“..the computer is a bicycle for the human mind..”
“...a force multiplier”
Belinda Parker Brown
from youarewithinthenorms.com
NORMAN J CLEMENT RPH., DDS, NORMAN L. CLEMENT PHARM-TECH, MALACHI F. MACKANDAL PHARMD, BELINDA BROWN-PARKER, IN THE SPIRIT OF JOSEPH SOLVO ESQ., INC., SPIRIT OF REV. IN THE SPIRIT OF WALTER R. CLEMENT BS., MS, MBA. HARVEY JENKINS, MD, PH.D., IN THE SPIRIT OF C.T. VIVIAN, JELANI ZIMBABWE CLEMENT, BS., M.B.A., IN THE SPIRIT OF THE HON. PATRICE LUMUMBA, IN THE SPIRIT OF ERLIN CLEMENT SR., EVELYN J. CLEMENT, WALTER F. WRENN III., MD., JULIE KILLINGSWORTH, RENEE BLARE, RPH, DR. TERENCE SASAKI, MD LESLY POMPY MD., CHRISTOPHER RUSSO, MD., NANCY SEEFELDT, WILLIE GUINYARD BS., JOSEPH WEBSTER MD., MBA, BEVERLY C. PRINCE MD., FACS., NEIL ARNAND, MD., RICHARD KAUL, MD., IN THE SPIRIT OF LEROY BAYLOR, JAY K. JOSHI MD., MBA, AISHA GARDNER, ADRIENNE EDMUNDSON, ESTER HYATT PH.D., WALTER L. SMITH BS., IN THE SPIRIT OF BRAHM FISHER ESQ., MICHELE ALEXANDER MD., CUDJOE WILDING BS, MARTIN NJOKU, BS., RPH., IN THE SPIRIT OF DEBRA LYNN SHEPHERD, BERES E. MUSCHETT, STRATEGIC ADVISORS
Nelson Mandela believed that true freedom requires the liberation of both the oppressed and the oppressor, as both are robbed of their humanity.
It was during those long and lonely years that my hunger for the freedom of my own people became a hunger for the freedom of all people, white and black. I knew as well as I knew anything that the oppressor must be liberated just as surely as the oppressed.
“..Once an enemy is insistent upon a lie, they will continue..”
Dr. Clarence Verdell, MD
To Bear False Witness
A man who takes away another man’s freedom is a prisoner of hatred; he is locked behind the bars of prejudice and narrow-mindedness. I am not truly free if I am taking away someone else’s freedom, just as surely as I am not free when my freedom is taken from me. The oppressed and the oppressor alike are robbed of their humanity.
The destruction of Black doctors is one of the saddest stories I’ve ever reported. I saw how the government blamed all the waste, fraud, and abuse on Black doctors while turning a blind eye to the white companies ripping off the government left and right. I saw illegal drugs being deposited in Black doctors’ offices and how people were paid to go in pretending to be sick to get drugs or steal prescription pads to write medicines sold illegally.
And this is about to happen again; instead, they’re saving tax dollars from waste, fraud, and abuse while they take the funds or stash them away for bigger yachts. African-American doctors make up about 3 percent of the total because there’s a constant effort by the government to stop them. Because of this, many doctors were jailed, and their families lost their livelihoods.
Where are the people supposedly making a documentary about this?
Failure of Black Media to Lead
We must work at the speed of science rather than the pace of politics. “What are you going to do about it?” It merely serves as a meaningless sales pitch intended to deceive people into believing their advocacy, research, or stance will lead to action. Sadly, in this, God bless his soul, “THE BLACK EAGLE” went blind.
Mr. Madison deliberately failed to understand that the overreach by medical boards is not just a threat to individual physicians but also “weakens the health care system at large.” It “distracts from patient care, influencing the quality of services delivered to those in need, contrary to the board’s stated mission of safeguarding patient safety.”
Sadly, through his platform and while our group, armed with facts and research, presented, he chose to ridicule us with his rudeness, muting and cutting us short, and encouraging others (on that platform) to dismiss and discredit our merits.
Mr. Madison failed those medical providers who have been subjected to the abuses of regulatory racism by State Medical Boards, DOJ-DEA — “TULSAFICATION.”
We were seen as a threat to his brand, his ego, and his academic insecurity, and “what you are going to do about it” has been reduced to an empty gesture, “Where Talk Began, No Action,” sold to an audience solely for score ratings.
Politics Have No Place in Medical Education
Erec Smith April 7, 2024 6:30 AM
Medical school is the place to learn to diagnose and treat diseases and injuries. It is not the place to learn to judge people as oppressors or the oppressed or to prioritize treatment based on victimhood.
What major statements do we know of that the DEA has stated have been false and misleading?
In this case, as noted, the Department of Justice takes criminal law seriously, it examines them and defines them and explains them accordingly….. in this case, the DOJ has defined criminal in advance of diseases and disease states and applied mens rea to the establishment of the arrival of the diagnosis of a medical condition and the treatment protocols….
The government and courts have protected these misadventures through qualified immunity, which permits them to carry on and avoid responsibility because they have come to realize their conduct is judicially career-rewarding enhancing the law enforcement intrusion into medical protocols to the detriment of those suffering from diseases, drug addiction, or, for that matter, any addictions, and further to the demise of their individual healthcare providers..”
TO CASH APP:$docnorm
ZELLE 3135103378
ALL WATCHED OVER BY MACHINES OF LOVING GRACE
BE SURE TO DONATE TO THE MARK IBSEN GOFUNDME DEFENSE FUND, WHERE THE SON ALWAYS RISES!!!
FOR NOW, YOU ARE WITHIN
REFERENCES:
Briefing: Backlash Against Medical Boards for Abusing Power
This briefing outlines the key themes and critical concerns raised in the article “Why medical boards are facing growing backlash for abusing power” by Kayvan Haddadan, MD. The central argument posits that medical boards, intended to safeguard patient safety and uphold justice, are increasingly operating outside fundamental judicial principles, leading to widespread abuse of power and negative consequences for individual physicians and the healthcare system at large.
Main Themes and Important Ideas:
1. Blurring of Judicial and Political Systems: The author asserts that medical boards dangerously conflate the principles of jurisprudence (seeking truth based on evidence) with the manipulative tactics often seen in political systems (prioritizing validation over truth). This distinction is crucial, as the boards are accused of prioritizing being “right” for political reasons rather than establishing actual truth.
“This critical distinction between politics and jurisprudence becomes dangerously blurred when examining the conduct of medical boards who are trying to mix these and care about the politics of being “right” rather than seeking the truth.”
2. Erosion of Due Process and Fundamental Judicial Principles: A core concern is the medical boards’ alleged disregard for due process and evidence-based decision-making. They are accused of “twisting facts and establishing arbitrary standards for assessing physician actions,” effectively creating their own narratives instead of upholding justice.
“From a legal standpoint, the actions of these medical boards are problematic, as they often bypass fundamental judicial principles. Rather than upholding justice rooted in evidence and due process, these boards sometimes create their own narrative by twisting facts and establishing arbitrary standards for assessing physician actions.”
3. Unchecked Power and Lack of Accountability: The article describes medical boards as operating with “unchecked power,” comparing them to “organized crime syndicates, where accountability is alarmingly absent.” This lack of oversight allows for the alleged abuses to persist without meaningful challenge.
4. Prosecutor Mindset and “Guilty Until Proven Innocent”: A significant factor contributing to the problem is the “one-track mentality” attributed to prosecutors working for medical boards. These individuals are portrayed as “relentlessly pursuing validation for their preconceived conclusions while disregarding any evidence that contradicts their stance.” Any objection from the physician is then labeled as “lack of remorse.” This approach fundamentally contradicts the legal principle of “innocent until proven guilty.”
“This approach signifies a departure from the impartial fact-finding process expected in legal environments, contributing to the devastating ruin of physicians’ careers. Any objection to their predetermined verdict is labeled as “lack of remorse” on the physician’s part.” “the predominant “guilty until proven innocent” approach is antithetical to fundamental legal rights.”
5. Physician Vulnerability and Coercion: Physicians, trained in patient care rather than legal defense, are described as “ill-equipped to confront such powerful adversaries.” Even with legal representation, they face “insurmountable challenges.” This power imbalance often forces physicians to “settle disputes rather than mount strong legal defenses,” undermining justice.
6. Ethical and Judicial Concerns Regarding Financial Incentives and “Paid Experts”: The article highlights “financial rewards linked to investigations” as a significant incentive driving these boards, raising “significant ethical and judicial concerns.” The use of “paid “experts” to manipulate facts undermines legal standards and subverts the mission of truth-seeking.”
7. Detrimental Impact on the Healthcare System: The overreach by medical boards is not just a threat to individual physicians but also “weakens the health care system at large.” It “distracts from patient care, influencing the quality of services delivered to those in need, contrary to the board’s stated mission of safeguarding patient safety.”
8. Failure of the Judiciary to Intervene: Alarmingly, the judiciary is criticized for its failure to address this systemic corruption, either by “assumption of board infallibility or complicity,” allowing the “erosion of legal integrity to continue unchecked.”
9. Urgent Need for Reform and Accountability: The author concludes by emphasizing the immediate need for “reevaluation and accountability measures from both government and medical boards.” This reform is deemed essential to “uphold the integrity of the health care system,” “restore trust in the judiciary’s ability to govern fairly and justly,” and ensure the protection of both physicians and patients under the law.
