THE BISON DEFENSE BRINGS THE SECOND COMING OF IBSEN, MD vs. THE BUREAUCRATIC INCOMPETENCE OF THE MONTANA BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS CONTROLED STATE AG’S SEEKING* HIGHER “POLITICALDOM” WHILE FAILING PUBLIC HEALTH

Illustration of CYP450, depicting a DNA helix and silhouettes of diverse individuals alongside test tubes, symbolizing genetic variation in drug metabolism.
The document details Dr. Ibsen’s own professional and personal price paid for defending his clinical decisions, including a lengthy, contentious battle with the Montana Board of Medical Examiners that he characterizes as a procedural railroad. This article further serves to defend the good faith basis of medical practice against a criminalized atmosphere that confuses legitimate physical dependence with addiction and ignores the genetic variations that necessitate individualized dosing.  Cover of 'Doctor Bison's Fables' by Mark Ibsen, featuring an anthropomorphic bison in a lab coat and two otters in a medical office setting, with the subtitle 'An Allegory of the American Pain Refugee Crisis'.
THE BISON DEFENCE (BRIT)

you are within the norms

NORMAN J CLEMENT RPH., DDS, NORMAN L. CLEMENT PHARM-TECH, MALACHI F. MACKANDAL PHARMD, BELINDA BROWN-PARKER, IN THE SPIRIT OF JOSEPH SOLVO ESQ., INC., SPIRIT OF REV. IN THE SPIRIT OF WALTER R. CLEMENT BS., MS, MBA. HARVEY JENKINS, MD, PH.D., IN THE SPIRIT OF C.T. VIVIAN, JELANI ZIMBABWE CLEMENT, BS., M.B.A., IN THE SPIRIT OF THE HON. PATRICE LUMUMBA, IN THE SPIRIT OF ERLIN CLEMENT SR., EVELYN J. CLEMENT, IN THE SPIRIT OF WALTER F. WRENN III., MD., JULIE KILLINGSWORTH, RENEE BLARE, RPH, DR. TERENCE SASAKI, MD LESLY POMPY MD., CHRISTOPHER RUSSO, MD., NANCY SEEFELDT, WILLIE GUINYARD BS., JOSEPH WEBSTER MD., MBA, BEVERLY C. PRINCE MD., FACS., NEIL ARNAND, MD., IN THE SPIRIT OF RICHARD KAUL, MD., IN THE SPIRIT OF LEROY BAYLOR, JAY K. JOSHI MD., MBA, AISHA GARDNER, ADRIENNE EDMUNDSON, ESTER HYATT PH.D., WALTER L. SMITH BS., IN THE SPIRIT OF BRAHM FISHER ESQ., MICHELE ALEXANDER MD., CUDJOE WILDING BS, MARTIN NJOKU, BS., RPH., IN THE SPIRIT OF DEBRA LYNN SHEPHERD, BERES E. MUSCHETT, STRATEGIC ADVISORS

ALLEGORY OF THE AMERICAN PAIN REFUGEE

In this legal affidavit, Dr. Mark S. Ibsen provides a harrowing account of the regulatory hostility facing physicians who treat chronic pain, arguing that government overreach has turned both doctors and patients into opiate refugees. He asserts that medical boards and law enforcement agencies have replaced scientific understanding with a reckless ignorance of pain management, leading to the systematic undertreatment of suffering individuals and an increase in patient suicides.

The document details Dr. Ibsen’s own professional and personal price paid for defending his clinical decisions, including a lengthy, contentious battle with the Montana Board of Medical Examiners that he characterizes as a procedural railroad. This article further serves to defend the good faith basis of medical practice against a criminalized atmosphere that confuses legitimate physical dependence with addiction and ignores the genetic variations that necessitate individualized dosing. A close-up image of a legal affidavit document with bullet points discussing issues related to pain management, patient despair, and the implications of regulatory actions on medical practices.

The document details Dr. Ibsen’s own professional and personal price paid for defending his clinical decisions, including a lengthy, contentious battle with the Montana Board of Medical Examiners that he characterizes as a procedural railroad. This article further serves to defend the good faith basis of medical practice against a criminalized atmosphere that confuses legitimate physical dependence with addiction and ignores the genetic variations that necessitate individualized dosing.

A graphic depicting two hands, one hand cuffed, with a quote about the consequences for physicians deviating from bureaucratic standards in treatment decisions.

Prescribing Pain Relief Is Now ‘Criminal

The Ignored Science: Your Genes Can Determine Your Need for Pain Medicine

The current regulatory environment often treats pain medication dosages with a one-size-fits-all approach, but established science directly contradicts this. Dr. Ibsen points to Cytochrome P450 (CYP450) tests, which analyze how an individual’s unique genetic makeup influences how they process, or metabolize, drugs. This genetic science, established over 20 years ago, demonstrates that different people require vastly different doses to achieve the same effect.

The document details Dr. Ibsen’s own professional and personal price paid for defending his clinical decisions, including a lengthy, contentious battle with the Montana Board of Medical Examiners that he characterizes as a procedural railroad. This article further serves to defend the good faith basis of medical practice against a criminalized atmosphere that confuses legitimate physical dependence with addiction and ignores the genetic variations that necessitate individualized dosing.. Illustration representing CYP450 genetic processing, featuring a silhouette of a person, a DNA strand, and figures of diverse individuals beside test tubes, symbolizing individualized pain management.
This genetic science, established over 20 years ago, demonstrates that different people require vastly different doses to achieve the same effect.

Despite this scientific certainty, medical boards and law enforcement often ignore it. Dr. Ibsen highlights the statistical reality of human variation: there is a 100% chance that 5% of the population will fall two standard deviations from the “average dose.”

This means a significant number of patients will genetically require much higher or lower doses than what guidelines might suggest. This willful disregard for established genetic science means current regulatory guidelines may be systematically forcing physicians to either undermedicate or overmedicate a significant portion of the population. This rejection of basic science creates an impossible situation for doctors, forcing them into a legal minefield.

The document details Dr. Ibsen’s own professional and personal price paid for defending his clinical decisions, including a lengthy, contentious battle with the Montana Board of Medical Examiners that he characterizes as a procedural railroad. This article further serves to defend the good faith basis of medical practice against a criminalized atmosphere that confuses legitimate physical dependence with addiction and ignores the genetic variations that necessitate individualized dosing.. A worried doctor sitting at a desk, looking apprehensive as shadowy figures representing law enforcement agencies loom in the background.

The Doctor’s Dilemma: Prescribing Pain Relief Has Become

“Criminal Russian Roulette”

According to Dr. Ibsen, the legal landscape for physicians who treat pain has become treacherous and unpredictable. Law enforcement and regulatory boards often lack clear standards, creating an “ambiguous changeable law enforcement mist” where a doctor may unknowingly cross a line despite acting in good faith. Consequently, many doctors have ceased treating pain entirely to protect their livelihoods.

The document details Dr. Ibsen’s own professional and personal price paid for defending his clinical decisions, including a lengthy, contentious battle with the Montana Board of Medical Examiners that he characterizes as a procedural railroad. This article further serves to defend the good faith basis of medical practice against a criminalized atmosphere that confuses legitimate physical dependence with addiction and ignores the genetic variations that necessitate individualized dosing.. A hospital scene showing a patient's hand resting on a bed, with text overlay discussing the struggles faced after a coronary artery bypass surgery and the limited pain medication prescribed by a cardiologist.

He describes the act of prescribing necessary medication as “criminal Russian roulette for physicians,” where a doctor’s career, reputation, and freedom are on the line with every prescription. The core of the problem lies in legal ambiguity.

Infographic titled 'A Physician in Peril: The Crisis in Pain Management', highlighting the challenges faced by doctors treating chronic pain and the consequences for patients. Sections outline the hostile environment for pain treatment, critical misunderstandings of addiction versus dependence, and the legal risks physicians encounter.

The Controlled Substances Act requires prosecutors to prove a physician acted “knowingly or intentionally” with “a vicious will” to commit a crime. However, doctors are often prosecuted under a much lower standard that more closely resembles medical malpractice than criminal intent. This confusion creates an environment of intense fear, where medical decisions are driven by legal risk rather than patient well-being. Unsurprisingly, when many physicians refuse to treat pain altogether, leaving patients with nowhere to turn.

This legal paralysis effectively removes a physician’s professional judgment from the equation, replacing patient-centered care with a defensive posture that prioritizes legal self-preservation above all else.

A tense moment in a hospital setting featuring three medical professionals, two looking concerned and focused, while the third looks on, highlighting the challenges of pain management and physician responsibilities. The document details Dr. Ibsen’s own professional and personal price paid for defending his clinical decisions, including a lengthy, contentious battle with the Montana Board of Medical Examiners that he characterizes as a procedural railroad. This article further serves to defend the good faith basis of medical practice against a criminalized atmosphere that confuses legitimate physical dependence with addiction and ignores the genetic variations that necessitate individualized dosing.
“Opiate Refugees”

The Human Cost: America Is Creating a Generation of “Opiate Refugees”

The direct human consequence of this “criminal Russian roulette” is the creation of a desperate and abandoned population Dr. Ibsen calls “opiate refugees.” These individuals, suffering from “relentless mind-numbing pain,” are forced to fend for themselves after being dropped by doctors who are too afraid to treat them. They are refugees in their own country, exiled from the care they desperately need.

The document details Dr. Ibsen’s own professional and personal price paid for defending his clinical decisions, including a lengthy, contentious battle with the Montana Board of Medical Examiners that he characterizes as a procedural railroad. This article further serves to defend the good faith basis of medical practice against a criminalized atmosphere that confuses legitimate physical dependence with addiction and ignores the genetic variations that necessitate individualized dosing. A doctor in a lab coat holding a legal document, looking directly at the camera with a serious expression, set against a softly lit background with window blinds.

The consequences of this abandonment are dire. With no hope for relief, many patients turn to suicide as a “deathly off ramp” to escape their unbearable suffering. They are not addicts seeking a high; they are people in agony seeking an end to pain that the medical system will no longer treat. Dr. Ibsen quotes T. S. Eliot to reflect on this moment of national crisis:

“The awful daring of a moment’s surrender which an age of prudence can never retract, by this, and only this, we have existed.”

Dr. Ibsen uses these words to question whether our nation’s ‘surrender’ to a misguided policy can ever be undone, or if the damage to suffering patients is permanent. The emergence of this refugee class represents a profound failure of health policy, transforming a system of care into an engine of suffering and despair.

⚖️⚖️⚖️

Infographic illustrating the connection between the Zong Massacre of the 18th century and modern algorithmic bias in insurance, policing, and healthcare, highlighting historical injustices and their contemporary echoes.
A smiling man wearing sunglasses and a pink polo shirt, standing outside a building.
Hank Asher. In 1982, Asher smuggled cocaine while living in the Bahamas over a seven-week stint, flying to Colombia and Belize in his plane. Later, he joined F. Lee Bailey and the Drug Enforcement Administration, convincing other Americans in the Bahamas to exit the drug trade.[2] “He was never charged with a crime, but a cloud of negative publicity has hung over his head for years, even prompting his resignation from Seisint’s board [in 2003].”[6]

HANK ASHER AND THE RISE OF ARTIFICIAL STUPIDITY

ARTIFICIAL STUPIDY ZONE MASSACRE PART-3
A man sitting at a desk with multiple computer screens displaying various images and information, including a criminal mugshot, surrounded by office supplies.
Hank Asher, founder of TLO LLC, sits for a photograph at the company’s facility in Boca Raton, Florida, U.S., on Thursday, Aug. 4, 2011. Asher is an active philanthropist, donating both his money and efforts, primarly focusing on working with the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children as well as cancer research. Photographer: Eliot J. Schechter/ Bloomberg via Getty Images

⚖️⚖️⚖️

A dark, stylized close-up of a futuristic robotic figure with glowing red eyes, wearing a helmet and holding a finger to its temple, suggesting contemplation or strategy.
The Digital Caligula of The Ghost Artificial Stupidity

The Anand-Clement Rule and Predictive

This document synthesizes an analysis of the “Anand-Clement Rule of Artificial Stupidity” (The AC Rule), a concept positing that an Artificial Intelligence (AI) system using a flawed algorithm inevitably produces “Artificial Stupidity” (AS). The rule, expressed as AI (alg*) = AS, is examined through the primary case study of Palantir’s AI systems, particularly their application in law enforcement and healthcare fraud detection.

⚖️⚖️⚖️

A smiling individual wearing a tropical shirt with a green leaf necklace, standing in an indoor setting.
Dr. Mark Ibsen MD

BACKGROUND

Extensive Clinical Experience:  My career spans decades and includes practice in a wide variety of demanding clinical settings, providing me with a comprehensive view of patient care in America. I have served as a staff physician in emergency rooms and urgent care clinics across Montana—including in Helena, Great Falls, Butte, and Kalispell—as well as in California, Wyoming, and Utah. My leadership roles have included serving as Medical Director of an Emergency Department and its associated A.L.E.R.T. Helicopter program, and as owner and operator of an urgent care clinic.

A close-up of a legal affidavit document titled 'DR. MARK S. IBSEN' with handwritten annotations next to a pen resting on the page.
A deep-seated commitment

• Commitment to Public Service: My medical practice has always been informed by a deep-seated commitment to serving the poor and underserved, both domestically and internationally. This experience has provided an invaluable perspective on the universal nature of human suffering. My service includes:

◦ Working with Mother Teresa’s Missionaries of Charity in Kolkata, India.

◦ Providing medical care at the Dalai Lama’s hospital in Zanskar, India.

◦ Serving patients in Nepal and Bombay.

◦ Serving patients on multiple Native American reservations, including the Mescalero Apache Reservation.

    ◦ Volunteering in inner-city free clinics and at St. Jude’s Hospital in St. Lucia, West Indies.

An image of Dr. Mark Ibsen, a compassionate physician, interacting with an elderly female patient in a medical setting, emphasizing his dedication to care and humanitarian service.

ALL WATCHED OVER BY MACHINES OF LOVING GRACE

Close-up image of a person's face with short, wavy hair and visible blue eyes.

DONATE THIS HOLY DAY SEASON TO MAINTAINING THIS BLOG. YOU ARE WITHIN THE NORMS FIGHT FOR PAIN CARE JUSTICE TO ZELLE 3135103378

OR TO CASH APP:$docnorm

BE SURE TO DONATE TO THE MARK IBSEN GOFUNDME DEFENSE FUND, WHERE THE SON ALWAYS RISES!!!

Tree of knowledge system - Wikipedia
OUR KNOWLEDGE WILL NEVER BE SUPPRESSED

pain pope and mammals
Pain, Pope and Mammals: Remember, This Holiday Season, Pain has been around since the beginning of time and is nearly ubiquitous across all life-forms. One could be a Dog, a Cat, a horse, a Bear, A Grizzly Bear, a Polar bear, or A Chicago bear. Pain is real. Donate to support You Are Within The Norms

“..one day you will make a difference..”

FOR NOW, YOU ARE WITHIN

YOUAREWITHINTHENORMS.COM, BENJAMIN CLEMENTINE “THE NEMESIS” LONDON, ENGLAND 2015

THE NORMS

REFERENCES:

*THE TENNANT PROTOCOLS

FOR PAIN CARE

THE TENNANT PROTOCOLS FOR PAIN CARE
The implication of the AC Rule suggests that sophisticated AI systems, even those purporting to deliver "oracular precision", fail when their proprietary nature prevents scrutiny of the core methodology (the alg*), leading to outcomes that are fundamentally flawed or "stupid" when applied to complex human matters like justice and intent. .
THE THREAT OF ARTIFICIAL STUPIDITY THE DIGITAL CALIGULA

The Anand-Clement Rule and Predictive Justice Systems

Executive Summary

PART-1

ARTIFICIAL STUPIDITY ANAND-CLEMENT RULE; ALGORITHMIC FATALISM
A digital illustration showing a revolver pointing towards a red curtain, symbolizing tension or conflict.
RED FLAGS OF DECEPTION

PART-2

ARTIFICIAL STUPIDITY AND THE FRENCH REVOLUTION AND BEYOND

Leave a Reply