“In an age of artificial intelligence, they are creating artificial stupidity.”
Thomas Sowell
“I no longer believe that freedom and democracy are compatible,” attributing this to the “vast increase in welfare beneficiaries” and “the extension of the franchise to women.”
…Peter Thiel, Founder of Palantir
NORMAN J CLEMENT RPH., DDS, NORMAN L. CLEMENT PHARM-TECH, MALACHI F. MACKANDAL PHARMD, BELINDA BROWN-PARKER, IN THE SPIRIT OF JOSEPH SOLVO ESQ., INC., SPIRIT OF REV. IN THE SPIRIT OF WALTER R. CLEMENT BS., MS, MBA. HARVEY JENKINS, MD, PH.D., IN THE SPIRIT OF C.T. VIVIAN, JELANI ZIMBABWE CLEMENT, BS., M.B.A., IN THE SPIRIT OF THE HON. PATRICE LUMUMBA, IN THE SPIRIT OF ERLIN CLEMENT SR., EVELYN J. CLEMENT, WALTER F. WRENN III., MD., JULIE KILLINGSWORTH, RENEE BLARE, RPH, DR. TERENCE SASAKI, MD LESLY POMPY MD., CHRISTOPHER RUSSO, MD., NANCY SEEFELDT, WILLIE GUINYARD BS., JOSEPH WEBSTER MD., MBA, BEVERLY C. PRINCE MD., FACS., NEIL ARNAND, MD., RICHARD KAUL, MD., IN THE SPIRIT OF LEROY BAYLOR, JAY K. JOSHI MD., MBA, AISHA GARDNER, ADRIENNE EDMUNDSON, ESTER HYATT PH.D., WALTER L. SMITH BS., IN THE SPIRIT OF BRAHM FISHER ESQ., MICHELE ALEXANDER MD., CUDJOE WILDING BS, MARTIN NJOKU, BS., RPH., IN THE SPIRIT OF DEBRA LYNN SHEPHERD, BERES E. MUSCHETT, STRATEGIC ADVISORS
“It is not our diversity that divides us; it is not our ethnicity, religion, or culture that divides us. Since we have achieved our freedom, there can only be one division amongst us: between those who cherish democracy and those who do not.”
Nelson Mandela
The provided text critiques the increasing influence of Palantir Technologies and its founder, Peter Thiel, on American society, particularly within the healthcare system.
It draws parallels between the historical injustices of South African apartheid and the fictionalized discrimination in District 9 to argue that Palantir’s AI algorithms are creating a new form of “digital apartheid.”
According to the source, this system silently profiles individuals based on data, leading to exclusions and denials, particularly for marginalized populations, under the guise of efficiency and fraud prevention.
The text further examines Thiel’s controversial anti-democratic philosophy, which advocates for a “post-liberal order” led by “founder-kings”. It views current societal issues, such as “diversity” initiatives, as distractions from a perceived decline in civilization.
Ultimately, the source warns that Palantir’s technology operationalizes this exclusionary ideology, replacing human judgment with algorithmic control and creating a “hyperreality” where simulation supersedes genuine human experience and justice.
THE DARK ENLIGHTENMENT: UNDERSTANDING THE ORIGINS AND MINDSET
The Artificial Intelligence Algorithm Will See You Now: From District Six to District 9 and America’s Healthcare Apartheid
In the shadow of Cape Town’s Table Mountain lies the scar of District Six. Bulldozed during apartheid under the bureaucratic euphemism of “urban renewal,” it became one of history’s most sanitized mass evictions.
It remembers the boots that marched through its narrow streets in 1966, the bulldozers that razed homes, the cries of 60,000 souls expelled in the name of racial purity.
District Six was not just a place; it was a warning. A living community, eradicated by a state that cloaked its violence in the sterile language of “order” and “progress.”
Mostly “Colored” South Africans were forcibly removed, their homes demolished, not with screams but with paperwork. The Government system didn’t need jackboots when it had zoning laws and polite signatures.
This is America’s prescient legacy that Neill Blomkamp channeled in his sci-fi parable District 9, where Johannesburg’s slums are filled not with Black South Africans but marooned aliens, derogatorily called “prawns.”
The “Prawns”, starved extraterrestrial refugees marooned in Johannesburg, become stand-ins for the marginalized. Hunted, herded, experimented on, and always subjected to the same cold logic that once emptied District Six: you don’t belong here. No line in District 9 captures this false civility better than the chilling directive of Wikus van de Merwe:
“When dealing with aliens, try to be polite, but firm. And always remember that a smile is cheaper than a bullet.”
Today in the United States, the bullet is gone, but the fake smile remains. It is baked into machine learning and artificial intelligence models. It’s coded into patient risk scores and medical benefit algorithms. It is scrubbed clean of overt bias but retains all the effectiveness of state-sanctioned exclusion.
The site of this quiet cruelty?
America’s healthcare system. And behind this new apartheid, neat, silent, and sanctioned, is the shadow of Palantir Technologies. This is the company that wants to map the world, and through online data tracking, is already mapping you.
KING PETER, WAYMAKER, MIRACLE WORKER, PROMISE KEEPER, LIGHT IN THE DARKNESS MY GOD, THAT IS WHO YOU ARE
Founded by Peter Thiel, Palantir has sold its services to ICE, the Pentagon, and countless private health insurers and hospital systems. It markets “prediction” and “prevention,” but what it offers is profiling.
It claims to fight fraud and waste, but in reality, it targets statistical deviance with a religious fervor.
The goal?
To Control Human Healthcare Delivery without fingerprints, classifications without context. Sorting the worthy human beings from the unworthy human beings with the sanctified neutrality of numbers.
STATE SANCTION EXCLUSION
Healthcare apartheid in the United States is no longer built on waiting rooms and ZIP codes alone. It’s algorithmic. An artificial intelligence predictive model may decide you’re a drug seeker, a misuse risk, or a burden. It doesn’t tell you this. It just tells the pharmacy to deny your medication.
“Ours may become the first civilization destroyed, not by the power of our enemies, but by the ignorance of our teachers and the dangerous nonsense they are teaching our children. In an age of artificial intelligence, they are creating artificial stupidity.”
…Thomas Sowell
Context is precisely what artificial intelligence algorithms omit in violation of constitutional and human rights, as any doctor in the country is possible these artificial intelligence systems, widely used by federal agencies and private insurers alike, ingest a deluge of data—insurance claims, pharmacy logs, and public records—and “red flags” to misidentify individuals whose behaviors deviate from established statistical norms.
These so-called healthcare fraud surveillance systems, which utilize artificial intelligence, do not ask why these outliers occur. Palantir’s AI does not consider whether a patient needed that care or whether a physician was serving a high-risk population.
“Palantir AI: The Illusion of Predictive Justice,” critiquing Palantir’s healthcare fraud algorithm. Palantir’s predictive AI argues that the system undermines concepts of moral agency, context-sensitive judgment, and the Principle of Alternate Possibilities.
Anand highlights concerns about misuse, misalignment, mistakes, and structural risks associated with AI systems like Palantir’s, as well as the concept of hyperreality as described by Jean Baudrillard, where simulations replace reality;
“Human imagination, care, choice, and context are not easily quantified. Human life journeys are stories, not spreadsheets of data.”
KING PETER OF PALANTIR: WAYMAKER, MIRACLE WORKER, PROMISE KEEPER, TOUCHING EVERY HEART
When we entrust our systems of justice to AI algorithms that treat correlation as conviction, we are not fighting fraud; we are dismantling the very scaffolding that makes justice and reality possible. Philosopher Jean Baudrillard called this state, hyperreality.”……Hyperreality captures a cultural condition in which simulations and symbols no longer represent reality; they replace it. In a hyperreal state, consumerism thrives on sign exchange value, and brand names become markers of identity and worth, detached from any functional or emotional reality. ”
“..the medium becomes the message and the message is guilt..”
It tells your insurer to flag your file. It tells your doctor, quietly, through alerts and scores, that you’re not worth the fight. And the best part?
No one has to be the bad guy. Not the insurer. Not the prescriber. Not the politician. Palantir’s machine did it.
“It is not our diversity that divides us; it is not our ethnicity, religion, or culture that divides us. Since we have achieved our freedom, there can only be one division amongst us: between those who cherish democracy and those who do not.”
Nelson Mandela
PROMISE KEEPER LIGHT IN THE DARKNESS TOUCHING EVERY HEART
Peter Thiel’s 1995 book, The Diversity Myth, co-authored with David Sacks, served as the “intellectual seedbed” for his mature worldview. Stemming from the “culture wars” at Stanford University, the book critiqued the shift toward multiculturalism in the curriculum, framing it as an attack on Western civilization, a symptom of institutional decay, and a threat to intellectual life.
Thiel, Sacks, and Curtis Yarvin an American bloggers, political theorists, and software developers, known by their pen names “Mencius Moldbug” The founder of the “neo-reactionary movement” or “Dark Enlightenment” all argued that the focus on “diversity” created a “culture of victimization” and stifled conformity, transforming a local campus dispute into a battle for civilization itself.
Their works established the key themes of decline, institutional failure, and the equation of progressive politics with a totalitarian impulse that would define Thiel’s later philosophy.
Most notably, a debate between Professor Danielle Allen and Curtis Yarvin at the Harvard Faculty Club. The discussion centers on the optimal form of societal governance and the role of institutions, such as Harvard, in shaping society.
Professor Allen asserts that “human equality precedes human difference,” emphasizing that all human beings possess “moral capacity” and the desire to “make tomorrow better than yesterday,” which forms the basis of human dignity and the need for freedom.
She clarifies that equality comes in various forms (moral, political, social, intellectual, economic) and that human differences are beautiful precisely because of this underlying equality.
Yarvin “completely rejects the idea that all human beings are created equal” in an empirical sense, suggesting that “all identical twins are created equal” is a “much more true statement.”
He employs thought experiments involving “uncontacted tribes” and hypothetical ancient human species (e.g., Homo habilis) to challenge the universality of moral equality, arguing that different forms of government are more suitable for different peoples.
THE ANAND-CLEMENT RULE OF ARTIFICIAL STUPIDITY (THE AC RULE) [ AI (alg*)= AS ] AND INTIMATE KNOWLEDGE OF DESIGN: ABUSE IN LAW ENFORCEMENT
Thiel’s “Great Stagnation” thesis.
The foundational ideas in The Diversity Myth broadened into a comprehensive indictment of the modern liberal order, unified by Thiel’s “Great Stagnation” thesis.
This theory posits that Western society has experienced a dangerous slowdown in technological and scientific progress since the 1970s, which Thiel blames on a “center-left establishment” and the “decadent distraction” of culture wars.
PROMISE KEEPER LIGHT IN THE DARKNESS, TOUCHING EVERY HEART
This diagnosis justifies his radical conclusions, including his rejection of democratic politics, which he believes are structurally incapable of fostering the long-term innovation needed to reverse decline.
His proposed solution is to abandon these broken systems in favor of a “post-liberal order” led by “heroic founder-entrepreneurs” or “founder-kings” who can force progress, a vision seen as a direct evolution from his initial grievances at Stanford.
Thiel’s philosophy contains numerous controversial and anti-egalitarian elements. In his 2009 essay, “The Education of a Libertarian,” he famously declared, “I no longer believe that freedom and democracy are compatible,” attributing this to the “vast increase in welfare beneficiaries” and “the extension of the franchise to women.”
Thiel’s worldview is described as a “Manichean and eschatological vision,” viewing modern society as nearing “apocalyptic collapse” and a literal battleground between good and evil. This has led him to make inflammatory statements, such as comparing the United Nations to the “antichrist.”
His rejection of the mainstream scientific consensus, which requires collective action, such as on climate change, and his dismissal of activists like Greta Thunberg, further underscore his contrarian stance.
THE DIGITAL LEBENSRAUM: stripping away human subjectivity in favor of mathematical hierarchy
As a “digital political kingmaker,” he has become a central figure in the “New Right,” seeking to push American politics in a more “reactionary direction.”
Thiel’s disdain for liberal institutions is now fully realized in Palantir’s computer architecture. This is not a company interested in building systems for justice or care. It builds systems to optimize.
And optimization, in this worldview, means stripping away human subjectivity in favor of mathematical hierarchy. To Thiel, compassion is inefficiency. Democracy is drag. Affordable healthcare as a human right is heresy.
The result is an America where digital apartheid flourishes in the name of efficiency, where being Black, Indian, poor, disabled, or chronically ill becomes a data point of suspicion, where risk scores mimic redlining.
Where pain becomes a metric to be doubted, Medicaid recipients are labeled as burdens, not patients.
Where the Government’s artificial intelligence algorithms will see you now, and maybe, if you’re lucky, it won’t.
This isn’t speculative fiction. It’s already happening. Predictive analytics tools like NarxCare generate “risk scores” on patients seeking controlled substances, even if they’ve never misused a drug. Machine learning models flag patients for “opioid misuse risk” and subtly influence prescribers through digital nudges.
And Palantir, with its contracts in everything from defense to public health, is uniquely poised to centralize these decisions in one unaccountable system. This is District 9 by way of Silicon Valley. Except now, the aliens aren’t the outsiders.
They’re us!
Unfortunately, the new class of undesirables is not extraterrestrial but terrestrial. Disabled veterans labeled “addicts,” sickle cell patients flagged as “frequent flyers,” working-class mothers refused pain relief after cesareans. They don’t live in a shantytown; they live under the shadow of a Government artificial intelligence algorithm.
American Apartheid enforced through AI, with the Butlerians (those who resist AI rule) set against the Palantirians (those who weaponize it)
In District Six, the lines of segregation are drawn with a pen or, in this case, computer code.
And like in District Six, the lines of segregation are drawn with a pen or, in this case, computer code. This techno-political experiment didn’t begin with AI, but AI gave it teeth. Palantir didn’t invent healthcare discrimination through its healthcare algorithms. It transformed it into a scalable, exportable product for In-Q-Tel (IQT).
This unique, not-for-profit strategic investor serves as a bridge between the U.S. government’s intelligence and defense communities and the dynamic world of innovation and technology development. Founded by the CIA in 1999, it leverages government funding to invest in companies developing cutting-edge technologies relevant to national security needs.
IQT aims to anticipate technological challenges, provide expertise, and accelerate the adoption of groundbreaking innovations for national security and the prosperity of the U.S. and its allies.
By partnering with startups and the venture capital community, IQT helps government agencies stay ahead of evolving threats and efficiently utilize emerging technologies, without relying solely on expensive, in-house development.
While generally seen as a successful model for public-private collaboration, IQT has faced criticism, particularly regarding potential conflicts of interest among its board members and concerns about the ethical implications of government-sponsored investments in private companies, especially those with international operations.
Despite these concerns, IQT continues to play a vital role in identifying, evaluating, and leveraging emerging technologies to support the U.S. national security community.
MY GOD, THAT IS WHO YOU ARE
This is the dream Peter Thiel has chased since his Stanford days, where he and David Sacks wrote The Diversity Myth, a blistering takedown of multiculturalism that framed campus equity movements as the canary in the coal mine of civilizational collapse. What masqueraded as an academic debate was, in fact, a dry run for Thiel’s ideological campaign against democracy itself.
Thiel then apprenticed at Sullivan & Cromwell which has a long and sometimes controversial history, marked by instances like aiding Nazi Germany’s arms buildup, involvement in the 1954 Guatemala coup d’état, and for its role in the FTX cryptocurrency exchange collapse.
These historic acts influenced Thiel, who later declared that “freedom and democracy are not compatible.” Thiel wasn’t being provocative; he was issuing a design brief.
Meanwhile, Thiel distracts the masses with what he now calls “divertissement.” At the Oxford Union in 2023, he described the DEI culture wars as a magician’s trick, flashy, silly, and designed to pull attention away from more pressing, “evil” problems. But that’s the point.
While America argues over pronouns and statues, Palantir builds the digital infrastructure of exclusion for our Government.
This is the great sleight of hand: criticize DEI as a distraction, while quietly constructing a system that operationalizes discrimination.
In the end, the same logic that justified bulldozing District Six now powers our AI digital systems. The same feigned civility that asked aliens to sign eviction notices in District 9 now asks us to “verify our identity,” “accept terms,” or “consent to monitoring.”
But here’s the truth: you cannot consent to an apartheid you don’t even see. Peter Thiel may believe that “founder-kings” should govern the future, but in American healthcare, those kings are building a world where only the predictable survive, and only the privileged thrive. So yes, the Government’s AI algorithm will see you now.
And it’s smiling!
OR SEND
TO CASH APP:$docnorm
ZELLE 3135103378
ALL WATCHED OVER BY MACHINES OF LOVING GRACE
BE SURE TO DONATE TO THE MARK IBSEN GOFUNDME DEFENSE FUND, WHERE THE SON ALWAYS RISES!!!
FOR NOW, YOU ARE WITHIN
THE NORMS
Briefing Document: Palantir and the Rise of Digital Healthcare Apartheid
Date: JULY 4, 2025
Subject: Analysis of Palantir’s Role in Algorithmic Healthcare Exclusion and Peter Thiel’s Underlying Philosophy
Key Themes:
This briefing document synthesizes the provided sources to outline the central argument: that Palantir Technologies, under the influence of its founder Peter Thiel’s ideology, is instrumental in establishing a “digital healthcare apartheid” in the United States.
This new form of discrimination, cloaked in the language of efficiency and data-driven prediction, mirrors historical injustices like South African apartheid and the fictionalized oppression in “District 9,” but operates through opaque algorithms and AI.
I. The “Digital Healthcare Apartheid”: A New Form of Exclusion
The core assertion is that America’s healthcare system is undergoing a quiet, yet profound, transformation towards an “algorithmic” apartheid. This system, facilitated by companies like Palantir, uses technology to create a discriminatory environment without overt, visible bias.
- Historical Parallels: The document draws direct comparisons to South African apartheid, specifically the forced removals in District Six, and the sci-fi parable “District 9.” The key takeaway is the shift from physical violence to a “fake smile” encoded into algorithms.
- “District Six was not just a place; it was a warning. A living community, eradicated by a state that cloaked its violence in the sterile language of ‘order’ and ‘progress.'”
- “Today in the United States, the bullet is gone, but the fake smile remains. It is baked into machine learning and artificial intelligence models.”
- The chilling directive from “District 9” is cited: “‘When dealing with aliens, try to be polite, but firm. And always remember that a smile is cheaper than a bullet.'” This is presented as a metaphor for the current algorithmic approach.
- Palantir’s Role: Palantir Technologies is identified as the “shadow” behind this new apartheid. The company, founded by Peter Thiel, sells “prediction” and “prevention” services that are reinterpreted as “profiling.”
- “And behind this new apartheid, neat, silent, and sanctioned, is the shadow of Palantir Technologies. This is the company that wants to map the world, and through online data tracking, is already mapping you.”
- Palantir “claims to fight fraud and waste, but in reality, it targets statistical deviance with a religious fervor.”
- The ultimate “goal? To Control Human Healthcare Delivery without fingerprints, classifications without context. Sorting the worthy human beings from the unworthy human beings with the sanctified neutrality of numbers.”
- Algorithmic Discrimination in Practice: The sources detail how AI-driven predictive models, often used by federal agencies and private insurers, identify individuals as “drug seekers, a misuse risk, or a burden.” This is done without transparency or explicit notification to the patient.
- “An artificial intelligence predictive model may decide you’re a drug seeker, a misuse risk, or a burden. It doesn’t tell you this. It just tells the pharmacy to deny your medication.”
- These “healthcare fraud surveillance systems” ingest vast amounts of data (insurance claims, pharmacy logs) and “red flag” individuals whose behavior “deviate from established statistical norms.”
- Crucially, “Palantir’s AI does not consider whether a patient needed that care or whether a physician was serving a high-risk population.” This omission of “context is precisely what artificial intelligence algorithms omit in violation of constitutional and human rights.”
- Consequences for Patients: The outcome is a system where “being Black, Indian, poor, disabled, or chronically ill becomes a data point of suspicion, where risk scores mimic redlining.”
- “Where pain becomes a metric to be doubted, Medicaid recipients are labeled as burdens, not patients.”
- Examples include “Disabled veterans labeled ‘addicts,’ sickle cell patients flagged as ‘frequent flyers,’ working-class mothers refused pain relief after cesareans.”
- The source explicitly states: “This isn’t speculative fiction. It’s already happening. Predictive analytics tools like NarxCare generate ‘risk scores’ on patients seeking controlled substances, even if they’ve never misused a drug.”
II. Peter Thiel’s Ideological Foundations: Fueling the Digital Divide
The source attributes the development of this “digital apartheid” to the underlying philosophy of Palantir’s founder, Peter Thiel. His worldview, shaped by early intellectual engagements, is characterized by a distrust of liberal institutions, a belief in societal decline, and a preference for “founder-kings” over democratic processes.
- “The Diversity Myth” as a Seedbed: Thiel’s 1995 book, “The Diversity Myth,” co-authored with David Sacks, is identified as the “intellectual seedbed” for his mature worldview. It critiqued multiculturalism, framing it as an attack on “Western civilization” and a “threat to intellectual life.”
- Thiel, Sacks, and Curtis Yarvin (founder of the “neo-reactionary movement”) argued that “diversity” created a “culture of victimization” and stifled conformity.
- The “Great Stagnation” and Rejection of Democracy: Thiel’s philosophy evolved into the “Great Stagnation” thesis, blaming a “center-left establishment” and “decadent distraction” for societal decline since the 1970s.
- This “diagnosis justifies his radical conclusions, including his rejection of democratic politics, which he believes are structurally incapable of fostering the long-term innovation needed to reverse decline.”
- His proposed solution is a “post-liberal order” led by “heroic founder-entrepreneurs” or “founder-kings.”
- Anti-Egalitarian and Controversial Views: Thiel’s rejection of democratic values is starkly articulated.
- In his 2009 essay, “The Education of a Libertarian,” he famously declared, “I no longer believe that freedom and democracy are compatible,” attributing this to the “vast increase in welfare beneficiaries” and “the extension of the franchise to women.”
- His worldview is described as a “Manichean and eschatological vision,” seeing modern society as nearing “apocalyptic collapse” and a battle between good and evil, leading to inflammatory statements like comparing the UN to the “antichrist.”
- Palantir as a Manifestation of Thiel’s Disdain: The source directly links Palantir’s architecture to Thiel’s philosophy.
- “Thiel’s disdain for liberal institutions is now fully realized in Palantir’s computer architecture. This is not a company interested in building systems for justice or care. It builds systems to optimize.”
- “And optimization, in this worldview, means stripping away human subjectivity in favor of mathematical hierarchy. To Thiel, compassion is inefficiency. Democracy is drag. Affordable healthcare as a human right is heresy.”
III. The Illusion of Predictive Justice and Hyperreality
The document critiques the underlying logic of Palantir’s AI systems, arguing that they undermine fundamental human values and contribute to a state of “hyperreality.”
- Omission of Context and Moral Agency: Palantir’s predictive AI is criticized for “undermining concepts of moral agency, context-sensitive judgment, and the Principle of Alternate Possibilities.”
- “Human imagination, care, choice, and context are not easily quantified. Human life journeys are stories, not spreadsheets of data.”
- The “Anand-Clement Rule of Artificial Stupidity (The AC Rule) [ AI (alg*)= AS ]” is introduced to highlight the potential for AI to lead to “artificial stupidity” due to the lack of intimate knowledge of design and potential for abuse.
- Hyperreality and the Replacement of Reality: The concept of “hyperreality” by Jean Baudrillard is invoked to describe a state where simulations and symbols replace reality.
- “When we entrust our systems of justice to AI algorithms that treat correlation as conviction, we are not fighting fraud; we are dismantling the very scaffolding that makes justice and reality possible. Philosopher Jean Baudrillard called this state, hyperreality.”
- In this state, “the medium becomes the message and the message is guilt.”
- The Unaccountable Machine: A key danger is the diffusion of responsibility.
- “No one has to be the bad guy. Not the insurer. Not the prescriber. Not the politician. Palantir’s machine did it.” This highlights the insidious nature of algorithmic decision-making.
IV. The “Sleight of Hand” and the Future of Control
The document concludes by emphasizing the deceptive nature of this digital transformation and its implications for individual freedom and autonomy.
- Distraction and Operationalized Discrimination: Thiel’s current “divertissement” strategy—criticizing DEI culture wars as a distraction—is presented as a “magician’s trick” to divert attention while “Palantir builds the digital infrastructure of exclusion for our Government.”
- “This is the great sleight of hand: criticize DEI as a distraction, while quietly constructing a system that operationalizes discrimination.”
- Involuntary Consent and a Controlled Future: The fundamental lack of choice in this algorithmic system is highlighted.
- “you cannot consent to an apartheid you don’t even see.”
- The ultimate outcome is a world “where only the predictable survive, and only the privileged thrive.”
- “So yes, the Government’s AI algorithm will see you now. And it’s smiling!”
Conclusion:
The sources present a dire warning about the intersection of advanced technology and a specific ideological framework. They argue that Palantir, guided by Peter Thiel’s anti-egalitarian and post-democratic philosophy, is actively constructing a “digital healthcare apartheid” in the United States.
This system, operating through opaque AI algorithms, undermines human agency, contextual understanding, and fundamental notions of justice, replacing reality with a “hyperreal” simulation where discrimination is automated and responsibility is diffused.
The consequence is a future where “the new class of undesirables is not extraterrestrial but terrestrial,” living under the shadow of governmental AI algorithms that decide their worth and access to care.
