“THE OPIOID SCAM CREATED BY MANIACS WITHIN MAIN JUSTICE IN WASHINGTON, D.C.”
INTRODUCTION
INTENTIONAL GOVERNMENT FABRICATED, FICTITIOUS, WRONGFUL DATA ANALYSIS TO HOODWINKED BIG PHARMA, WHOLESALERS, CHAINS DRUG STORES, SMALL INDEPENDENT PHARMACIES, AND THE PUBLIC AND BILKING OF $BILLIONS SEE VIDEO BELOW: WORK OF JACOB RICH WITH JAY JOSHI, MD DAILY REMEDY
A CASE OF JUDICIAL EXTORTION
VIDEO POWERPOINT PRESENTATION
reported by youarewithinthenorms.com
NORMAN J. CLEMENT, RPH, DDS, NORMAN L. CLEMENT, PHARM-TECH, MALACHI F. MACKANDAL, PHARMD, BELINDA BROWN-PARKER, L.JOSEPH PARKER, MD, IN THE SPIRIT OF JOSEPH SOLVO, ESQ., INC.T. SPIRIT OF REV. IN THE SPIRIT OF WALTER R. CLEMENT BS., MS, MBA. HARVEY JENKINS, MD, PH.D., AISHA GARNER, DAVID STEIN, MD, IN THE SPIRIT OF C.T. VIVIAN, JELANI ZIMBABWE CLEMENT, BS., MBA., IN THE SPIRIT OF THE HON. PATRICE LUMUMBA, IN THE SPIRIT OF ERLIN CLEMENT SR., EVELYN J. CLEMENT, WALTER F. WRENN III., MD., JULIE KILLINGSWORTH, RENEE BLARE, RPH, DR. TERENCE SASAKI, MD LESLY POMPY MD., CHRISTOPHER RUSSO, MD., NANCY SEEFELDT, WILLIE GUINYARD BS., JOSEPH WEBSTER MD., MBA, BEVERLY C. PRINCE MD., FACS., NEIL ARNAND, MD., RICHARD KAUL, MD., LEROY BAYLOR, JAY K. JOSHI MD., MBA, ADRIENNE EDMUNDSON, ESTER HYATT PH.D., WALTER L. SMITH BS., IN THE SPIRIT OF BRAHM FISHER ESQ., MICHELE ALEXANDER MD., CUDJOE WILDING BS, MARTIN NJOKU, BS., RPH., IN THE SPIRIT OF DEBRA LYNN SHEPHERD, BERES E. MUSCHETT, STRATEGIC ADVISORS
DEMAND FOR CONGRESSIONAL OVERSIGHT OF DEA-DOJ
STATEMENTS OF FACTS
PRESCRIPTION OXYCONTIN NOR DOCTORS WERE THE CAUSE OF AN OPIOID CRISIS
“…The foundation of the Government’s argument against the CSA and CFR’s vagueness is that the language has remained judicially unscathed for decades. To support this contention, the Government provided an extensive list of incomparable cases involving heinous conduct. Yet, Defendant’s challenge must be assessed as it relates to the defendant, and the Government cites no analogous authorities that undermine her position…”
“HOW DID THE GOVERNMENT GET AWAY WITH THIS???” THEIR NUMBERS JUST DON’T ADD UP!!!
“..SHOW ME THE ALGORITHMS..”
FRAUDULENT TESTIMONY OF DR. ANDREW KOLODNY, MD, 2018, PASCO COUNTY FLORIDA
Mary W wrote and tweeted on 11/30/2021:
“What Dr. Kolodny has done will go down as the worst human atrocity of our age committed by a psychiatrist in collusion with our government agency for money.
The amount of medical torture to death the weakest in society, our medically ill, have forcibly endured should never be allowed nor sanctioned again.
Thousands have been willfully tortured to death when the physical pain from their medical conditions is a 100 % treatable medical condition.
Again the worst PREVENTABLE human atrocity ever committed in our DECADE.
Psychiatry, unfortunately, but realistically, has a long history of abusing those who cannot defend themselves, and it has been allowed to happen again, with our government’s help and the sanctioning of it by the very people who were supposed never to let it happen in the 1st place.
DISCUSSION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA V. MERIDETH C. NORRIS, DO Def: CASE NO. 2-22-cr-132-NT
According to Dr. Norris’s legal team, in a document filed in The United States District Court of Maine:
“The foundation of the Government’s argument against the CSA and CFR’s vagueness is that the language has remained judicially unscathed for decades. The Government provided an extensive list of incomparable cases involving heinous conduct to support this contention. Yet, the Defendant’s challenge must be assessed as it relates to the defendant, and the Government cites no analogous authorities that undermine her position.
Further, the historical Government’s argument fails because Ruan reshaped the arena surrounding § 841(a)(1) prosecutions. Defendant’s Motion cannot be measured against the failed arguments of drug-trafficking doctors, pill mills, and corrupt executives, nor can her alleged actions be interpreted in light of bygone interpretations of the CSA. As it applies to Dr. Norris, the language in 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and 21 C.F.R. § 1306.04(a) is unconstitutionally vague.
Wherefore, Dr. Meredith Norris respectfully submits her Reply to the Government’s Opposition to her Motion to Dismiss.”
Dated this 13th day of November 2023 in Portland, Maine.
This case exposes the racket being perpetrated by Dr. Timothy King, a racket aided and abetted by rogue governmental agencies that have been coopted and are controlled by for-profit healthcare insurance corporations.
Dr. King has, on many occasions, used this fraudulent instrument to render legal testimony to cause the incarceration and loss of licenses of innocent physicians. Dr. King has been paid over $2 million for his fraudulent expert testimony at trials and for hearing preparation and/or testimony in administrative actions of the Drug Enforcement Agency (“DEA”). He is motivated by money and a desire for self-aggrandizement.
This case, US vs. Merideth C. Norris, D.O., underscores the need to thoroughly examine the role of Dr. Timothy King, a government expert witness in these legal proceedings, “has seemingly had little to no education in biostatistics, statistics and/or pharmacy “red flags”, nor does he seem to have any experience or particularized skill set regarding biostatistics, and as such, is not qualified to testify about medical statistics at hearing and/or trial in this matter.”
Questions about bias, conflicts of interest, and adherence to scientific principles demand resolution to ensure that potentially unscrupulous practices do not compromise the pursuit of justice.
“..SHOW US THE ALGORITHM..”
PROBABILITY MATHEMATICS
According to Walter R. Clement:
“What the DEA is doing is applying probability mathematics. Probability is a mathematical tool used to study randomness. It deals with the chance of an event occurring. Through this agency’s application of probability statistical mathematics, the DEA uses its ARCOS as an instigation tool to identify the diversion of controlled substances into illicit channels of distribution.
What this federal agency is doing is monitoring “the point of sale from the point of manufacture through commercial distribution channels to the point of sale or distribution at the dispensing/retail level – hospitals, retail pharmacies, practitioners, mid-level practitioners, and teaching institutions.” In essence, this agency monitors and prosecutes medical professionals for performing their licensed medical fiduciary responsibilities to patients.
The trouble with probability mathematics is if a doctor is good and performs exemplary service, medical professionals would be targeted despite his or her professional services.
For example, with the DEA’s ARCOS system, when a doctor or pharmacist orders a class 2 medication, the DEA knows the exact number of the medication ordered. With the DEA ARCOS system, the agency knows when the doctor’s prescription is and who receives the prescription by name.
The agency knows when the pharmacist filled the prescription and by name who received the amount and type of class 2 medications. It has been clearly seen that his agency applies geographic enforcement tactics to identify the diversion of controlled substances and illicit channels of distribution using probability and statistics.
When we examine the charges placed against medical professionals, we can clearly see the application of the ARCOS system when the agency writes within their affidavit, “C.F.R. § 1306.04(a) (emphasis added). A pharmacist violates this provision only if the pharmacist “knowingly fill[s]” a “purported” prescription—i.e., a prescription that was not written, “in the usual course of professional treatment.”
To mathematically analyze and establish the probability that a licensed professional and state “mis-practicing pharmacist ” knowingly fills a “purported” prescription—i.e., a prescription that was not written “in the usual course of professional treatment.” This statement clearly establishes that the agents apply circumstantial analytical evidence to substantiate a violation. They do so by examining who received the medication and how much was provided to the patient.
The DEA applies inferential statistics, with the null hypothesis that two possibilities are the same. If a pharmacist orders 6000 class oxycodone pills, the DEA approves the receipt of the medication. In fact, the DEA approves the shipment and authorizes the pharmacy to receive the medication.
However, with their knowledge of their approval for the pharmacist to receive the medication, the DEA often calls a pharmacy a ‘pill mill ‘…
“The Automation of Reports and Consolidated Orders System (ARCOS) is an online reporting system that includes reports from all DEA registrants who distribute specific controlled substances, including opioids. ARCOS can be a great source of data, particularly with regard to the volume of controlled substances being dispensed by certain professionals.
DEA plays an integral role in the regulation of physicians who prescribe opioids. In his article, Overview of the Drug Enforcement Administration Diversion Control Program, Louis J. Milione summarizes that regulation:
This statement clearly establishes that the agents apply circumstantial analytical evidence to substantiate a violation.
The DEA ARCOS is an automated, comprehensive drug reporting system that monitors the flow of DEA-controlled substances from their point of manufacture through commercial distribution channels to the point of sale or distribution at the dispensing/retail level – hospitals, retail pharmacies, practitioners, mid-level practitioners, and teaching institutions.
ARCOS accumulates these transactions, which are then summarized into reports, which give investigators in Federal and state government agencies information that can be used to identify the diversion of controlled substances into illicit distribution channels.
“Information on drug distribution is used throughout the United States (U.S.). by U.S. Attorneys and DEA investigators to strengthen criminal cases in the courts.” Through their own word usage and practice, ” DEA uses statistical analyzation to review to determine and identify the diversion of controlled substances into illicit channels of distribution.”
CONCLUSION
“SHOW US THE ALGORITHM AND WE WILL SHOW YOU THE OPIOID CRISIS HAS BEEN ONE COLOASSAL FRAUD ON THE AMERICAN TAXPAYER…THE GREATEST SCANDAL COOKED UP BY GOVERNMENT LAW ENFORCEMENT”
FOR NOW, YOU ARE WITHIN
THE NORMS
OR SEND
TO CASH APP:$docnorm
ZELLE 3135103378
So, Donate to the “Pharmacist For Healthcare Legal Defense Fund,”
