, incurable bodily afflictions to subject them to forced re-identification and forced conversion into their highly profitable addiction industry commodity. I’ve seen enough evidence to know there is no other side to this story. They finished the first phase of terrorizing every physician from providing care, tagging and tracking us like feral animals using their PDMP, and exploiting us into poverty. I’m a very serious person. I write this with no exaggeration that they would make us wear patches on our shirts if they could. Now Kolodny’s new narrative is claiming NSAIDs are equally effective to even the strongest opioid for any bodily affliction using one garbage pail study from 2004. He is minimizing the most horrific incurable progressive bodily afflictions to lower back pain with the blessing of our government. He wants to ban Kratom or any other alternative. He’s a sadistic psychopath who doesn’t care about any living being.”
UNDERSTANDING AND REFUTING KOLODNY’S FALSE NARRATIVE OF PHYSICIANS OVERPRISCRIBING PRECIPITATED THE OPIOID EPIDEMIC
According to no less an authority than Nora Volkow, MD, Director of the National Institute on Drug Abuse, ―Unlike tolerance and physical dependence, addiction is not a predictable result of opioid prescribing. Addiction occurs in only a small percentage of persons who are exposed to opioids —even among those with preexisting vulnerabilities.
Older medical texts and several versions of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) either overemphasized the role of tolerance and physical dependence in the definition of addiction or equated these processes (DSM-III and DSM-IV).
However, more recent studies have shown that the molecular mechanisms underlying addiction are distinct from those responsible for tolerance and physical dependence, in that they evolve much more slowly, last much longer, and disrupt multiple brain processes.‖[14]
It is also known that rates of opioid analgesic prescribing by doctors to their patients have no relationship of any kind to either (a) rates of hospital admissions for opioid toxicity, or (b) rates of accidental death involving prescription opioids.[15],[16] These facts are confirmed and referenced in the 2023 consensus guidelines of the American Association of Interventional Pain Physicians.[17]
This text from Andrew Kolodny, MD, examines the opioid crisis, arguing that it is more accurately defined as an epidemic of opioid use disorder (OUD) rather than solely an epidemic of overdose deaths. The Kolodny falsely emphasizes that the crisis was fundamentally triggered by the aggressive over-prescribing of prescription opioids starting around 1996, which flooded the market and led to widespread addiction. This addiction, in turn, fueled the demand for illicit drugs like heroin and, more recently, fentanyl, demonstrating that supply and demand are interrelated. Koldony’s speech outlines three main groups of opioid-addicted Americans, differentiating between those who started with prescriptions and switched to black-market drugs (predominantly younger white individuals) and long-time heroin users. Ultimately, the speaker advocates for a shift in strategy, emphasizing primary prevention through more cautious prescribing and significantly improving access to effective OUD treatment, such as buprenorphine (in which he has a financial interest and failed to disclose), to curb the epidemic’s devastating impact successfully.
According to the Eugenic Archives, ” The term ‘dehumanization’ was coined in the early 19th century and has acquired a wide range of meanings since then. These include:
“treating certain people in degrading ways (for instance, merely as means to an end), referring to them as non-human animals or as inanimate objects, denying that they possess distinctively human characteristics, treating them in degrading ways that cause them to experience themselves as less than human, denying that they have mental states, conceiving of other people as less human than oneself, conceiving of them as inanimate objects, and conceiving of them as subhuman animals.”
Now Kolodny is trying to weasel out by claiming he and @supportprop had nothing to do with the guidelines, when there’s overwhelming evidence that they were the principal architects.
The DEA’s deployment of these algorithms operates through multiple layers of surveillance:
Primary Data Collection: Every prescription filled in America generates multiple data points that flow into federal databases. The 50+ risk factors tracked by the system create a comprehensive digital fingerprint of each physician’s practice patterns, patient demographics, and geographic reach.
Algorithmic Processing: Isolation Forest algorithms process this data continuously, generating anomaly scores that update in real-time as new prescriptions are filled. Physicians cross algorithmic thresholds without knowing they’re under surveillance.
Targeting and Investigation: High anomaly scores trigger DEA investigations, often beginning with covert surveillance, undercover patients, and financial analysis. The algorithms essentially function as a prescreening system, identifying physicians for human investigators to target.
Prosecution Support: During trial, government experts testify that anomaly scores demonstrate criminal intent, transforming statistical outliers into evidence of mens rea (criminal state of mind).
This system represents the industrialization of physician persecution. Where once the DEA had to identify potential targets through informants, patient complaints, or obvious red flags, Isolation Forest algorithms can process millions of prescriptions simultaneously, flagging dozens of physicians for investigation based purely on mathematical deviation.
Case Summary: United States v. Terence Sasaki, M.D.
1.0 Case Overview
This document provides a formal and objective overview of the key events, charges, and procedural controversies surrounding the federal prosecution and conviction of Dr. Terence Sasaki. It synthesizes publicly available information to present a clear summary of the case for professional review.
The case centers on Dr. Terence Sasaki, a neurologist indicted in 2010 and convicted in 2012 on federal charges of conspiracy to distribute controlled substances and money laundering. According to the source material, the indictment was issued after Dr. Sasaki had initially reported illegal activities by others to the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA).
THE ANAND -CLEMENT RULE AND THE RISE OF ARTIFICIAL STUPIDITY (AS): [AI(alg*) =AS]
Central to the post-conviction analysis of the case are significant allegations of misconduct leveled against the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the DEA, particularly concerning the procurement of an alleged confession and the broader context of a retaliatory investigation
To fully appreciate the complexities of the legal proceedings, it is first necessary to understand the defendant’s professional background.
2.0 Defendant Profile
Understanding the defendant’s professional credentials provides essential context for the legal proceedings and the nature of the federal charges filed against him. Dr. Terence Sasaki is a board-certified neurologist.
• Medical Specialty: Neurologist
• Medical Degree: University of Hawaii
• Residency Training: New York University (NYU)
This professional history forms the backdrop for the sequence of events that ultimately led to his indictment and trial.
3.0 Chronology of Key Events
A clear timeline is essential for understanding the procedural history of the case and the context of the subsequent allegations of misconduct. The significant gap between the alleged offense, the investigation, the indictment, and the final conviction is a noteworthy aspect of this case.
• 2005: The year the alleged crime for which Dr. Sasaki was prosecuted occurred.
• 2007: The year of a DEA interrogation during which federal agents claim Dr. Sasaki confessed.
• 2010: The year Dr. Sasaki was formally indicted on federal charges.
• 2012: The year Dr. Sasaki was convicted of the charges against him.
This timeline establishes the framework for examining the specific legal charges filed against the defendant.
4.0 Formal Charges and Case Disposition
This section outlines the precise legal charges filed against the defendant by the United States government and the final outcome of the case. Dr. Sasaki was indicted and ultimately convicted on two federal offenses: conspiracy to distribute controlled substances and money laundering.
The final disposition of the case, reached in 2012, was a conviction on these charges. The evidence used to secure this conviction, and the controversies surrounding it, are critical to a complete understanding of the case.
5.0 Core Prosecution Evidence and Allegations of Misconduct
This section critically analyzes the central elements of the government’s case alongside the significant allegations of procedural and prosecutorial misconduct that have defined the controversy surrounding this conviction. The case record is marked by disputes over the validity of key evidence and a central thesis, originating from the source material, that the case represents a pattern of targeted prosecution.
5.1 The Disputed Confession
According to the source material, a cornerstone of the government’s case was an alleged confession made by Dr. Sasaki during a 2007 interrogation with the DEA. However, the circumstances surrounding this confession are a primary source of controversy. The key points of dispute include:
• The DEA’s assertion that the interrogation was entirely unrecorded, with no audio or visual records of the interview.
• The allegation that the confession did not appear in initial versions of the interview notes, but only surfaced in a revised, unverified third version.
• The claim that these revised notes were produced by DEA Special Agent Tyler Parkison several weeks after the interview took place.
5.2 Contradictory Agency Actions
Adding to the controversy is an apparent contradiction in the DEA’s actions regarding Dr. Sasaki’s professional status. According to case documents, Dr. Sasaki’s DEA narcotics certificate was not only renewed but was also expanded after the date of his alleged 2007 confession. From an analytical perspective, this action creates a logical inconsistency that undermines the prosecution’s timeline of belief in the defendant’s guilt, forming a key element of the post-conviction challenge.
5.3 Allegations of Targeted Prosecution
The source material alleges a pattern of targeted prosecution by the specific government attorneys involved in this case. These claims, attributed directly to the source document, suggest a potential bias in how medical professionals are selected for prosecution.
The source posits that Assistant United States Attorneys Edward F. Feran and Rebecca C. Lutzko, both of whom are white, have a history of teaming up against medical professionals of color. The source provides the following individuals as other examples of this alleged pattern:
• Dr. Adolph Harper: A black man.
• Vinesh Darji: An Asian pharmacist.
• Dora Fernandez: A Latina doctor.
• Narendra Kumar Agrawal: An Asian Ohio doctor.
Furthermore, the source alleges that Dr. Sasaki’s own defense was compromised, claiming his lawyer, Jay Milano, “threw Dr. Sasaki, an Asian, under the bus” for AUSA Feran.
Together, these contested evidentiary elements and allegations of targeted prosecution form the basis for the perspective that Dr. Sasaki’s conviction was wrongful.
6.0 Key Parties Involved
This section provides a reference list of the key individuals and agencies involved in the case to aid reader comprehension and clarify their alleged roles as described in the source material.
| Name/Agency | Role in Case | Key Action or Allegation Mentioned |
| Dr. Terence Sasaki | Defendant | Neurologist convicted of narcotics distribution and money laundering after allegedly first reporting illegal activity to the DEA. |
| Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) | Investigating Agency | Conducted the 2007 interrogation; renewed Sasaki’s narcotics certificate post-confession. |
| Department of Justice (DOJ) | Prosecuting Agency | Indicted and prosecuted Dr. Sasaki. |
| Special Agent Tyler Parkison | DEA Agent | Alleged to have produced an unverified third version of interview notes containing a confession. |
| AUSA Edward F. Feran | Assistant U.S. Attorney / Prosecutor | Alleged to have a pattern of targeting medical professionals of color. |
| AUSA Rebecca C. Lutzko | Assistant U.S. Attorney / Prosecutor | Alleged to have a pattern of targeting medical professionals of color. |
| Lawyer Jay Milano | Defense Attorney for Dr. Sasaki | Alleged to have “thrown Dr. Sasaki… under the bus” for the prosecution. |
TO CASH APP:$docnorm
ZELLE 3135103378
ALL WATCHED OVER BY MACHINES OF LOVING GRACE
BE SURE TO DONATE TO THE MARK IBSEN GOFUNDME DEFENSE FUND, WHERE THE SON ALWAYS RISES!!!
FOR NOW, YOU ARE WITHIN
THE NORMS
reference:
