TUESDAY APRIL 8, 2025: KING RETURNS TO COURT ROOM UNDER CROSS EXAMINATION: PROSECUTION REST- ANAND’S DEFENCE TEAM UP TO BAT!!!

Tim King Rat

πŸ€πŸ€πŸ€πŸ€πŸ€ πŸ€πŸ€πŸ€πŸ€πŸ€

reported by youarewithinthenorms.com

NORMAN J CLEMENT, RPH, DDS, NORMAN L. CLEMENT PHARM-TECH, MALACHI F. MACKANDAL PHARMD, BELINDA BROWN-PARKER, IN THE SPIRIT OF JOSEPH SOLVO ESQ., INC.T. SPIRIT OF REV. IN THE SPIRIT OF WALTER R. CLEMENT BS., MS, MBA. HARVEY JENKINS MD, PH.D., IN THE SPIRIT OF C.T. VIVIAN, JELANI ZIMBABWE CLEMENT, BS., MBA., IN THE SPIRIT OF THE HON. PATRICE LUMUMBA, IN THE SPIRIT OF ERLIN CLEMENT SR., EVELYN J. CLEMENT, WALTER F. WRENN III., MD., JULIE KILLINGSWORTH, RENEE BLARE, RPH, DR. TERENCE SASAKI, MDLESLY POMPY MD., CHRISTOPHER RUSSO, MD., NANCY SEEFELDT, WILLIE GUINYARD BS., JOSEPH WEBSTER MD., MBA, BEVERLY C. PRINCE MD., FACS., NEIL ARNAND, MD.RICHARD KAUL, MD., LEROY BAYLOR, JAY K. JOSHI MD., MBA, ADRIENNE EDMUNDSON, ESTER HYATT PH.D., WALTER L. SMITH BS., IN THE SPIRIT OF BRAHM FISHER ESQ., MICHELE ALEXANDER MD., CUDJOE WILDING BS, MARTIN NJOKU, BS., RPH., IN THE SPIRIT OF DEBRA LYNN SHEPHERD, BERES E. MUSCHETT, STRATEGIC ADVISORS

Dr. Mark Ibsen, MD
“Timothy King MD_ Bite Marks, Opioids, and Forensic Fraud”.

The article presents a highly critical and accusatory view of Dr. Timothy E. King, portraying him as a purveyor of fraudulent scientific claims, particularly within the context of opioid-related legal proceedings.

By drawing a strong parallel to the well-documented issues with bite mark analysis, the author(s) aim to discredit Dr. King’s expert testimony and suggest it has led to wrongful convictions and contributed to the suffering of pain patients and physicians.

The article advocates for Dr. King’s prosecution and the investigation of ΰ€Έΰ€‚ΰ€¬ΰ€‚ΰ€§ΰ€Ώΰ€€ government officials, reflecting a broader concern about the handling of the opioid crisis and the use of expert testimony in related cases.

Further investigation and exaπŸ€πŸ€πŸ€πŸ€πŸ€ πŸ€πŸ€πŸ€πŸ€πŸ€mination of other sources would be necessary to obtain πŸ€πŸ€πŸ€πŸ€πŸ€ πŸ€πŸ€πŸ€πŸ€πŸ€a comprehensive understanding of the allegations against Dr. King and the broader context of the opioid litigation.

DR. NEIL ANAND MD, ANESTHESIOLOGIST FACING 780 YEARS PRISON PERSECUTION, PHILADELPHIA PENN DEA-DOJ BOARD CERTIFIED NOW CALL A DRUG DEALER IN A WHITE COAT

DONATE LEGAL DEFENSE

OR SEND

TO CASH APP:$docnorm

ZELLE 3135103378

ALL WATCHED OVER BY MACHINES OF LOVING GRACE

BE SURE TO DONATE TO THE MARK IBSEN GOFUNDME DEFENSE FUND, WHERE THE SON ALWAYS RISES!!!

Tree of knowledge system - Wikipedia
OUR KNOWLEDGE WILL NEVER BE SUPPRESSED

FOR NOW, YOU ARE WITHIN

YOUAREWITHINTHENORMS.COM, BENJAMIN CLEMENTINE β€œTHE NEMESIS” LONDON, ENGLAND 2015

THE NORMS

REFERENCES:

Detailed Timeline of Main Events

This timeline and cast of characters reflect the main points and individuals discussed across the provided sources, highlighting the historical context of the Nazi “euthanasia” program and the contemporary concerns raised about the DEA’s approach to prescription painkillers in the United States.

Early 20th Century – Pre-Nazi Germany:

  • Early 20th Century: Sterilization of individuals with hereditary defects and perceived “antisocial” behavior is a respectable field of medicine in some countries (Canada, Denmark, Switzerland, US). Germany is noted as being relatively reluctant to introduce such legislation.
  • 1920s: Studies rank Germany as unusually reluctant to introduce sterilization legislation.
  • 1924: Adolf Hitler, in his book Mein Kampf, writes about racial hygiene as a future great deed.
Dr. Christopher Russo, MD US vs. Bothra, et al., Detroit, Mi., A VICTOR, Reiterates, “..when it was broken down and presented to the jury, the prosecution narrative melted like an ice cube in the Arizona desert. They had no answers for an actual medical defense. We took them to the pool’s deep end, where they couldn’t swim…” FOUND NOT GUILTY”

Nazi Era and Aktion T4 (1933-1945):

  • July 1933: The “Law for the Prevention of Hereditarily Diseased Offspring” is passed in Germany, prescribing compulsory sterilization for individuals with conditions deemed hereditary, including schizophrenia, epilepsy, Huntington’s chorea, “imbecility,” chronic alcoholism, and other forms of social deviance. Hereditary Health Courts (Erbgesundheitsgerichte) are established to administer the law.
  • 1933-1939: An estimated 360,000 people are sterilized under the 1933 law.
  • Mid-1930s: The Nazi Party conducts a propaganda campaign in favor of euthanasia, highlighting the cost of maintaining asylums for the incurably ill. Films like The Inheritance (1935) and Victims of the Past (1937) are produced.
  • 1935: Hitler tells the Leader of Reich Doctors, Gerhard Wagner, that the “euthanasia” problem could be more easily carried out in wartime.
  • After 1937: Labor shortages due to rearmament lead to a decline in the rate of sterilization as those capable of work are deemed “useful.”
  • Late 1938: The Aktion T4 program begins with a “trial” case involving the “mercy killing” of Gerhard Kretschmar, a child with blindness and disabilities. Hitler instructs Karl Brandt to proceed similarly in other cases.
ATTY RONALD CHAPMAN DR, LEY KOUSA, MD NOT GUILTY
  • August 18, 1939: The Reich Committee for the Scientific Registering of Hereditary and Congenital Illnesses is established to register sick children and newborns identified as “defective.” Secret killing of infants begins and increases after the start of WWII.
  • September 1, 1939: Hitler drafts a letter (backdated to this date and kept confidential) entrusting Reich Leader Philipp Bouhler and Dr. Karl Brandt with the authority to grant “mercy death” to patients deemed incurably ill based on “human judgment.” This serves as the informal basis for Aktion T4.
  • September 1939 – 1945: The systematic killings of people with mental and physical disabilities take place in psychiatric hospitals across Germany, Austria, occupied Poland, and the Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia. An estimated 275,000 to 300,000 people are killed.
  • October 1939: First experiments with gassing patients using carbon monoxide occur at Fort VII in Posen (PoznaΕ„). Heinrich Himmler witnesses a gassing in December 1939.
  • January 1940: The first gassings in Germany proper take place at the Brandenburg Euthanasia Centre, using bottled pure carbon monoxide.
  • 1940-1945: Extermination centers are established at six psychiatric hospitals: Bernburg, Brandenburg, Grafeneck, Hadamar, Hartheim, and Sonnenstein. Over 1,000 children are killed at Am Spiegelgrund and Gugging in Austria. Nazi doctors take thousands of brains from “euthanasia” victims for research.
  • August 1940: Justice Minister Franz GΓΌrtner is shown Hitler’s 1939 letter to secure his cooperation with Aktion T4.
  • 1941: More than 5,000 children have been killed under the child euthanasia program. The film I Accuse (Ich klage an) is released, based on a novel by Hellmuth Unger, a consultant for “child euthanasia.”
  • 1941: Bishop Clemens August Graf von Galen begins to publicly preach against the killings in August, leading to widespread, albeit suppressed, opposition.
  • June 29, 1943: Pope Pius XII issues the encyclical Mystici corporis Christi, condemning the killing of physically deformed, mentally disturbed, and hereditarily ill people in Germany.
  • September 1943: Bishops across Germany read a condemnation of the killings from pulpits.
  • May 29, 1945: Richard Jenne, the last known child victim, is killed at the Kaufbeuren-Irsee state hospital, after the US Army occupied the town.
ADELGLASS COURT
  • 1969 – 1974: Richard Nixon serves as the 37th President of the United States and is mentioned in the context of sanctioning “mass looting of doctors” (though the specifics and timing of this are not detailed).
  • Early 2000s:The DEA, under the Department of Justice, receives criticism for its goals not aligning with the President’s Federal National Drug Control Strategy (based on Ronald T. Libby’s 2005 report referencing 2000 and 2001).
  • The DEA seeks a “new front” in the War on Drugs and begins to conflate prescription narcotic medications with illicit substances like heroin, cocaine, and methamphetamine.
  • DEA Commissioner Asa Hutchinson publicly describes the nonmedical use of OxyContin as a deadly new epidemic starting in Appalachia and spreading nationwide.
  • The DEA launches the OxyContin Action Plan, drawing parallels to the Harrison Act in its ability to prosecute physicians prescribing legal narcotics based on fears of a “dope menace.”
  • The DEA begins reallocating resources from illegal drugs in urban areas to illicit prescription drugs in rural areas, working with state and local law enforcement and utilizing the Asset Forfeiture Fund.
  • The DEA contacts 775 medical examiners in 2001, instructing them to report “OxyContin-related deaths” for 2000 and 2001.
  • Based on these reports, the DEA announces 464 “OxyContin-related deaths” over those two years.
  • Media outlets, including Time magazine (January 2001), begin reporting on the alleged rising death toll from OxyContin, sometimes comparing it to crack cocaine.
  • Police in multiple states report robberies of pharmacies and homes of OxyContin users.
  • May 16, 2002: The DEA’s Diversion Control Program publishes a “Summary of Medical Examiner Reports on Oxycodone-Related Deaths,” detailing their criteria for defining an “OxyContin-related death.”
  • April 11, 2002: DEA Administrator Asa Hutchinson provides testimony before the United States Senate Caucus on International Narcotics Control.
  • 2002: Ronald T. Libby’s report highlights the DEA’s public relations effort linking OxyContin to illicit drugs as a departure from its traditional mission.
  • March 2003: The Journal of Analytical Toxicology publishes a study finding that only a small percentage of oxycodone-related deaths showed evidence of oxycodone alone in the system, with most being due to “multiple drug poisoning.”
  • October 2004: The DEA reportedly disavows the contents of a pamphlet related to prescribing guidelines, further confusing physicians.
  • 2004: At a Healthcare Fraud Prevention and Funds Recovery Summit, a federal investigator outlines the government’s criteria for probable cause in prosecuting doctors for narcotics prescriptions.
  • 2001 – 2004: The DEA’s OxyContin Action Plan leads to over 400 investigations and 600 arrests, with 60% involving medical professionals.
  • 2005: Ronald T. Libby publishes his report, “Treating Doctors as Drug Dealers: The DEA’s War on Prescription Painkillers,” critically examining the DEA’s approach and the flawed data used to portray an “OxyContin-related” death crisis. The report notes that the DOJ-DEA was likely aware the “opioid crisis” narrative was fraudulent by this time.
  • 2006: Dr. Freddy Williams dies in federal prison after being sentenced to 40 years as a “drug dealer in white.”
  • 2010/2012 (circa): Dr. Vilsini Ganesh states that a “secret agreement” was entered into by the insurance industry and certain governmental agencies, codifying elements of a “conspiracy” against medical providers.
  • August 29, 2019: The DEA seizes equipment from Pronto Pharmacy (Tampa, FL) but never files charges.
  • 2020: JosΓ© Irizarry, a former DEA agent, is convicted of corruption and fraud.
  • January 2022: JosΓ© Irizarry speaks to the Associated Press, alleging widespread corruption and fraud within the DEA, including falsified reports, skimming drugs and cash, and misuse of funds for personal travel.
  • June 22, 2022: In the case of United States vs. Bothra et al., four interventionalist anesthesiologists are found “NOT GUILTY” on 287 counts of over-prescribing opioids and healthcare fraud after a 3.5-year imprisonment of Dr. Bothra.
  • December 29, 2023: Award-winning Carl Nelson dismisses Norman Clement’s concerns about DEA targeting as “not news.”
  • January 19, 2024: The DEA returns seized equipment to Pronto Pharmacy’s attorneys.
  • March 1, 2024: The “youarewithinthenorms” article is published.

1 Comment

Leave a Reply