NORMAN J CLEMENT RPH., DDS, NORMAN L. CLEMENT PHARM-TECH, MALACHI F. MACKANDAL PHARMD, BELINDA BROWN-PARKER, IN THE SPIRIT OF JOSEPH SOLVO ESQ., INC.T. SPIRIT OF REV. IN THE SPIRIT OF WALTER R. CLEMENT BS., MS, MBA. HARVEY JENKINS MD, PH.D., IN THE SPIRIT OF C.T. VIVIAN, JELANI ZIMBABWE CLEMENT, BS., MBA., IN THE SPIRIT OF THE HON. PATRICE LUMUMBA, IN THE SPIRIT OF ERLIN CLEMENT SR., EVELYN J. CLEMENT, WALTER F. WRENN III., MD., JULIE KILLINGSWORTH, RENEE BLARE, RPH, DR. TERENCE SASAKI, MD LESLY POMPY MD., CHRISTOPHER RUSSO, MD., NANCY SEEFELDT, WILLIE GUINYARD BS., JOSEPH WEBSTER MD., MBA, BEVERLY C. PRINCE MD., FACS., NEIL ARNAND, MD., RICHARD KAUL, MD., IN THE SPIRIT OF LEROY BAYLOR, JAY K. JOSHI MD., MBA, AISHA GARDNER, ADRIENNE EDMUNDSON, ESTER HYATT PH.D., WALTER L. SMITH BS., IN THE SPIRIT OF BRAHM FISHER ESQ., MICHELE ALEXANDER MD., CUDJOE WILDING BS, MARTIN NJOKU, BS., RPH., IN THE SPIRIT OF DEBRA LYNN SHEPHERD, BERES E. MUSCHETT, STRATEGIC ADVISORS
“..Dismantling DEA Fraud Atty. Coley O. Reynolds Cross Examines Dr. Timothy E. King, MD..”
Overall, the document paints a concerning picture of the increasing use of AI in law enforcement and the unintended consequences of government policies aimed at addressing the opioid crisis.
In 2016, the CDC issued its Guidelines for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain Patients.
In publishing the guidelines, the CDC explicitly stated that they were meant to be voluntary and “not prescriptive,” saying that healthcare practitioners knew their patients’ unique clinical situation and should weigh the potential risks and benefits when prescribing opioids.
- AI (alg) = AS:* This formula, referred to as the Anand-Clement Rule, highlights that Artificial Intelligence using a biased algorithm (alg*) generates Artificial Stupidity (AS). This concept underlines the importance of using unbiased data in AI systems, especially in law enforcement, where wrong assessments can have severe consequences.
- Misuse of PDMPs: Prescription drug monitoring programs (PDMPs), originally intended to monitor controlled substance prescriptions, are used by law enforcement to identify and prosecute healthcare practitioners suspected of “overprescribing.” This has created a chilling effect on legitimate pain management practices.
- Flawed CDC Guidelines: The CDC’s 2016 guidelines for opioid prescribing, while intended to be voluntary, have been adopted as rigid rules by many states. These guidelines have been criticized for their lack of scientific basis, particularly the use of MMEs as a measure of opioid potency.
- Impact on Pain Patients: The crackdown on so-called opioid prescribing is further ill-defined and has resulted in the mistreatment by pharmacists engaged in “academic authoritative power tripping,” thus undertreatment of chronic pain patients, leading to a rise in “pain refugees” struggling to find adequate care. This has pushed some patients towards dangerous alternatives like the black market or suicide.
- The Eliminating Bias in Algorithmic Systems Act of 2024: This legislation seeks to address the risks of algorithmic bias by requiring federal agencies to establish civil rights offices specifically tasked with identifying and mitigating such bias in AI systems.
- Alg = unbiased algorithm, AI= Artificial Intelligence, alg*= bias or defective algorithm THUS AI(alg*) = AS The AC Rule: this supports the saying garbage in anywhere can only generate garbage out or garbage in is garbage out and exposes the limitation draw upon conclusion using bias algorithms
CONGRESSWOMAN SUMMER LEE:
A trailblazer in Pennsylvania politics and a rising voice in the U.S. Congress is making history again. Lee, the first Black woman from Pennsylvania elected to the U.S. House of Representatives, introduced the Eliminating Bias in Algorithmic Systems Act of 2024 (H.R. 10092).
This bold legislation seeks to tackle the systemic inequities perpetuated by artificial intelligence (AI) and algorithmic decision-making, particularly in healthcare and other critical sectors.
SENATOR ED MARKEY (D) MASS.
Introduced the “Artificial Intelligence (AI) Civil Rights Act” (S.5152) in the U.S. Senate on September 24, 2024.
The legislation would put strict guardrails on companies’ use of algorithms, ensure algorithms are tested before and after deployment, help eliminate and prevent bias, and ensure accuracy and fairness in complex algorithms.
THE AC RULE
- “The Anand-Clement Rule or The AC Rule simply states Artificial Intelligence AI using an unbiased Algorithm alg generates Artificial Intelligence; however, Artificial Intelligence using a defective or biased alg* generates Artificial Stupidity or AS.”
- “Thus providing the Federal and local law enforcement use these PDMPs to screen for health care practitioners suspected of ‘overprescribing’ or operating so-called ‘pill mills.'”
- “MME dosing was designed in an attempt to examine opioids with similar analgesic effects and should not be used to determine an exact mathematical dosing conversion.”
- “These interventions have cast a chilling effect on the prescribing practices of healthcare providers.”
- “The Eliminating Bias in Algorithmic Systems Act of 2024, introduced by Rep. Summer Lee (D-PA) and Sen. Markey (D-MA), is designed to bring much-needed oversight to AI systems used by federal agencies.
TURNING KING’S FORENSIC SYSTEM METHOD OF DETECTING FRAUD, ABUSE, AND OPIOID DIVERSION INTO INTELLECTUAL RUBBLE
Enter Coley O. Reynolds, a Philadelphia criminal defense attorney with over 24 years of experience. His prosecutorial past sharpened his instincts for the fight.
Fast-forward to Philadelphia, where Coley O. Reynolds faced Dr. Timothy King. With the same precision Darrow wielded, Reynolds attacked King’s forensic system. “Dr. King,” he began, his voice steady, “Have you ever made a charting mistake?”
Like Darrow, who volunteered to defend John Scopes against Tennessee’s anti-evolution law, Reynolds stepped into this fray to unmask Dr. King’s pseudoscience and save a doctor from a system rigged for conviction.
This gem, used to dissect 14 medical charts in United States v. Anand, netted him a cool $95,000 plus $12,000 for two days of testimony. Nothing screams integrity like a government paycheck for playing judge, jury, and executioner.
It calls for a more nuanced and human-centered approach to both issues, emphasizing the need for unbiased data, ethical considerations, and the recognition of the complex realities of chronic pain management.
While legit researchers toil over randomized controlled trials, Dr. King’s here with his homemade hieroglyphs, turning patient care into a prosecutorial piñata. Reynolds, though, wasn’t there to applaud the circus, so he brought a scalpel.
This wasn’t just a cross-examination but a masterclass in dismantling a fraud. Dr. King, who’s turned his untested patent wonder into a cottage industry of conviction, sat there as Reynolds laid bare the absurdity: a charlatan paid more for two days’ bloviating than most doctors earn in a month, all to ruin lives with an untested artificial intelligence criminal mens rea methodology that wouldn’t pass a high school science fair.
OR SEND
TO CASH APP:$docnorm
ZELLE 3135103378
ALL WATCHED OVER BY MACHINES OF LOVING GRACE
BE SURE TO DONATE TO THE MARK IBSEN GOFUNDME DEFENSE FUND, WHERE THE SON ALWAYS RISES!!!
FOR NOW, YOU ARE WITHIN
THE NORMS
