youarewithinthenorms.com
NORMAN J CLEMENT RPH., DDS, NORMAN L. CLEMENT PHARM-TECH, MALACHI F. MACKANDAL PHARMD, BELINDA BROWN-PARKER, IN THE SPIRIT OF JOSEPH SOLVO ESQ., INC., SPIRIT OF REV. IN THE SPIRIT OF WALTER R. CLEMENT BS., MS, MBA. HARVEY JENKINS, MD, PH.D., IN THE SPIRIT OF C.T. VIVIAN, JELANI ZIMBABWE CLEMENT, BS., M.B.A., IN THE SPIRIT OF THE HON. PATRICE LUMUMBA, IN THE SPIRIT OF ERLIN CLEMENT SR., EVELYN J. CLEMENT, IN THE SPIRIT OF WALTER F. WRENN III., MD., JULIE KILLINGSWORTH, RENEE BLARE, RPH, DR. TERENCE SASAKI, MD LESLY POMPY MD., CHRISTOPHER RUSSO, MD., NANCY SEEFELDT, IN THE SPIRIT OF WILLIE GUINYARD BS., JOSEPH WEBSTER MD., MBA, BEVERLY C. PRINCE MD., FACS., NEIL ARNAND, MD., RICHARD KAUL, MD., IN THE SPIRIT OF LEROY BAYLOR, JAY K. JOSHI MD., MBA, AISHA GARDNER, ADRIENNE EDMUNDSON, ESTER HYATT PH.D., WALTER L. SMITH BS., IN THE SPIRIT OF BRAHM FISHER ESQ., MICHELE ALEXANDER MD., CUDJOE WILDING BS, MARTIN NJOKU, BS., RPH., IN THE SPIRIT OF DEBRA LYNN SHEPHERD, BERES E. MUSCHETT, STRATEGIC ADVISORS


Angela Greene examines the systemic targeting of minority healthcare providers and the legal erosion of clinical independence in medicine.
Angela Greene examines the systemic targeting of minority healthcare providers and the legal erosion of clinical independence in medicine. Greene highlights how federal investigators use minor administrative errors to criminalize Black doctors, effectively stripping them of their livelihoods and harming the communities they serve.

The Fifth Amendment takingS clauses
This phenomenon is framed as a violation of the Fifth Amendment, with legal arguments suggesting that government interference in medical judgment constitutes an unconstitutional seizure of professional property. Furthermore, the texts reveal a stark racial disparity in pain management, in which patients of color are frequently denied necessary medication due to institutional bias. The materials advocate for restoring scientific integrity and protecting the doctor-patient relationship from aggressive federal overreach.

ANAND’S MOTION FOR APPEAL

The targeting of medical professionals, as described in the sources, reflects a systematic shift from administrative oversight to aggressive criminal prosecution, often specifically affecting Black doctors and other practitioners of color. This phenomenon is described by one former Assistant U.S. prosecutor, David Zarendow, whom journalist Barbara Reynolds interviewed some 35 years prior, (in the 1990’s) as a form of “legalized extortion,” in which the government uses regulatory frameworks to “hunt” and “shake down” doctors who treat vulnerable populations, such as poor and elderly Medicaid recipients.

THE PRICE FOR TREATING THE POOR AND THE ELDERLY MEDICAID RECIPIENTS
Mechanisms of Targeting
The sources detail several specific methods used to target and remove medical professionals from practice:
- Criminalization of Clerical Errors: Medicaid Fraud Investigators have reportedly elevated simple clerical errorsand “regulatory violations” to the level of criminal theft to justify indicting and imprisoning doctors.
- Technological “Cherry Picking”: Modern investigations utilize artificial intelligence, predictive policing, and surveillance tools to scan medical records and “cherry pick” data to entrap unsuspecting practitioners.
- Sham Peer Reviews: Elite, highly trained specialists are sometimes targeted through “Sham Peer Reviews,”which aim to remove them from practice by reporting them to the National Practitioner’s Data Bank.
- “Hired-Gun” Experts: The state often seizes a physician’s decision-making authority and transfers it to private contractors or “hired-gun” experts who benefit financially and professionally from the resulting prosecution.

The Three Pillars of Prosecutorial Overreach
This targeting is supported by a “corrosive transformation” in healthcare oversight, defined by three primary pillars:
- Criminalization of Clinical Subjectivity: This transforms independent medical judgment into a fraudulent act, effectively “taking” a physician’s professional autonomy.
- Erasure of the Civil-Criminal Distinction: The boundary between administrative errors (typically handled via civil “clawbacks”) and crimes is collapsed to bypass the “preponderance of evidence” standard required in civil cases.
- Bypass of Professional Governance: Investigators often ignore the authority of the American Medical Association (AMA) and the CPT Editorial Panel, choosing instead to redefine medical nomenclature as a criminal enterprise.

Legal and Constitutional Violations
The sources argue that these actions often violate both statutory and constitutional protections:
- Statutory Violations: Under 42 U.S.C. § 1395, federal officers are explicitly prohibited from exercising supervision or control over the practice of medicine or the compensation of health services. To bypass this, the executive branch may use an “Emergency Loophole,” declaring Public Health Emergencies to grant themselves unauthorized powers over clinical practice.
- Regulatory Takings: From a constitutional perspective, this targeting is viewed as a “regulatory occupation” of a physician’s “intangible workspace.” By dictating how a professional utilizes their expertise—such as their license or CPT codes—the state is seen as seizing the “utility” of the professional interest without just compensation, violating the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment.


Impact on Doctors and Patients
The consequences of this targeting extend beyond the destruction of medical careers and include significant human suffering:
- Destruction of Minority Healthcare: The targeting of Black doctors creates an imminent risk to the health of the Black community, which loses providers who look like them and understand their needs.
- Patient Harm: Restrictive guidelines and the criminalization of clinical work have been linked to patient suicides, such as the case of Dr. Charles Syzman. Other uncounted metrics include patients losing basic functionality, economic displacement due to lost therapeutic access, and medical complications like strokes caused by forced medication tapers.

A federal jury acquitted Dr. Lesly Pompy of extremely questionable government evidence at trial of unlawful prescribing, healthcare fraud, 38 counts of distribution of controlled substances, in exchange for cash, wrote medically unnecessary prescriptions for large quantities of controlled drug medications such as Adderall, fentanyl, hydrocodone, methadone, oxycodone, and oxymorphone, and maintained a drug-involved premises after a month-long trial. Dr. Pompy was represented by Ronald Chapman II of the Chapman Law Group and founder of Chapman Consulting Group. He was also represented by George Donnini and Joe Richotte of Butzel Long.


🔓 🔓 🔓
ALL WATCHED OVER BY MACHINES OF LOVING GRACE


OUR TREE OF KNOWLEDGE SHALL NEVER BE SUPPRESSED


FOR NOW
YOU ARE WITHIN
THE NORMS
references:
DR SANJEEV KUMAR, MD
