DIAMOND AND SILK: “ACCEPTED MEDICAL PRACTICES TURNED INTO FEDERAL CRIMES,” AND THE JUDICIAL PERSECUTION OF MEMPHIS, TN., OB-GYN SURGICAL ONCOLOGIST DR. SANJEEV KUMAR, MD., EPISODE-4

from youarewithinthenorms.com

NORMAN J CLEMENT RPH., DDS, NORMAN L. CLEMENT PHARM-TECH, MALACHI F. MACKANDAL PHARMD, BELINDA BROWN-PARKER, IN THE SPIRIT OF JOSEPH SOLVO ESQ., INC., SPIRIT OF REV. IN THE SPIRIT OF WALTER R. CLEMENT BS., MS, MBA. HARVEY JENKINS, MD, PH.D., IN THE SPIRIT OF C.T. VIVIAN, JELANI ZIMBABWE CLEMENT, BS., M.B.A., IN THE SPIRIT OF THE HON. PATRICE LUMUMBA, IN THE SPIRIT OF ERLIN CLEMENT SR., EVELYN J. CLEMENT, IN THE SPIRIT OF WALTER F. WRENN III., MD., JULIE KILLINGSWORTH, RENEE BLARE, RPH, DR. TERENCE SASAKI, MD LESLY POMPY MD., CHRISTOPHER RUSSO, MD., NANCY SEEFELDT, IN THE SPIRIT OF WILLIE GUINYARD BS., JOSEPH WEBSTER MD., MBA, BEVERLY C. PRINCE MD., FACS., NEIL ARNAND, MD., IN THE SPIRIT OF RICHARD KAUL, MD., IN THE SPIRIT OF LEROY BAYLOR, JAY K. JOSHI MD., MBA, AISHA GARDNER, ADRIENNE EDMUNDSON, ESTER HYATT PH.D., WALTER L. SMITH BS., IN THE SPIRIT OF BRAHM FISHER ESQ., MICHELE ALEXANDER MD., CUDJOE WILDING BS, MARTIN NJOKU, BS., RPH., IN THE SPIRIT OF DEBRA LYNN SHEPHERD, BERES E. MUSCHETT, STRATEGIC ADVISORS

Regulatory Divergence:

This digital content features a broadcast hosted by Diamond and Silk, where they interview Dr. Sanjeev Kumar regarding the alleged weaponization of the legal system against healthcare professionals. The discussion focuses on the claim that traditional, accepted medical practices are being reframed as federal crimes, specifically through the lens of political and institutional interference. By hosting this dialogue on Rumble, the creators aim to challenge mainstream narratives and highlight what they describe as manufactured violations designed to target specific doctors. Ultimately, the source serves as a platform for political and medical dissent, connecting health policy critiques with broader themes of governmental overreach.

The Criminalization of Clinical Protocol and the FDA’s Expansion of Adulteration Statutes

The federal prosecution of Dr. Sanjeev Kumar, a double-board-certified gynecologic oncologist, represents a chilling bellwether of the shifting boundary between clinical practice and federal criminal oversight.

This case signals a new era where the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) bypass administrative remedies to pursue draconian prison sentences for regulatory disagreements. Dr. Kumar, a leading robotic surgeon in Memphis, specialized in high-stakes diagnostics for reproductive cancers—a practice that treated over 9,000 women across 40,000 clinical visits.

Based on the provided sources, the concept of manufactured violations is discussed by Dr. Sanjeev Kumar during a segment of the show “Diamond and Silk Chit Chat Live,” specifically with Silk.

The Federal Prosecution of Dr. SANJEEV KUMAR, MD

The discussion focuses on the premise that accepted medical practices are being reclassified or “turned into” federal crimes. Key aspects of this topic include:

Weaponization: The show categorizes these manufactured violations under the theme of “weaponization,” suggesting a deliberate use of the legal and regulatory system against medical professionals.
Legal Context: The title, “Accepted Medical Practice Turned Into Federal Crimes,” implies that actions once considered standard within the medical community are now being targeted for federal prosecution.
Broader Narrative: The topic is presented alongside other critical medical and political segments, such as “Remdesivir Loss of Life” and discussions regarding Fauci, indicating a broader skepticism toward current medical regulations and government oversight.

While the snippets provide the overarching theme and the participants involved, they do not list specific individual violations beyond the general assertion that standard practices are being criminalized.

weaponization of the legal system

This digital content features a broadcast hosted by Diamond and Silk, where they interview Dr. Sanjeev Kumar regarding the alleged weaponization of the legal system against healthcare professionals. The discussion focuses on the claim that traditional, accepted medical practices are being reframed as federal crimes, specifically through the lens of political and institutional interference. By hosting this dialogue on Rumble, the creators aim to challenge mainstream narratives and highlight what they describe as manufactured violations designed to target specific doctors. Ultimately, this Rumble broadcast by Diamond and Silk serves as a platform for political and medical dissent, connecting health policy critiques with broader themes of governmental overreach.

Chief Judge Shery Lipman of the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee

The Judicial Execution of Dr. Sanjeev Kumar

In the trial of Dr. Sanjeev Kumar, the “mere presence” doctrine refers to a specific set of jury instructions allowed by Judge Sheryl Lipman that significantly lowered the burden of proof for the prosecution.

According to the sources, this doctrine established the following:

No Proof of Reuse Required: Prosecutors were not required to prove that a “single-use” medical device was actually reused on a patient.
Attachment of Criminal Liability: Under this theory, a physician could be held criminally liable simply because a device labeled as “single-use” was present in the medical office.
Broad Application: This liability applied even if the device in question was:
- Inoperable or lacked a battery.
- Physically incapable of being reused due to built-in “kill switches” or “bricks”.
- Sitting in a disposal bin or staged for waste disposal according to CDC guidelines.
- Never used and never touched a patient.

The sources describe this as a “novel legal theory” that criminalizes normal medical practice and administrative possession. Dr. Kumar and other commentators argue that if the government can secure a conviction based solely on the presence of a device—rather than its actual use or any resulting patient harm—then “no physician is safe” from federal prosecution.