HANDS OFF UHURU-3!!! A DECISIVE VICTORY: AS PHYSICIANS, PHARMACISTS, DENTISTS, AND NURSE PRACTITIONERS CAN LEARN A VALUABLE LESSON DEVELOPING COALITIONS IN FIGHTING DOJ/D.E.A. MALICIOUS TARGETING (AN ANALYTICAL PODCAST)

“WHEN WE FIGHT TOGETHER WE WILL WIN“

NORMAN J CLEMENT RPH., DDS, NORMAN L. CLEMENT PHARM-TECH, MALACHI F. MACKANDAL PHARMD, BELINDA BROWN-PARKER, IN THE SPIRIT OF JOSEPH SOLVO ESQ., INC.T. SPIRIT OF REV. IN THE SPIRIT OF WALTER R. CLEMENT BS., MS, MBA. HARVEY JENKINS MD, PH.D., IN THE SPIRIT OF C.T. VIVIAN, JELANI ZIMBABWE CLEMENT, BS., MBA., IN THE SPIRIT OF THE HON. PATRICE LUMUMBA, IN THE SPIRIT OF ERLIN CLEMENT SR., EVELYN J. CLEMENT, WALTER F. WRENN III., MD., JULIE KILLINGSWORTH, RENEE BLARE, RPH, DR. TERENCE SASAKI, MD LESLY POMPY MD., CHRISTOPHER RUSSO, MD., NANCY SEEFELDT, WILLIE GUINYARD BS., JOSEPH WEBSTER MD., MBA, BEVERLY C. PRINCE MD., FACS., NEIL ARNAND, MD., RICHARD KAUL, MD., IN THE SPIRIT OF LEROY BAYLOR, JAY K. JOSHI MD., MBA, AISHA GARDNER, ADRIENNE EDMUNDSON, ESTER HYATT PH.D., WALTER L. SMITH BS., IN THE SPIRIT OF BRAHM FISHER ESQ., MICHELE ALEXANDER MD., CUDJOE WILDING BS, MARTIN NJOKU, BS., RPH., IN THE SPIRIT OF DEBRA LYNN SHEPHERD, BERES E. MUSCHETT, STRATEGIC ADVISORS

“The illusion of freedom will continue as long as it’s profitable to continue the illusion. At the point where the illusion becomes too expensive to maintain, they will take down the scenery, they will pull back the curtains, move the tables and chairs out of the way, and you will see the brick wall at the back of the theater.”– Frank Zappa Musician and Artist.

Click Below: Listen to the Analysis and Discussion

“NO ONE WAS GOING TO PRISON; NO ONE WAS GOING TO BE FINED“

Scores of supporters packed a Federal Courtroom in Tampa as on Monday, December 16, 2024, Federal Judge William Jung sentenced Omali Yeshitela, Penny Hess, and Jesse Nevel in Florida, members of a pan-Africanist group known as the “Uhuru 3” to three years of probation and 300 hours of community service on the conspiracy conviction.

They had faced a maximum possible sentence of five years in prison and a $250,000 fine each. 

A DECISIVE VICTORY

“No one’s going to prison; no one’s going to be fined,” stated U.S. District Court Judge William Jung in the sentencing of the “Uhuru 3.”  Supporters gave sustained applause after the judge left the bench, meaning they would avoid prison time in a legal saga that saw the antiwar activists targeted for their vocal criticism of U.S. policy.

The jubilance continued for several minutes in the hallway outside amid smiles, hugs, pumped fists, and chants of “Not one day!”

The sentence represented a decisive victory in the “Hands Off Uhuru!” fightback campaign’s two and ½ year battle against bogus U.S. government charges.

“NOT ONE DAY, NOT ONE DIME, NOT ONE NICKEL, NOT ONE PENNY”

The 83-year-old (Yeshitela) from St. Petersburg, Florida, a 9-year veteran of The United States Army in uniform, serving all around the world in the early 1960s (Germany, Korea ) only to return home to Florida and subjected to horrific American Apartheid, Chairman Omali Yeshitela stated:

“The only reason we didn’t get prison time is because we fought back against this government attack. We fought! Our lawyers were outstanding! The jury affirmed that we work for Black people, not Russia…It is a precedent-setting case, the first time a foreign agent law has been used to target pure political speech. The Hands Off Uhuru! Fightback Coalition is launching a campaign to repeal the foreign agent laws…”

Jesse Nevel recounted,

“On July 29, 2022, they came with hundreds of agents. How much money was spent on that day alone? You have the National Security Division of the Justice Department coordinating the prosecution…

…You have an untold amount of resources and focus that the U.S. government tried to bring down against the movement of African people for liberation. And they got their asses handed to them...that is a testament to all of you. Still, above all, it is a testament to the relentless indestructible leadership of Chairman Omali Yeshitela, the African People’s Socialist Party, Deputy Chair Ona Zené Yeshitela…

“..we have much more in common than we have differences..“

Norman J. Clement RPh., DDS., MS

I consider it the most incredible honor of my life up to this point to have been targeted, alongside my two heroes, the leaders who have been the greatest inspiration to my life—Chairman Omali Yeshitela and Chairwoman Penny Hess. This is the time now for all white people who want to take a stand and join the Uhuru Solidarity Movement…”

FEDERAL EVIDENCE BASED ON RESTRICTING FIRST AMENDMENT CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS? !!NEVER BEFORE!!

The members of the African People’s Socialist Party were convicted in September of conspiring with the Russian government to “sow discord” and “interfere” in U.S. elections, which the accused have rejected as “ridiculous.”

The Fed’s evidence was based on the defendants restricting the group’s First Amendment rights to protest and issue propaganda statements against imperialism and black oppression.

Prosecutors went so far as to raise the specter that “Russia had interfered on Jesse Nevel’s behalf when he ran for mayor of St. Petersburg, Florida, in 2017.

This included Uhuru Director Omali Yeshitela attending a 2015 anti-globalization conference in Moscow, promoting a 2017 “Petition to the United Nations on the Crime of Genocide Against African People,” and siding with Russia in Ukraine. None of this is a crime!

However, an FBI agent admitted on the witness stand,

“.. there wasn’t a shred of evidence for these ridiculous claims..”

‘WHATEVER BE HIS STATION‘

“This witchhunt thReatenS all of us“

This witchhunt is a dangerous attack on the rights of free speech and association and a threat to labor, black people, socialists, and anyone who opposes U.S. imperialism. It must be stopped dead in its tracks. Many black nationalist groups, socialists, and community activists mobilized in solidarity for the trial this month. 

As further outlined in the Worker Vanguard Newspaper,

“..The Democrats posture as the “defenders of democracy” against Trump.

But the Biden/Harris administration’s real face can be seen in their prosecution of the APSP and Uhuru, part of a drive to bolster the repressive apparatus of the capitalist state.

The bosses’ courts have long relied on the ” conspiracy ” charge against workers trying to organize. “Conspiracy” is a thought crime, to this day viciously wielded by prosecutors when they can’t show that any real crime was committed…”

However, the jury found the group not guilty of being “unregistered Russian Agents, which would have required a 10-year sentence.

FROM ALL OVER THE WORLD, THE PEOPLE THEY CAME AND THE PEOPLE STOOD UP TOGETHER, UNITED

Scott Ritter, a former UN weapons inspector and whistleblower, said, “I am not you, you are not me. It’s not what separates us that brings us here. It’s about what unites us. Omali knows more about the Constitution than I do because he learned it the hard way. It was written for people like me, not for people like him, because his people were slaves, and they had to learn it by fighting over and over again.

This is the battle for freedom of speech. If you take away freedom of speech, there is no America, and there’s no more incredible warrior for freedom of speech than Chairman Omali Yeshitela and the Uhuru 3.”

Hundreds of supporters packed the courtroom and overflowed into the hallway, and Thousands from around the world monitored the activities occurring in the Tampa Federal Courtroom on the 17th floor. When the sentencing hearing concluded and supporters came out to share the news, the hallway erupted in chants of “Not one day!”

Former New York State Assemblyman Charles Barron recalled the story told by an African performer at a Uhuru 3 support rally the previous day.

“Yesterday, Sister SYTE told us about an elephant that a lion was attacking, and the elephant stomped his elephant foot on the ground, and it was heard 6,000 miles away by other elephants. 

“Well, the warriors of the Uhuru Movement stomped their feet on the ground, and we came from New York, Chicago, California, Florida, and all over the nation.

The stomp was heard in Africa, the Caribbean, and all over the world, and we have come today to say, ‘Listen, our struggle has just begun.’ Efia Nwangaza, a veteran of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee, argued that “Black Power, all power to the people, represents the closing of the gap between the defeat of the human rights struggle of the ‘60s and the revival of today. We must stand up.”

Caleb Maupin, leader of the Center for Political Innovation, declared that “the FARA absurd piece of legislation needs to be overturned. It’s a threat to all Americans who advocate peace. A full pardon needs to be granted to the Uhuru 3.”

Zaki Baruti, St. Louis-based leader of the Universal African People’s Organization, said, “It’s a damn shame this government spent millions [on the Uhuru 3 case] when we got homeless out here. We need to investigate the FBI. They must be up in the court rather than the Uhuru 3.” 

HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS CAN LEARN A VALUABLE LESSON IN DEVELOPING COALITIONS OF UNITY

Let’s get back into the streets. We were not on trial, and the American justice system was on trial. The only solution is revolution.”

One of the Uhuru 3, Omali Yeshitela, spoke after the sentencing yesterday.

Healthcare providers can learn a valuable lesson from the trial of the Uhuru -3.

We must take every case to trial, never accept a plea deal, and fight.

We healthcare providers must call upon freedom-loving people all over the world, particularly in Medicine, as our professions and all of American healthcare are being attacked by DOJ-DEA using us merely for easy enforcement targets and their career enhancements.

We call on all freedom-loving people who are interested in coming to the Uhuru 3 Trial(DR. NEIL ANAND, MD TRIAL MARCH 2025) on Sept 3rd, March & Rally (Aug 31st) or volunteering to Take Action at:

Pharmacist Steve observed recently

“I have heard from many attorneys that when a federal prosecutor takes someone to federal court, 90%-95% of the time, they will be found guilty. After you watch this 17-minute video of a Federal Prosecutor, you will easily understand how that high conviction rate can be attained.

What I suspect is that this attorney claims each possible violation. He only talks about a single patient and interaction with a practitioner.  Just imagine the number of potential federal law violations that could be fabricated on just 1-2 handfuls of patents from a particular practitioner’s practice.

Omali Yeshitela: “I want to say that the only reason this discussion is happening right now is about free speech, and the judge was allowed to make the ruling and make the statements that he made; the only reason he was given this opportunity is that we fought. If we had laid down, we wouldn’t have had this discussion.”

VICTORY CAN ONLY BE ACCOMPLISHED THROUGH SOLIDARITY

The Mastery now of Fifth-Generation Warfare and continuous, unrestricted intellectual combat principles are essential to preserve justice in the face of unrelenting change.  Yet, many legal scholars have failed to prevent the relentless advance of the U.S. Department of Justice’s General Dynamics Information Technology (GDIT) Quantum Artificial Intelligence. (1)(2)

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Doctor Roya Jafari-Hassad (@doctorroya1)

The legal battle unfolded in the criminal defense of Dr. Roya Jafari-Hassad, a physician accused of illegitimately prescribing opioids. The U.S. Department of Justice, assisted by a foe, GDIT’s Quantum, an AI system that is not merely an evolution of modern technology. It represents the pinnacle of Fifth-Generation Warfare (5GW).

Battles are fought through information, perception, and manipulation. Unlike traditional kinetic conflict, 5GW leveraged AI and cyber capabilities to dismantle legal arguments, anticipate legal strategies, and reshape legal narratives in real time.

In the end, Dr. Roya Jafari-Hassad conviction was a clarion call a reminder that even in an era dominated by artificial intelligence, the human spirit, guided by wisdom and principle, remains an indomitable force.

DONATE LEGAL DEFENSE

OR SEND

TO CASH APP:$docnorm

ZELLE 3135103378

ALL WATCHED OVER BY MACHINES OF LOVING GRACE

BE SURE TO DONATE TO THE MARK IBSEN GOFUNDME DEFENSE FUND, WHERE THE SON ALWAYS RISES!!!

FOR NOW, YOU ARE WITHIN

THE NORMS

______________________________________________/

1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g4eo9z-Zwf8
2. https://doctorsofcourage.org/the-complete-collapse-of-american-medicin

REFERENCES:

Uhuru 3 and the Fight for Freedom of Speech: A Study Guide

Briefing Doc: The Uhuru 3 Trial and its Implications

Main Themes:

• Freedom of Speech and Political Persecution: The Uhuru 3 trial centers on the prosecution of three members of the African People’s Socialist Party (APSP) for alleged conspiracy with the Russian government. The case raises concerns about the potential criminalization of political speech and association, particularly for groups critical of U.S. foreign policy.
• Racial Justice and Anti-Imperialism: The APSP, a Black nationalist and socialist organization, advocates for the liberation of African people globally and challenges U.S. imperialism. The trial highlights the continued struggle for racial justice and the targeting of groups advocating for systemic change.
• Solidarity and Coalition Building: The Uhuru 3 trial galvanized support from various groups, including Black nationalist organizations, socialists, anti-war activists, and healthcare providers facing legal challenges. This demonstrates the potential for building powerful coalitions to combat perceived injustices and protect fundamental rights.

Key Facts:

• The Accusations: Omali Yeshitela, Penny Hess, and Jesse Nevel were accused of conspiring with the Russian government to sow discord and interfere in U.S. elections. The government’s evidence focused on their attendance at conferences in Russia, issuance of statements critical of U.S. policy, and promotion of a petition against the genocide of African people.
• The Verdict and Sentence: The jury acquitted the Uhuru 3 of being unregistered Russian agents, a charge carrying a 10-year sentence. They were convicted of conspiracy but ultimately sentenced to three years probation and 300 hours of community service, avoiding prison time.
• The Defense’s Argument: The defense argued that the prosecution was politically motivated, aimed at silencing dissent and suppressing criticism of U.S. foreign policy. They asserted that the government’s case relied on First Amendment-protected activities and lacked evidence of any criminal wrongdoing.
• Broader Implications: The case is seen as a potential precedent for targeting political speech under the guise of foreign interference. Critics argue that the prosecution could have a chilling effect on activists and organizations critical of U.S. policy, both domestically and internationally.

Important Quotes:

• Omali Yeshitela: “The only reason we didn’t get prison time is because we fought back against this government attack. We fought! […] It is a precedent-setting case, the first time a foreign agent law has ever been used to target pure political speech.”
• Jesse Nevel: “You have an untold amount of resources and focus that the U.S. government tried to bring down against the movement of African people for liberation. And they got their asses handed to them…that is a testament to all of you, but above all, it is a testament to the relentless indestructible leadership of Chairman Omali Yeshitela.”
• Scott Ritter: “This is the battle for freedom of speech. If you take away freedom of speech there is no America, and there’s no greater warrior for freedom of speech than Chairman Omali Yeshitela and the Uhuru 3.”
• Worker Vanguard Newspaper: “The Biden/Harris administration’s real face can be seen in their prosecution of the APSP and Uhuru, part of a drive to bolster the repressive apparatus of the capitalist state.”

Analysis:

The Uhuru 3 trial raises significant concerns about the erosion of civil liberties and the potential for political persecution in the United States. The case highlights the tension between national security concerns and the protection of fundamental rights, particularly freedom of speech and association.

The government’s use of the “foreign agent” label to target political dissent, even in the absence of concrete evidence of criminal activity, sets a dangerous precedent that could have far-reaching consequences for activists and organizations critical of U.S. policies.

The trial also underscores the importance of solidarity and coalition building in the face of state repression. The diverse groups mobilized in support of the Uhuru 3 demonstrate the potential for forging powerful alliances to protect civil liberties and challenge systemic injustices. This case serves as a reminder that the struggle for justice requires collective action and an unwavering commitment to defending fundamental freedoms.

Uhuru 3 Sentencing: A Victory Against Repression

Uhuru 3 Sentencing: A Victory Against Repression and a Call for Continued Struggle

This briefing doc analyzes the recent sentencing of the “Uhuru 3,” members of the African People’s Socialist Party, highlighting key themes and insights from the provided sources.

Key Themes:

• Repression of Dissent and Freedom of Speech: The case is presented as an attack on free speech and association, targeting the Uhuru Movement’s criticism of U.S. imperialism and advocacy for Black liberation. The prosecution’s reliance on the “foreign agent” law is criticized as a dangerous precedent that criminalizes political speech.
• Solidarity and Collective Resistance: The successful outcome of the case is attributed to the strong mobilization of supporters from various movements and communities, demonstrating the power of collective resistance against state repression.
• The Illusion of Freedom in the Face of Systemic Injustice: The case is contextualized within the broader struggle against systemic racism and oppression, emphasizing the ongoing fight for genuine liberation and challenging the notion of freedom within a system that perpetuates inequality.

Important Ideas and Facts:

• Charges and Sentencing: The Uhuru 3 were convicted of conspiracy but acquitted of being unregistered Russian agents. They were sentenced to three years probation and 300 hours of community service, avoiding the maximum possible sentence of five years in prison and a $250,000 fine.
• Basis of the Prosecution: The prosecution alleged that the Uhuru 3 conspired with the Russian government to “sow discord” and “interfere” in U.S. elections. The evidence presented, however, was largely based on the group’s First Amendment protected activities, such as attending conferences, issuing petitions, and expressing political views.
• Victory Through Struggle: The Uhuru 3 and their supporters view the lenient sentence as a victory achieved through their fightback campaign, highlighting the importance of legal defense and grassroots mobilization in challenging state repression.
• Lessons for Healthcare Providers: The case is presented as a model for healthcare providers facing legal challenges from the DOJ and DEA. The message is to fight back, never accept a plea deal, and build broad coalitions of support.

Quotes:

• Omali Yeshitela: “The only reason we didn’t get prison time is because we fought back against this government attack. We fought! … It is a precedent-setting case, the first time a foreign agent law has ever been used to target pure political speech.”
• Jesse Nevel: “You have an untold amount of resources and focus that the U.S. government tried to bring down against the movement of African people for liberation. And they got their asses handed to them…that is a testament to all of you, but above all, it is a testament to the relentless indestructible leadership of Chairman Omali Yeshitela.”
• Scott Ritter: “This is the battle for freedom of speech. If you take away freedom of speech there is no America, and there’s no greater warrior for freedom of speech than Chairman Omali Yeshitela and the Uhuru 3.”

Analysis:

The sources paint a picture of a politically motivated prosecution aimed at silencing a movement critical of U.S. imperialism. The case raises concerns about the erosion of civil liberties and the use of legal mechanisms to target dissent.

The successful outcome for the Uhuru 3, attributed to their resilience and the solidarity of various groups, underscores the importance of organized resistance in defending democratic rights. However, the case also highlights the ongoing struggle against systemic racism and the need for continued vigilance in protecting the freedoms of marginalized communities.

Key Terms Glossary

1. Uhuru Movement: A Pan-Africanist movement founded by Omali Yeshitela that advocates for the self-determination and liberation of African people worldwide.
2. African People’s Socialist Party (APSP): A political party founded by Omali Yeshitela, closely aligned with the Uhuru Movement, that seeks to build political and economic power for African people.
3. Uhuru 3: Refers to Omali Yeshitela, Penny Hess, and Jesse Nevel, members of the APSP who were accused of conspiring with the Russian government.
4. FARA (Foreign Agents Registration Act): A U.S. law requiring people acting as agents of foreign principals in a political or quasi-political capacity to disclose their relationship and activities to the government.
5. Fifth-Generation Warfare (5GW): A conceptual framework describing warfare fought primarily through non-kinetic means, utilizing information, perception manipulation, and technology like AI for strategic advantage.
6. Quantum AI: A type of artificial intelligence leveraging quantum computing principles, theoretically offering significantly advanced capabilities in processing and analyzing information.
7. Imperialism: A policy or ideology of extending a nation’s rule over foreign countries, often through military force or economic control.
8. Black Nationalism: A political and social ideology advocating for the unity, self-determination, and empowerment of Black people, often emphasizing cultural and political independence.
9. Propaganda: Information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote a particular political cause or point of view.
10. Coalition: A temporary alliance for combined action, especially of political parties forming a government.

Short Answer Quiz

Instructions: Answer the following questions in 2-3 sentences each.

1. What were the primary charges brought against the Uhuru 3, and what was the maximum possible sentence they faced?
2. What evidence did the prosecution present to support their claims against the Uhuru 3?
3. What was the outcome of the trial, and how did Judge William Jung rule in the sentencing of the Uhuru 3?
4. What was the significance of the “Hands Off Uhuru!” fightback campaign in the context of the trial?
5. How did the Uhuru 3 and their supporters view the charges against them?
6. What specific connections did the prosecution attempt to establish between the Uhuru Movement and the Russian government?
7. What arguments did critics of the trial make about its implications for free speech and political dissent?
8. How did Scott Ritter, a former UN weapons inspector, characterize the significance of the Uhuru 3 trial and the importance of free speech?
9. What role did solidarity and coalition building play in the Uhuru 3’s defense and in mobilizing support for their cause?
10. What lesson do the authors suggest healthcare providers can learn from the Uhuru 3’s experience?

Short Answer Quiz: Answer Key

1. The Uhuru 3 were charged with conspiring with the Russian government to sow discord and interfere in US elections. They faced a maximum possible sentence of five years in prison and a $250,000 fine each.
2. The prosecution presented evidence of the Uhuru 3’s attendance at events in Russia, their promotion of anti-imperialist views, and their criticism of US foreign policy as evidence of their alleged conspiracy with the Russian government.
3. The Uhuru 3 were found not guilty of being unregistered Russian agents but were convicted of conspiracy. Judge Jung sentenced them to three years of probation and 300 hours of community service, avoiding prison time.
4. The “Hands Off Uhuru!” campaign mobilized support for the Uhuru 3, raising awareness about the case and challenging the government’s allegations. It was crucial in securing a favorable outcome for the Uhuru 3 and in framing the trial as an attack on free speech.
5. The Uhuru 3 and their supporters viewed the charges as politically motivated and an attempt to suppress their activism and criticism of US imperialism. They maintained their innocence and argued that the case was a threat to free speech and political dissent.
6. The prosecution attempted to link the Uhuru Movement to the Russian government by highlighting Omali Yeshitela’s attendance at a conference in Moscow, the group’s promotion of a petition to the UN that criticized US foreign policy, and their stance on the conflict in Ukraine.
7. Critics argued that the trial was an attempt to silence dissent and criminalize anti-imperialist views. They expressed concerns that the case set a dangerous precedent by using FARA to target political speech and activism that is critical of the US government.
8. Scott Ritter stated that the Uhuru 3 trial was a battle for freedom of speech and that the charges against them attacked this fundamental right. He praised Omali Yeshitela as a champion of free speech who had fought tirelessly to defend this right for all.
9. Solidarity and coalition building played a significant role in the Uhuru 3’s defense. Activists, organizations, and individuals from across the US and internationally mobilized to support the Uhuru 3, highlighting the importance of collective action in resisting political repression.
10. The authors suggest that healthcare providers, increasingly facing legal challenges and prosecution, can learn from the Uhuru 3’s experience the importance of fighting back, building coalitions, and refusing to accept plea deals that compromise their principles.

Essay Questions

1. Analyze the prosecution’s use of FARA (Foreign Agents Registration Act) in the Uhuru 3 case. Do you believe it was an appropriate application of the law? How did the case highlight potential concerns regarding freedom of speech and political dissent in the context of FARA?
2. The authors suggest that the Uhuru 3 trial can be understood as an example of Fifth-Generation Warfare (5GW). Explain the concept of 5GW and discuss how it might be relevant to the trial, considering the prosecution’s tactics, the use of information warfare, and the broader political context.
3. Examine the role of solidarity and coalition building in the Uhuru 3’s defense. How did the “Hands Off Uhuru!” campaign contribute to their eventual outcome? Discuss the importance of collective action in resisting political repression and supporting those targeted for their beliefs.
4. The authors draw a parallel between the Uhuru 3 trial and the challenges faced by healthcare providers, particularly in the context of legal prosecution. Analyze this comparison, exploring the potential commonalities in their experiences and the lessons healthcare providers can learn from the Uhuru Movement’s fightback.
5. Consider the broader historical and political context of the Uhuru Movement and the APSP’s ideology of Black Nationalism and anti-imperialism. How do these factors contribute to understanding the motivations behind the charges against the Uhuru 3 and the significance of their trial for the African liberation movement?

Timeline of Events

Early 1960s: Omali Yeshitela serves in the US Army in Germany and Korea.

2015: Omali Yeshitela attends an anti-globalization conference in Moscow.

2017:

• Jesse Nevel runs for mayor of St. Petersburg, Florida.
• The Uhuru Movement promotes a “Petition to the United Nations on the Crime of Genocide Against African People”.

July 29, 2022: The FBI raids the Uhuru House in St. Petersburg, Florida, with hundreds of agents, targeting members of the African People’s Socialist Party.

September 2024: The “Uhuru 3” (Omali Yeshitela, Penny Hess, and Jesse Nevel) are convicted of conspiring with the Russian government to interfere in US elections. They are found not guilty of being unregistered Russian agents.

December 16, 2024: The “Uhuru 3” are sentenced to three years of probation and 300 hours of community service.

March 2025: Dr. Neil Anand’s trial is scheduled to begin.

August 31, 2025: A rally is planned in support of the Uhuru movement and healthcare providers targeted by the DOJ and DEA.

September 3, 2025: A march is planned in support of the Uhuru movement and healthcare providers targeted by the DOJ and DEA.

Cast of Characters

Omali Yeshitela: Co-founder and leader of the African People’s Socialist Party and the Uhuru Movement. An army veteran who served in the early 1960s. He was a key figure in the “Uhuru 3” trial.

Jesse Nevel: A member of the African People’s Socialist Party and the Uhuru Movement. He ran for mayor of St. Petersburg, Florida, in 2017 and was one of the “Uhuru 3” targeted by the FBI.

Penny Hess: A member of the African People’s Socialist Party and the Uhuru Movement and one of the “Uhuru 3”.

William Jung: The U.S. District Court Judge who presided over the “Uhuru 3” trial and sentencing.

Scott Ritter: Former UN weapons inspector and whistleblower who spoke out in support of the Uhuru 3 and criticized the US government’s prosecution of the group.

Charles Barron: Former New York State Assemblyman who attended the “Uhuru 3” sentencing and spoke about the importance of solidarity in the fight for justice.

Efia Nwangaza: Veteran of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee who argued that the Uhuru Movement represents a revival of the human rights struggle of the 1960s.

Caleb Maupin: Leader of the Center for Political Innovation who called for the repeal of the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) and a full pardon for the “Uhuru 3”.

Zaki Baruti: St. Louis-based leader of the Universal African People’s Organization who criticized the government’s spending on the Uhuru 3 case while societal issues like homelessness remain unaddressed.

Dr. Neil Anand: A medical doctor whose trial is scheduled for March 2025. He is likely being targeted by the DOJ and DEA for reasons similar to those used against the Uhuru 3.

Dr. Roya J. Hassad: A physician who was convicted in a case involving opioid prescriptions. Her case highlights the use of AI and technology by the US Department of Justice in legal battles.

Pharmacist Steve: A pharmacist with over 50 years of experience who has observed the high conviction rate in federal courts and highlights the potential for fabricated charges.