NORMAN J CLEMENT RPH., DDS, NORMAN L. CLEMENT PHARM-TECH, MALACHI F. MACKANDAL PHARMD, BELINDA BROWN-PARKER, IN THE SPIRIT OF JOSEPH SOLVO ESQ., INC.T. SPIRIT OF REV. IN THE SPIRIT OF WALTER R. CLEMENT BS., MS, MBA. HARVEY JENKINS MD, PH.D., IN THE SPIRIT OF C.T. VIVIAN, JELANI ZIMBABWE CLEMENT, BS., MBA., IN THE SPIRIT OF THE HON. PATRICE LUMUMBA, IN THE SPIRIT OF ERLIN CLEMENT SR., WALTER F. WRENN III., MD., JULIE KILLINGSWORTH, RENEE BLARE, RPH, DR. TERENCE SASAKI, MD LESLY POMPY MD., CHRISTOPHER RUSSO, MD., NANCY SEEFELDT, WILLIE GUINYARD BS., JOSEPH WEBSTER MD., MBA, BEVERLY C. PRINCE MD., FACS., NEIL ARNAND, MD., RICHARD KAUL, MD., LEROY BAYLOR, JAY K. JOSHI MD., MBA, ADRIENNE EDMUNDSON, ESTER HYATT PH.D., WALTER L. SMITH BS., IN THE SPIRIT OF BRAHM FISHER ESQ., MICHELE ALEXANDER MD., CUDJOE WILDING BS, MARTIN NJOKU, BS., RPH., IN THE SPIRIT OF DEBRA LYNN SHEPHERD, BERES E. MUSCHETT, STRATEGIC ADVISORS
January 24, 2024:
Dear Attorney General Garland: “…We write to urge you to halt all Department of Justice (DOJ) grants for predictive policing systems until the DOJ can ensure that grant recipients will not use such systems in ways that have a discriminatory impact...”
Anand vs. United States SEEKS TO END DISCRIMINATION; TARGETING AND DESTRUCTION OF VETERANS HEALTHCARE
The Neil Anand v. United States provided a set of facts presenting a complex scenario involving multiple legal and ethical issues, necessitating a detailed analysis.
- Fundamental Rights and Title VI Violations: The United States Government is accused of violating fundamental rights and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by implementing a discriminatory classification scheme targeting non-white physicians. This violates the Equal Protection Clause and Title VI’s prohibition against discrimination based on race in federally funded programs.
- Predictive Policing Concerns: Senators have raised concerns about biased predictive policing, fueled by federal funding, and its adverse impact on Americans of color. They urge the Attorney General to halt grants for predictive policing systems until issues of bias and discriminatory impact are addressed. The United States Government’s involvement in predictive policing exacerbates racial disparities in law enforcement, leading to unjustified stops and arrests in minority neighborhoods. And especially our Veterans.
- Joint Enterprise with Private Entities: The United States Government’s collaboration with private entities, including Blue Cross Blue Shield and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Government, raises questions about the misuse of government functions for private gain. The joint enterprise’s selective prosecution and implementation of predictive policing for profit violate civil rights and undermine public trust in law enforcement.
- Healthcare Fraud Prevention Partnership (HFPP) and Discriminatory Practices: HFPP’s discriminatory classification system unfairly targets black, brown, and Asian physicians, resulting in a disproportionate impact on non-white practitioners. This violates both the Equal Protection Clause and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act.
- Need for Judicial Review: Judicial review is essential to address the United States Government’s unlawful actions and ensure compliance with civil rights legislation. It can lead to reforms in predictive policing, healthcare practices, and government partnerships to prevent discrimination and uphold fundamental rights.
- Data Analytics and Impermissible Evidence: The use of artificial intelligence in data analytics, while purportedly aimed at reducing drug overdose rates, fails to establish a causal relationship between prescription rates and mortality. This flawed evidence contributes to unjust outcomes and underscores the need for transparency and accountability in healthcare practices.
In Neil Anand v. United States, judicial review is imperative because the United States Government allegedly violated fundamental rights and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, prohibiting discrimination based on race in federal financial assistance programs.
On April 15, 2021, many of us demanded that DOJ stop making grants to local, state, and tribal law enforcement agencies for purchasing predictive policing systems…”
The United States Government, in collaboration with the HFPP partnership, has developed an artificial intelligence program that intentionally misclassifies non-white, elderly, or affluent physicians engaged in treating addiction or chronic pain as drug dealers.
This discriminatory behavior has prompted Senators to caution against biased predictive policing, emphasizing the need to establish evidence standards to prevent discriminatory impacts on Americans of color and Veterans Care.
IT IS VERY EASY FOR LAW ENFORCEMRNT TO STEAL YOUR PROPERTY AND GET AWAY WITH IT: CLICK LINK HERE
SENATOR RON WYDEN et al.,: LETTER TO DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE REGARDING FUNDING AND OVERSIGHT OF PREDICTIVE POLICING APRIL 15, 2021
DOJ TARGETING PROVIDERS ESPECIALLY THOSE OF COLOR
Despite these warnings, the United States Government, in conjunction with private entities and the Pennsylvania government, has formed a joint enterprise that violates civil rights through selective prosecution and the implementation of discriminatory predictive policing.
Moreover, the United States Government’s classification system targets black, brown, and Asian physicians, resulting in a disproportionate impact on non-white practitioners. Such actions violate the Equal Protection Clause and contravene Title VI of the Civil Rights Act.
SENATOR RON WYDEN et al.,: LETTER TO DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE TO END FUNDING OF PREDICTIVE POLICING JANUARY 24, 2024
The data analytics produced by artificial intelligence are deemed impermissible evidence as they fail to establish a causal relationship between prescription rates and overdose death rates among different racial groups.
This failure to accurately assess healthcare data leads to detrimental outcomes, such as disproportionate mortality rates among minorities.
Given these egregious violations and their potential consequences, judicial review is necessary to rectify the situation. It can change how Pennsylvania physicians treat patients in need of chronic pain management or substance use disorder treatment and affect the outcomes of criminal proceedings against physicians facing allegations of improper prescribing.
OR SEND
TO CASH APP:$docnorm
ZELLE 3135103378
So, Donate to the “Pharmacist For Healthcare Legal Defense Fund,
THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE IS CLUELESS ABOUT NUMBERS OF FICTITIOUS POLICING PROGRAMS
DOJ FUNDING OF $BILLION$ OF DOLLAR$ ON QUESTIONABLE, WORTHLE$$ BIA$ DATA
SUMMARY
In summary, judicial review is crucial to addressing the United States Government’s unlawful actions, ensuring equitable treatment in healthcare and law enforcement, and upholding the principles of civil rights legislation.
The presented facts highlight systemic discrimination, bias, and misuse of government resources. Judicial review is crucial to address these violations, protect fundamental rights, and promote equitable access to healthcare and justice. The United States Government’s actions undermine public trust and contribute to the depopulation of marginalized communities, warranting immediate intervention and corrective measures.
FOR NOW, YOU ARE WITHIN
THE NORMS
REFERENCE:
IT’S ALL ABOUT RACE AND ASSETS
