reported by
youarewithinthenorms.com
NORMAN J CLEMENT RPH., DDS, NORMAN L. CLEMENT PHARM-TECH, MALACHI F. MACKANDAL PHARMD, BELINDA BROWN-PARKER, IN THE SPIRIT OF JOSEPH SOLVO ESQ., INC., SPIRIT OF REV. IN THE SPIRIT OF WALTER R. CLEMENT BS., MS, MBA. HARVEY JENKINS, MD, PH.D., IN THE SPIRIT OF C.T. VIVIAN, JELANI ZIMBABWE CLEMENT, BS., MBA., IN THE SPIRIT OF THE HON. PATRICE LUMUMBA, IN THE SPIRIT OF ERLIN CLEMENT SR., WALTER F. WRENN III., MD., JULIE KILLINGSWORTH, RENEE BLARE, RPH, DR. TERENCE SASAKI, MD LESLY POMPY MD., CHRISTOPHER RUSSO, MD., NANCY SEEFELDT, WILLIE GUINYARD BS., JOSEPH WEBSTER MD., MBA, BEVERLY C. PRINCE MD., FACS., NEIL ARNAND, MD., RICHARD KAUL, MD., LEROY BAYLOR, JAY K. JOSHI MD., MBA, ADRIENNE EDMUNDSON, ESTER HYATT PH.D., WALTER L. SMITH BS., IN THE SPIRIT OF BRAHM FISHER ESQ., MICHELE ALEXANDER MD., CUDJOE WILDING BS, MARTIN NJOKU, BS., RPH., IN THE SPIRIT OF DEBRA LYNN SHEPHERD, BERES E. MUSCHETT, STRATEGIC ADVISORS
replacing clinical judgment with legal fear
Based on the provided correspondence from Dr. Mark Ibsen, shifting regulatory guidelines—specifically the 2016 CDC guidelines for pain management—fundamentally altered the doctor-patient relationship by replacing clinical judgment with legal fear, transitioning the medical culture from “patriarchal” to “authoritarian”.
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1C8RQyXLyK/?mibextid=wwXIfr
Here is an analysis of how this relationship has changed:
From Clinical Autonomy to Authoritarian Compliance Traditionally, the practice of medicine relied on a physician’s ability to assess and treat individual needs.
However, Dr. Ibsen notes that medicine shifted toward an “authoritarian” model between 2012 and 2016. This shift was solidified by the 2016 CDC guidelines, which were widely misinterpreted and codified into state laws and VA policies.
Consequently, individualized care has been replaced by rigid mandates. For example:
• In Ohio, laws prohibit prescribing more than a 7-day supply of opiates (5 mg oxycodone, four times a day) regardless of the patient’s condition.
• Physicians are granted “no exemption” from these laws, even when treating fellow doctors for major surgeries.
• Dr. Ibsen recounts his own experience after a quadruple coronary bypass, where his pain was severely undertreated because strict protocols superseded his actual physical agony.
The Injection of Fear and Self-Preservation The relationship has shifted from a partnership focused on healing to a defensive stance focused on the doctor’s legal survival. The sources highlight that state medical boards “silently and secretly changed” their policies from supporting pain management to attacking doctors.
• Scrutiny over Empathy: Doctors are now conditioned to be judgmental rather than curious, as prescribing pain medication attracts scrutiny from state boards and the DEA.
• Legal Threats: DEA agents have explicitly warned doctors that they are risking their freedom and licenses by treating chronic pain patients.
• Mass Abandonment: This fear caused many doctors to get scared and abruptly stop prescribing, leaving patients in withdrawal through no fault of their own. Dr. Ibsen notes that over 4,000 “compassionate physicians” have been imprisoned due to this crackdown.
The Criminalization of the Patient The regulatory environment has forced doctors to view patients as potential liabilities rather than people in need. The “pendulum” swung from liberal pain management to a restriction so severe that it treats pain patients similarly to how illicit drug users are treated,.
• Forced Desertion: Dr. Ibsen was forced to retire from prescribing opiates in 2017 to avoid DEA retribution. This severance of the doctor-patient bond had lethal consequences: six of his former patients died, not from his prescriptions, but from suicide, alcohol complications, or other overdoses after losing access to medical care.
Shame and the Black Market: Patients on pain medication now feel ashamed and, upon losing access to legal medical support, often turn to the “black market,” which creates a more dangerous environment than the clinical setting.
Analogy: To understand this fundamental shift, imagine a pilot (the doctor) who is flying a plane through turbulent weather (the patient’s pain). Traditionally, the pilot used their training and instruments to make real-time adjustments to keep the passengers safe.
Under the new regulatory guidelines, air traffic control has locked the flight controls, forcing the pilot to fly at a specific, arbitrary altitude regardless of the storm outside. The pilot knows the passengers are suffering and the plane is shaking, but they are forbidden from adjusting the course, terrified that touching the controls will result in being thrown in jail.
FOR NOW, YOU ARE WITHIN
THE NORMS
REFERENCES:
Why are you using an AI image of Dr. Dasgupta?
I spoke with him today and he loves it