DENIED!!! THE RIGHTS TO DUE PROCESS AND HUMAN RIGHTS BY THE D.E.A.: DR. MOHAMED ALY RIFIA MD., SETS FORTH IN A SPIRIT!!! CHALLENGES OF CONSTITUTIONAL DIMENSION

republished in youarewithinthenorms.com from federal court filings of ronald chapman esq

NORMAN J CLEMENT RPH., DDS, NORMAN L. CLEMENT PHARM-TECH, MALACHI F. MACKANDAL PHARMD, BELINDA BROWN-PARKER, IN THE SPIRIT OF JOSEPH SOLVO ESQ., INC.T. SPIRIT OF REV. IN THE SPIRIT OF WALTER R. CLEMENT BS., MS, MBA. HARVEY JENKINS MD, PH.D., IN THE SPIRIT OF C.T. VIVIAN, JELANI ZIMBABWE CLEMENT, BS., MBA., IN THE SPIRIT OF THE HON. PATRICE LUMUMBA, IN THE SPIRIT OF ERLIN CLEMENT SR., EVELYN J. CLEMENT, WALTER F. WRENN III., MD., JULIE KILLINGSWORTH, RENEE BLARE, RPH, DR. TERENCE SASAKI, MD LESLY POMPY MD., CHRISTOPHER RUSSO, MD., NANCY SEEFELDT, WILLIE GUINYARD BS., JOSEPH WEBSTER MD., MBA, BEVERLY C. PRINCE MD., FACS., NEIL ARNAND, MD., RICHARD KAUL, MD., IN THE SPIRIT OF LEROY BAYLOR, JAY K. JOSHI MD., MBA, AISHA GARDNER, ADRIENNE EDMUNDSON, ESTER HYATT PH.D., WALTER L. SMITH BS., IN THE SPIRIT OF BRAHM FISHER ESQ., MICHELE ALEXANDER MD., CUDJOE WILDING BS, MARTIN NJOKU, BS., RPH., IN THE SPIRIT OF DEBRA LYNN SHEPHERD, BERES E. MUSCHETT, STRATEGIC ADVISORS

“..The struggle may be a moral one or it may be a physical one, or it may both moral and physical, but it must be a struggle.

Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never has and it never will. Find out just what a people will submit to, and you have found out the exact amount of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them; and these will continue till they are resisted with either words or blows, or with both.

The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppress..”

Dr. Rifai has set forth IN WITH THE SPIRITS, challenges of a constitutional dimension

Dr. Rifai has set forth challenges of a constitutional dimension. More specifically, Dr. Rifai has alleged that the DEA has violated his Fourth Amendment Right Against Unreasonable Searches and Seizures

(Count 1); that his Fifth Amendment Right to Due Process was violated

(Count 2); and that the DEA’s Administrative Law System is Unconstitutional

(Count 3). (ECF No.17, at 14-20). Dr. Rifai also alleged in his initial complaint that the appointment and removal of the DEA’s Administrative Law Judges (“ALJ”) is unconstitutional.

Dr. Rifai challenges the DEA’s unconstitutional broadening of its authority under the Controlled Substance’s Act whereby it has used self-promulgated “general practice standards” to revoke registrant’s DEA registration. (ECF No.17, at 19-20).

“..Find out just what a people will submit to, and you have found out the exact amount of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them; and these will continue till they are resisted with either words or blows, or with both..”

Dr. Rifai also challenges the unconstitutional DEA proceedings, which include the deprivation of due process by denying registrants any type of hearing and the flippant use of administrative subpoenas to obtain evidence for parallel criminal proceedings in violation of the Fourth Amendment. (See Id. at 14-18).

Dr. Rifai has further challenged the appointment and removal of DEA ALJs. 

Dr. Rifai is instead challenging the DEA’s existence as presently constituted and the unconstitutional levers that it pulls in depriving registrants of their Fourth Amendment and Fifth Amendment rights while expanding the scope of its authority exceeding its authority under the CSA.

The Government is mistaken. An administrative agency cannot enforce its regime in violation of the Constitution.

That represents “a here-and-now injury.” Axon, 598 U.S. at 191 (citation omitted). Dr. Rifai is moving that the Court abolish the DEA’s unconstitutional practice of violating the Fourth Amendment and leveraging administrative subpoenas to obtain evidence to be used in a criminal prosecution.

__________________________________________________________/

See, United States v. Hossbach, 518 F. Supp. 759, 766-67 (E.D. Pa. 1980).

Dr. Rifai is also moving for the Court to exclude from the DEA administrative process any evidence that was obtained from the illegitimate subpoena.

Here, by applying the exclusionary rule and excluding the Government’s “ill-gotten gains,” the Court can ensure that other registrant’s do not fall prey to the DEA’s unconstitutional use of administrative subpoenas.

Use of the rule is particularly important in this context too because it will dissuade the DEA from pursuing frivolous revocation proceedings against registrants in order to obtain evidence for criminal prosecution.

DENIED: HUMAN DIGNITY

“..If there is no struggle, there is no progress. Those who profess to favor freedom and yet deprecate agitation are men who want crops without plowing the ground. They want rain without thunder and lightning. They want the ocean without the roar of its mighty waters..”

Renee Blare RPh.

Here’s the “story” or at least the summary of my “SUFFERING.” But then again, every lawyer I’ve talked to and government civil rights dept brush me and my husband off. I guess it’s not enough to lose everything in life, you have to lose your life too before you suffer enough to matter.

‘ Renee Blare

Betty_Black

@BlkBettyALBurn

Replying

Of the horrific abuse & depraved indifference to how they treat us. It’s a known fact many in higher positions tend to be narcissistic & since nobody holds them accountable, they continue to get away with this abuse, fraud, greed, etc.

Replying to

@BlkBettyALBurn

@ASanchezs65

and 49 others

Except these sociopaths/psychopaths know they can get away with it because their titles protect them & they use it against anyone/everyone, twisting their field of expertise into a way to abuse people & even “get back at” people they deem inferior, lesser than, or even deserving

DONATE LEGAL DEFENSE

OR SEND

TO CASH APP:$docnorm

ZELLE 3135103378

ALL WATCHED OVER BY MACHINES OF LOVING GRACE

BE SURE TO DONATE TO THE MARK IBSEN GOFUNDME DEFENSE FUND, WHERE THE SON ALWAYS RISES!!!

FOR NOW, YOU ARE WITHIN

THE NORM