
STORY OF LESLY POMPY
REPORTED BY
youarewithinthenorms.com
NORMAN J CLEMENT RPH., DDS, NORMAN L. CLEMENT PHARM-TECH, MALACHI F. MACKANDAL PHARMD, BELINDA BROWN-PARKER, IN THE SPIRIT OF JOSEPH SOLVO ESQ., INC.T. SPIRIT OF REV. IN THE SPIRIT OF WALTER R. CLEMENT BS., MS, MBA. HARVEY JENKINS MD, PH.D., C.T. VIVIAN, JELANI ZIMBABWE CLEMENT, BS., MBA., IN THE SPIRIT OF THE HON. PATRICE LUMUMBA, IN THE SPIRIT OF ERLIN CLEMENT SR., WALTER F. WRENN III., MD., JULIE KILLINGWORTH, LESLY POMPY MD., CHRISTOPHER RUSSO, MD., NANCY SEEFELDT, WILLIE GUINYARD BS., JOSEPH WEBSTER MD., MBA, BEVERLY C. PRINCE MD., FACS., NEIL ARNAND, MD., RICHARD KAUL, MD., LEROY BAYLOR, JAY K. JOSHI MD., MBA, ADRIENNE EDMUNDSON, ESTER HYATT PH.D., WALTER L. SMITH BS., IN THE SPIRIT OF BRAHM FISHER ESQ., MICHELE ALEXANDER MD., CUDJOE WILDING BS, MARTIN NJOKU, BS., RPH., IN THE SPIRIT OF DEBRA LYNN SHEPHERD, BERES E. MUSCHETT, STRATEGIC ADVISORS
Will Rogers__
“The problem ain’t what people know. It’s what people know that ain’t so that’s the problem.”

OR SEND
$100, $250, $500
TO ZELLE 3135103378
OR
CASH APP:$docnorm
https://www.13abc.com/video/2023/01/21/monroe-doctor-speaks-out/
justice has become a victim of the justice system AS IT ARRIVES SLOWLY FOR LESLY POMPY MD
https://www.13abc.com/video/2023/01/21/monroe-doctor-speaks-out/
James Bob ·
I’m reaching out to all news sources that ran Pompy’s name threw mud 13 abc of toledo and Detroit news stations they need to make this right. Not only am i sad. I’m down right furious. To possibly think my mom could still be here today if he was still doing what he does.
I was digging threw post in the group and seen my mom posted this. 2 months later she was gone. I don’t think this was by chance. They put the fear of God in all doctors to prescribe pain medication. I believe the pain was to much for her to handle and she gave up. IM FURIOUS NOW.
I am so proud of you doctor Pompy, You have a great team defending you. God does give his best Solders the tuffest case’s. You sir paved the way for all doctors to fight back. I would like my doctor back.
Its about time.he is the most wonderful Dr i ever had.great man in human care and compassion at its finest. Love this man.he is the real deal
https://www.13abc.com/video/2023/01/21/monroe-doctor-speaks-out/
Dr Pompey we never stopped praying he knew you are a great man we knew you were not guilty from the beginning we had faith that everything would work out God is great keep going strong thank you Father in the name of Jesus Amen

LESLY POMPY MD
https://www.13abc.com/video/2023/01/21/monroe-doctor-speaks-out/
Finally some justice for one of our many drs that have had their livelihood and lives torn apart
It’s insane that some drs are actually doing a life sentence just for trying to help very bad off pain patients This in itself is shameful for our country and in my opinion criminal Let’s all do everything we can to bring awareness to CPP issues and liberties that are being stomped on daily
https://www.13abc.com/video/2023/01/21/monroe-doctor-speaks-out/
Admin
Think about how much money the DOJ gains from these cases. They take everything from the doctors including their practice, drain bank accounts and then they have to prove their innocence when it supposed to be that they are innocent until proven guilty. It’s nothing but a cash grab!

https://www.13abc.com/video/2023/01/21/monroe-doctor-speaks-out/
Legal Background
BY Xiulu raun md

Under the Federal Rules of Evidence {Fed. R. Evid.), as a lay witness, he or she may only testify to an opinion that is: (a) rationally based on the witness’s perception; (b) helpful to clearly understanding the witness’s testimony or to determining a fact in issue; and (c) not based on scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge within the scope of Fed. R. Evid. 702. (Fed. R. Evid. 701) {Rule 701)
A witness who is qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education may give opinion testimony if:
(a) the expert’s scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will help to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue; (b) the testimony is based on sufficient facts or data; (c) the testimony is the product of reliable principles and methods; and (d) the expert has reliably applied the principles and method to the facts of the case.
(Fed. R. Evid. 702) (Rule 702)
list
Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (Fed. R. Crim. P.) 16(a)(1)(G) requires the government to disclose certain information toa defendant, including, among other things, a written summary of any expert testimony the government intends to use. Fed. R. Crim. P. 16(d)(2) provides that when a party fails to comply with that requirement, a trial court can impose any appropriate sanction, including granting a continuance or excluding the undisclosed evidence.
Fed. R. Evid. 401 provides that evidence is relevant if: (a) it has any tendency to make a fact more or less probable than it would be without the evidence; and (b) the fact is of consequence in determining the action. (Rule 401)
Fed. R. Evid. 402 provides that relevant evidence is admissible unless any of the following provides otherwise: the U.S. Constitution; a federal statute; these rules; or other rules prescribed by the Supreme Court. Irrelevant evidence is not admissible. (Rule 402)
Fed. R. Evid. 403 provides that the court may exclude relevant evidence if its probative value is substantially outweighed by a danger of one or more of the following: unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, misleading the jury, undue delay, wasting time, or needlessly presenting cumulative evidence. (Rule 403)
DOCTORS ALSO FOUND NOT GUILTY IN EARLIER PROCEEDINGS


DAVID KIM MD OKLAHOMA






COUCH AND RUAN ALABAMA
GANIU EDU MD

WILLIAM HUESEL MD, COLUMBUS OH
FOR NOW YOU ARE WITHIN
THE NORMS
LOW HANGING FRUIT