NORMAN J CLEMENT RPH., DDS, NORMAN L.CLEMENT PHARM-TECH, MALACHI F. MACKANDAL PHARMD, IN THE SPIRIT OF RETIRED DETROIT POLICE SARGENT WALTER R. CLEMENT BS., MS., MBA., HOWARD ADELGLASS, MD., BELINDA BROWN-PARKER, IN THE SPIRIT OF JOSEPH SOLVO ESQ., INC.T. SPIRIT OF REV. C.T. VIVIAN, JELANI ZIMBABWE CLEMENT, BS., MBA., IN THE SPIRIT OF THE HON. PATRICE LUMUMBA, IN THE SPIRIT OF ERLIN CLEMENT SR., WALTER F. WRENN III., MD., JULIE KILLINGWORTH, LESLY POMPY MD., CHRISTOPHER RUSSO, MD., NANCY SEEFELDT, WILLIE GUINYARD BS., JOSEPH WEBSTER MD., MBA, BEVERLY C. PRINCE MD., FACS., NEIL ARNAND, MD., RICHARD KAUL, MD., LEROY BAYLOR, JAY K. JOSHI MD., MBA, ADRIENNE EDMUNDSON, ESTER HYATT PH.D., WALTER L. SMITH BS., IN THE SPIRIT OF BRAHM FISHER ESQ., MICHELE ALEXANDER MD., CUDJOE WILDING BS, MARTIN NJOKU, BS., RPH., IN THE SPIRIT OF DEBRA LYNN SHEPHERD, BERES E. MUSCHETT, STRATEGIC ADVISORS
1.MASSIVE GOVERNMENT OVERREACH
JENNIFER OLIVA, LAW PROFESSOR:
Attorney General Jeffery Sessions as a policy matter, directed federal agencies to use untested computer algorithms and ruthless regulatory action to address national priorities related to the U.S. “opioid epidemic” and via these agency orders tried to demote U.S. Congressional Branch’s enacted laws and court precedents and elevate AG Sessions’ personal policy choices. The Defendants intend to overrule or ignore binding law.
Such agency action is unconstitutional. Repealing the rules based on a U.S. President’s policy choice would violate the Take Care Clause, the Supremacy Clause, and the separation-of-powers doctrine. The president has the unique constitutional duty to ensure that the laws are faithfully executed. The president’s policy choice of having Attorney General Jeffery Sessions derogate portions of the nation’s laws is forbidden by the Take Care Clause – his decision to demote the nation’s laws by elevating his policy preferences over them.
RESEARCH OF ProPublica COMPUTERS VS. CRIME
3.FROM ANAND et. al “FOIA REQUEST“
NEIL ANAND MD, TARGETED ANESTHESIOLOGIST:
The Defendants’ created a suspect class comprising of physicians who treat patients suffering from the diseases of chronic pain and substance use disorders. According to Robinson v. California, Supreme Court of the United States, 1962 370 U.S. 660, 82 S. Ct. 1417, it was improper to qualify a person as a criminal simply because of their medical status.
Statistical analysis by Doctors of Courage of the selection process by analyzing indicted physicians reveals a classification selection process that has produced a disproportionate number of physicians of African American origin (i.e., physicians of minority racial origin), colored physicians, and elderly physicians (old age) for criminal investigation and prosecution. Health and Human Services (HHS), Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA), and the HFPP public-private joint enterprise’s algorithms almost exclusively target older physicians, wealthy physicians, dark-skinned colored physicians, or independent physicians (as compared to large physician groups).
A potential reason for this discriminatory practice is that Defendants HHS and DEA consider colored or older physicians to be disposable. There is less worry that there will be a public outcry by the general population for the targeting of dark-skinned minority and/or elderly physicians.
5. MACHINE BIAS BY ProPublica
6.FOR NOW, YOU ARE WITHIN
$10, $15, $20, $75, 175, $500, OR MORE TO CASH APP:$docnorm
So, Donate to the “Pharmacist For Healthcare Legal Defense Fund,”
LOW HANGING FRUIT