NORMAN J CLEMENT, RPH, DDS, NORMAN L. CLEMENT PHARM-TECH, MALACHI F. MACKANDAL PharmD, BELINDA BROWN-PARKER, L. JOSEPH PARKER MD, IN THE SPIRIT OF ROBERT L. THOMAS RPh., PHARMD., IN THE SPIRIT OF JOSEPH SOLVO ESQ., INC.T. SPIRIT OF REV. IN THE SPIRIT OF WALTER R. CLEMENT BS., MS, MBA. HARVEY JENKINS MD, PH.D., AISHA GARNER, DAVID STEIN, MD IN THE SPIRIT OF C.T. VIVIAN, JELANI ZIMBABWE CLEMENT, BS., MBA., IN THE SPIRIT OF THE HON. PATRICE LUMUMBA, IN THE SPIRIT OF ERLIN CLEMENT SR., EVELYN J. CLEMENT, WALTER F. WRENN III., MD., JULIE KILLINGSWORTH, RENEE BLARE, RPH, DR. TERENCE SASAKI, MD LESLY POMPY MD., CHRISTOPHER RUSSO, MD., NANCY SEEFELDT, WILLIE GUINYARD BS., JOSEPH WEBSTER MD., MBA, BEVERLY C. PRINCE MD., FACS., NEIL ARNAND, MD., RICHARD KAUL, MD., LEROY BAYLOR, JAY K. JOSHI MD., MBA, ADRIENNE EDMUNDSON, ESTER HYATT PH.D., WALTER L. SMITH BS., IN THE SPIRIT OF BRAHM FISHER ESQ., MICHELE ALEXANDER MD., CUDJOE WILDING BS, MARTIN NJOKU, BS., RPH., IN THE SPIRIT OF DEBRA LYNN SHEPHERD, BERES E. MUSCHETT, STRATEGIC ADVISORS
MONEY BALLING YOUR MEDICAL CARE: MEET ANNE MILGRAM, The DEA’s Sociopathic Queen of Statistics
The Art Behind Final Solutions;
“…in using statistics, the government now has the road map to switch from knowledge to deeds…”
Richard Khorer, Adolf Hitler’s statistician
“MONEY BALLING,” MEDICAL HEALTHCARE: ANN MILGRAM, THE REINCARNATION IN THE FOOTSTEPS OF RICHARD KHORER, NAZI, EUGENICS STATISTICIAN
“…if the data premise is flawed, then the inference drawn from the data premise is flawed…”
Some people call it data science, but Anne Milgram calls it “Money Balling Criminal Justice,” disguised and known as “Risk Assessment.”
According to one Physicians’ Advocate group;
“ The Government has created false metrics of Criminal medical practices and enforced them as if they were law.”
If using smart data and statistics to make player decisions was good enough for the Oakland A’s, Milgram figured it would be good enough for the legal system.
Milgram assembled a team of data scientists and researchers to build a universal risk assessment tool, which gives judges and other decision-makers a data-driven approach to support better decision-making.
These risk assessments use data extracted from police and court records, focusing on factors like the suspect’s neighborhood, family criminal history, income, and education.
Traditionally, criminal justice and punishment presuppose evidence of a crime being committed. This time-honored principle is violated once the punishment is meted out “for crimes never committed.”
PRE-COG, EXPOSING THE CRIMINAL MINDSET OF THE DEA’S ANN MILGRAM, HOW BASEBALL STRIKES OUT MEDICAL CARE AND SENDS YOUR DOCTORS TO PRISON, “MONEY BALLING:”
the dangerS AND FALSEHOOD of Milgram’s Risk assessment
However, Attorney Paul J. Hetznecker, a federal public defender in Philadelphia, penned an article titled “Pre-Crime” and the Danger of “Risk Assessments” in 2016, which provides a critical analysis of this concerning trend.
Published on September 12, 2016, the article is especially relevant today in the context of the case of United States v. Anand and Dr. Neil Anand.
Hetznecker’s article introduces the concept of “pre-crime,” derived from the world of “Minority Report,” where individuals are arrested before they can commit crimes.
The evolving landscape of modern law enforcement has ushered in the “pre-crime” concept, reminiscent of the science fiction thriller “Minority Report.”
The author asserts that this once far-fetched idea is becoming a reality through the use of “risk assessments” in contemporary law enforcement. These assessments, portrayed as crime prevention tools, involve profiling individuals based on data-driven, computer-based risk assessments.
In this dystopian world, law enforcement identifies and apprehends criminals before they have the chance to commit a crime.
Mr. Hetnecker quickly points out, “These risk assessments use data extracted from police and court records, focusing on factors like the suspect’s neighborhood, family criminal history, income, and education.
However, this once-fictional notion has now found its place in reality, raising significant concerns about civil liberties, racial bias, and the erosion of constitutional protections.”
The article introduces the concept of “pre-designation,” where law enforcement targets individuals within specific groups for profiling, essentially shifting the focus of the criminal justice system from punishing and rehabilitating offenders to identifying and targeting potential future offenders without any crime having been committed.
This approach, Hetznecker argues, undermines constitutional protections and exacerbates racial and class-based biases within the system.
“Pre-Crime “and the Danger of “Risk Assessments”
OR SEND
TO CASH APP:$docnorm
ZELLE 3135103378
So, Donate to the “Pharmacist For Healthcare Legal Defense Fund,”
SOME FACTS ON DIRECTORS MILGRAM’S BACKGROUND
A former prosecutor in the Manhattan district attorney’s office and at the U.S. Department of Justice, Anne Milgram was appointed as New Jersey’s attorney general in 2007, overseeing 21 prosecutors and some 30,000 law enforcement officers.
She served as the vice president of criminal justice at the Arnold Foundation.External link:open_in_new
A graduate of Rutgers, Milgram also holds a Master of Philosophy degree in social and political theory from Cambridge and a law degree from NYU School of Law, where she serves as a senior fellow in the administration of criminal law.
DEA CORRUPTION SCANDALS UNDER DIRECTOR ANN MILGRAM
Recently, on April 27, 2023, Lawmakers grilled U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration chief Anne Milgram over millions of dollars in no-bid contracts that are the subject of a watchdog probe into whether the agency improperly hired some of her past associates.
Milgram faced a barrage of criticisms from mostly Republican members of the House Appropriations Committee over an Associated Press investigation that the DEA spent $4.7 million on “strategic planning and communication” and other no-bid contracts to hire people Milgram knew from her days as New Jersey’s attorney general and as a New York University law professor — at costs far exceeding pay for government officials.
DEA OVERSIGHT CORRUPTION REPORT KEPTED VAGUE TO AVOID CONGRESSIONAL OVERSIGHT
MARCH, 24, 2023, AP REPORTED:
”
” After nearly two years and at least $1.4 million spent, the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration released an external review of its overseas operations on Friday that barely mentions recent corruption scandals and offers recommendations that critics dismissed as overly vague.
Much of the 50-page report outlines the DEA’s sprawling, 69-country “foreign footprint” while lauding its efforts to plug gaping holes in the oversight of undercover money laundering operations and special vetted units overseas.
“This report is stunningly vague in its actual evaluation of known problems at the DEA and remedies to fix them,” said Sen. Chuck Grassley, an Iowa Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee. “This speaks to the agency’s broader effort to evade oversight. The agency has attempted to dodge my oversight inquiries but I intend to push forward.”
MILGRAM’S “RISK ASSESSMENT” A CONCEPT WHOSE FOUNDATIONS ARE BASED ON EUGENIC SUBHUMANIZATION
In this TED Talk: Why Smart Statistics are the Key to Fighting Crime,External link:open_in_new, she discusses her past role as New Jersey’s attorney general and her quest to understand “who we were arresting, who we were charging, and who we were putting in jail.”
Under Director Milgram, HFPP, and BCBSA, in partnership with Drug Enforcement Agency and Health and Human Services, supercharged and supersized precursor Nazi “Subhumanizing” technologies to create a pre-crime, data analytics computer system.
Similarly, “Risk Assessment” or DEA Milgram’s “Money Balling” intentionally misclassifies Jewish, Black, Hispanic, and Asian physicians among other healthcare providers who are engaged in the treatment of addiction and/or chronic pain as drug dealers and drug traffickers and coverts fundamental medical training of assessment, diagnosis and treatment into “actus rhea” in the manner Eugenist and Nazism intentionally subhumanizes peoples of the non-Aryan stock.
According to the Eugenic Archieves;
“The very concept of the subhuman requires a corresponding definition of what it means to be human. In the history of eugenics, individuals who were characterized as subhuman were typically understood in relation to three concepts: reason, animality, and morality. Eugenicists picked out many groups as subhuman by defining them as animal-like and by highlighting their lack of cognitive and moral capacities.
Subhumanization also helped to define many of the practices and policies at the heart of the eugenics movement. At a theoretical level, the concept of the subhuman functioned in a number of ways: it contributed to an understanding of the “feeble-minded” and certain ethnic and racial groups as inferior and directly influenced theories regarding their treatment and management. In turn, the idea that some groups were less than fully human justified many eugenic practices, including institutionalization, sterilization, social segregation, and abuse.”
EVIDENCE LAUNDERING
PARALLEL CONSTRUCTION ALLOWS THE DEA TO EVISCERATE HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS’ 4TH AMENDMENT RIGHTS
Parallel construction is a law enforcement process of building a parallel, or separate, evidentiary basis for a criminal investigation in order to conceal how an investigation actually began.[1]
In the US, a particular form is evidence laundering, where one police officer obtains evidence via means that are in violation of the Fourth Amendment‘s protection against unreasonable searches and seizures and then passes it on to another officer, who builds on it and gets it accepted by the court under the good-faith exception as applied to the second officer.[2]
This practice gained support after the Supreme Court’s 2009 Herring v. United States decision.[2]
“WE ARE PHYSICIANS, PHARMACISTS, DENTISTS TREATING PATIENTS IN NEED OF PAIN CARE NOT STREET DRUG DEALERS AND TRAFFICKERS”
FOR NOW, YOU ARE WITHIN
THE NORMS
