THIS CASE OF FALSE CONFESSION, INJUSTICE AGAINST A PHYSICIAN: DR. TERRENCE SASAKI, MD, “IN THE LAND OF THE DYING SUN” (1)

from youarewithinthenorms.com

NORMAN J CLEMENT RPH., DDS, NORMAN L. CLEMENT PHARM-TECH, MALACHI F. MACKANDAL PHARMD, BELINDA BROWN-PARKER, IN THE SPIRIT OF JOSEPH SOLVO ESQ., INC., SPIRIT OF REV. IN THE SPIRIT OF WALTER R. CLEMENT BS., MS, MBA. HARVEY JENKINS, MD, PH.D., IN THE SPIRIT OF C.T. VIVIAN, JELANI ZIMBABWE CLEMENT, BS., M.B.A., IN THE SPIRIT OF THE HON. PATRICE LUMUMBA, IN THE SPIRIT OF ERLIN CLEMENT SR., EVELYN J. CLEMENT, WALTER F. WRENN III., MD., JULIE KILLINGSWORTH, RENEE BLARE, RPH, DR. TERENCE SASAKI, MD LESLY POMPY MD., CHRISTOPHER RUSSO, MD., NANCY SEEFELDT, WILLIE GUINYARD BS., JOSEPH WEBSTER MD., MBA, BEVERLY C. PRINCE MD., FACS., NEIL ARNAND, MD., RICHARD KAUL, MD., IN THE SPIRIT OF LEROY BAYLOR, JAY K. JOSHI MD., MBA, AISHA GARDNER, ADRIENNE EDMUNDSON, ESTER HYATT PH.D., WALTER L. SMITH BS., IN THE SPIRIT OF BRAHM FISHER ESQ., MICHELE ALEXANDER MD., CUDJOE WILDING BS, MARTIN NJOKU, BS., RPH., IN THE SPIRIT OF DEBRA LYNN SHEPHERD, BERES E. MUSCHETT, STRATEGIC ADVISORS

The Sasaki Case: Injustice Against a Physician

“The Sasaki Case: Injustice Against a Physician” discusses the alleged wrongful conviction of Dr. Terrence Sasaki, a neurologist accused of crimes he purportedly did not commit, with the U.S. government aware of his innocence. The core of the case revolves around a purported false confession, which is presented as the sole evidence against him, despite inconsistencies and a lack of corroboration from other agents present or any signed documentation. The authors question whether the Department of Justice (DOJ) and Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) are overstepping their authority by using questionable tactics, such as employing unqualified expert witnesses and prosecuting numerous other doctors, thereby raising concerns about trust and awareness within the medical community regarding these agencies’ actions.

Wanted to know if this case of false confession by the DEA/DoJ against Dr. Terrence Sasaki, MD, scares you, or is this common knowledge in the medical profession? Are the DoJ & DEA overstepping their reach?

We are not doctors, but we saw this case of one (Dr. Terry Sasaki, MD), whom we believe to be totally innocent. You have to wade through the crazy formatting & weird, irrelevant hyperlinks, but the story of his fabricated “confession” is just unbelievable. We were wondering what doctors thought of the actions taken by the DOJ and DEA against this physician.

Do most doctors trust the Department of Justice or the Drug Enforcement Agency?

Why do you think they did this to this guy?

They used an OB-GYN and a pharmacist to testify as experts against this neurologist.

Based on the links above, the US government has prosecuted more than 2,000 other doctors. Should this be concerning?

Or are these tactics justified by the drug epidemic?

A case is riddled with errors and Judicial Misconduct

The Innocent Convicts, a nonprofit specializing in looking into cases of wrongful convictions, said,

” Dr. Terence Sasaki’s case is riddled with more errors showing both his legal and actual innocence than any other case we have seen or even heard of. “

In this case, the fed wrote three different versions of notes. Only the third version, two weeks after the interview, states that Sasaki confessed.

“There has been a deliberate conscious decision by the DEA-DOJ, the Federal Courts, and Dr. Andrew Kolodny to deny people in pain a final solution, leading to their extermination in what can be seen as medical genocide.”

Parkinson did not take notes

The DEA Diversion Manager, Richard Springer, testified that Parkinson did not take notes. Out of the 5 DEA employees at the interview, only Parkison says that he took notes, and only Parkison says that Dr. Sasaki confessed. It was not recorded either audio or visually.

Sasaki never signs anything or admits anything by email. So it is just this fed saying Sasaki confessed.

To top it all off. Even though DEA agent Parkison claims he confessed to endangering lives, selling narcotics, recruiting other doctors to do it, etc, they don’t arrest him. They renew and expand his narcotic privileges the next year. Then they wait 3 years later to arrest him. We are absolutely floored by this case.

That’s why it’s interesting to see the response we’re getting from doctors, because we thought that if anyone would actually review the prescriptions, transcripts, or bank records, it would be doctors. However, apparently, they are just googling things like everyone else.

in summary

“The Sasaki Case: DOJ and DEA Misconduct” paints a troubling picture of alleged governmental misconduct, focusing on a possibly fabricated confession, the targeting of a whistleblower, inconsistent and contradictory actions by federal agencies, and a broader pattern of aggressive prosecutions against medical professionals.

All while raising questions about trust and awareness within the medical community.

•2 yr. agonycdude2003

We at r/InnocenceProject & r/Innocent were wondering what doctors thought of this issue. Please let us know. Also, please let us know if you are aware of any similar stories or ways to assist with this document. Thanks. Ed on their website at the time (eg, the presumption of drug misuse was not even based on testing of blood or urine).²

Details to come later

DONATE LEGAL DEFENSE

OR SEND

TO CASH APP:$docnorm

ZELLE 3135103378

ALL WATCHED OVER BY MACHINES OF LOVING GRACE

BE SURE TO DONATE TO THE MARK IBSEN GOFUNDME DEFENSE FUND, WHERE THE SON ALWAYS RISES!!!

FOR NOW, YOU ARE WITHIN

THE NORMS

Briefing Document: Review of “The Sasaki Case: DOJ and DEA Misconduct”

This briefing document reviews the provided source, “The Sasaki Case: DOJ and DEA Misconduct,” which details alleged governmental overreach and misconduct by the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) against Dr. Terrence Sasaki, MD. The source, presented as a series of questions and observations from groups like “agonycdude2003,”

“The Innocent Convicts” and Reddit communities highlight concerns about false confessions, questionable investigative tactics, and the broader implications for the medical profession.

Main Themes and Most Important Ideas/Facts:

1. Allegations of Fabricated Confession:

• The central claim is that Dr. Sasaki’s “confession” was fabricated by DEA Special Agent Tyler Parkison. The source states, “Dr. Sasaki apparently only confessed in DEA Parkison’s third version. That version, which was his 2nd revision, was typed up 2 weeks after the interrogation, after Parkison spoke to many others including those who were not at the meeting and decided what Dr. Terry Sasaki should confess to.”
• Crucially, “No other DEA employee, government witness, or anyone else either verified or testified that DEA Tyler Parkison took notes NOR that Dr. Sasaki gave a confession, to this day.”
• Adding to the skepticism, DEA Diversion Program Manager Richard Springer “testified that Parkison did NOT take notes.” The interview was not recorded (audio or visual), and Sasaki never signed or admitted anything in writing.

1. Retaliation Against a Whistleblower:

• Dr. Sasaki is portrayed as a whistleblower who actively reported potentially illegal activities to the DEA. “Whistleblower Dr Sasaki had actually called and sent numerous emails to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) in early 2007 notifying them of potentially illegal activities by others.”
• Despite providing this information and meeting with the DEA, “Three years later, in April of 2010… the Department of Justice (DOJ), US Attorney’s Office (USAO), and DEA indicted Dr. Sasaki along with those very people he had warned them about.” This suggests a possible retaliatory motive or a failure to act on Sasaki’s initial warnings.

1. Inconsistent Actions by DEA/DOJ:

• Despite Parkison’s alleged “confession” of serious offenses (endangering lives, selling narcotics, recruiting other doctors), the DEA’s subsequent actions contradict the severity of the alleged crimes.
• “Interestingly whether Dr. Sasaki confessed or did not confess to distributing or facilitating the distribution of narcotics in 2007, the DEA actually renewed Dr. Sasaki’s DEA narcotics certificate, expanded his ability to prescribe narcotics… never took any available administrative actions against him (eg, removing his medical license), etc.”
• Furthermore, “They wait 3 years later to arrest him.” This delay and the continued permission to prescribe narcotics raise significant questions about the validity of the alleged confession and the perceived danger Dr. Sasaki posed.

1. Concerns Regarding “Expert” Testimony and Broader Prosecutions:

• The source highlights questionable choices for expert witnesses: “They used an OB-GYN and a pharmacist to testify as experts against this neurologist.” This raises concerns about the appropriateness and relevance of their expertise in a case against a neurologist.
• The document points out a broader trend: “Based on the links above, the US government has prosecuted more than 2,000 other doctors. Should this be concerning? Or are these tactics justified by the drug epidemic?” This question implies a potential pattern of aggressive prosecution against medical professionals.

1. Perceived Legal and Factual Innocence:

• The nonprofit “The Innocent Convicts,” specializing in wrongful convictions, states, “Dr. Terence Sasaki’s case is riddled with more errors showing both his legal and actual innocence than any other case we have seen or even heard of.” This strongly asserts Dr. Sasaki’s innocence and the egregious nature of the alleged misconduct.

1. Lack of Trust and Awareness within the Medical Profession:

The source explicitly asks, “Do most doctors trust the Department of Justice or the Drug Enforcement Agency?” and expresses surprise at the general medical community’s response: “That’s why it is interesting the response we are getting from doctors, because we thought if anyone would actually look at the prescriptions or look at the transcripts or look at the bank records, etc, it would be doctors, but apparently they are just googling things like everyone else.” This suggests a potential disconnect between the severity of such cases and the awareness or engagement of the broader medical community.

How common are cases like Dr. Sasaki’s, and does the medical community perceive them as isolated incidents or a systemic issue?

False confession and conviction

The sources indicate that Dr. Sasaki’s case, involving an alleged false confession and conviction despite strong evidence of innocence, is not an isolated incident. One source notes that “the US government has prosecuted more than 2,000 other doctors.” While the specific details of each case are not provided, the sheer number suggests a pattern of aggressive prosecutions against medical professionals.

The article also raises questions about awareness within the medical community, implying that many doctors may be “just googling things” rather than deeply reviewing such cases, which could lead to a perception of these issues being less widespread than they are. The mention of Dr. Sasaki being a “whistleblower” also suggests potential retaliatory targeting, adding another layer to the systemic concerns.

Do doctors generally trust the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) given cases like Dr. Sasaki’s?

The sources directly question doctors’ trust in the DOJ and DEA. The case of Dr. Sasaki, with its alleged fabricated confession, inconsistent actions by federal agencies (renewing and expanding his narcotic privileges after he supposedly confessed to serious crimes), and the use of expert witnesses from unrelated specialties, strongly suggests a basis for distrust. The narrative highlights “alleged governmental misconduct” and “DOJ and DEA Misconduct,” clearly framing the actions of these agencies as problematic. The question “Do most doctors trust the Department of Justice or the Drug Enforcement Agency?” implies that this trust may be significantly eroded by such high-profile and seemingly unjust cases.

What are the key elements that cast doubt on Dr. Sasaki’s “confession” and the government’s case against him?

Several crucial elements undermine the validity of Dr. Sasaki’s alleged confession:

1. Inconsistent Notes: The government produced three different versions of notes, with the “confession” only appearing in the third version, written two weeks after the interview.
2. Sole Witness to Confession: Only one out of five DEA employees present, Agent Parkinson, claimed Sasaki confessed and also stated he took notes, while another DEA Diversion Manager, Richard Springer, testified Parkinson did not take notes.
3. Lack of Documentation: The confession was neither audio nor visually recorded, and Sasaki never signed or admitted anything via email.
4. Delayed Arrest and Renewed Privileges: Despite Parkinson claiming Sasaki confessed to severe crimes like endangering lives and selling narcotics, the DEA did not arrest him immediately. Instead, they renewed and expanded his narcotic privileges the following year, only arresting him three years later.

These discrepancies collectively form what is called a “cascade of capitulation” against the government’s claims.

Why might the DOJ and DEA have pursued Dr. Sasaki so aggressively, especially given the apparent flaws in their case?

While the sources do not provide a definitive reason for the aggressive pursuit, several possibilities are hinted at:

1. Targeting a Whistleblower: The summary mentions the “targeting of a whistleblower,” suggesting that Dr. Sasaki may have been prosecuted in retaliation for exposing something.
2. Broader Pattern of Prosecutions: The fact that over 2,000 doctors have been prosecuted indicates a potential strategy to demonstrate action against the “drug epidemic,” even if it means employing questionable tactics.
3. Pressure to Secure Convictions: The alleged fabrication of a confession could point to a high-pressure environment within federal agencies to secure convictions, regardless of actual guilt.
4. Misconduct and Overreach: The sources heavily emphasize “DOJ and DEA Misconduct” and “overstepping their reach,” suggesting that the actions against Dr. Sasaki might be a manifestation of broader agency issues rather than a specific motive tied to him individually.

Is the use of experts from unrelated medical specialties, like an OB-GYN and pharmacist testifying against a neurologist, considered appropriate or concerning?

The use of an OB-GYN and a pharmacist to testify as “experts” against a neurologist in Dr. Sasaki’s case is presented as highly concerning. It raises questions about the validity and relevance of the expert testimony, particularly when dealing with the complexities of neurology. This practice contributes to the narrative of “injustice” and “governmental misconduct” by suggesting that the prosecution may have relied on less-than-ideal or inappropriate expertise to secure a conviction, rather than seeking specialized knowledge relevant to the charges.

Should the prosecution of over 2,000 doctors be a significant concern, or are these tactics justified by the drug epidemic?

The prosecution of over 2,000 doctors is presented as a significant concern, not necessarily justified by the drug epidemic. While the drug epidemic is acknowledged, the context of Dr. Sasaki’s case—highlighting alleged false confessions, fabricated evidence, and targeting of individuals—casts doubt on the justification of these tactics. The sources imply that while addressing drug misuse is important, the methods employed by the DOJ and DEA may be disproportionate, unjust, and potentially targeting innocent medical professionals, rather than genuinely addressing the root causes of the epidemic through fair legal processes. The question implicitly challenges the notion that the “ends justify the means” when it comes to legal tactics.

THE OXYCONTIN CRISIS WAS A COMPLETE HOAX

Julie Killingworth Kasel 

@jmkillingnyc

@yancykm, you are an Illicit Manufactured Fentanyl Historian. Thank you! It’s so important we show proof they all knew a new, highly potent, and extremely deadly street drug had infiltrated the country well before OxyContin was approved. It was only a few years between the OxyContin and Suboxone approvals. Once Suboxone was fast-tracked and approved misusing the Orphan Drug Act in 2002, the alleged OxyContin Epidemic started being reported by

@supportprop

cohort

@BarryMeier Meier glorified the OG Suboxone aggressive overprescriber

@supportprop member #DrArtVanZee in his Painkiller fiction. How can a prescription drug become an epidemic in a few short years? It can’t. The OxyContin Epidemic was manufactured by Suboxone Peddlers. Meier deceptively omitted that Van Zee has been aggressively prescribing #Suboxone to 20% of his patients since 2003 and never prescribed OxyContin. How could Van Zee be an expert in the marketing of a pharmaceutical he’s never prescribed to any of his patients? His OxyContin Marketing publication was initially rejected due to lack of evidence. The Prince of Pork Rep. Hal Roger (PDMP) made sure it was published. Being knowledgeable about a topic does not make someone an Expert. I would absolutely call #DrArtVanZee an expert on deceptive marketing of Suboxone after 16 years of aggressively overprescribing to his unsuspecting (now toothless and hooked if alive) patients. He should have been in the prison cell next to #ReckittBenckiserGroup #Indivior Chief Marketing Strategist Shaun Thaxter for criminal lying about the safety of Suboxone. The crimes Van Zee committed were worse than Thaxter. He concealed that he was prescribing a highly addictive and dangerous Schedule III pharmaceutical while trying to get another Schedule III pharmaceutical prescribed as needed, recalled.

@supportprop member Art Van Zee, Stephen Gelfand, and Pete Jackson petitioned with their organization Advocates For The Reform of Prescription Opioids (ARPO). APRO was deactivated, becoming PROP, to have OxyContin recalled while aggressively prescribing Suboxone. We know for a fact that Pete Jackson’s daughter was never prescribed OxyContin by a physician. They will never be held accountable, weaponizing Deception by Omission, destroying the lives of pain patients.