from doctorsofcourage.org represented in youarewithinthenorms.com
NORMAN J CLEMENT RPH., DDS, NORMAN L. CLEMENT PHARM-TECH, MALACHI F. MACKANDAL PHARMD, BELINDA BROWN-PARKER, IN THE SPIRIT OF JOSEPH SOLVO ESQ., INC.T. SPIRIT OF REV. IN THE SPIRIT OF WALTER R. CLEMENT BS., MS, MBA. HARVEY JENKINS MD, PH.D., IN THE SPIRIT OF C.T. VIVIAN, JELANI ZIMBABWE CLEMENT, BS., MBA., IN THE SPIRIT OF THE HON. PATRICE LUMUMBA, IN THE SPIRIT OF ERLIN CLEMENT SR., EVELYN J. CLEMENT, WALTER F. WRENN III., MD., JULIE KILLINGSWORTH, RENEE BLARE, RPH, DR. TERENCE SASAKI, MD LESLY POMPY MD., CHRISTOPHER RUSSO, MD., NANCY SEEFELDT, WILLIE GUINYARD BS., JOSEPH WEBSTER MD., MBA, BEVERLY C. PRINCE MD., FACS., NEIL ARNAND, MD., RICHARD KAUL, MD., IN THE SPIRIT OF LEROY BAYLOR, JAY K. JOSHI MD., MBA, AISHA GARDNER, ADRIENNE EDMUNDSON, IN THE SPIRIT OF FELXI BRIZUELA, D.O., ESTER HYATT PH.D., WALTER L. SMITH BS., IN THE SPIRIT OF BRAHM FISHER ESQ., MICHELE ALEXANDER MD., CUDJOE WILDING BS, MARTIN NJOKU, BS., RPH., IN THE SPIRIT OF DEBRA LYNN SHEPHERD, BERES E. MUSCHETT, STRATEGIC ADVISORS
“..Doctors are terrified of losing their licenses or facing prison time for doing what should be simple medical procedures..”
ALL WATCHED OVER BY DRONES (MACHINES) OF LOVING GRACE
Imagine a futuristic dystopia where women, especially those with the audacity to get pregnant, are monitored by continuous surveillance drones powered by artificial intelligence and armed with vague legislation.
Sound far-fetched? Well, we might be closer than we think. Justice Louis Brandeis, the progressive luminary who argued for “the right to be let alone,” must be rolling in his grave. You see, Judge Brandeis was a bit of a paradox.
On the one hand, he was the defender of privacy and an advocate for individual rights against the combination of economic and political power, which he called a surefire recipe for tyranny.
Brandeis Supported the decision, which was a significant victory for eugenicists.
But on the other hand, he didn’t seem to mind when that tyranny came in the form of state-sponsored control over women’s bodies. Yes, the same Brandeis who championed privacy also signed off on Buck v. Bell, the landmark case that said, “Hey, sterilizing women against their will? Totally fine. It’s for the greater good.”
Remember that gem of a ruling? The state of Virginia’s attempt to create a more “perfect” society by forcibly sterilizing a young woman?
Brandeis was totally on board. After all, if the government doesn’t have the power to decide who should be allowed to reproduce, what kind of dystopian paradise are we even living in?
Fast forward to today, and we’ve come full circle. Women, once again, find themselves at the mercy of government regulation, with doctors terrified of losing their licenses or facing prison time for doing what should be simple medical procedures.
But this time, it’s not eugenics (at least not explicitly) that’s driving state power; it’s the ever-so-vague pro-life legislation that leaves OB-GYNs second-guessing their every move. One slip-up, and they’re out of a job, their career sterilized, if you will.
As Dr. Mark Graves, a veteran OB-GYN, put it in an online comment, “What on earth makes you think people haven’t already been meeting with their legislators and trying to change laws? We have, and women are still dying!”
But hey, it’s 2024, and who needs medical expertise when you’ve got legislators armed with dogma and a total lack of healthcare training? Maybe instead of reforming healthcare, we should just let the AI drones handle it. And what better way to streamline this brave new world than with AI drones that track every pregnant woman’s uterus?
Imagine the efficiency! There is no need for pesky doctors who might hesitate when faced with poorly written laws. Just let the drones decide when a fetus becomes more important than the woman carrying it. After all, as Tiboer Mandely pointed out, “Doctors are forced to wait until a life-or-death moment.”
But with the power of AI drones, why wait? Every pregnant woman can be fitted with a handy surveillance bracelet, like a Fitbit, but for fetal development! Big Brother isn’t watching, but Congress might have given birth to it. Welcome to the future (sarcasm on)!
The Handmaid’s Tale,
This isn’t even a far leap from Brandeis’s utopian vision of state power “meeting modern conditions by regulation.” Muller v. Oregon, anyone?
Remember when the Supreme Court argued that the government has a special interest in controlling how women use their bodies because, get this, those bodies might give birth to future generations?
Women are a form of collective property. You can’t make this stuff up. When she wrote The Handmaid’s Tale, Margaret Atwood sure didn’t, though.
She took a look at history and projected it onto a grim future where women’s reproductive rights are obliterated in the name of artificial intelligence government control.
As JoEllen Wynne, another healthcare veteran, aptly commented, “I am disgusted to be a United States citizen and horrified to be a native Texan.” Join the club, JoEllen. Doctors aren’t just quitting OB-GYN practice; they’re running for the hills, choosing specialties where they don’t have to consult a lawyer every time they need to save a patient’s life. And speaking of lawyers, let’s not forget the hospital administrators who now call the shots literally.
“Women in fact were not treated because hospital lawyers told MDs not to act until women were sicker,” noted Susanna Levin, NP. Nothing says we care about your health like waiting for sepsis before intervening. It’s not a dystopia; it’s artificial intelligence healthcare, American style.
So here we are, one legal decision away from a future where women are reduced to walking incubators under constant AI drone surveillance by the United States. Forget privacy, forget autonomy just thank your lucky stars that AI hasn’t figured out how to handcuff you to the hospital bed yet.
With his contradictory legacy of both privacy advocacy and pro-eugenics decisions, Judge Brandeis might have been onto something: the ultimate dystopia doesn’t happen all at once.
It creeps in, one Government action at a time. Welcome to the Republic of Gilead, brought to you by the U.S. Government.
Now featuring AI drones and 24/7 pregnancy monitoring, because nothing says freedom like AI government control of your uterus. The ongoing debate over abortion rights in the U.S. has extended far beyond political corridors, shaking the foundations of government-controlled artificial intelligence healthcare itself.
OR SEND
TO CASH APP:$docnorm
ZELLE 3135103378
ALL WATCHED OVER BY MACHINES OF LOVING GRACE
BE SURE TO DONATE TO THE MARK IBSEN GOFUNDME DEFENSE FUND, WHERE THE SON ALWAYS RISES!!!
PROCEED TO THE BIRD WATCH: SERIES-2 OF TYRANNY OF THE WOMB
YOU ARE WITHIN THE NORMS
For DECADES, I have been telling women who are faced with draconian legislation like this, to simply stop agreeing to sex until the men come to their senses and enact bodily autonomy. So far, none have taken up this method of protest