from youarewithinthenorms.com
NORMAN J CLEMENT RPH., DDS, NORMAN L. CLEMENT PHARM-TECH, MALACHI F. MACKANDAL PHARMD, BELINDA BROWN-PARKER, IN THE SPIRIT OF JOSEPH SOLVO ESQ., INC., SPIRIT OF REV. IN THE SPIRIT OF WALTER R. CLEMENT BS., MS, MBA. HARVEY JENKINS, MD, PH.D., IN THE SPIRIT OF C.T. VIVIAN, JELANI ZIMBABWE CLEMENT, BS., M.B.A., IN THE SPIRIT OF THE HON. PATRICE LUMUMBA, IN THE SPIRIT OF ERLIN CLEMENT SR., EVELYN J. CLEMENT, WALTER F. WRENN III., MD., JULIE KILLINGSWORTH, RENEE BLARE, RPH, DR. TERENCE SASAKI, MD LESLY POMPY MD., CHRISTOPHER RUSSO, MD., NANCY SEEFELDT, WILLIE GUINYARD BS., JOSEPH WEBSTER MD., MBA, BEVERLY C. PRINCE MD., FACS., NEIL ARNAND, MD., RICHARD KAUL, MD., IN THE SPIRIT OF LEROY BAYLOR, JAY K. JOSHI MD., MBA, AISHA GARDNER, ADRIENNE EDMUNDSON, ESTER HYATT PH.D., WALTER L. SMITH BS., IN THE SPIRIT OF BRAHM FISHER ESQ., MICHELE ALEXANDER MD., CUDJOE WILDING BS, MARTIN NJOKU, BS., RPH., IN THE SPIRIT OF DEBRA LYNN SHEPHERD, BERES E. MUSCHETT, STRATEGIC ADVISORS
The excerpt in this article from KevinMD.com titled “Why medical boards are facing growing backlash for abusing power,” by Dr. Kayvan Haddadan, MD, critiques the abusive power and problematic conduct of some medical boards, arguing they often stray from established judicial principles. Instead of seeking truth through evidence and due process, these boards are accused of twisting facts and creating arbitrary standards to validate preconceived conclusions, especially by their prosecutors. This unchecked authority, the text claims, undermines justice for physicians, forcing settlements and harming the broader healthcare system by distracting from patient care.
1. What is the core concern regarding medical boards and their conduct?
The primary concern is that some medical boards are blurring the lines between jurisprudence and politics, prioritizing a political agenda of being “right” over the impartial pursuit of truth based on evidence. This leads to them bypassing fundamental judicial principles, manipulating facts, and establishing arbitrary standards for evaluating physician actions.
2. How do the actions of these medical boards deviate from established legal principles?
Medical boards often deviate from legal principles by not upholding justice rooted in evidence and due process. Instead, they may create their own narratives, twist facts, and set arbitrary standards for assessing physician conduct. This unchecked power makes them appear to operate without proper accountability, resembling entities that prioritize their own agenda over fair legal processes.
3. What role do prosecutors for medical boards play in this problematic system?
Prosecutors working for medical boards are often described as having a “one-track mentality.” They relentlessly pursue validation for their preconceived conclusions, often disregarding any evidence that contradicts their stance. This approach deviates from impartial fact-finding and can severely damage physicians’ careers, labeling any objection as “lack of remorse.” Their motivation is often to prove themselves “right” rather than to uncover the truth.
4. Why are physicians at a disadvantage when confronting medical boards?
Physicians are at a significant disadvantage because their training focuses on patient care, not legal defense. They are often ill-equipped to confront powerful adversaries like medical boards. Even when legal counsel is hired, attorneys face substantial challenges against boards operating with unchecked authority. The pressure from these boards often compels physicians to settle disputes rather than mount robust legal defenses, undermining due process.
5. What are the broader implications of medical board overreach on the healthcare system?
The overreach by some medical boards not only harms individual physicians but also weakens the entire healthcare system. It diverts focus from patient care, potentially impacting the quality of services delivered, which contradicts the board’s stated mission of safeguarding patient safety. The erosion of trust in the fairness of the system can have widespread adverse effects.
6. Are there financial incentives or ethical concerns related to medical board investigations?
Yes, the source highlights significant ethical and judicial concerns related to financial incentives driving these boards, particularly the rewards linked to investigations. The employment of paid “experts” to manipulate facts is seen as undermining legal standards and subverting the truth-seeking mission inherent in judicial processes.
7. How has the judiciary responded to these alleged abuses of power?
Alarmingly, the judiciary has largely failed to rectify this systemic corruption. The source suggests this could be due to an assumption of board infallibility or even complicity, allowing the erosion of legal integrity to continue unchecked. There’s a call for the judiciary to assert that every individual facing a medical board deserves fairness and due process based on factual evidence, not subjective “gut feelings” from paid experts.
8. What reforms are being called for to address these issues?
Immediate reevaluation and accountability measures are demanded from both the government and the medical boards. The reforms are considered essential to uphold the integrity of the healthcare system, restore trust in the judiciary’s ability to govern fairly, and ensure that both physicians and patients are treated with respect and protected under the law. The current “guilty until proven innocent” approach, often triggered by baseless accusations and dubious expertise, needs to be replaced with a system that adheres to fundamental legal rights.
OR SEND
TO CASH APP:$docnorm
ZELLE 3135103378
ALL WATCHED OVER BY MACHINES OF LOVING GRACE
BE SURE TO DONATE TO THE MARK IBSEN GOFUNDME DEFENSE FUND, WHERE THE SON ALWAYS RISES!!!
FOR NOW, YOU ARE WITHIN
