NORMAN J CLEMENT RPH., DDS, NORMAN L. CLEMENT PHARM-TECH, MALACHI F. MACKANDAL PHARMD, BELINDA BROWN-PARKER, IN THE SPIRIT OF JOSEPH SOLVO ESQ., INC.T. SPIRIT OF REV. IN THE SPIRIT OF WALTER R. CLEMENT BS., MS, MBA. HARVEY JENKINS MD, PH.D., IN THE SPIRIT OF C.T. VIVIAN, JELANI ZIMBABWE CLEMENT, BS., MBA., IN THE SPIRIT OF THE HON. PATRICE LUMUMBA, IN THE SPIRIT OF ERLIN CLEMENT SR., EVELYN J. CLEMENT, WALTER F. WRENN III., MD., JULIE KILLINGSWORTH, RENEE BLARE, RPH, DR. TERENCE SASAKI, MD LESLY POMPY MD., CHRISTOPHER RUSSO, MD., NANCY SEEFELDT, WILLIE GUINYARD BS., JOSEPH WEBSTER MD., MBA, BEVERLY C. PRINCE MD., FACS., NEIL ARNAND, MD., RICHARD KAUL, MD., IN THE SPIRIT OF LEROY BAYLOR, JAY K. JOSHI MD., MBA, AISHA GARDNER, ADRIENNE EDMUNDSON, ESTER HYATT PH.D., WALTER L. SMITH BS., IN THE SPIRIT OF BRAHM FISHER ESQ., MICHELE ALEXANDER MD., CUDJOE WILDING BS, MARTIN NJOKU, BS., RPH., IN THE SPIRIT OF DEBRA LYNN SHEPHERD, BERES E. MUSCHETT, STRATEGIC ADVISORS
THE BIRD WATCH
These Particular Articles from the blog youarewithinthenorms.com concerning a Woman’s Right for Access to Pain and Reproductive Healthcare are Being Banned from Posting by Facebook’s Community Standards on Dangerous Individuals and Organizations Algorithms. .
MODIFID VERSION-2B
MR. ZUCKERBERG META’s A-I ALGORITHMS ARE BOTH BIAS AND FAULTY
Mr. Zuckerberg, your A-I Algorithms clearly reflect bias by inferring our blog includes references to designated dangerous organizations and individuals in the context of social and political discourse; nothing could be more ridiculous. In our letter to the “Face Book Oversight Board” these articles have nothing to do with the support of Nazi’s, they solely support the right of a women to have access to reproductive care.
There are no parts within these articles or its addendum that ” Glorifies, Supports or Represents ideologies that promote hate, such as nazism and white supremacy. Nor are there any unclear references to these designated events or ideologies of Nazism and/or White Supremacy.
Yet, what is more troubling in your censorship, there contains within any of our presentations absolutely no Glorification, Material Support, and Representation of these entities, their leaders, founders or prominent members.
MR. ZUCKERBERG ThESE articleS haVE absolutely nothing to do with Hitler or Nazi sYMPATHIZERs
In the Margaret Atwood Book, “The Handmaids Tale,” the rights of women bodies were control by the State of The Republic of Gilead, similar to that which existed before Roe vs. Wade, in the United States after the Supreme Court decision of Buck vs. Bell Justice.
This horiffic opinion was led by the narrow-mindedness of the Chief Justice Oliver wendell Holmes, and Associate Justice Louis Brandeis in a majority formed on the bases on Eugenics. Adolf Hitlers socialist movement was based and generated from the same concept and foundation of beliefs held by Holmes and Brandeis’s.
In the design of these articles we specifically chose as our priority the Flag of Gilead (which appears 3 times before the Nazi Flag appears). The Nazi Flag which was selected here was not our choosing but that of facebook’s defective and faulty algorithm.
FB algorithms selected the Nazi Flag for primary display then conveniently mis-indentified our blog as;
“Support, or Representation of the perpetrator(s) of such attacks; (2) perpetrator-generated content relating to such attacks; or (3) third-party imagery depicting the moment of such attacks on visible victims …. Simpathizers of White Supremacy“ …nothing could be further from the truth.
THESE articleS REFLECT WOMEN’S PAIN CARE AND REPRODUCTIVE CARE healthcare ARE ONE IN THE SAME!!
While it is easy to just to remove the Nazi flag we rise in objections of FB decision as it wrecks havoc with journalistic Freedom of Expression and Speech and seeks to curtail to limit our discussions to only rapp music, p-diddy, and NWA.
Dr. Craig Watkins the Ernest A. Sharpe Centennial Professor and Executive Director of the IC² Institute at the University of Texas at Austin. A scholar and expert on the social and behavioral impacts of technology,
Dr. Watkins leads research teams investigating how AI, data systems, and machine learning influence everything from health care access to mental health outcomes, particularly in marginalized communities.
Dr. Craig Watkins has explored the alignment problem in AI—how algorithms that are technically efficient may still be misaligned with broader social values such as equity and justice.
His work sheds light on how predictive algorithms, rather than solving problems, can often entrench systemic inequalities. His work has further explored the alignment problem in AI and how algorithms that are technically efficient may still be misaligned with broader social values such as equity and justice.
I AM NOT A TIER-1 Specially Designated Global Terrorists (SDGTs)
Clearly in this case, our group has been misaligned, and marginalized by Mr. Zuckerberg A-I bias. In a world where the line between machine and human decision-making is increasingly blurred, scholars like Dr. Watkins remind us of the importance of keeping human values at the center of technological progress.
I am deeply offended /aghast at FB Narrow-mindedness (FB-5E8Y6ZN3 filed 10/16/24) as this article depicts the Fictious facist Republic of Gilead from Margaret Atwood’s the Handmaid’s Tail Flag …
Therefore, I’m critical of the historic FB Police as we demonstrate Gilead and the Flag of Nazi’s are one in the same and Exist in the same space.
RESTORE MY ARTICLE NOW
WHY FACEBOOK REMOVE THIS ARTICLE
“Why Facebook Removed The Content“
“Facebook removed the content you’re appealing because it believes your content didn’t follow the Community Standards on Dangerous Individuals and Organizations.
In an effort to prevent and disrupt real-world harm, we do not allow organizations or individuals that proclaim a violent mission or are engaged in violence to have a presence on our platforms. We assess these entities based on their behavior both online and offline, most significantly, their ties to violence.
Under this policy, we designate individuals, organizations, and networks of people. These designations are divided into two tiers that indicate the level of content enforcement, with Tier 1 resulting in the most extensive enforcement because we believe these entities have the most direct ties to offline harm.
Tier 1 focuses on entities that engage in serious offline harms – including organizing or advocating for violence against civilians, repeatedly dehumanizing or advocating for harm against people based on protected characteristics, or engaging in systematic criminal operations.
___ Ronald T. Libby is a professor of political science and public administration at the University of North Florida.
Tier 1 includes hate organizations; criminal organizations, including those designated by the United States government as Specially Designated Narcotics Trafficking Kingpins (SDNTKs); and terrorist organizations, including entities and individuals designated by the United States government as Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTOs) or Specially Designated Global Terrorists (SDGTs).
We remove Glorification, Support, and Representation of Tier 1 entities, their leaders, founders or prominent members, as well as unclear references to them.
In addition, we do not allow content that glorifies, supports, or represents events that Meta designates as violating violent events – including terrorist attacks, hate events, multiple-victim violence or attempted multiple-victim violence, serial murders, or hate crimes.
Nor do we allow (1) Glorification, Support, or Representation of the perpetrator(s) of such attacks; (2) perpetrator-generated content relating to such attacks; or (3) third-party imagery depicting the moment of such attacks on visible victims.
We also remove content that Glorifies, Supports or Represents ideologies that promote hate, such as nazism and white supremacy.We remove unclear references to these designated events or ideologies. Tier 2 includes Violent Non-State Actors that engage in violence against state or military actors in an armed conflict but do not intentionally target civilians. It also includes Violence Inducing Entities that are engaged in preparing or advocating for future violence but have not necessarily engaged in violence to date.
These are also entities that may repeatedly violate our Hate Speech or Dangerous Organizations and Individuals policies on or off the platform. We remove Glorifying, Material Support, and Representation of these entities, their leaders, founders, or prominent members. We recognize that users may share content that includes references to designated dangerous organizations and individuals in the context of social and political discourse.
This includes content reporting on, neutrally discussing or condemning dangerous organizations and individuals or their activities.
News reporting includes information that is shared to raise awareness about local and global events in which designated dangerous organizations and individuals are involved. E.g. “Breaking News: Al-Shabab claimed responsibility for the attack in Somalia” E.g. “Timeline and expert Analysis:
How the shooting at the Buffalo Supermarket unfolded and what did the perpetrator say in court” Neutral discussion includes factual statements, commentary, questions, and other information that do not express positive judgment around the designated dangerous organization or individual and their behavior. E.g. “Al Qaeda represents less threat than ISIS given the lack of leadership and finance” E.g. “Anders Breivik is one example of how complex the radicalization process can be”
Condemnation includes disapproval, disgust, rejection, criticism, mockery, and other negative expressions about a designated dangerous organization or individual and their behavior. E.g. “I feel disgusted by the crime of Salvador Ramos. The judge’s words resonated so much to me.
He should get no mercy by the court” E.g. “Hitler’s crimes shall never be forgotten ever.
These were some of the darkest moments in history” Our policies are designed to allow room for these types of discussions while simultaneously limiting risks of potential offline harm.
We thus require people to clearly indicate their intent when creating or sharing such content. If a user’s intention is ambiguous or unclear, we default to removing content.
In line with international human rights law, our policies allow discussions about the human rights of designated individuals or members of designated dangerous entities, unless the content includes other glorification, support, or representation of designated entities or other policy violations, such as incitement to violence.”
THE NORMS
