“…what’s the difference between a hero and a coward???..they both are scared…but one will move forward and the other will turn back..”
…song writer Lionel Richey
from: youarewithinthenorms.com
NORMAN J CLEMENT RPH., DDS, NORMAN L. CLEMENT PHARM-TECH, MALACHI F. MACKANDAL PHARMD, BELINDA BROWN-PARKER, IN THE SPIRIT OF JOSEPH SOLVO ESQ., INC., SPIRIT OF REV. IN THE SPIRIT OF WALTER R. CLEMENT BS., MS, MBA. HARVEY JENKINS, MD, PH.D., IN THE SPIRIT OF C.T. VIVIAN, JELANI ZIMBABWE CLEMENT, BS., M.B.A., IN THE SPIRIT OF THE HON. PATRICE LUMUMBA, IN THE SPIRIT OF ERLIN CLEMENT SR., EVELYN J. CLEMENT, WALTER F. WRENN III., MD., JULIE KILLINGSWORTH, RENEE BLARE, RPH, DR. TERENCE SASAKI, MD LESLY POMPY MD., CHRISTOPHER RUSSO, MD., NANCY SEEFELDT, WILLIE GUINYARD BS., JOSEPH WEBSTER MD., MBA, BEVERLY C. PRINCE MD., FACS., NEIL ARNAND, MD., RICHARD KAUL, MD., IN THE SPIRIT OF LEROY BAYLOR, JAY K. JOSHI MD., MBA, AISHA GARDNER, ADRIENNE EDMUNDSON, ESTER HYATT PH.D., WALTER L. SMITH BS., IN THE SPIRIT OF BRAHM FISHER ESQ., MICHELE ALEXANDER MD., CUDJOE WILDING BS, MARTIN NJOKU, BS., RPH., IN THE SPIRIT OF DEBRA LYNN SHEPHERD, BERES E. MUSCHETT, STRATEGIC ADVISORS
“..maybe one day you will make a difference..”
MATTHEW FOGG: THE TALE OF TWO BADGES AND THE FOGG OF AMERICA’S WAR ON DRUGS AND PAINCARE
“..one day you will make a difference..”
THE FOGG
Dr. Matthew Fogg, a retired Chief Deputy U.S. Marshal, delivers a powerful address detailing his decades-long battle against systemic racial discrimination and institutional bias within the U.S. Department of Justice. He explains how formative personal experiences—ranging from childhood segregation to a wrongful arrest—inspired him to challenge the most powerful government in the world.
Fogg served as the lead plaintiff in a significant and protracted class-action lawsuit against the U.S. Marshals Service, eventually securing a landmark jury verdict that officially recognized the agency as a racially hostile environment for African Americans.
The central conflict revolves around a class-action civil rights lawsuit he filed in 1994, which alleged pervasive internal discrimination and was later brought to public attention with the headline “Bigots with Badges.”
He recounts how a federal jury in 1998 ultimately found the agency guilty of maintaining a “racial hostile environment” for African American Marshals, similarly, African American D.E.A. employees, yet these litigations remained unresolved decades later.
RICHARD LAWHERN: Indictment OF America’s PUBLIC Healthcare ON PAIN
Fogg and others have criticized how the “War on Drugs” was enforced to target and incarcerate Black and Brown citizens, physicians, pharmacists, dentists, nurse practitioners, a policy he felt made him a “slave hunter” rather than an equal opportunity enforcer.
The DEA-DOJ Pain Policy Is the Largest Healthcare Fraud
The D.E.A. then extended its “War on Drugs to Medical Providers by accusing them of over-prescribing; however, according to Dr. Richard Red Lawhern, arguing that the national overdose crisis was not caused or sustained by physician overprescribing, but rather by the subsequent rise of illegal drugs, particularly illicitly manufactured fentanyl, following state crackdowns on prescription sources.
Lawhern presents data that strongly correlates overdose and suicide risks to a patient’s pre-existing mental health history, not the dosage of their pain medication. Accordingly, he demands that the CDC and VA immediately repudiate their 2022 guidelines and urges patients and clinicians to unite in advocacy against ongoing government suppression of evidence-based medical practice.
HELENA HANSON’S White Opioids: Race, Addiction, and Drug Policy A Tale of Two Treatments
Dr. Helena Hanson has done a critical analysis of the current so- called US opioid epidemic and the historical relationship between race and narcotics policy.
Hanson asserts that the crisis is fundamentally structured by the racialization of drugs and people, which establishes separate, unequal tracks for substance use intervention. She identifies “technologies of whiteness”—including addiction neuroscience, regulation, and targeted ethnic marketing—as mechanisms that fostered a highly profitable, medically mainstream market for drugs like OxyContin and Suboxone, primarily targeting white consumers.
This privileged clinical path exists alongside a historically criminalized and punitive system imposed on Black and Latino communities, particularly those tied to methadone maintenance. Hanson details how this market segmentation, often invisible by design, is a major driver of health disparities and has limited the potential for effective public health responses. She suggests that leveraging the current crisis could lead to wider systemic changes, such as advocating for universal healthcare.
POPPY, DOCS AND AI- STUPIDITY
CONCLUSION
Despite the extreme retribution and threats he Fogg has faced he concludes by asserting the spiritual and moral imperative of his protracted fight for justice and reveals his political aspiration to run for Congress.
ALL WATCHED OVER BY MACHINES OF LOVING GRACE
DONATE THIS HOLY DAY SEASON TO MAINTAINING THIS BLOG. YOU ARE WITHIN THE NORMS FIGHT FOR PAIN CARE JUSTICE TO ZELLE 3135103378
OR TO CASH APP:$docnorm
BE SURE TO DONATE TO THE MARK IBSEN GOFUNDME DEFENSE FUND, WHERE THE SON ALWAYS RISES!!!
“..one day you will make a difference..”
FOR NOW, YOU ARE WITHIN
THE NORMS
REFERENCES:
The Anand-Clement Rule and Predictive Justice Systems
Executive Summary
This document synthesizes an analysis of the “Anand-Clement Rule of Artificial Stupidity” (The AC Rule), a concept positing that an Artificial Intelligence (AI) system using a flawed algorithm inevitably produces “Artificial Stupidity” (AS). The rule, expressed as AI (alg*) = AS, is examined through the primary case study of Palantir’s AI systems, particularly their application in law enforcement and healthcare fraud detection.
The core critique is that such systems, while projecting an aura of “oracular precision,” create a dangerous illusion of justice. By concealing their proprietary and potentially flawed algorithms, they prevent necessary scrutiny and treat statistical correlation as factual conviction. This methodology replaces traditional legal adjudication with a form of “algorithmic fatalism,” where the AI’s prediction is treated as an undeniable outcome. The system’s power is amplified by “persuasive aesthetics”—compelling data visualizations that simulate knowledge for judges and juries but do not constitute traditional evidence. This framework introduces significant structural risks, including misuse by bad actors and failures emerging from complex systemic interactions.
The Anand-Clement Rule of Artificial Stupidity (The AC Rule)
The Anand-Clement Rule provides a framework for understanding the destructive outcomes that occur when flawed algorithms are embedded within AI systems deployed in critical sectors.
Definition and Formula
The rule is defined by the concept that Artificial Intelligence, when multiplied by a flawed algorithm, generates Artificial Stupidity. This is presented mathematically and textually.
| Component | Symbol | Description |
| Artificial Intelligence | AI | The overarching intelligent system. |
| Flawed Algorithm | alg* or algt* | The core methodology or set of rules that contains fundamental errors, biases, or logical deficiencies. |
| Artificial Stupidity | AS | The resulting output, which is a flawed, misleading, or destructive outcome masquerading as intelligence. |
Formal Statement:
• AI (alg*) = AS
• The rule is further elaborated as: (AI) ARTIFICIAL INTELLEGENCE TIMES A FLAWED ALGORITHM alg* GENERATES (AS) ARTIFICIAL STUPIDITY.
Core Implication
The central argument of the AC Rule is that the sophistication of an AI system cannot compensate for a flawed core algorithm. When the proprietary nature of a system like Palantir’s prevents scrutiny of its methodology (the alg*), its outputs become fundamentally flawed. The rule is explicitly linked to the “INTIMATE KNOWLEDGE OF DESIGN AND ABUSE IN LAW ENFORCEMENT,” suggesting that these flawed systems are particularly dangerous when applied to complex human matters like justice and intent. The result is a system that treats “correlation as conviction, dismantling the necessary scaffolding for justice.”
