After discussion with others, such as Dr. Terence Sasaki, MD, who felt that the use of true but strong words like “dickhead” may hurt US Federal Judge Jed S Rakoff’s feelings and make him cry, We have decided to replace them with more precise words like “ignorant.”
“SO SAY WE ALL”
NORMAN J CLEMENT RPH., DDS, NORMAN L. CLEMENT PHARM-TECH, MALACHI F. MACKANDAL PHARMD, BELINDA BROWN-PARKER, IN THE SPIRIT OF JOSEPH SOLVO ESQ., INC.T. SPIRIT OF REV. IN THE SPIRIT OF WALTER R. CLEMENT BS., MS, MBA. HARVEY JENKINS MD, PH.D., IN THE SPIRIT OF C.T. VIVIAN, JELANI ZIMBABWE CLEMENT, BS., MBA., IN THE SPIRIT OF THE HON. PATRICE LUMUMBA, IN THE SPIRIT OF ERLIN CLEMENT SR., WALTER F. WRENN III., MD., JULIE KILLINGSWORTH, RENEE BLARE, RPH, DR. TERANCE SASAKI, MD LESLY POMPY MD., CHRISTOPHER RUSSO, MD., NANCY SEEFELDT, WILLIE GUINYARD BS., JOSEPH WEBSTER MD., MBA, BEVERLY C. PRINCE MD., FACS., NEIL ARNAND, MD., RICHARD KAUL, MD., LEROY BAYLOR, JAY K. JOSHI MD., MBA, ADRIENNE EDMUNDSON, ESTER HYATT PH.D., WALTER L. SMITH BS., IN THE SPIRIT OF BRAHM FISHER ESQ., MICHELE ALEXANDER MD., CUDJOE WILDING BS, MARTIN NJOKU, BS., RPH., IN THE SPIRIT OF DEBRA LYNN SHEPHERD, BERES E. MUSCHETT, STRATEGIC ADVISORS
FEDERAL JUDGE JED S. RAKOFF, STOP BEING IGNORANT
DICK-HEAD IN THE SENTENCING DR.HOWARD ADELGLASS, MD, AND IGNORING THE SCIENCE
Unfortunately, recent publications have included “pooled studies with widely differing definitions, outcome variables, and populations,” which detract from their conclusions.  Concerns about such misleading data and definitions come from various sources. [36–38] The term “prescription opioids” is problematic as the adjective does not distinguish how the user obtained the drug.
FEDERAL JUDGE RAKOFF, STOP BEING A
DICK-HEAD IGNORANT BY IGNORING BY DEA’S OPIOID TASK FORCE IS A GRAND JUDICIAL HOAX.
THE DEA’S OPIOID TASK FORCE HAS BEEN A GRAND HOAX ON THE AMERICAN HEALTHCARE SYSTEM
Subtle choices have big consequences!!! The below link was hosted by Stanford Medical School in November 2022 with Dr. Naburun Dasgupta’s informative lecture on the falsehood of the Morphine Milligram Equivalent and calls into question the Prosecution of healthcare providers by the US Attorney General and the Department of Justice and DEA in the use of Narcotic Analgesic Medications (Opioids)
FEDERAL JUDGE RAKOFF STOP BEING IGNORANT
A DICK-HEAD BY IGNORING THE FACTS. CDC’S GUIDELINES ARE SERIOUSLY FLAWED. READ AND LISTEN TO DR. NABRUN DASGUPTA, PH.D. et al. Lecturer Stanford School of Medicine:
The CDC states that “prescription opioids are just as addictive as heroin.”  Others call them “heroin pills.”  But a full year after after major surgery, only “0.4% of older opioid-naive patients continued to receive ongoing opioid therapy.” For chronic opioid treatment, studies show rates of developing an opiate use disorder to be in the range of 2% to 10% (Figure 1a). Even then, as others  have noted, the complexities of chronic pain and addiction behaviors make the outright diagnosis of opiate use disorder a challenge (see link below).
FEDERAL JUDGE RAKOFF STOP BEING A DICK-HEAD BY IGNORING THE FACTS;
“MME is a deeply flawed science used by DEA as a way to calculate the total amount of opioids, accounting for differences in opioid drug type and strength…” Read:
Neat, Plausible, and Generally Wrong:
A Response to the CDC Recommendations for Chronic Opioid Use
Stephen A. Martin, MD, EdM;
Ruth A. Potee, MD, DABAM; and
Andrew Lazris, MD
THE MORPHINE MILLIGRAM EQUIVALENT (MME) IGNORES THE FACTS
The problem with all the conversations about MME ignoresthe fact that no one knows what MME has to do with drug absorption and addiction. The lack of knowledge of opiate receptors and the belief that addiction is dose-dependent continues to be the missing link. The reason for the need for increasing doses in addiction is due to the increase in the metabolic rate of detoxification by the liver.
The bottom line here is that MME. Cannot be considered a hard threshold because it’s not a standardized clinical metric. And uh, you know, interventions like this, and policy documents, cl clinical guidelines that Don’t define how MME. Per day, especially the word day is handled, is inherently problematic in my mind.
FEDERAL JUDGE RAKOFF STOP BEING IGNORANT
A DICK-HEAD BY IGNORING SCOTUS RUAN-KHAN vs. UNITED STATES FAILURE UNDER NARCOTIC ANALGESICS
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE 10TH CIRCUIT
MARCH 2, 2023
“Based on Ruan, in a separate decision, the Supreme Court vacated our judgment affirming Dr. Henson’s convictions, see Henson v. United States, — U.S. —-, 142 S. Ct. 2902 (2022). We have since received a supplemental briefing from the parties addressing the implications of Ruan and Kahn for the vitality of Dr. Henson’s convictions.
The parties agree that Ruan and Kahn render erroneous certain jury instructions that the court issued implicating the mens rea requirement of § 841. The parties further agree that these instructional errors were not harmless, as to most of Dr. Henson’s convictions. In particular, they agree that the erroneous instructions rendered fatally infirm all of Dr. Henson’s convictions except for his convictions as to Counts 19 and 20.
Consequently, the parties agree that the appropriate course of action for us is to order the vacatur of all of Dr. Henson’s counts of conviction, except for Counts 19 and 20, and to remand for further proceedings.”
ORDER JUDGMENT TO VACATE HENSON-CONVICTION
BACKGROUND OF THE DR. STEVEN HENSON, MD CASE
Dr. Steven R Henson’s legal team led by Beau B. Brindley, and with Blair T. Westover on the for Defendant-Appellant had argued that the:
“Federal government has no business trying to definewhat practices are and are not within the “course of professional medical practice” or what constitutes a “legitimate medical purpose.”
C-span video Beau Brindley
Beau Brindley defense attorney for both Drs Henson and Kahn states:
“Beginning with the reversal of Dr. Kahn’s conviction, and now the reversal Dr. Henson’s, my office continues its efforts to dismantle a corrupt system that has scapegoated doctors for an opiate crisis for which they are not responsible.
No more will mere negligence be morphed into drug trafficking by federal prosecutors who want to appear to be fighting the opiate crisis while, in actuality, punishing chronic pain patients who need their doctors.”
IN THE CASE OF DR STEVEN R. HENSON, MD UNITED STATES 1OTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS REVERED ITSELF IN A PREVIOUS RULING
Dr. Steven R. Henson, MD, the legal team moved to dismiss the government’s indictment charging him with distributing and conspiring to distribute controlled substances in violation of Title 21 U.S.C. § 841(a) and 21 U.S.C. § 846 of the Controlled Substance Act (CSA), as well as non-drug related offenses not at issue now. Specifically, the defendant argues:
AGUSA Attorney Stephen McAllister had stated:
“I want this case to send a message to physicians and the health care community,”
“Unlawfully distributing opioids and other controlled substances is a federal crime that could end a medical career and send an offender to prison.”
(1) the language of the statute requiring controlled substances be issued in the “usual course of his professional practice” and for “a legitimate medical purpose” is unconstitutionally vague as applied to his case (Dkt. 268, at 1-2); and
(2) the indictment sets forth an “illegitimate standard of medical care” to evaluate the defendant’s actions by preempting state law with an arbitrary federal standard. (Dkt. 268, at 15).
The 10th Circuit Court of Appeals found these arguments unpersuasive. Thus, the defendant’s motion to dismiss is denied in March 2019.
STEVEN HENSON’S FOUR LIFE SENTENCES VACATED BASED ON THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT RULING RUAN-KHAN vs. UNITED STATES
Accordingly, in light of the parties’ agreements in their supplemental briefs, we REMAND this case to the district court with instructions to VACATE all of Dr. Henson’s counts of conviction except for Counts 19 and 20 (that is, to vacate his convictions on Counts 1–14, 16, 17, and 26–31) and for further proceedings consistent with this order and judgment.
Entered for the Court
Jerome A. Holmes, Chief Judge
March 2, 2023
FEDERAL JUDGE JED S. RAKOFF STOP BEING A DICK-HEAD !!!
VACATE THE WRONGFUL PROSECUTION AND JUDGEMENT OF DR. HOWARD ADELGLASS, MD
RUAN-KHAN IS THE LAW
THE COURT HAS SPOKEN
“SO SAY WE ALL”
FOR NOW, YOU ARE WITHIN
$100, $250, $500
TO ZELLE 3135103378