THE COURT OF INTIMIDATION
NORMAN J CLEMENT RPH., DDS, NORMAN L. CLEMENT PHARM-TECH, MALACHI F. MACKANDAL PHARMD, BELINDA BROWN-PARKER, IN THE SPIRIT OF JOSEPH SOLVO ESQ., INC.T. SPIRIT OF REV. IN THE SPIRIT OF WALTER R. CLEMENT BS., MS, MBA. HARVEY JENKINS MD, PH.D., IN THE SPIRIT OF C.T. VIVIAN, JELANI ZIMBABWE CLEMENT, BS., MBA., IN THE SPIRIT OF THE HON. PATRICE LUMUMBA, IN THE SPIRIT OF ERLIN CLEMENT SR., DR. LINDA WHITBY, MD., L.JOSEPH PARKER, MD., EVELYN J. CLEMENT, WALTER F. WRENN III., MD., JULIE KILLINGSWORTH, RENEE BLARE, RPH, DR. TERENCE SASAKI, MD LESLY POMPY MD., CHRISTOPHER RUSSO, MD., NANCY SEEFELDT, WILLIE GUINYARD BS., JOSEPH WEBSTER MD., MBA, BEVERLY C. PRINCE MD., FACS., NEIL ARNAND, MD., RICHARD KAUL, MD., LEROY BAYLOR, JAY K. JOSHI MD., MBA, ADRIENNE EDMUNDSON, ESTER HYATT PH.D., WALTER L. SMITH BS., IN THE SPIRIT OF BRAHM FISHER ESQ., MICHELE ALEXANDER MD., CUDJOE WILDING BS, MARTIN NJOKU, BS., RPH., IN THE SPIRIT OF DEBRA LYNN SHEPHERD, BERES E. MUSCHETT, STRATEGIC ADVISORS
A COURT OF INTIMIDATION AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL DESIGN
All Courts in America are set up constitutionally where each Justice or Judge of the United States;
” shall take the following oath or affirmation before performing the duties of his/her office: I,____, do solemnly swear(or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as____under the Constitution and laws of the United States, So help me God.”
The DEA Court as designed, is unconstitutional, and any decisions that have been ever handed down by this tribunal are all unconstitutional.
The DEA tribunal operates outside Federal Rules of Evidence and Civil procedures and whose final decision is made by the DEA administrator, who the United States Senate confirms.
Most cases are held in Arlington, Va, 99% of the time. So now the Clients and their witnesses must travel to Virginia to seek so-called justice.
The DEA level of corruption goes all the way to the top of the political chain in the Justice Department and the political structure in America. The House Committee on Judiciary and the House Committee on Government Operation must give oversight.
RIDLEY’S FAMILY MARKETS, INC VS. MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; ANNE MILGRAM, UNITED STATES DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION; JOHN J. MULROONEY, II, CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE, UNITED STATES DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY; and THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BOGUS JUDICIAL COURT PROCEEDINGS AND SYSTEMS
THE FAILURE OF CONGRESSIONAL FOOT DRAGGING AND OVERSIGHT
The DEA enforces two sets of laws. They enforce federal laws and DEA laws. Under federal laws, there are constitutional laws and guidelines.
What is so unique about the DEA courts are criminal search warrants are signed by DEA Judges. Thus when the properties are seized, the hearing is an administrative hearing.
What further makes this so confusing is that there is no clear distinction between the enforcement of criminal laws and DEA laws and all DEA cases in these courts proceeding are solely based on the “numbers of Pills” received and filled.
1. Diversion Investigation often interviews no patients or prescribing practitioners and violates patients’ right to seek care by tracking their travel to seek medical using google maps.
2. These Courts never address the disease states of the Patient receiving the narcotic analgesic medications. This important information and facts are excluded from Court Testimony.
3. The DEA created a law called Pharmacist corresponding responsibility “under the Controlled Substances which compels the Pharmacist to practice medicine by withholding medical treatment from a patient based on MME unscientific guidelines, without reviewing radiographs, physicians progress notes or conducting a physical examination of the patient.
4. The DEA has set arbitrary prescription limits on the amounts of medications Black Owned, Hispanic, and Asian Pharmacies are permitted to fill and the distance their patients can travel. While predominately white own pharmacies are allowed to fill narcotic medication into millions of tablets, capsules, and liquids without being questioned by DEA Diversion.
The DEA System is blatantly biased and unfair Sickel Cell patientshave been accused, charged, and prosecuted for being involved with the diversion of narcotics of specific patients, for a specific prescription a ” pill mill doctor,” only to see the same patients with the same prescription and same “pill mill doctor” get their prescription filled at a white own pharmacy and that is ok with the DEA.
5. The Court is designed to violate the patient’s Human Right to seek medical care and acts arbitrarily and capriciously to violate all constitutional rights of both patients, pharmacists, and practitioners. Further, DEA has relied on fear and bullying, rest and seizure of property to silence most black pharmacists and owners.
THE KANGAROO TRIBUNALS FORCES PHARMACISTS TO SECOND GUESS THE PRESCRIBING PRACTITIONERS’
This agency of DEA’s Judicial operations alone has created many unseen problems such patient profiling and Pharmacist improperly overriding a prescribing physicians/dentists diagnosis and treatment without putting anything in writing as to reasons medication were being withheld.
DEA’s overreach has resulted in pharmacists becoming a public health threats, and the imminent danger
There is a direct need for Congressional Oversight and Review and it is incumbent these intrinsic failures are investigated and with public hearing.
More notably this bogus courts system can only be classified as deceitful. Attorneys should be permitted to file complaints under Giglio, and every so called targeted and convicted medical provider would be released from prison.
DEA INDEPENDENT OWN PHARMACY BIASES
Prescribed SCHEDULE II Control Narcotic biases further aggravates treatment protocols for it is not usual a pain patient to denied at a Black own independent pharmacy to watch the very patient who was a red flag (at the black own pharmacies) get the same prescriptions, written by the same prescriber, using the same payment filled at a another pharmacy.
NORMAN CLEMENT OF PRONTO PHARMACY VS. BOGUS DEA JUDICIAL COURT PROCEEDINGS
“We are but low-hanging fruit being harvested for a prison to be conveniently exterminated, and their Probity enforces their belief there is no one bit of educational achievement Black Folk have attained that any Institution is bound to respect.”
CHALLENGING DEA’S TRIBUNALS VIOLATIONS OF THE DOCTOR-PATIENT RELATIONSHIP
WALMART VS UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
ATTORNEY JOHN FLANNERY REPRESENTING REBECCA SNYDER, et. al VS. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, et. al. BOGUS JUDICIAL COURT PROCEEDINGS AND SYSTEMS
This is in reality, why Walmart has filed this preemptive strike against both DOJ/ DEA because it fears disruption of commerce, it fears extortion, injustice fears injury to its brand its attorneys know it must thwart the corrupt actions of the DEA kangaroo tribunals in which the pathology of diseases, disease states will never take the stand, and the physician-patient relationships ( healthcare practitioners) becomes eviscerated in support of the ill-gotten gains of DEA and DOJ.
According to the United States Chamber of Commerce Amicus Curiae brief:
This is a case where a company did not acquiesce and has not settled. This gives the Court an all-too-rare opportunity to stop the otherwise inexorable trend toward regulation by post-hoc enforcement.
Compliance programs are frustrated, not furthered when agencies enforce sub-regulatory guidance, created without notice as if it were binding law.
Even businesses with robust compliance programs are left guessing when burdensome obligations stem from loose policymaking.
Facing potentially crushing liability, many companies acquiesce and settle, seeming to validate the sub-regulatory guidance and encouraging further aggrandizement by the government. This is why courts demand that agencies observe basic procedural requirements and fundamental fairness in creating, interpreting, and enforcing substantive obligations on regulated entities.
On December 22, 2020, Attorneys for Walmart Pharmacy wrote in response to the United States Justice lawsuit stating:
“Historical ethics violations taint the Justice Department’s investigation, and this lawsuit invents a legal theory that unlawfully forces pharmacists to come between patients and their doctors and is riddled with factual inaccuracies and cherry-picked documents taken out of context. Blaming pharmacists for not second-guessing the very doctors the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) approved to prescribe opioids is a transparent attempt to shift blame from DEA’s well-documented failures in keeping bad doctors from prescribing opioids in the first place.
In contrast to DEA’s own failures, Walmart always empowered our pharmacists to refuse to fill problematic opioids prescriptions, and they refused to fill hundreds of thousands of such prescriptions. Walmart sent DEA tens of thousands of investigative leads, and we blocked thousands of questionable doctors from having their opioid prescriptions filled at our pharmacies.
According to Walmart Pharmacy’s legal team, when a patient brings an opioid prescription from a doctor into a pharmacy to fill:
“Pharmacists aren’t doctors and don’t write opioid prescriptions. Instead, when a patient hands an opioid prescription written by a DEA-approved doctor to a pharmacist, a pharmacist has to decide whether to fill it. No one disputes that if a pharmacist knows a prescription is fake or forged, she shouldn’t fill it.
The Department’s lawsuit raises a different issue: what a pharmacist should do with a prescription that is valid on its face and written by a state-licensed and DEA-approved doctor.
Should a pharmacist accept the doctor’s medical judgment and fill the prescription for a prescription like that? Or should a pharmacist second-guess the doctor and not fill it, leaving the patient without the medicine prescribed by her doctor?
Remember, a pharmacist must make this decision without the benefit of a medical degree, without examining the patient, and without access to the patient’s medical records.
This single-focused act by the DEA and its court systems should fear every American. The constitution was not intended to be used to identify and attack particular groups of people. The DEA and its court system have created an unrestricted bias whereby this organization has yielded the power to act as they please.
ALL COURTS IN AMERICA ARE SET UP CONSTITUTIONALLY EXCEPT THE DEA’s COURT TRIBUNAL
AUTHORITY FOR PROMULGATION OF RULES TITLE 28, UNITED STATES CODE
§ 2072. Rules of procedure and evidence; power to prescribe
(a) The Supreme Court shall have the power to prescribe general rules of practice and procedure and rules of evidence for cases in the United States district courts (including proceedings before magistrate judges thereof) and courts of appeals.
(b) Such rules shall not abridge, enlarge, or modify any substantive right. All laws in conflict with such rules shall be of no further force or effect after such rules have taken effect.
(c) Such rules may define when a ruling of a district court is final for the purposes of appeal under section 1291 of this title.
(Added Pub. L. 100–702, title IV, § 401(a), Nov. 19, 1988, 102 Stat. 4648, eff. Dec. 1, 1988; amended Pub. L. 101–650, title III, §§315, 321, Dec. 1, 1990, 104 Stat. 5115, 5117.)
Federal agents mad ’cause I’m flagrant
Tap my cell and the phone in the basement
My team supreme, stay clean
Triple beam lyrical dream, I be that
Cat you see at all events bent
Gats in holsters, girls on shoulders“
§ 2073. Rules of procedure and evidence; method of prescribing
(a)(1) The Judicial Conference shall prescribe and publish the procedures for the consideration of proposed rules under this section.
(2) The Judicial Conference may authorize the appointment of committees to assist the Conference by recommending rules to be prescribed under sections 2072 and 2075 of this title. Each such committee shall consist of members of the bench and the professional bar and trial and appellate judges.
(b) The Judicial Conference shall authorize the appointment of a standing committee on rules of practice, procedure, and evidence under subsection (a) of this section. Such standing committee shall review each recommendation of any other committees so appointed and recommend to the Judicial Conference rules of practice, procedure, and evidence and such changes in rules proposed by a committee appointed under subsection (a)(2) of this section as may be necessary to maintain consistency and otherwise promote the interest of justice.
(c)(1) Each meeting for the transaction of business under this chapter by any committee appointed under this section shall be open to the public, except when the committee so meeting, in open session and with a majority present, determines that it is in the public interest that all or part of the remainder of the meeting on that day shall be closed to the public, and states the reason for so closing the meeting. Minutes of each meeting for the transaction of business under this chapter shall be maintained by the committee and made available to the public, except that any portion of such minutes, relating to a closed meeting and made available to the public, may contain such deletions as may be necessary to avoid frustrating the purposes of closing the meeting.
However, the DEA’s tribunal, whose rulings have the overall effect of any Civil Court (civil), conducts all proceedings outside of Federal Civil Rules and Procedures. However, there is not one law in America the DEA or its Court System is bound to respect;
- Federal RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURES ARE NOT PERMITTED.
- Jenks’s rulings or procedures are not allowed.
- Giglio rulings or protections are not allowed.
- Federal rules of evidence are not allowed.
- The Judge of a DEA Court works for the DEA Administrator (DRUG CZAR), and he/she has final say so in all hearing decisions.
- If the DEA administrator does not agree with the Administrative Judges’ recommendations, the Judge is terminated.
- Attorneys who practice before this Court, describe rules as arcane, stealthy, very bizarre.
- Most of All cases are heard in Virginia, putting the Respondents from around the Country and their Attorneys at a logistical disadvantage and nightmare.
- Until recently, the DEA Administrator has the final decision on all recommendations, he/she has can sit on a recommended order as long as 3 years.
- CONGRESS MUST INVESTIGATE DEA AND THEIR COURT SYSTEM.
THE CONDUCT OF DEA’S COURT NEEDS SERIOUS JUDICIAL REVIEW
The Court System of the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA), which has slipped through both Judicial review and Congressional oversite, operates outside the Federal Rules of Civil and Criminal Procedures and is in contempt and violation of those protections of the Constitution of The United States of America needs serious Judicial/ Congressional Review
As officers of the Court, their mission is not to seek out the truth but to promote injustice by eliminating the truth and supporting bias. disguising their racism with the use of enablers (filter negroes).
The DEA has thus gained the powers over the entire field of medicine(healthcare science) to redefine medical procedures and medical science.
These Bogus Judges in DEA’s Bogus Courts make their own rules which permitted DEA Agents, and diversion investigators act as rogues to which no federal or constitutional protection they are bound to respect or abide.. in Associate Supreme Court Justice Gorsuch wrote …“
“So what is this court is it supposedly a Civil Court or Criminal Court but doesn’t function under Federal civil rules and procedure? It further operates as a Federal Criminal without six amendment constitutional protections.
This belongs to Congressional, and it behaves as both a non-court outside federal civil procedure and rules that fall under Judicial scrutiny…”
NEARLY All DECISIONS HANDED DOWN BY THE DEA COURT APPEAR UNCONSTITUTIONAL
THE DEA COURT OF THE KANGAROO is designed to make the scientific foundation of the medical procedures and opinions inconsequential. both civil and criminal law its officers (SEE Ramos V Louisiana Supreme Court April 20, 2020)
According to Dr. Felix Brizuela, DO.;
Reviewing the data I obtained from a FOIA request by another doctor. It has become abundantly clear that insurance companies, temp to cut their costs, have created Analytics to target doctors inappropriately.
It appears that the analytics insurance companies used created red flags that had no medical relevance to inappropriately target doctors’ race, religion, country of origin, and economic status.
This is not only anti-American; it is illegal. The insurance companies release this data to the DEA who’s that targets physicians.
Apparently, the DEA cherry-picks doctors in private practice with over 60 foreign graduates, blacks, Asians, Hispanics, and Jews. I have read forms that are collected by the insurance companies that include such information as a percentage of brand medicine ordered and several antivirals ordered.
IN THEIR WORDS CAN’T ENFORCED ILLICIT DRUG LAWS WHEN DEA AGENTS ARE UNDER THE COVERS FUCKING CARTEL PROSTITUTES AND LAUNDERING THEIR MONEY THE WAR ON DRUGS IS A LOST FAILURE
This information clearly does not indicate that a physician is doing anything wrong. But they are indicators of physicians, which may be costing the insurance company more money.
Forms also have how many cars the physician has, how close to the water their house is, how rich their neighbors are, how far the physician’s office is from the pharmacy, how far the patients have to travel to the pharmacy how far the patients travel to the physician.
Each of these questions is assigned a numerical score. If a physician’s analytic # is above a certain score, he’s referred to the DEA, who then picks out physicians to target based on their race, religion, age, color their economic status.
The government cannot obtain this data independently, so they partner with the insurance co. The ins. company gets rid of Drs who cost them too much money, and the DEA takes the doctor’s assets. This is the way things happen in a third-world country.
On my indictment, I was given a—— score which is the percentage of opioids to non-opiods that I prescribed. What relevance does that data have? What studies have been done to support the relevance of that number?
This data is being used to save insurance companies $ by discriminating against doctors in a biased manner.
Dr”s are being charged criminally for prescribing appropriate medicine that the insurance Companies do want to pay independent medical providers.
There are obviously many more Analytics that are used to target physicians. I would like to see this information to help defend myself for my upcoming case in October. Thank you.
“…LEAD ME OH FATHER, LEAD ME MY SAVIOR IN ALL THE SORROW OF THIS WORLD YOU CALM MY FEARS FATHER THANK YOU FOR YOU STILL PROTECT ME…”
FOR NOW, YOU ARE WITHIN
THE NORMS
Enjoy the blog and have learned from it. But you are BADLY in need of a proofreader/editor! In every posting there are several sentences or paragraphs that are mostly incomprehensible.
Please continue the blog, but give your readers a break from having to figure out what you are writing.
Thank you! -Kevin R
Got it
It’s my disphexia AND WE ARE NOT COMPLETE WITH THIS ARTICLE
I APECIATE YOUR COMMENT BUT THIS ARTICLE IS A PUBLISHED ROUGH DRAFT, FOR EDITING LATTER , I THESE TYPE OF ARTICLES WE CALL IT EDIT ON THE FLY