youarewithinthenorms.com
NORMAN J CLEMENT RPH., DDS, NORMAN L. CLEMENT PHARM-TECH, MALACHI F. MACKANDAL PHARMD, BELINDA BROWN-PARKER, IN THE SPIRIT OF JOSEPH SOLVO ESQ., INC., SPIRIT OF REV. IN THE SPIRIT OF WALTER R. CLEMENT BS., MS, MBA. HARVEY JENKINS, MD, PH.D., IN THE SPIRIT OF C.T. VIVIAN, JELANI ZIMBABWE CLEMENT, BS., M.B.A., IN THE SPIRIT OF THE HON. PATRICE LUMUMBA, IN THE SPIRIT OF ERLIN CLEMENT SR., EVELYN J. CLEMENT, WALTER F. WRENN III., MD., JULIE KILLINGSWORTH, RENEE BLARE, RPH, DR. TERENCE SASAKI, MD LESLY POMPY MD., CHRISTOPHER RUSSO, MD., NANCY SEEFELDT, IN THE SPIRIT OF WILLIE GUINYARD BS., JOSEPH WEBSTER MD., MBA, BEVERLY C. PRINCE MD., FACS., NEIL ARNAND, MD., IN THE SPIRIT OF RICHARD KAUL, MD., IN THE SPIRIT OF LEROY BAYLOR, JAY K. JOSHI MD., MBA, AISHA GARDNER, ADRIENNE EDMUNDSON, ESTER HYATT PH.D., WALTER L. SMITH BS., IN THE SPIRIT OF BRAHM FISHER ESQ., MICHELE ALEXANDER MD., CUDJOE WILDING BS, MARTIN NJOKU, BS., RPH., IN THE SPIRIT OF DEBRA LYNN SHEPHERD, BERES E. MUSCHETT, STRATEGIC ADVISORS
(Case 2024-01078)
FBI LOGS FROM THE EVIDENCE MANAGEMENT UNIT (EMU) AND THE TRACE EVIDENCE UNIT (TEU)
The internal decision-making process of forensic examiners is the most reliable indicator of evidence quality, as it documents objective technical barriers before they are influenced by prosecutorial requirements.
In Case 2024-01078, internal FBI logs from the Evidence Management Unit (EMU) and the Trace Evidence Unit (TEU) reveal a systemic refusal to proceed with forensic analysis due to the evidence’s compromised state.
Analysis of FBI Laboratory Communication Logs
Communication entries from May 9, 2024, and May 10, 2024, detail a multi-unit rejection of the case. Forensic Examiners (FE) Moore and Lowe cited the presence of cleaning solutions as a terminal obstacle, rendering the determination of DNA sources impossible.
Furthermore, the Laboratory Physical Operations Unit (LPOU) refused to attempt to examine the evidence, on the assumption that it had been extensively handled by the subject and his staff. These entries culminated in the decision to issue a “Discontinuation Report” rather than a report of findings.
Personnel Involved in Forensic Discontinuation:
- SA Reagan Fajkus (DNA Unit): Contacted to discuss the DNA request; confirmed that testing was “not appropriate for case” due to cleaning solution contamination.
- Brittany G. Macias (Evidence Control): Documented the refusal of multiple units to accept the case and relayed the decision to return the evidence.
- FE Moore (Chemistry/TEU): Forensic Examiner who refused the case for Chemistry/DNA testing due to the state of the items.
- FE Lowe (Chemistry/TEU): Forensic Examiner who refused the case, noting the presence of cleaning solutions prevented reliable analysis.
- FE Cover (LPOU): Advised that the Laboratory Physical Operations Unit would not attempt exams because the “subject, Dr. Kumar, and his PAs” had handled the medical equipment.
The internal FBI stance was one of categorical refusal; the laboratory units explicitly declined to “accept case” for processing, creating a profound disconnect with the narrative subsequently forwarded by the FDA.
The standard for high-level disinfection of hysteroscopes is established by both federal health guidelines and manufacturer instructions.
A FORENSIC FAILURE
CLICK ON THE VIDEO BELOW
According to the sources, the CDC guidelines direct that high-level disinfection of endoscopes, including hysteroscopes, is the standard of care. Furthermore, the FDA-cleared Instructions for Use (IFU) for these devices specifically state that high-level disinfection is an acceptable and appropriate method for reprocessing.
Key details regarding this standard include:
- Expert Validation: National experts on office hysteroscopy have testified that utilizing high-level disinfection protocols for medical equipment meets, and in some instances exceeds, the required standard of care.
- Classification Debate: Within the scientific and regulatory community, there is ongoing discussion regarding whether a hysteroscope should be classified as a “critical” or “semi-critical” device, a distinction that depends on whether the uterus is defined as a “sterile cavity”.
- Decontamination of Waste: Separate from the reprocessing of multi-use instruments, the CDC’s biomedical waste disposal guidelines recommend the decontamination of biologic waste even for single-use items before they are discarded.
- Prevention of Reuse: To maintain safety standards, some specialized equipment like the Endosee hysteroscope includes an inbuilt “kill switch” designed to physically prevent the reuse of a single-use cannula on multiple patients.
Defense experts and legal counsel challenged the allegations of medical unnecessary by focusing on clinical documentation, the lack of qualified government experts, and the broad medical justification for the procedures performed.
The defense in the provided sources argues that these cleaning and sterilization procedures are regulatory matters intended for the scientific community to manage, rather than criminal issues.
Key details regarding this standard include:
Prevention of Reuse: To maintain safety standards, some specialized equipment, like the Endosee hysteroscope, includes an inbuilt “kill switch” designed to physically prevent the reuse of a single-use cannula on multiple patients.
Sterilization and Equipment Use
Misleading Evidence: The defense alleges the government intentionally hid evidence of the multi-use devices in the clinic and focused only on single-use items found in the trash, which were being decontaminated according to biohazardous waste guidelines.
High-Level Disinfection: The defense contends that Dr. Kumar followed CDC guidelines and FDA-cleared instructions by using high-level disinfection for multi-use hysteroscopes.
No Evidence of Reuse: A microtrace expert and multiple witnesses testified that there was no evidence that single-use devices were reused on patients. Additionally, some devices, such as the Endosee, have an inbuilt “kill switch” specifically designed to prevent cannula reuse.
🔓 🔓 🔓
ALL WATCHED OVER BY MACHINES OF LOVING GRACE
BE SURE TO DONATE TO THE MARK IBSEN GOFUNDME DEFENSE FUND, WHERE THE SON ALWAYS RISES!!!
OUR TREE OF KNOWLEDGE SHALL NEVER BE SUPPRESSED
FOR NOW, YOU ARE WITHIN
THE NORMS
REFERENCES:
