OR SEND
$150 DOLLARS TO CASH APP:$docnorm
REPORTED BY
NORMAN J CLEMENT RPH., DDS, NORMAN L.CLEMENT PHARM-TECH, MALACHI F. MACKANDAL PHARMD, BELINDA BROWN-PARKER, IN THE SPIRIT OF JOSEPH SOLVO ESQ., INC.T. SPIRIT OF REV. C.T. VIVIAN, JELANI ZIMBABWE CLEMENT, BS., MBA., IN THE SPIRIT OF THE HON. PATRICE LUMUMBA, IN THE SPIRIT OF ERLIN CLEMENT SR., WALTER F. WRENN III., MD., JULIE KILLINGWORTH, LESLY POMPY MD., CHRISTOPHER RUSSO, MD., NANCY SEEFELDT, WILLIE GUINYARD BS., JOSEPH WEBSTER MD., MBA, BEVERLY C. PRINCE MD., FACS., NEIL ARNAND, MD., RICHARD KAUL, MD., LEROY BAYLOR, JAY K. JOSHI MD., MBA, ADRIENNE EDMUNDSON, ESTER HYATT PH.D., WALTER L. SMITH BS., IN THE SPIRIT OF BRAHM FISHER ESQ., MICHELE ALEXANDER MD., CUDJOE WILDING BS, MARTIN NJOKU, BS., RPH., IN THE SPIRIT OF DEBRA LYNN SHEPHERD, BERES E. MUSCHETT, STRATEGIC ADVISORS
“WE ARE NOT POWERLESS, AND THROUGH OUR VIDEOS, WRITINGS, AND PHOTOGRAPHS WE WILL EXPOSE THE ABUSES AND TYRANNY JUST AS THE VIDEO WAS RECORDED BY THE CELL PHONE CAMERA OF YOUNG DARNELLA FRAZIER, BORE WITNESS TO THE MURDER OF GEORGE FLOYD THE BLOG youarewithinthenorms.com BARES WITNESS AND BOTH ALLOWS THE SYSTEM TO BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE”
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
Civil Action No. 1:22CV2 Criminal Action No. 1:18CR1
AMERICA: WE ARE PHYSICIANS PHARMACISTS AND DENTISTS NOT DRUG STREET DEALERS WE ARE JUST EASIER PASSIVE TARGETS
FELIX A. BRIZUELA, JR.,
Petitioner,
vs. Civil Action No. 1:22CV2 Criminal Action No. 1:18CR1
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent
May 26, 202
The mainstream media has been mum on the subject of the so-called “prescription opiate crisis,” no doubt perhaps due to a gag order by the government, which never existed, and resulted in an “illegal opiate crisis”, which was caused by government overreach as emphasized in this very impressive article that dares to tell the truth.
BRIZUELA EXHIBIT A
There never was never a prescription opiate crisis caused by doctors. The government tying the hands of doctors not only resulted in a real crisis, fentanyl (which the DOJ has chosen to ignore), but has resulted in the deaths of millions in the form of suicide, both civilian and military, and most of those in chronic pain have resorted to buying them in the streets.
Street fentanyl is not real fentanyl but a deadly opiate-like drug, which is much more dangerous and lethal, with unpredictable pharmacokinetics making it impossible to predict what dose will cause death. Street fentanyl is absorbed in the GI tract; real fentanyl can only be absorbed through the mucous membranes and skin. Therefore, not the same drug. The feds want to link them together in order to falsely attribute the crisis to doctors.
Finally, someone in the mainstream media tells the truth.(see exhibit A) Again, the real issue at hand here is Douglas Sughrue and ineffective counsel. But here is very legitimate proof of the lies being fed to the public by the government, whose agenda is to remove doctors from practice and incarcerate as many as possible. The reasoning for this is just not clear.
We are trying to get the department of health and human services, through a FOIA to reveal details of the pill mill project, which we feel holds all the answers to this question, but they have been stalling. Again, I am not retrying my entire case, which was overturned by the fourth circuit court of appeals. But the HS matter is linked to the lies and corruption, which should have been addressed by Mr. Sughrue, and is further proof of ineffective counsel on his behalf.
STEPHEN E. NADEAU, JEFFERY K. WU, AND RICHARD LAWHERN
This data was available well before this article and a hard-working attorney who is focused on their client, as expected by the codes of conduct and constitution, would have known about this. Regardless, he admittedly did not review discovery and is guilty of ineffective counsel anyway. But I felt that it was imperative to show this as proof of one of the most disgusting acts perpetrated by our government. Clearly to be remembered as one of the sadist times in our history.
Sincerely,
Felix Brizuela Jr. DO,
“A TARGETED NEUROLOGIST PHYSICIAN”
FOR NOW, YOU ARE WITHIN
THE NORMS
REFERENCE:
UNITED STATES FEDERAL COURT CONTINUES TO PERMIT AND PROTECT THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE FROM DISCLOSING “AMERICA’S BIG OPIOID DOCTOR LIE“
FEDERAL DISTRICT JUDGE COLLEEN LOLLAR-KOTELLY ORDER PROTECTS THE OPIOID BIG
ADDENDUMS (1)
“What is very unique about this article is that although other media, mainly in the south, has stated that prescription opiates accounted for less than 3% of opioids abuse, that there was never a crisis until the government stopped prescribing and that was street fentanyl, that suicides is of biblical proportions due to pain patients not getting what they need, etc……….. This is the first article I have seen from a “credible” publication which is why we all have to lift our heads out of our asses and exploit this. Although this article is a little older, September 2021, I still think that it is coming to light now because they are seeing the writing on the wall with the up-and-coming Ruan case.
I sent the attached to the court. pertaining to my case. The idea is that although there is no denying that my attorney, like Walters’s attorney, is guilty of ineffective counsel, as Neil indicates in his conspiracy theories judge can play dirty. This way, she is put in a position in which she would have to play dirty based on falsified facts, which would make her part of the corruption.”
ADDENDUMS (2)
First of all, I would like to introduce the definition of a response, “Definition of response
1: an act of responding.
2: something constituting a reply or a reaction: such as. a : a verse, phrase, or word sung or said by the people or choir after or in reply to the officiant in a liturgical service”
In the case of a criminal or civil, it is the duty of the plaintiff and defense counsel to “respond” by reviewing in order to ensure a fair and impartial trial. In the case of Mr. Saghrue, he failed to “respond” by not reviewing the discovery and advising me accordingly. This is the ultimate violation of the codes of conduct, not the mention the constitution, “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.”
In summary, in light of the lack of due diligence on the part of Mr. Saghrue in properly reviewing and applying records related to the case, or as the courts call it, “discovery”, we have not only a major violation of the codes of conduct, but as the courts have allowed for the purpose of unlawfully prosecuting doctors by means such as misinformation with American patients as collateral damage, a major breach of the constitution. My case involving HS must be dismissed with prejudice. (see exhibit A).
Felix.
LOW HANGING FRUIT
1 Comment