NORMAN J CLEMENT RPH., DDS, NORMAN L. CLEMENT PHARM-TECH, MALACHI F. MACKANDAL PHARMD, BELINDA BROWN-PARKER, IN THE SPIRIT OF JOSEPH SOLVO ESQ., INC.T. SPIRIT OF REV. IN THE SPIRIT OF WALTER R. CLEMENT BS., MS, MBA. HARVEY JENKINS MD, PH.D., IN THE SPIRIT OF C.T. VIVIAN, JELANI ZIMBABWE CLEMENT, BS., MBA., IN THE SPIRIT OF THE HON. PATRICE LUMUMBA, IN THE SPIRIT OF ERLIN CLEMENT SR., WALTER F. WRENN III., MD., JULIE KILLINGSWORTH, RENEE BLARE, RPH, DR. TERENCE SASAKI, MD LESLY POMPY MD., CHRISTOPHER RUSSO, MD., NANCY SEEFELDT, WILLIE GUINYARD BS., JOSEPH WEBSTER MD., MBA, BEVERLY C. PRINCE MD., FACS., NEIL ARNAND, MD., RICHARD KAUL, MD., LEROY BAYLOR, JAY K. JOSHI MD., MBA, ADRIENNE EDMUNDSON, ESTER HYATT PH.D., WALTER L. SMITH BS., IN THE SPIRIT OF BRAHM FISHER ESQ., MICHELE ALEXANDER MD., CUDJOE WILDING BS, MARTIN NJOKU, BS., RPH., IN THE SPIRIT OF DEBRA LYNN SHEPHERD, BERES E. MUSCHETT, STRATEGIC ADVISORS
“According to subject matter expert Richard A (Red) Lawhern, PhD, the US DEA is indeed attempting to become the final arbiter of the practice of American pain medicine.
Individual Administrative Court judges are instructing juries to accept the “expert” testimony of hired-gun doctors who are paid to represent DEA prosecutors’ unqualified notions of what constitutes accepted practice in prescribing.
In many cases, these doctors are by no stretch of a wild imagination, “experts” in this field. By any other name, this may comprise officially sanctioned jury tampering.”
“DEA also published a draft guideline on prescription of opioids some years ago in the Federal Register.
However, that draft guideline was quietly withdrawn without comment, leaving any definitive official “standard” in limbo.
The Agency has been aware for at least five years that opioid prescribing by doctors has never dominated or even seriously driven overdose mortality in the United States.
But they continue targeting and persecuting doctors who prescribe opioids, because they are easier targets than drug cartels whose soldiers can shoot back.”
LET’S START WITH REAGAN
Dr L. Joseph Parker articulates and writes;
Let’s start with Reagan. Reagan did a lot of things.
One of the things he did was change the rules in American courts. Arguing that the criminal justice system had collapsed, he advocated legal changes that would make it easier to deny the accused bail and allow prosecutors to use illegally seized evidence in court. He made it clear that it was time to put “public safety” ahead of “offender’s rights.”
He argued that poverty and a bad environment did not produce crime and that retribution for criminals should be swift. While speaking to several thousand police officers, he said he regretted not having authorized more executions while he was the Governor of California.
He would point out examples of murderers who had killed again after parole and said that “our legal system has failed to carry out its most important function -the protection of the innocent and the punishment of the guilty.”
This was hard to argue against. Human beings, though capable of rational thought, most often make their decisions based on visceral emotional responses from much older systems in the brain.
We then put those more rational systems to work, justifying our decisions.
He passionately believed that capital punishment would reduce crime. Or at least said he did. He was, after all, a politician, and an actor.
This “common sense” argument has been proven false over and over again, yet it has a degree of “truthiness” to it, as Stephen Colbert would say, that does not allow it to die. Reagan also believed that the “exclusionary rule” prohibiting the use of illegally seized evidence, should not prohibit the use of that evidence at trial. This is also inherently truthy!!
No sane person wants a serial killer to go free with two bodies in the trunk because the taillight wasn’t really out when he was stopped. Reagan also argued to limit the use of habeas corpus petitions. Habeus corpus allows someone to argue that their trial or the verdict was unfair or wrong, and Reagan feared bad people would get off on “a technicality.”
But what message did those words from the president of the United States, and the subsequent changes Reagan championed in the courts, have on our justice system?
Simple. If you have to break the law to get a conviction, that’s okay, as long as you get the “bad guy.” People in prison whine too much and should not be listened to, and not enough bad guys are getting locked up or killed.
In the past, police would carry throw-away guns to plant in case they shot an unarmed person; now, that wasn’t necessary; just say you ‘feared for your life.’ The biggest coward gets to cap the most people nowadays. And “testilying” became a phrase used by many corrupt police officers to describe what they did in court.
TO BE CONTINUED
OR SEND
TO CASH APP:$docnorm
ZELLE 3135103378
So, Donate to the “Pharmacist For Healthcare Legal Defense Fund,
FOR NOW, YOU ARE WITHIN
THE NORMS
REFERENCE:
Lyrics
“WE MUST LISTEN TO GOD“
Song A: Uyalalelwa
Uyalalelwa Usomandla (We must listen to God)
Noma isimo singavumi (even though the situation doesn’t allow)
Uyalalelwa Usomandla (We must listen to God)
Noma isimo singavumi (even though the situation doesn’t allow)
Ukulalela kwesiny’isikhathi (listening sometimes)
Kubiza ukuphila kwethu (make us live)
Uyalalelwa Unkulunkulu (We must listen to God)
Song B: Wachith’igazi
Wachithi’igazi esiphambanweni (your blood was shed on the cross)
Yingakho ngithi ungcwele njalo (thats why i say you are holy always)
Noma ngiligwa akushintshi lutho
(even when I encounter trials, that doesn’t change anything)
Ungithandile esphambanweni (you loved me on the cross)
Song C: Jehova Retshepile Wena
Jehova re Tshepile (Lord we trust)
Re tshepile wena (We trust in You)
Ka Matsatsi le Matsatsi (From day to day)
Jehova re Tshepile (Lord we trust)
Re tshepile wena (We trust in You)
Song D: Mohadi
Monhadi, Messiah, tshela moya o halalelang
(Lord, Messiah, pour the Holy Spirit into us)
Monhadi, Messiah, tshela moya o halalelang
(Lord, Messiah, pour the Holy Spirit into us)
Song E: Hlonolofatsa
Iyo-yo hlonolofatsa
(Ilo yo yo Bless)
Iyo-yo hlonolofatsa
(Ilo yo yo Bless)
Iyo ka lebitso la ntate
(Iyo Bless in the name of the father)
Iyo-yo ka lebitso
(Iyo In the name of the father we bless)
DAVID SMITH
Dr Norman J Clement is fighting a broadcaster on XM satellite radio who is spreading the propaganda that the Sackler family and Purdue Pharma (makers of Oxycontin) created the overdose crisis, which is Not supported by the CDC’s own data. Substance use disorder has nothing to do with exposure to a substance, it is a psychological problem that arises as a person becomes unable to cope, and is looking for a way out of a situation or life experience that they cannot cope with. People who use these substances with no medical need will use any substance they can get their hands on, whether alcohol, methamphetamines, cocaine, opioids, until they go unconscious or die. Exposure to a substance does not automatically create a raving addict. The vast majority of people (99.99%) can be treated with proper, appropriate opioid medications after a surgery or dental procedure during the healing phase, and then stop using the medication and resume normal activity with no problem. This propaganda that anyone who is prescribed opioid medications is at risk of addiction is NOT supported by the data and MUST be challenged!