!!!PALAVA!!!
“IF EVER ONE THINKS THEY’RE TOO SMALL TO MAKE CHANGES, THEN THEY HAVE NEVER SLEPT WITH A MOSQUITO !!!”
NORMAN J CLEMENT RPH., DDS, NORMAN L. CLEMENT PHARM-TECH, MALACHI F. MACKANDAL PHARMD, BELINDA BROWN-PARKER, IN THE SPIRIT OF JOSEPH SOLVO ESQ., INC., SPIRIT OF REV. C.T. VIVIAN, JELANI ZIMBABWE CLEMENT, BS., MBA., IN THE SPIRIT OF THE HON. PATRICE LUMUMBA, IN THE SPIRIT OF ERLIN CLEMENT SR., WALTER F. WRENN III., MD., JULIE KILLINGWORTH, LESLY POMPY MD., CHRISTOPHER RUSSO, MD., NANCY SEEFELDT, WILLIE GUINYARD BS., JOSEPH WEBSTER MD., MBA, BEVERLY C. PRINCE MD., FACS., NEIL ARNAND, MD., RICHARD KAUL, MD., LEROY BAYLOR, JAY K. JOSHI MD., MBA, ADRIENNE EDMUNDSON, ESTER HYATT PH.D., WALTER L. SMITH BS., IN THE SPIRIT OF BRAHM FISHER ESQ., MICHELE ALEXANDER MD., CUDJOE WILDING BS, MARTIN NJOKU, BS., RPH., IN THE SPIRIT OF DEBRA LYNN SHEPHERD, BERES E. MUSCHETT, STRATEGIC ADVISORS
“WE ARE HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS, PHYSICIANS, DENTISTS, PHARMACISTS, NOT FUCKING STREET DRUG DEALERS“
DOCTOR PATIENT FORUM RESEARCH DEBUNKS PROSECUTOR ARUN BODAPATI’S MYTH: heroin users initiated their drug use with prescription opioids from doctors
This presentation from The Doctor Patient Forum debunks the widely cited statistic that “80% of heroin users started with a prescription from their doctor.”
The authors, Claudia Merandi and Beverly Schechtman, meticulously dissect the origin of this claim, tracing it back to a misinterpretation of a 2013 SAMHSA report that referred to nonmedical use of prescription opioids, not prescriptions from physicians.
By clarifying this crucial distinction, the article argues that most heroin users did not initiate with prescribed medication and that current data indicate a significant shift, with heroin and illicit fentanyl now being primary drivers of opioid issues.
We therefore urge and demand that Federal Judge Chad Kinney VACATE THE GUILTY VERDICT WITH PREJUDICE of Dr. Neil Kamal Anand, MD.
The “80% Heroin Started with Prescription” Myth Debunked
What the Data Actually Shows
The claim that “80% of heroin users started with a prescription from their doctor” falls apart the moment you actually look at the data. Research over the last decade shows that:
- Most people who use heroin did not start with their own opioid prescription
- Heroin use is rare among people who take opioids as prescribed
- Misuse is more likely to begin with pills obtained from friends, family, or dealers, not from a doctor.
“The “80%” statistic is not only misleading—it’s outdated.“
Heroin Use Rarely Starts with Prescribed Use
The National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) has repeatedly emphasized that heroin use is not common among people who are prescribed opioids for legitimate medical reasons:
“Research suggests that heroin use is rare in people who use prescription opioids as directed, even among those with long-term medical use.”
— NIDA Research Report
In other words, taking opioids for pain—under the care of a doctor—is not what drives people to heroin. The vast majority of pain patients do not transition to illicit drug use.
ALL SEEN HERE ARE PHYSICIANS HAVING BEEN ARRESTED AND AS DRUG DEALERS “PILL MILL DOCTORS IN WHITE COATS
NEVER HAVING INVOLVEMENT WITH THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM UNTIL THEY BECAME MEDICAL DOCTORS
Marjorie Belsky, MD, Esq, Integrated Pain Care Specialist, says, “The lines between law enforcement and health care are blurring. Police increasingly lean on doctors to provide them with genetic samples, prescription histories, and toxicology results they could not obtain independently.
This often occurs without a warrant or the patient’s consent.” Brown, Teneille R., When Doctors Become Cops (January 1, 2023).”
__________________________/
- University of Utah College of Law Research Paper No. 566, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4346154 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4346154
DEFINING JUDICIAL MUNCHAUSEN OR ‘CLEMENT SYNDROME*’
This article is a comparative analysis outlining Munchausen’s Syndrome through Judicial Prosecutions.
While much has been made of the fact that law enforcement (DEA, FBI) uses paid informants to snare pain physicians which then crosses the line and allows law enforcement to create a narrative supported by fraud, we are reminded, that it’s a lot easier to raid a doctor’s air-conditioned office, and then make a splashy headline-grabbing press release while making it home in time for dinner.
“Exposing the DOJ-DEA targeting of Doctors and the issues of entrapment is of the same mindset and nearly identical to the disease state Munchausen’s syndrome by proxy (MSBP). Described as a mental health problem in which a caregiver makes up or causes an illness or injury in a person under his or her care, such as a child, an elderly adult, or a person who has a disability.“
Because vulnerable people are the victims, MSBP is a form of child abuse or elder abuse.
*Similarly, Munchausen’s Syndrome thru Judicial Prosecution (MSJP) DEA law enforcement “makes up an illness,” using a person under their control.
MUNCHAUSEN(MSJP), THROUGH JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT, IS ENTRAPMENT
In slightly different words: Even though someone may have sold drugs, as charged by the government, if it was the result of entrapment, then he is not guilty. Government agents entrapped him if three things occurred:
- First, the idea of committing the crime came from government agents and not from the person accused.
- Second, the government agents persuaded or talked the person into committing the crime. Simply allowing him to commit the crime is not the same as persuading him.
- And third, the person was not ready and willing to commit the crime before the government agents spoke with him.
On the issue of entrapment, the government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that government agents did not entrap the defendant.
REASONABLE DOUBT AND ENTRAPMENT
Doctors are trained to believe patients. @FBIDetroit went into a clinic with fake records, fake MRI scans, and even fake doctors’ offices for staff to call.
This sure sounds like the elements of entrapment, and it follows the saying, “If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it has to be a duck.”
On the other hand, if the evidence leaves a reasonable doubt whether the person intended to commit the crime except for inducement or persuasion by some government officer or agent, then the person is not guilty.
THE GOODY BAG
CASE GOES TO JURY
THE DETROIT 5 TRIAL “DOCTORS ARE EASY PICKING” FOR DOJ-DEA
In a trial in the Southeast Federal District of Michigan, “The Detroit 5” Plaintiffs’ Prosecutors acted improperly before them, violating the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. The U.S. Executive Branch improperly utilizes the Controlled Substances Act in a selective manner against healthcare providers.
The lead @FBIDetroit investigator, Mark Kroger, mysteriously disappears during the Pain Center trial once it was revealed in the courtroom that @FBIDetroit paid an active crack cocaine addict $16,800 in cash to set up the Detroit pain management physician, David Lewis.
That effort by @FBI Detroit failed. Dr. Lewis’s attorney, Ron Chapman, brought this up during his closing argument, and it was very interesting indeed. It was a terrible look for the prosecution and the FBI in Detroit.
Then there was Dr. Hersh Patel, the undercover physician in the group who was recording Dr. David Lewis for the prosecution, and the FBI accidentally recorded him referring to the patients who sought care from the pain center as “ghetto”!!!! That came out in court!!!.
Lewis’s defense team told the jury during the closing that he was grateful to Dr. Patel because his 9.5 hours of secret audio helped illuminate a day in Dr. Lewis’s life. Then, he went on to use the audio to illustrate the wonderful care Lewis was providing.
LINK AND OSTERLING
And then there were FBI special agents Claudia Link and Stephen Osterling. Link and Osterling were part of the FBI Detroit team participating in the investigation. They were in court daily, but the lead FBI investigator, Mark Kroger, was mysteriously 100% absent.
The defense lawyers suspected it was because the FBI paid the undercover confidential informant $16,800 in cash to try to set up the pain doctors despite knowing that he was actively using crack cocaine.
FBI special agent Claudia Link was repeatedly observed prepping prosecution witnesses in the hallways, elevators, and courtroom gallery. She also discussed “red flags” on the witness stand, but didn’t know what MME was or stood for.
@chronicpain18:
Changing the narrative is one of the biggest challenges #chronic #pain patients face- inaccurate info or cherry-picked data creates stigma on top of discrimination. Every BODY is different, what works for some may not for others…don’t belittle others for wanting a better quality of life.
Over 3000 healthcare providers have been terrorized by the rogue DEA/DOJ. Overwhelmingly, physicians over age 50, private practice, solo or small group, family medical groups, and physicians of color are disproportionately targeted as well. Physicians of color also receive much harsher sentences than white physicians.
The government’s expert witness, Neel Mehta, MD, lied under oath about the status of his board certifications in anesthesia and pain.
HHS OIG, TESTIMONY A CLOWN SHOW
HHS OIG Brian Tolan staked out the pain center from the parking lot and took photos of the building. He told the jury that the parking lot was packed and there were lines of people out the door, but his photographs showed an empty parking lot and only one solitary person walking outside the pain Center.
Special agents Brian Tolan and Claudia Link’s testimony was a clown show. Both were humiliated on cross-examination. Agent Link could not define a pill mill, and could not determine what red flags were undermining the credibility of this case brought forth by the government.
@deabusters234
If the agent (@FBIDetroit) used fake imaging, wouldn’t that be considered entrapment?
This was demonstrated by cross-examination, and his testimony was completely discredited.
LEGAL DEFINITION OF ENTRAPMENT: EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW
A person is entrapped when he is induced or persuaded by law enforcement officers or their agents to commit a crime that he had no previous intent to commit; in such a case, the law forbids conviction.
1. Exceptions to Entrapment
2. Reasonable Doubt and Entrapment
@deabusters234
“Not only does DEA send in fake patients, they even have a fake ‘office’ that takes calls on the fake patient. So when staff call a previous doctor’s office for information, the DEA is there to lie to the staff. The criminals are from the Szyman case in 2017@DEAHQ @DOJCrimDiv.
FROM THE WASHINGTON POST:
LOW HANGING FRUIT
CONCLUSION
@deabusters234
This means the FBI, DOJ-DEA determines exactly how a patient comes into the practice, verifies the authenticity of previous records, and often orders new imaging studies, UDT. That means patients won’t get CS on the first visit.
They have to function as intel operations. We live in a police state, and the doc needs to practice operational security. The Feds are the enemy of the people. They know it. That’s why they live in a bubble.
FOR NOW, YOU ARE WITHIN
the norms
I can’t understand how a conviction can come from these types of tactics. If new Dr calls for affirmation of the new patient medical needs and the dea has set up a phony Dr to give him the info he needs to treat said new patient. How in the HELL is that Not Entrapment and means for IMMEDIATE DISMISSAL OF ALL CHARGES???????
Are these types of things not brought up at trial??
What is said New Dr supposed to do? How is he supposed to treat said New Patient?? He has to go with what the referencing Dr told him and his own judgment. So he is committing No Crime. The Only person committing crimes is the DEA and Prosecuters.
As a US NAVY VETERAN and Chronic Pain Patient, this just makes me sick to my stomach. AND Pisses me Off. This is NOT what I Volunteered to defend when I joined the US Navy. These are NOT the actions of a Democratic Republic. It’s Illegal, Immoral and Just Plain Sickening to allow our DOJ/ DEA to operate in this manner. Everyone involved should be prosecuted. NOT THE DOCTORS!!