Medical Advocates: Dentistry, Pharmacy, Physicians "Leaving No Stone Unturned , No Subject Untouched, No Ass UnKicked"
THE ATTEMPTED RAILROADING OF DR. NORMAN J. CLEMENT, RPH., DDS AND HOW NEUMANN PHARMACY RULING UNRAVELED THE D.E.A AND THE FLORIDA BOARD OF PHARMACY MISINTERPRETATIONS OF CONTROL SUBSTANCES LAW
“..WE ARE NOT POWERLESS, AND THROUGH OUR VIDEOS, WRITINGS, AND PHOTOGRAPHS, WE WILL EXPOSE THE ABUSES AND TYRANNY …JUST AS THE VIDEO WAS RECORDED BY THE CELL PHONE CAMERA OF YOUNG Darnella Frazier, BORE WITNESS TO THE MURDER OF GEORGE FLOYD, THE BLOG youarewithinthenorms.com bears WITNESS, AND BOTH ALLOWS THE SYSTEM TO BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE..”
youarewithinthenorms.com
NORMAN J CLEMENT RPH., DDS, NORMAN L. CLEMENT PHARM-TECH, MALACHI F. MACKANDAL PHARMD, BELINDA BROWN-PARKER, IN THE SPIRIT OF JOSEPH SOLVO ESQ., INC., SPIRIT OF REV. IN THE SPIRIT OF WALTER R. CLEMENT BS., MS, MBA. HARVEY JENKINS, MD, PH.D., IN THE SPIRIT OF C.T. VIVIAN, JELANI ZIMBABWE CLEMENT, BS., M.B.A., IN THE SPIRIT OF THE HON. PATRICE LUMUMBA, IN THE SPIRIT OF ERLIN CLEMENT SR., EVELYN J. CLEMENT, IN THE SPIRIT OF WALTER F. WRENN III., MD., JULIE KILLINGSWORTH, RENEE BLARE, RPH, DR. TERENCE SASAKI, MD LESLY POMPY MD., CHRISTOPHER RUSSO, MD., NANCY SEEFELDT, IN THE SPIRIT OF WILLIE GUINYARD BS., JOSEPH WEBSTER MD., MBA, BEVERLY C. PRINCE MD., FACS., NEIL ARNAND, MD., RICHARD KAUL, MD., IN THE SPIRIT OF LEROY BAYLOR, JAY K. JOSHI MD., MBA, AISHA GARDNER, ADRIENNE EDMUNDSON, ESTER HYATT PH.D., WALTER L. SMITH BS., IN THE SPIRIT OF BRAHM FISHER ESQ., MICHELE ALEXANDER MD., CUDJOE WILDING BS, MARTIN NJOKU, BS., RPH., IN THE SPIRIT OF DEBRA LYNN SHEPHERD, BERES E. MUSCHETT, STRATEGIC ADVISORS
THE D.E.A.’S RAILROADING OF PRONTO PHARMACY, LLC, TAMPA, FL.
Dr. Norman Clement is a Pharmacist and Dentist whose reputation and business were destroyed when he became the subject of a DEA investigation for filling valid prescriptions for patients provided by the doctors. 2 much larger pharmacies within a 5-mile radius were not subject to this raid and humiliation. There seems to be a racial element in his targeting, as other Black-owned pharmacies in his state and around the US were also targeted. After a raid and legal process, he remains broken by the process, despite an appeal to the Supreme Court. The solution to the criminalization of Pain Management in America is for policymakers. Doctors get destroyed. Patients become pain refugees. No one wins.
Late Sarge. Walter R. Clement, BS, MS, MBA writer, researcher, 34 years, Detroit Police Department
DEA Raided Pronto While Giants Sold Millions: “The Imminent Danger”
SGT WALTER R. CLEMENT: “EXPOSEDTHE FILTERED NEGROE’S PROTOCOLS“
James Albert, DEA, an Unqualified Investigator: During a January 28, 2020, cross-examination, the DEA Diversion Investigator admitted under oath that he did not “know or understand the laws or how, ” revealing that the agency had targeted Pronto Pharmacy based on unproven, unscientific assumptions that any law applies to the practice of pharmacy.” (1) (pg116)
DEA AMIE ALBERT DEA PRONTO ALBERT CASH, TRAVEL, MANUFACTURE, RED FLAG FILTERED
D.E.A’S DIVERSION OF THE TRUTH IN THE CASE OF PRONTO PHARMACY AND OVERREACH OF AUTHORITY
THE STORY OF PRONTO PHARMACY, LLC
NEUMANN PHARMACY
NEUMANNS PHARMACY WHERE THE D.E.A.-DOJ CASE CRUMBLED
The Neumann Paradigm Shift: Subjective vs. Objective Knowledge: The landmark ruling in Neumann’s Pharmacy v. DEA (2026) stands as a profound judicial rebuke to years of regulatory overreach. The court vacated the DEA’s deregistration order, explicitly holding that when an agency substitutes a different rule of decision for the governing text of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA), its actions are arbitrary and capricious. A primary example of this overreach addressed in Neumann was the DEA’s attempt to apply a specific Louisiana state law—which prohibited physicians from prescribing to family members—as a federal standard to penalize a pharmacist for filling such a script. The court signaled that the DEA cannot use state-specific professional bans to manufacture federal liability for dispensers.
THE GAME CHANGER
A comparison table showing two legal standards: ‘Rejected: Objective Standard’ and ‘Mandated: Subjective Standard.’ The objective standard has a metric based on what a reasonable doctor would do, while the subjective standard focuses on what the specific doctor actually believed. Keywords for the objective standard include ‘Honest effort / Objective Good Faith,’ resulting in the inappropriate application of civil negligence in criminal prosecution. The subjective standard’s keywords are ‘Subjective Intent / Subjective Good Faith,’ requiring the defendant to know their actions are unauthorized.
The Fifth Circuit ruling
Central to the Neumann shift is the court’s rejection of the “reason to know” (objective) standard in favor of a strict “subjective knowledge” (scienter) requirement. Utilizing the “transitive verb” argument, the court clarified that “knowingly” serves as a modifier for the transitive verb “fills” and its object “invalid prescription.”
The court invoked the “child and the toy”
“child and the toy”
To define this, the court invoked the “child and the toy” analogy from Flores-Figueroa v. United States: if a child knowingly takes a sibling’s toy, they must not only know they are taking an object, but they must possess the subjective knowledge that the object specifically belongs to that sibling. For a pharmacist, this means the government must prove the pharmacist knew the prescription was invalid at the time of dispensing.
This distinction is the core of modern legal strategy. The government’s burden of proof has shifted from an objective negligence standard—
“What would a reasonable pharmacist do?”—to a subjective scienter standard:
“What was in this specific pharmacist’s mind?”
This higher threshold protects practitioners from federal felony-level liability based on mere negligence or a perceived failure to meet an amorphous “standard of care” that the DEA attempts to impose.
D.E.A. vs. pharmacists
United States Court of Appeals 5th Circuit: Central to the Neumann shift is the court’s rejection of the “reason to know” (objective) standard in favor of a strict “subjective knowledge” (scienter) requirement. Utilizing the “transitive verb” argument, the court clarified that “knowingly” serves as a modifier for the transitive verb “fills” and its object “invalid prescription.” To define this, the court invoked the “child and the toy” analogy from Flores-Figueroa v. United States: if a child knowingly takes a sibling’s toy, they must not only know they are taking an object, but they must possess the subjective knowledge that the object specifically belongs to that sibling. For a pharmacist, this means the government must prove the pharmacist knew the prescription was invalid at the time of dispensing.
DEA PRONTO ALBERT CASH, TRAVEL, MANUFACTURE, RED FLAG FILTERED KANGAROO
dr. donald sullivan,
The “Intent to Treat” as a Legal Shield: Ruan vs. United States, D.E.A The standard is rooted in the “intent to treat,” which creates a clear legal boundary between a DEA-registered practitioner and a street drug dealer. Formal Education: A practitioner’s professional status and therapeutic relationship with patients differentiate them from illicit traffickers. Protection of Medical Disagreements: This standard prevents the “criminalization of errors,” ensuring that doctors are not imprisoned for good-faith mistakes, minority medical opinions, or treating patients with incurable pain in ways that government protocols might discourage. Good Faith Defense: Formerly a vulnerable standard, the “Good Faith Defense” is now a robust shield that requires the government to look beyond simple data points to find evidence of actual criminal motivation
Pain, Pope, and Mammals: Remember, This Holiday Season, Pain has been around since the beginning of time and is nearly ubiquitous across all life forms. One could be a Dog, a Cat, a horse, a Bear, A Grizzly Bear, a Polar bear, or A Chicago bear. Pain is real. Donate to support You Are Within The Norms
The legal distortion of drug cocktails and the pharmacological trinity
Anand-Borel-Clement (ABC) Pharmacological Trinity Concept: While opioids target G-protein-coupled receptors to block pain signals, benzodiazepines enhance GABAergic inhibition to provide necessary sedation and muscle relaxation. This synergistic approach allows for lower medication doses, which effectively reduces adverse side effects while extending the duration of relief. Beyond clinical mechanics, the text uses a theological metaphor of the Holy Trinity to illustrate how these distinct agents work in dynamic communion to heal the patient. Ultimately, the goal of this integrated therapy is to restore the individual’s quality of life, enabling them to return to employment, mobility, and social connection.
Limitation of Executive Medical Judgment
The Ruan decision reinforces the concept that the structure of the CSA reflects Congress’s unwillingness to cede medical judgments to executive officials, such as the Attorney General or the DEA, who lack medical expertise. Legal arguments following this decision assert that:
A qualified professional with medical expertise must be the one to determine if a prescription is medically legitimate,.
The DEA’s internal interpretations of medical regulations (specifically 21 C.F.R. § 1306.04(a)) may not be entitled to “Auer deference” because the agency lacks the “clear congressional authorization” to make medical judgments.
TARGETING OUR ASSETS AND SUCESS
Legal Distinction Between Doctors and Drug Dealers
The ruling emphasizes that the education, conduct, and “intent to treat” of a DEA-registered practitioner fundamentally differentiate them from street drug dealers. By requiring proof of subjective knowledge of illegitimacy, the decision protects practitioners from being prosecuted as “drug dealers in white coats” for what may actually be good-faith medical disagreements or errors.
ALL WATCHED OVER BY MACHINES OF LOVING GRACE
🔓 🔓 🔓
ALL WATCHED OVER BY MACHINES OF LOVING GRACE
DONATION: Graphic promoting donations for legal defense, featuring the title ‘You Are Within The Norms’, website link, and donation methods including Zelle and Cash App.
Dr.Freddy Williams, MD, of Panama City, Fl., MD, Meharry Grad. 2004 Sentenced to 30 years: Lifelong Republican, died Buckner, Prison, 2006
FOR NOW, YOU ARE WITHIN
YOUAREWITHINTHENORMS.COM, BENJAMIN CLEMENTINE “THE NEMESIS” LONDON, ENGLAND 2015
THE NORMS
end notes:
(1) Legalized Extortion; Green Angela, “The DEA’s ARCOS system identified three pharmacies in the Tampa area within a six-mile radius: two white-owned and one Black-owned, Dr. Clement’s Pronto Pharmacy. Between 2006 and 2012, PMSI Pharmacy received 26,253,800 Class 2 pills, OMNICARE Pharmacy received 13,816,900 Class 2 pills, and Pronto Pharmacy received 348,000 Class 2 pills. Yet it was Pronto Pharmacy, the Black pharmacy, that was targeted despite having far fewer Class 2 pills than its neighboring pharmacies. pg 116-118
“..WE ARE NOT POWERLESS, AND THROUGH OUR VIDEOS, WRITINGS, AND PHOTOGRAPHS, WE WILL EXPOSE THE ABUSES AND TYRANNY …JUST AS THE VIDEO WAS RECORDED BY THE CELL PHONE CAMERA OF YOUNG Darnella Frazier, BORE WITNESS TO THE MURDER OF GEORGE FLOYD THE BLOG youarewithinthenorms.com bears WITNESS AND BOTH ALLOWS THE SYSTEM TO BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE..”
REFERENCES:
In her book and upcoming documentary, Angela Greene exposes a systematic campaign of racial injustice where the government allegedly weaponized the legal system to target medical professionals of color. The targeting of medical professionals, as described in the sources, is characterized by a systematic shift from administrative oversight to aggressive criminal prosecution, often specifically impacting Black doctors and other practitioners of color. This phenomenon was identified by one former U.S Justice Department Attorney who described the process as a form of “legalized extortion.
Railroading of Dr. Barbara D. Marino, MD
BARBARA MARINO, MD, PAIN SPECIALIST, OB-GYN ONCOLOGY SURGEON. SHE AND FAMILY WERE BRUTALLY ATTACKED BY DEA-DOJ SWAT TEAM. INTIMIDATION IS AWAITING TRIAL AND PREVENTED HER FROM WORKING AS A DOCTOR BY THE TRIAL JUDGE. “SHE SPEAKS OUT
Railroading of Dr. Neil K. Anand, MD
Dr. Neil Anand, MD, is the youngest physician in New York City. He rushed to Ground Zero. He treated victims. He saved lives. He earned the NYU Hero’s Award. Twenty-three years later, the federal government imprisoned him for a crime that had no victim. THIS DOCUMENTARY EXPOSES: → Why a 9/11 hero sits in federal prison → How algorithms weaponize data into criminal charges → The REAL crime: Systemic targeting of minority physicians → No patient deaths. No proven harm. Yet a conviction. → Statistical proof that this is not an accident—it’s systemic. Dr. Anand’s story is not unique. Across America, physicians face similar persecution. In this first part, we build the story—who he was, what happened, and the pattern of targeting. Part 2 reveals the verdict and the call to action. WATCH. SHARE. ACT. This is the crime the government doesn’t want you to see.
Railroading of Dr. Mark Ibsen, MD
Due process protects “property” interests, which in this case includes Dr. Ibsen’s professional license and reputation. Citing Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co., the motion explains that property is an “individual entitlement grounded in state law, which cannot be removed except for cause”. Additionally, the Supreme Court case Board of Regents v. Roth is cited to emphasize that “liberty” and “property” are “broad and majestic terms” that extend beyond the ownership of physical goods to the “whole domain of social and economic fact”
