from youarewithinthenorms.com
NORMAN J CLEMENT RPH., DDS, NORMAN L. CLEMENT PHARM-TECH, MALACHI F. MACKANDAL PHARMD, BELINDA BROWN-PARKER, IN THE SPIRIT OF JOSEPH SOLVO ESQ., INC.T. SPIRIT OF REV. IN THE SPIRIT OF WALTER R. CLEMENT BS., MS, MBA. HARVEY JENKINS MD, PH.D., IN THE SPIRIT OF C.T. VIVIAN, JELANI ZIMBABWE CLEMENT, BS., MBA., IN THE SPIRIT OF THE HON. PATRICE LUMUMBA, IN THE SPIRIT OF ERLIN CLEMENT SR., EVELYN J. CLEMENT, WALTER F. WRENN III., MD., JULIE KILLINGSWORTH, RENEE BLARE, RPH, DR. TERENCE SASAKI, MD LESLY POMPY MD., CHRISTOPHER RUSSO, MD., NANCY SEEFELDT, WILLIE GUINYARD BS., JOSEPH WEBSTER MD., MBA, BEVERLY C. PRINCE MD., FACS., NEIL ARNAND, MD., RICHARD KAUL, MD., IN THE SPIRIT OF LEROY BAYLOR, JAY K. JOSHI MD., MBA, AISHA GARDNER, ADRIENNE EDMUNDSON, ESTER HYATT PH.D., WALTER L. SMITH BS., IN THE SPIRIT OF BRAHM FISHER ESQ., MICHELE ALEXANDER MD., CUDJOE WILDING BS, MARTIN NJOKU, BS., RPH., IN THE SPIRIT OF DEBRA LYNN SHEPHERD, BERES E. MUSCHETT, STRATEGIC ADVISORS
OR SEND
TO CASH APP:$docnorm
ZELLE 3135103378
ALL WATCHED OVER BY MACHINES OF LOVING GRACE
BE SURE TO DONATE TO THE MARK IBSEN GOFUNDME DEFENSE FUND, WHERE THE SON ALWAYS RISES!!!
FOR NOW, YOU ARE WITHIN
THE NORMS
REFERENCES:
Briefing Document: Analysis of Provided Sources: BATTLE IN THE CITY OF BENJAMIN FRANKLIN
This briefing document synthesizes the main themes, important ideas, and facts presented in the provided sources: an award certificate for NYU Downtown Hospital, Dr. Neil K. Anand’s curriculum vitae, and an article titled “How biased medical experts are destroying doctors’ lives and careers in the opioid crisis.”
In summary, the provided sources offer contrasting perspectives within the healthcare and legal landscape surrounding opioid prescribing. Dr. Anand’s CV showcases a traditional and accomplished medical career.
At the same time, the article on biased experts paints a contentious picture of the role of certain medical experts in legal proceedings, explicitly targeting Dr. Timothy King and his methods for detecting prescription fraud.
The NYU award certificate provides a glimpse of positive recognition within a medical institution.
Connecting the Sources:
- The CV of Dr. Neil K. Anand establishes his credentials as an experienced anesthesiologist and pain management specialist. This contrasts with the third source’s portrayal of Dr. Timothy King as a biased and allegedly fraudulent expert in the same field.
- While the NYU Downtown Hospital award certificate lacks specific details, it represents a form of positive professional recognition within the medical field. This starkly contrasts the severe accusations of professional misconduct leveled against Dr. King.
- The patent application excerpts introduce the forensic system developed by Dr. Timothy King, which is central to the criticisms in the “Rat King” article. The article argues that this system, intended to provide objective evidence of prescription fraud, is inherently biased due to Dr. King’s financial interests and flawed methodologies.
1. NYU Downtown Hospital Award Certificate (Exhibit B):
- Central Theme: Recognition of service.
- Key Idea/Fact: This document is an “Award Certificate NYU Downtown Hospital.” While the excerpt provided is incomplete, the title indicates that the document formally recognizes and commends an individual or group by NYU Downtown Hospital. Further details about the recipient and the nature of the award are not available within this excerpt.
2. Curriculum Vitae of Dr. Neil K. Anand, M.D. (Exhibit E):
- Main Theme: Professional qualifications and experience of Dr. Neil K. Anand.
- Key Ideas/Facts:Credentials: Dr. Anand holds an M.D. from Albany Medical College and a B.S. from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (magna cum laude). He is board-certified by “The American Board of Anesthesiology” and “Perioperative Transesophageal Echocardiography.”
- Memberships: He is a member of the “American Academy of Pain Physicians” and the “American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians.”
- Employment History: Dr. Anand has a diverse and extensive employment history, including:
- Current positions as “Chief of Anesthesiology” at the Ambulatory Endoscopic Surgery Center of Bucks County (Sept 2018-Present) and “Chief of Pain Management” at the Institute of Advanced Medicine Surgery (Feb 2013-Present).
- Significant experience as a “Cardiothoracic Anesthesiologist” at multiple hospitals, including Deborah Heart and Lung Hospital, Aria Health, Florida Medical Center Heart Institute, and Lower Keys Medical Center.
- Previous role as “Medical Director” at Alliance Recruiting and Locums Inc. (Nov 2008-Oct 2009).
- Academic experience as an “Assistant Professor” at West Virginia University School of Medicine (Aug 2006-Apr 2007).
- Military Service: Dr. Anand served as a “Lieutenant Commander in the US Naval Medical Corps” from Jan 2001 to May 2012, receiving an honorable discharge and specializing in “Regional Anesthesia Specialization” at Walter Reed Army Hospital.
- Distinctions: He received the “Joseph Seltzer Award for Best Academic Resident, Thomas Jefferson Hospital” on June 10, 2005, and the “NYU Hero’s Award (Commendation for work done at the World Trade Center)” on September 11, 2001.
- Post Graduate Training: Completed a Cardiothoracic Fellowship at the University of Miami Medical Center and an anesthesiology Residency at Thomas Jefferson Univ. Hospital, and an Internal Medicine Internship at NY University Downtown Hospital.
- Research: Dr. Anand has been involved in various research projects, including studies on genicular nerve ablation, popliteal nerve block, dexametomidine, prostate cancer, nutritional interventions in head and neck cancer, and basic science research. He has presented research at national meetings.
- Lectures: He has delivered national and international symposia lectures on medical technology and anesthesia history.
- Publications: Dr. Anand has authored and co-authored publications in peer-reviewed journals and a book chapter. Examples include “Anesthetic Implications for Patients with RateResponsive Pacemakers” and “Gift of the Gorgons: A History of Neuromuscular Blocking Agents…”
- Entrepreneurship: Dr. Anand is the founder/partner of the Ambulatory Endoscopic Surgery Center of Bucks County and the founder/medical director of Ezdispensing LLC and Integrity Dispensing LLC.
3. “How biased medical experts are destroying doctors’ lives and careers in the opioid crisis” (Untitled 3.pdf):
- Main Theme: Criticism of the use of biased medical experts, particularly Dr. Timothy King, in the prosecution of doctors for opioid prescribing practices.
- Key Ideas/Facts: Allegation of Biased Experts: The article argues that many “medical experts” hired in court or Medical Board proceedings are “simply ‘hired guns’ – clinical predators hired for large sums of money to tell stories whose details they do not understand.”
- Lack of Understanding by Judges and Juries: The author asserts that judges, juries, and media reporters often lack the medical and scientific literacy to properly assess the credibility of expert witnesses or the weaknesses of medical literature.
- Flaws in Scientific Peer Review: The article highlights the “replication crisis” and failures in the peer review process in medical literature, suggesting that even published studies can be biased or wrong.
- Targeting of Pain Management Doctors: The author contends that U.S. physicians treating pain with opioids have been unfairly targeted by drug enforcement agencies and medical boards, even for legitimate prescribing practices.
- Focus on Dr. Timothy King (“RAT KING”): The article dedicates significant attention to Dr. Timothy King, labeling him the “RAT KING” and accusing him of providing “false expert testimony” and biased opinions that have led to the “unjust incarceration and devastation of countless innocent healthcare professionals.”Alleged Lies and Malicious Targeting: The article claims Dr. King is a “serial liar” who has “maliciously targeted healthcare professionals.”
- Conflict of Interest: A key accusation is that Dr. King has a “patented system for assessing opioid prescription writing,” creating a “perverse incentive” to find more providers in violation, thus increasing his opportunities for government contracts and consulting work. The article states, “Dr. King’s patented system, used to determine whether healthcare providers violated controlled substances laws, allegedly creates a conflict of interest.”
- Subjectivity of Pain: The article emphasizes that “pain is subjective,” questioning Dr. King’s insistence on “objective evidence” of functional improvement for legitimate opioid prescriptions.
- Misrepresentation of Studies and MME: Dr. King is accused of “misrepresenting the evidence presented in those studies” he cites and relying on “morphine milligram equivalents (MME)” as a standard, which the article argues “lack scientific rigor.” The article quotes that the “90 MME maximum daily dose is a recommendation and is not to be used by law enforcement to attack physicians who prescribe more than that as it is based on a patient’s individual needs.”
- Connection to “Neo-Eugenics”: The article alludes to a perspective that the DOJ’s approach, influenced by figures like Dr. King, has adopted a form of “Neo-Eugenics.”
- Impact on Healthcare Professionals and Patients: The article details severe consequences for doctors, including “unjust incarceration, loss of medical licenses, financial devastation,” and “patient abandonment,” potentially leading to increased suffering and suicide. Quotes include: “Robert Curtis: ‘King belongs in prison for the rest of his life…For the pain and suffering plus all the convictions based on King’s lies in testimony should have him serving a life sentence…’” and “Tanner Ayoob: ‘One of the most evil men in America…He has caused patient abandonments and multiple deaths. Timothy E. King, MD.’”
- Accusation of Racketeering: The article alleges a “complex web of corruption involving for-profit healthcare insurance corporations and unscrupulous physicians who provide false expert testimony” to enhance corporate profits. It claims, “Timothy King…has been implicated as a key figure in the insidious plot to manipulate the administration of pain management and opiate prescription practices.”
- Critique of Qlarant Data Analytics: The article criticizes Qlarant, a company using data analytics to identify healthcare fraud, for having “no scientific origins in their analysis” and relying on potentially flawed PDMP data and arbitrary MME limits.
- Call for Accountability: The article calls for “transparency and accountability in using expert witnesses in opioid litigation” and the “removal of Dr. Timothy King, MD.”
- Focus on Dr. Richard A. Lawhern’s Perspective: The article frequently references and seems to be authored by Richard A. Lawhern, PhD, who identifies as a patient advocate and offers questions for medical experts and answers challenging common assumptions about opioid prescribing. He argues that “presently no consensus standard by which a doctor’s prescribing practices can be determined to lie outside usual and accepted conditions of practice.” He concludes that “Government overreach has grossly criminalized the practice of medicine in the U.S.” and calls for cases against clinicians to be dismissed unless patient harm due to dangerous behavior is verified.
