“…LAW DESIGNED IN VAGUENESS CAN BE DESIGNED TO BE INTERPRETED EITHER WAY…”
from docnorm’s rule number #5., norman j clement,rph., dds
REPORTED IN
January 15, 2026
youarewithinthenorms.com
NORMAN J CLEMENT RPH., DDS, NORMAN L. CLEMENT PHARM-TECH, MALACHI F. MACKANDAL PHARMD, IN THE SPIRIT OF WALTER R. CLEMENT MS., MBA., BELINDA BROWN-PARKER, IN THE SPIRIT OF JOSEPH SOLVO ESQ., IN THE SPIRIT OF REV. C.T. VIVIAN, JELANI ZIMBABWE CLEMENT, BS., MBA., IN THE SPIRIT OF WILLIE GUINYARD BS., IN THE SPIRIT OF ERLIN CLEMENT SR., JOSEPH WEBSTER MD., MBA, IN THE SPIRIT OF RICHARD KAUL, MD., BEVERLY C. PRINCE MD., FACS., IN THE SPIRIT OF LEROY BAYLOR, JAY K. JOSHI MD., MBA, ADRIENNE EDMUNDSON, IN THE SPIRIT OF WALTER F. WRENN III, MD., ESTER HYATT PH.D., WALTER L. SMITH BS., IN THE SPIRIT OF BRAHM FISHER ESQ., MICHELE ALEXANDER MD., CUDJOE WILDING BS, MARTIN NDJOU, BS., RPH., IN THE SPIRIT OF DEBRA LYNN SHEPHERD, BERES E. MUSCHETT, STRATEGIC ADVISORS
INTRODUCTION
In this text, Walter Clement argues that the Drug Enforcement Agency engaged in gross constitutional violations by targeting African American-owned pharmacies with defective search warrants that lacked the necessary foundations of probable cause.
By highlighting the specific case of At Cost Pharmacy in Florida, the author illustrates a pattern of racial profiling, noting that nearby white-owned businesses providing identical services were not subjected to similar raids or harassment.
Clement asserts that these law enforcement actions directly infringe upon Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable searches and seizures, ultimately calling for the legal system to suppress illegally obtained evidence and provide monetary redress for the affected owners.
Through the lens of his experience as a veteran law enforcement professional, the author frames these administrative overreaches as a systemic assault on the civil liberties of all American citizens.
The search warrant was defective
“..it failed to illustrate and support the rudimentary descriptions defining Probable Cause..”
On February 14, 2018, the Special Agent, or Task Force Officer, of the Drug Enforcement Administration of the Department of Justice conducted a raid pursuant to a signed search warrant that failed to describe or define the elements of a crime. This search warrant was defective in that it failed to illustrate and support the rudimentary descriptions defining Probable Cause.
The investigator wrote, “Application having been made, and probable cause as defined by 21 U.S.C. § 880(d)(1) having been shown by the affidavit of Diversion Investigator Norita N. Persaud, United States Drug Enforcement Administration, for an inspection of the controlled premises of Aarric, Inc., dba At Cost Rx, 16970 San Carlos Boulevard, Suite 110, Fort Myers, FL 33908, with DEA number FA2125640, it appears that said inspection is appropriate under 21 U.S.C. § 880”.
The investigator agent clearly expressed his knowledge of probable cause as defined by 21 U.S.C. § 880(d)(1). Yet, within the search warrant, he did not describe the place to be searched or the descriptive elements that would support and clearly identify any elements of a crime, allowing a reasonable officer to conclude that probable cause exists.
The signed warrant authorized the investigating Agent,
“to seize from the above-described controlled premises such of the following records, information, reports, documents, files and inventories, as are appropriate and necessary to the effective accomplishment of the inspection, and for the purpose of copying or verifying their correctness, or that are used or intended to be used in violation of the Controlled Substances Act whether in electronic or printed media format as noted above.”
The Supreme Court has defined “probable cause” as an officer’s reasonable belief, based on circumstances known to that officer, that a crime has occurred or is about to occur. Carroll v. United States, 267 U.S. 132, 149 (1925).
By the fact that this inspection warrant lacked sufficient levels of evidence to support probable cause. The act to inspect the premises was not based on a reasonable officer.
VIOLATION OF THE FOURTH AMENDMENT
As a nation, we must fear the acts of this search that a law enforcement officer can obtain a baseless warrant and search a premise at will. The act of the DEA to inspect without cause violates the “Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Which protects the people’s right “to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures.”
After the inspection, the investigating officer were further authorized to seize legally sanctioned ‘Class two, three, and four controlled substances’ from the premises; The agent wrote
“Such of the following records, information, reports, documents, files and inventories, as are appropriate and necessary to the effective accomplishment of the inspection, and for the purpose of copying or verifying their correctness, or that are used or intended to be used in violation of the Controlled Substances Act whether in electronic or printed media format”.
This inspection warrant is a document to be examined. However, nothing in the warrant authorized the inspection to determine whether a crime occurred. The 4th Amendment clearly establishes the basis for search and seizure. The agents failed to address the elements of evidence obtained through an unlawful search or seizure. Under “Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961). Any evidence derived from illegally obtained evidence must also be suppressed.”
Thus, the courts have a fiduciary duty to safeguard the public, since the criminal justice system is there to protect it from harm. Such acts within this search is an assault upon every American. If our protections are eroded, then whom shall we depend upon if the police and the courts act at will?
Return all items taken and redress all monetary losses to the operator-owner of Aarric, Inc., Rx, 16970 San Carlos Boulevard, Suite 110, Fort Myers, FL 33908. Our constitution stands on years of rulings and reforms.
We are “One Nation Under God with Liberty and Justice for All”
ALL WATCHED OVER BY MACHINES OF LOVING GRACE
OR TO CASH APP:$docnorm
BE SURE TO DONATE TO THE MARK IBSEN GOFUNDME DEFENSE FUND, WHERE THE SON ALWAYS RISES!!!
“..one day you will make a difference..”
FOR NOW, YOU ARE WITHIN
THE NORMS
COMMENTS:
Dear Norman, I have read all of the emails you recently sent me. I am not surprised by any of them. Big Pharma is totally corrupt, killing “customers” as long as they make billions, and nobody in the govt cares in the slightest, since the “regulatory agencies” are bought and paid for by Big Pharma. But every aspect of the government, indeed every aspect of this country, is corrupt. The world we live in.
REFERENCE:
ALGORITHMIC LEGAL PLUNDER: THE NEW TYRANNY
Dr. Neil Anand warns us in his August 7th article,“90 Seconds to Midnight: Humanity Approaches the Omega Point with the Birth of General Artificial Intelligence (ChatGPT-5.0)” published in the Blog Doctors of Courage;
..In The Law (1850), Frédéric Bastiat warned of legal plunder, the use of law to take from some and give to others under a veneer of legitimacy……Today, artificial intelligence algorithms have become its most sophisticated instrument…This pattern of legalized plunder extends beyond healthcare. Credit scoring models that disadvantage specific zip codes. School funding formulas that reward districts with political connections. “Objective” algorithms whose statistical fingerprints reveal systematic bias. Each appears neutral, each enacts legal plunder on a massive scale...”
- Criminalization of Medical Judgment: What was once considered a sound clinical decision can be reinterpreted as a criminal act if it doesn’t align with administrative checklists or billing codes.
- Erosion of Trust: The relationship between doctor and patient, once sacred and based on trust, is now often replaced with suspicion and surveillance.
- Increased Prosecutions: There has been a marked rise in criminal investigations against medical professionals, with many facing allegations that challenge their professional integrity, often without direct evidence of harm to patients.
- Focus on Metrics over Nuance: Government agencies often use data analytics and AI to identify “outliers” or “emerging fraud schemes,” treating statistical deviations as probable cause for criminal investigation, without considering the complex clinical context or patient needs.
- Stigma and Ruin: Even if charges are never filed or are later overturned, the mere presence of agents, seizure of records, and public exposure can ruin a physician’s career and reputation, as seen in cases like Dr. Pramela Ganji and Dr. Forrest Tennant. This environment contributes to medical burnout and discourages independent practices.
