NORMAN J CLEMENT, RPH, DDS, NORMAN L. CLEMENT PHARM-TECH, MALACHI F. MACKANDAL PHARMD, BELINDA BROWN-PARKER, L.JOSEPH PARKER MD, IN THE SPIRIT OF JOSEPH SOLVO ESQ., INC.T. SPIRIT OF REV. IN THE SPIRIT OF WALTER R. CLEMENT BS., MS, MBA. HARVEY JENKINS MD, PH.D., AISHA GARNER, DAVID STEIN, MD IN THE SPIRIT OF C.T. VIVIAN, JELANI ZIMBABWE CLEMENT, BS., MBA., IN THE SPIRIT OF THE HON. PATRICE LUMUMBA, IN THE SPIRIT OF ERLIN CLEMENT SR., EVELYN J. CLEMENT, WALTER F. WRENN III., MD., JULIE KILLINGSWORTH, RENEE BLARE, RPH, DR. TERENCE SASAKI, MD LESLY POMPY MD., CHRISTOPHER RUSSO, MD., NANCY SEEFELDT, WILLIE GUINYARD BS., JOSEPH WEBSTER MD., MBA, BEVERLY C. PRINCE MD., FACS., NEIL ARNAND, MD., RICHARD KAUL, MD., LEROY BAYLOR, JAY K. JOSHI MD., MBA, ADRIENNE EDMUNDSON, ESTER HYATT PH.D., WALTER L. SMITH BS., IN THE SPIRIT OF BRAHM FISHER ESQ., MICHELE ALEXANDER MD., CUDJOE WILDING BS, MARTIN NJOKU, BS., RPH., IN THE SPIRIT OF DEBRA LYNN SHEPHERD, BERES E. MUSCHETT, STRATEGIC ADVISORS
THE SIGNIFICANCE OF ROSALINDA FRANKLIN
“On 6 May 1952, at King´s College London in London, England, Rosalind Franklin photographed her fifty-first X-ray diffraction pattern of deoxyribose nucleic acid or DNA. Photograph 51, or Photo 51, revealed information about DNA´s three-dimensional structure by displaying how a beam of X-rays scattered off a pure DNA fiber.
Franklin took Photo 51 after scientists confirmed that DNA contained genes. Maurice Wilkins, Franklin´s colleague, showed James Watson and Francis Crick Photo 51 without Franklin´s knowledge. Watson and Crick used that image to develop their structural model of DNA. In 1962, after Franklin´s death, Watson, Crick, and Wilkins shared the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for their findings about DNA. Franklin´s Photo 51 helped scientists learn more about the three-dimensional structure of DNA and enabled scientists to understand DNA´s role in heredity.”
DEMONSTRATING HOW THE OPIOID CRISIS HAS BEEN A COMPLETE HOAX
ANAND-POMPY EXHIBIT 27 (PHOTO-51),
This document obtained on discovery Anand-Pompy vs. United States Department of Justice EXHIBIT 27, was a research report submitted to the United States Department of Justice in 2015.
The Department has not published this report. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the authors(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the United States Department of Justice(USDOJ).
However, it is more than clear from Exhibit 27 that both the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and DOJ were fully aware the Prescription Drugs Monitoring Program was seriously flawed as far back as 2015 when this report had been submitted to DOJ.
AMA BOARD OF DIRECTORS STUDY 2019
A NEED FOR CAUTION AND HUMILITY IN THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI)
FROM
CHIEF JUSTICE JOHN ROBERTS
While these technologies have successfully identified instances of fraud, there is a growing concern about the unintended targeting of innocent healthcare providers and practices. This has ignited a national debate on finding the right balance between crime prevention and safeguarding civil liberties in the age of rapidly evolving AI and machine learning in the legal and healthcare domains.
The United States Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) have intensified efforts to combat healthcare fraud using advanced technologies such as data analytics, Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI), and Machine Learning.
Despite concerns and a persistent public perception of a “human-AI fairness gap,” Chief Justice Roberts predicts that human judges will remain relevant. Still, he foresees significant impacts on judicial work, particularly at the trial level, due to AI. This transformation will affect the practical aspects of how judges perform their duties and reshape their understanding of AI’s role in the cases they adjudicate.
TO END THIS WAR ON PEOPLE (DRUGS) WE NEED CONGRESSIONAL INVESTIGATIONS
DEA AN AGENCY FULL OF MANIACS DICTATING MEDICAL PROCEDURES
Attorney Paul J. Hetznecker, a federal public defender in Philadelphia, penned an article titled “Pre-Crime” and the Danger of “Risk Assessments” in 2016, which provides a critical analysis of this concerning trend.
Hetznecker’s article introduces the concept of “pre-crime,” derived from the world of “Minority Report,” where individuals are arrested before they can commit crimes. One notable legal case contributing to the ongoing debate on privacy, surveillance, and the boundaries of government AI is United States v. Anand. These assessments, portrayed as crime prevention tools, involve profiling individuals based on data-driven, computer-based risk assessments.
They’ve used and are using fraudulent, unscientific, bogus data that they knew and have known to be flawed/suspect to target and arrest doctors and falsified search warrants by redefining medical procedures and protocols.
In public healthcare the data used by DOJ-DEA against Pronto Pharmacy LLC has been based on a foundation of junk science, where DEA’s Diversion Investigator and Pharmacist Expert admitted no investigation was done where figures who lied ( Richard Alpert, Donald Sullivan, John Beerbower,) and who a
Published on September 12, 2016, the article is especially relevant today in the context of the case of United States v. Dr. Neil Anand. Dr. Neil Anand, a medical professional, becomes a focal point in this legal battle, prompting critical questions about the erosion of medical privacy in the U.S. and its potential ramifications for future legal cases.
However, Hetznecker contends that this data-centric approach fails to consider the underlying systemic issues contributing to crime, such as poverty, lack of education, economic opportunities, and racism. By focusing on statistics, this method perpetuates the symptoms of an unfair system without addressing the root causes. These risk assessments use data extracted from police and court records, focusing on factors like the suspect’s neighborhood, family criminal history, income, and education.
The article introduces the concept of “pre-designation,” where law enforcement targets individuals within specific groups for profiling, essentially shifting the focus of the criminal justice system from punishing and rehabilitating offenders to identifying and targeting potential future offenders without any crime having been committed. This approach, Hetznecker argues, undermines constitutional protections and exacerbates racial and class-based biases within the system.
These cases shed light on the use of AI algorithms for targeting and interrogating chronic pain patients and those with substance use disorders, sparking a nationwide discussion.
Even though much of the data DOJ-DEA had generated was erroneous, they could get away with it through a rigged Kangaroo Court System that the agency created and that operates outside the rules of Federal Civil Procedures.
Skilled Attorneys found themselves powerless to rules that made it impossible to present evidence. Innocent doctors also found themselves handcuffed, and some went to prison.
In many cases, healthcare providers found themselves forced to plea responsible for fictitious DEA medical protocols DEA investigators, Supervisors, and Judges created, which are contrary to the practitioners’
In essence, the DOJ-DEA has engaged in wholesale prosecutorial misconduct and corruption to promote their war on medically prescribed narcotic analgesics (opioids) pain medications by extorting both medical practitioners and drug manufacturers and by concocting search warrants, immediate suspension orders(ISO), that lacked any semblances of probable cause.
Based on their actions, the DOJ-DEA used fraudulent and bogus data to target doctors, pharmacist, and their patients around the country, particularly Black and Asian providers and went so far as the illegal use of Google Maps to track patients.
NIXONIAN DIRTY TRICKS -1 debunking their own myth
The government became so alarmed they sent their top team of lawyers led by AUSA Douglas Drier, who immediately documented briefs to thwart Anand’s and his doctor buddies’ curiosity about how such personal medical records were obtained with the issuance of warrants.
If that were not enough, dead birds and feces were frequently left at Doctor Anand’s home, including intimidating his parents, sister, and brother, who are both physicians.
So alarmed became the government they went so far as to file a superseding indictment against Anand et al. When Norman J Clement, both a pharmacist and dentist, jumped into the FOIA Drier Team along with AUSA Anita Gay, employed micro-aggressions depicting Clement as dumb and stupid:
NIXONIAN DIRTY TRICK -2
JUDICIAL MALEFICENTS AT DC COURT OF APPEALS
They didn’t every dirty trick at the US COURT T APPEALS Clerks Judge assigned OFFICE to thwart his case, including the assignment to a 3-judge panel consisting of Hon. Justin R. Walker, Hon. Gregory Katsas, Hon. Neomi Rao of whom are Lenard Leo friends within the Federalist Society.
This is the horrible truth: the US Government is all-powerful and can destroy everyone and everything, and its agents, the US prosecutors, are under orders to reduce the entire population of “the land of the free” to serfdom. And they can do it, and they will do it. They did it to me.
They’ve done it to TENS OF THOUSANDS of decent people, including Dr. Shiva Akula, Nova Montgomery, and just more than we could ever name in four days running. This is an OUTRAGE.
This prosecutor’s report on policy makes a MOCKERY of the Constitution and the whole concept of “Truth, Justice, and the American Way”—because prosecutors with this “TOOLBOX” he talks about—can put EVERYONE in jail FOREVER if they want to.
It makes me sick.
Let us congratulate this ARKANSAS USA prosecutor on his TOTALLY BRUTAL HONESTY—the “art” of prosecution is to use available law to prosecute absolutely everybody because they can. ABSOLUTELY EVERYBODY FOR EVERYTHING. And, of course, they/we can sue them in civil court if the evidence isn’t quite “beyond a reasonable doubt.”
The law in the hands of a government with a monopoly on violence is a MUCH MORE POWERFUL weapon than any one set of guns or artillery ever could be. Because the ARMY, NATIONAL GUARD, and NATIONAL POLICE all back up the prosecutors… implicitly or explicitly. So, legal reform and freedom require us to DISARM THE GOVERNMENT and ARM THE PEOPLE.
DEA’s CAMPAIGN ON INTIMIDATION
FECES, RATS, DEAD BIRDS, and stolen property:
How Prosecutors use certain specific statutes to indict ham sandwiches
THEY KNEW WHERE CARPET FIBERS AND BITE MARKS WERE
DEA’S PROBABILITY MATHEMATICS OF DECEPTION
According to Walter R. Clement,
“What the DOJ-DEA is doing is applying probability mathematics. Probability is a mathematical tool used to study randomness. It deals with the chance of an event occurring. Through this agency’s application of probability statistical mathematics, the DEA uses its ARCOS as an instigation tool to identify the diversion of controlled substances into illicit channels of distribution.
These federal agencies monitor “the point of sales from the point of manufacture through commercial distribution channels to the point of sale or distribution at the dispensing/retail level – hospitals, retail pharmacies, practitioners, mid-level practitioners, and teaching institutions.” This agency monitors and prosecutes medical professionals for performing their licensed medical fiduciary responsibilities to patients.
On Qlarant’s website, it is proclaimed it “has the knowledge, skills and abilities derived from many years of fraud investigations using data analytics” to aid DEA, US Dept. of Health and Human Services, the Office of Inspector General (OIG), Centers of Medicare and Medicaid and private Insurance Companies like Blue Cross Blue Shield with the medical records they have acquired from doctor’s offices and pharmacy records from pharmacies as evidence of violations of Health Care Fraud (HCF) and the Controlled Substance Act.
Qlarant’s website advertises that they are experts in detecting fraud, waste, and abuse (FWA). In partnership with HHS/OIG, FBI, DEA, and private insurance companies such as BCBS, they can sift through medical records and provide the information necessary to maximize the DEA, HHS/ OIG, FBI law enforcement efforts to maximize criminalization of medical providers and pharmacists. In actuality, Qlarant, by maximizing false data to the DEA, is, in fact, maximizing their pockets. Qlarant gets a percentage of the restitution that is claimed from the providers.
jail and Intimidate the whistleblowers
where the illicit drugs were, and how they got into the United States
However, Qlarant, a Maryland-based technology company, has developed algorithms to identify questionable behavior patterns related to controlled substances and opioids, partnering with various state and federal enforcement entities, including the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General, the FBI, and the Drug Enforcement Administration. To flag providers, these algorithms analyze a wide range of data sources, including court records, insurance claims, drug monitoring data, property records, and incarceration data.
Concerns about these unreviewed and unknown algorithms have also reached the American Medical Association (AMA). Bobby Mukkamala, MD, chair of the AMA’s Substance Use and Pain Care Task Force, highlights the significant impact on physicians, stating that “these unknown and unreviewed algorithms have resulted in physicians having their prescribing privileges immediately suspended without due process or review by a state licensing board — often harming patients in pain because of delays and denials of care.”
William Mapp, Qlarant’s Chief Technology Officer, underlines that the final decision on what to do with the information generated by their algorithms lies with people, not the algorithms themselves. He acknowledges the potential for errors and the company’s continuous efforts to minimize them.
REMEDY
REMOVE DEA CONTROL REGISTRATION TO THE U.S. SURGEON GENERAL
It is high time for Congress to remove the authority of the DEA from registration of control drug medications and assign this mission to the United States Office of the Surgeon General, as this agency has a more specific understanding of the overall field of medicine.
LET MEDICAL SCIENCE AUTHORIZE CONTROL REGISTRATION; LET CONGRESS OVERSEE AND DISSOLVE THE DEA
In creating the Control Substance Act, Congress determined Federal law enforcement agencies are unqualified to determine whether drugs “have a useful and legitimate medical purpose and are necessary to maintain the health and general welfare of the American people.” 21 U.S.C. § 801(1).
Congress did not leave it to the DEA to perform one of its core CSA functions—the scheduling of controlled substances— without healthcare agency oversight and evaluation. See id. § 811(b) (“The Attorney General shall, before initiating proceedings . . . [to schedule or reschedule a drug] . . . request from the [HHS] Secretary a scientific and medical evaluation, . . . The recommendations of the Secretary to the Attorney General shall be binding . . . as to such scientific and medical matters.”).
As a Law Enforcement agency, DEA is not in a position to authorize or dictate what a doctor prescribes to a patient. DEA cannot grant waivers of any kind when it comes to the practice of medicine because no such waiver exists as the United States’ component body charged with the management of controlled substances and chemicals for scientific, medical research, and industrial applications; the DEA regulates the flow of control substances, not the practice of medicine.
A SHERO OVERLOOKED BUT NOT FORGOTTEN, DR. ROSALIND FRANKLIN MUST BE REWARDED THE NOBEL PRIZE POSTHUMOUSLY
” Later, in May 1953, Watson and Crick proposed a replication mechanism for DNA using their DNA structure. Their replication mechanism, later called semi-conservative replication, described how to copy the DNA molecule containing the genes and pass the genes from cell to cell and from parent to offspring.
For their findings related to DNA, Watson, Crick, and Wilkins received the 1962 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine. Franklin also contributed to understanding DNA structure, especially through her collection of Photo 51. She also independently determined many important DNA structure features using Photo 51. The Nobel Prize is never posthumously awarded, and Franklin died in 1958 before receiving the 1962 Nobel Prize.
Some controversy and speculation surround the 1962 Nobel Prize concerning Franklin and her contributions to Watson and Crick´s DNA model. Only after the publication of Watson´s book The Double Helix: A Personal Account of the Discovery of the Structure of DNA in 1968 was the role that Franklin played in the discovery of the structure of DNA realized.”
FOR NOW, YOU ARE WITHIN
THE NORMS
