from the ywtn series reporting “The Tim Rats, MD,” how these Varmints pose an immediate danger to healthcare
reported by youarewithinthenorms.com
NORMAN J CLEMENT , RPH, DDS, NORMAN L. CLEMENT PHARM-TECH, MALACHI F. MACKANDAL PHARMD, BELINDA BROWN-PARKER, IN THE SPIRIT OF JOSEPH SOLVO ESQ., INC.T. SPIRIT OF REV. IN THE SPIRIT OF WALTER R. CLEMENT BS., MS, MBA. HARVEY JENKINS MD, PH.D., DAVID STEIN, MD IN THE SPIRIT OF C.T. VIVIAN, JELANI ZIMBABWE CLEMENT, BS., MBA., IN THE SPIRIT OF THE HON. PATRICE LUMUMBA, IN THE SPIRIT OF ERLIN CLEMENT SR., EVELYN J. CLEMENT, WALTER F. WRENN III., MD., JULIE KILLINGSWORTH, RENEE BLARE, RPH, DR. TERENCE SASAKI, MD LESLY POMPY MD., CHRISTOPHER RUSSO, MD., NANCY SEEFELDT, WILLIE GUINYARD BS., JOSEPH WEBSTER MD., MBA, BEVERLY C. PRINCE MD., FACS., NEIL ARNAND, MD., RICHARD KAUL, MD., LEROY BAYLOR, JAY K. JOSHI MD., MBA, ADRIENNE EDMUNDSON, ESTER HYATT PH.D., WALTER L. SMITH BS., IN THE SPIRIT OF BRAHM FISHER ESQ., MICHELE ALEXANDER MD., CUDJOE WILDING BS, MARTIN NJOKU, BS., RPH., IN THE SPIRIT OF DEBRA LYNN SHEPHERD, BERES E. MUSCHETT, STRATEGIC ADVISORS
DEFENSE ATTORNEY RON ALD CHAPMAN OUTLINES, “HOW WE GOT HERE ??”
FEDERAL COURT DETERMINES DR. TIMOTHY MUNZING’S (SMCS) TESTIMONY NOT CREDIBLE
Case No. 2:19-cr-202 Judge Michael H. Watson: Defendant Dr. Thomas J Romano was charged with thirty-four counts of unlawfully distributing a controlled substance. See Superseding Indictment, ECF No. 30. From August 1 through August 12, 2022, the Court presided over the Defendant’s trial. See ECF Nos. 72, 75, 77, 78-83, & 86. The Jury returned a verdict of acquittal as to ten counts and a guilty verdict as to the other counts. See ECF No. 87.
While the jury was deliberating, the Defendant moved to dismiss the indictment based on newly disclosed impeachment material on one of the government’s experts, Dr.Timothy Munzing(“Dr.Munzing”)
That summary strongly suggested that Dr. Munzing’s DEA Hearing testimony undermined or contradicted some of his central points on the stand in this case. See id. At 11-17. A subsequent review of the DEA Hearing Transcript confirmed that, at the DEA Hearing, Dr. Munzing gave contradictory testimony to the testimony he offered in this trial.
WAR ON YOUR DOCTOR
“The discipline of pain medicine is an accepted and recognized medical subspecialty
…Legitimate and qualified medical experts have specialized knowledge, education, training, and experience and utilize a multi-disciplinary approach
… Fellowship training programs exist for the purpose of further education in the subspecialty of pain medicine, making graduates eligible for board certification in pain medicine.”
…is recognized by state regulatory boards as a subspecialty of anesthesiology, physical medicine and rehabilitation, neurology, and psychiatry, which are recognized as primary specialties
However, the prosecutors have retained these so-called experts listed below, Munzing, Sullivan, Patel, et al., because they are more than willing to say whatever was needed as long as they are paid millions of dollars for their biased and prejudicial testimonies.
RISE OF THE SUBJECT MATER COCK SUCKERS
CDC: “24-126 million Americans in chronic pain” “Restore the sacred physician-patient relationship. “
According to Salley Satel, MD,
The consequences of this new OPIOPHOBIA have fallen on the shoulders of patients experiencing acute or chronic pain, many of whom have found themselves abandoned by healthcare providers in the name of preventing opioid abuse and addiction.
Dose tapering of chronic-pain patients with commercial health insurance and Medicare Advantage has increased substantially in recent years, and a quarter of those patients have had their doses tapered more quickly than medically recommended, according to a 2019 study by researchers at the University of California, Davis.
In 2017, a survey of 3,100 chronic pain patients by the non-profit Pain News Network revealed that 71% could no longer obtain necessary opioid medication from a doctor or had to settle for a lower dose.
According to Walter F. Wrenn, MD
” Have we come to a time in medicine when we care nothing about the welfare of patients seeking care and refusing those on controlled medications that assist them in carrying out their activities of daily living? What has fostered this attitude?
Could it be that due to the hysteria, unfounded charges, and imprisonment of physicians who prescribe opiate pain medications and have been blamed unfairly for opiate addiction and increased death?
Opiate addiction is not caused by physicians who prescribe opiate pain medications or by pharmaceutical companies that make opiate pain medication. It is caused entirely and solely by how opiate medications work in the body. This medication attaches to opiate receptors in the brain and body and is detoxified by the liver.
This process has nothing to do with the milligram (MME) dose or whether it is a short-acting or long-acting medication. It is the physiology of all opiate medications, legal or illegal. An environment has been created where proper care and treatment have been threatened.”
Ruan/Khnan from the United States Supreme Court
” In the practice of medicine, good faith means the honest exercise of good professional judgment as to a patient’s medical needs. Good faith connotes an honest effort to treat patients in compliance with generally recognized and acceptable standards of medical practice.
The unanimous decision in Ruan/Khnan from the United States Supreme Court dismantles a corrupt system led by the DOJ/DEA that has scapegoated doctors for an opiate crisis for which they are not responsible.
No more will mere negligence be morphed into drug trafficking by federal prosecutors who want to appear to be fighting the opiate crisis while actually punishing chronic pain patients who need their doctors.”
RICHARD LAWHERN, PHD, DEBUNKING CDC’S ENTIRE OPIOID GUIDELINES 2016 AND 2022
“..It has long been known that there is a wide range in minimum effective opioid doses between individuals. But none of the clinical trials literature for opioid analgesics, specifically none of the trials reviewed by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, employs protocols that address this variability.
PROP still claims that the CDC “has been clear about the cause of the crisis: overprescribing of opioids, especially for chronic non-cancer pain…”
Thus, both the revised CDC guidelines and the final report of the Opioid Workgroup chose to ignore 25-year clinical literature identifying genetic influences on variations in opioid metabolism between individuals. Minimum effective opioid dose and side effects are mediated by polymorphism of CYP450 enzymes in the human liver.
As a consequence, the entire clinical trial literature on the effectiveness and safety of prescription opioid analgesics is arguably in need of being burned to the ground and done over. This is one of the larger “dirty little secrets” of current clinical practice in pain management.
I have come to believe that revised CDC guidelines were published with the full awareness of the writers that if these two issues were ever acknowledged, the CDC would be forced to suspend publication and repudiate their advocacy for restricting patient access to this indispensable class of medications.
Instead, CDC chose to “damn the torpedoes and full speed ahead” with a published public health policy that is now confirmed as clinically unsafe and deeply ethically flawed…”
SENZENI NA ??
FOR NOW, YOU ARE WITHIN
$175.00 OR MORE TO CASH APP:$docnorm
So, Donate to the “Pharmacist For Healthcare Legal Defense Fund,”