WHO DECIDES YOUR PAIN TREATMENT!!! YOUR DOCTOR OR THE DEA
The Art Behind Final Solutions;
“…in using statistics, the government now has the road map to switch from knowledge to deeds…”
Reinhardt Khorer, Adolf Hitler’s statistician
NORMAN J CLEMENT, RPH, DDS, NORMAN L. CLEMENT PHARM-TECH, MALACHI F. MACKANDAL PHARMD, BELINDA BROWN-PARKER, L. JOSEPH PARKER MD, IN THE SPIRIT OF ROBERT L. THOMAS RPh., PHARMD., IN THE SPIRIT OF JOSEPH SOLVO ESQ., INC.T. SPIRIT OF REV. IN THE SPIRIT OF WALTER R. CLEMENT BS., MS, MBA. HARVEY JENKINS MD, PH.D., AISHA GARNER, DAVID STEIN, MD IN THE SPIRIT OF C.T. VIVIAN, JELANI ZIMBABWE CLEMENT, BS., MBA., IN THE SPIRIT OF THE HON. PATRICE LUMUMBA, IN THE SPIRIT OF ERLIN CLEMENT SR., EVELYN J. CLEMENT, WALTER F. WRENN III., MD., JULIE KILLINGSWORTH, RENEE BLARE, RPH, DR. TERENCE SASAKI, MD LESLY POMPY MD., CHRISTOPHER RUSSO, MD., NANCY SEEFELDT, WILLIE GUINYARD BS., JOSEPH WEBSTER MD., MBA, BEVERLY C. PRINCE MD., FACS., NEIL ARNAND, MD., RICHARD KAUL, MD., LEROY BAYLOR, JAY K. JOSHI MD., MBA, ADRIENNE EDMUNDSON, ESTER HYATT PH.D., WALTER L. SMITH BS., IN THE SPIRIT OF BRAHM FISHER ESQ., MICHELE ALEXANDER MD., CUDJOE WILDING BS, MARTIN NJOKU, BS., RPH., IN THE SPIRIT OF DEBRA LYNN SHEPHERD, BERES E. MUSCHETT, STRATEGIC ADVISORS
LEAD US, FATHER (BAWO), YOU CALM OUR FEARS
“keep on speaking”
REMEMBER: IN SPIRIT OF THE WHITE ROSE PROJECT, WHEN GERMANS SPOKE UP
THE DOJ-DEA FEDERAL COURT JUDGES REFUSE TO RESPECT THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT’S UNANIMOUS DECISION IN RUAN vs UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In Ruan v. United States, No. 20-1410 (June 27, 2022)(link is external), the Supreme Court unanimously held, for the crime of prescribing controlled substances outside the usual course of professional practice in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841, the mens rea “knowingly or intentionally” applies to the statutes “except as authorized” clause.
Once a defendant meets the burden of producing evidence that his or her conduct was “authorized,” the Government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant knowingly or intentionally acted in an unauthorized manner.
Dr. Kahn’s wife, Lyn, was dragged into the case so that ALL of their assets could be confiscated.
Ruan was consolidated with Kahn v. United States, No. 21-5261. Justice Breyer delivered the 9 to 0 opinion of the Court. Justice Alito filed a concurring opinion, joined by Justices Thomas and Barrett.
Petitioners Xiulu Ruan and Shakeel Kahn are medical doctors licensed to prescribe controlled substances. Each was tried for violating 21 U. S. C. §841, which makes it a federal crime, “[e]xcept as authorized[,] . . . for any person knowingly or intentionally . . . to manufacture, distribute, or dispense . . . a controlled substance.”
A federal regulation authorizes registered doctors to dispense controlled substances via prescription, but only if the prescription is “issued for a legitimate medical purpose by an individual practitioner acting in the usual course of his professional practice.”
§1395. Prohibition against any Federal interference
From Title 42-THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE CHAPTER 7-SOCIAL SECURITY SUBCHAPTER XVIII-HEALTH INSURANCE FOR AGED AND DISABLED
“…Nothing in this sub chapter shall be construed to authorize any Federal officer or employee to exercise any supervision or control over the practice of medicine or the manner in which medical services are provided, or over the selection, tenure, or compensation of any officer or employee of any institution, agency, or person providing health services; or to exercise any supervision or control over the administration or operation of any such institution, agency, or person…”
DIRECTOR ANN MILGRAM, BETRAYING THE PUBLIC TRUST AND MUST RESIGN
The 50-plus years of the United States Drug Enforcement Administration clearly have shown it has been a colossal institutional failure to engage in unspeakable crimes. Since its founding in 1973, the DEA has intercepted a fraction of one percent of illicit drug trades. Drugs have never been stronger, cheaper, or more available. Meanwhile, the global economic and human costs of ‘enforcement’ keep rising.
Under Director Ann Milgram, DOJ-DEA operates unchecked as a rogue sub-agency of government operating outside the rule of law, creating their medical science Auer deference seizing property using unipotent ill-gotten gain. As a result of their actions, thousands of people have needlessly died from chronic diseases of intractable pain, and more suffer because practitioners fear being imprisoned, assets frozen, and stolen by this unchecked agency.
Under Director Anne Milgram, her DEA uses Asset forfeiture as a tool in our country’s battle against drug abuse and drug crimes, helping to shut down “pill mills” and stop rogue doctors, pharmacists, and dealers. The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) uses forfeiture to attack the financial structure of drug trafficking and money laundering groups worldwide, from the lowly courier carrying cash or drugs to the top levels of drug cartels. Forfeiture, particularly civil forfeiture (see below), is very effective against drug crimes committed for profit.
Under Director Ann Milligram, as she had previously done as Attorney General in New Jersey, the New Jersey Office of Insurance Fraud Prosecutors (OIFP) interpreted “insurance crimes laws” vaguely, so vague in order to fit their purpose.
“do not be afraid”
AN AGENCY GONE ROGUE
THE PROBITY: IN THE CASE OF PRONTO PHARMACY
Simply put, compliance means nothing, and the Constitution means absolutely nothing. As rogue prosecutors boast and brag, they can creatively use laws to criminalize medical protocols and procedures and then move the goalpost backward and forward.
THE TERM RED FLAG
The chronic pain community is not all that different from our country as a whole
The DEA has set up a system of de facto discrimination through Cognitive Dissonance, which encourages Pharmacists to profile patients by the Processes of “RED FLAGGING.” The term Red Flag has no statutory meaning in the areas of pharmacy and or within the medical profession. Those pharmacists who merely question these DEA policies risk loss of employment and/or administrative sanctions.
The DEA can impose these errant actions because they possess unchecked authority and weapons and the ability to intimidate by seizing property and assets. That these DEA policies are applied so arbitrarily makes them discriminatory.
“…Recently, a fellow chronic pain pt who had been advocating for end-stage pediatric patients in a large hospital system that has a “no opiate” policy. All of a sudden, the advocate was told that he was no longer permitted to advocate for these end-of-life pediatric cancer patients. I suppose that this major hospital system will return to treating these pediatric pts with NSAIDS and Acetaminophen and let them live the rest of their lives in a torturous level of pain...”
“do not be silent”
That is “free money” that these Feds can put in their dept’s coffers to use/spend as they wish
“and No one will reach out to harm you”
THE FAILURE OF OUR FEDERAL BENCH AND THE FAILURE OF LAW
DEA ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS WHERE THE KANGAROOS WEAR JUDGES’ ROBES
The rule of law is the most fundamental concept of our country. Without it, our society crumbles. Unfortunately, it allows an agency to take anything they want unchecked based on their own manufactured rules, misinterpretation of laws, and medical procedures guidelines, creating their science and facts. The great fear at the moment is the DEA.
According to Richard Lawhern, Ph.D. (Lawhern Report)
“This unjustifiable witch hunt is unsupported by science or ethics. However, it has resulted in the departure of thousands of physicians from pain management practice. Millions of patients in agony have been denied access to community clinics or force-tapered from opioid therapy, which has been the only effective means of controlling their pain. This campaign’s death toll in medical collapse and suicide is rising.”
“for there are many in this city who are MY people.”
OUR LEGAL HEROES
TARTAGLIA & PENZA LAW FIRM
WORKING TOGETHER TO BRING DEA ATROCITIES TO JUSTICE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY
JOANNE BARROWS and SUSAN HAGOOD, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,
Defendant.
Civil File No.
CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
vs. HUMANA, INC.,
PLAINTIFFS’ CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
This putative class action arises from Humana’s illegal deployment of artificial intelligence (AI) in place of real doctors to wrongfully deny elderly patients care owed to them under Medicare Advantage Plans. The AI Model, known as nH Predict, is used to override real treating physicians’ determinations as to medically necessary care patients require.
Humana knows that the nH Predict AI Model predictions are highly inaccurate and are not based on patient’s medical needs but continues to use this system to deny patients’ coverage.
OR SEND
TO CASH APP:$docnorm
ZELLE 3135103378
So, Donate to the “Pharmacist For Healthcare Legal Defense Fund,”
FOR NOW, YOU ARE WITHIN
THE WHITE ROSE PROJECT
THE NORMS
