NORMAN J CLEMENT RPH., DDS, NORMAN L. CLEMENT PHARM-TECH, MALACHI F. MACKANDAL PHARMD, BELINDA BROWN-PARKER, IN THE SPIRIT OF JOSEPH SOLVO ESQ., INC.T. SPIRIT OF REV. IN THE SPIRIT OF WALTER R. CLEMENT BS., MS, MBA. HARVEY JENKINS MD, PH.D., IN THE SPIRIT OF C.T. VIVIAN, JELANI ZIMBABWE CLEMENT, BS., MBA., IN THE SPIRIT OF THE HON. PATRICE LUMUMBA, IN THE SPIRIT OF ERLIN CLEMENT SR., WALTER F. WRENN III., MD., JULIE KILLINGSWORTH, RENEE BLARE, RPH, DR. TERENCE SASAKI, MD LESLY POMPY MD., CHRISTOPHER RUSSO, MD., NANCY SEEFELDT, WILLIE GUINYARD BS., JOSEPH WEBSTER MD., MBA, BEVERLY C. PRINCE MD., FACS., NEIL ARNAND, MD., RICHARD KAUL, MD., LEROY BAYLOR, JAY K. JOSHI MD., MBA, ADRIENNE EDMUNDSON, ESTER HYATT PH.D., WALTER L. SMITH BS., IN THE SPIRIT OF BRAHM FISHER ESQ., MICHELE ALEXANDER MD., CUDJOE WILDING BS, MARTIN NJOKU, BS., RPH., IN THE SPIRIT OF DEBRA LYNN SHEPHERD, BERES E. MUSCHETT, STRATEGIC ADVISORS
According to Ronald T. Libby, Professor of Political Science and Public Administration at the University of North Florida, in a June 16, 2005 report called “Treating Doctors as Drug Dealers The DEA’s War on Prescription Painkillers.”
“In 2000 and 2001, the Department of Justice, which administers the DEA, gave the agency a highly critical rebuke and asserted that the Drug Enforcement Agency’s goals were not consistent with the President’s Federal National Drug Control Strategy.
The DEA would need to find a new front for the War on Drugs, one that could produce tangible, measurable results.” (1)
However, this situation has raised ethical and security concerns, prompting calls for increased regulation and oversight in developing and deploying artificial intelligence systems.
On January 24, 2024, Seven Members of the United States Legislative branch, including Six United States Senators, Ron Wyden, Jeffrey A. Merkley (D’s) Oregon, Alex Padilla (D) California, Peter Welch (D) Vermont, John Fetterman (D) Pennsylvania, Edward J. Markey (D) Massachusetts, Congresswoman Yvette D. Clarke (D) New York 11th District, wrote U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland,
“…urging him to halt all Department of Justice (DOJ) grants for predictive policing systems until the DOJ can ensure that grant recipients will not use such systems in ways that have a discriminatory impact... ”
The Legislative Members Pointed Out:
“Mounting evidence indicates that predictive policing technologies do not reduce crime. Instead, they worsen the unequal treatment of Americans of color by law enforcement. Predictive policing systems rely on historical data distorted by falsified crime reports and disproportionate arrests of people of color.
DEA ADMINISTRATOR Anne Milgram’s Pursuit of Data-Driven Justice Unleashes Skynet-Like AI
In the original 1984 Terminator movie, Skynet is a revolutionary artificial intelligence system built by Cyberdyne Systems for SAC-NORAD. The character Kyle Reese explains in the film: “Defense network computers. New… powerful… hooked into everything, trusted to run it all. They say it got smart, a new order of intelligence”.
According to Reese, Skynet “saw all humans as a threat, not just the ones on the other side” and “decided our fate in a microsecond: extermination.” It began a nuclear war that destroyed most of the human population and initiated a program of genocide against survivors. Skynet used its resources to gather a slave labor force from surviving humans.
Anne Milgram’s ambitious attempt to predict and analyze human behavior through artificial intelligence has inadvertently led to the creation of a Skynet-like entity, sparking concerns about the unintended consequences of advanced data science.
Milgram, known for her efforts to introduce smart statistics into criminal justice, began her journey with a vision to bring objectivity and efficiency to the legal system. Inspired by the success of “moneyballing” in baseball, she aimed to create a universal risk assessment tool using advanced analytics and statistics.
However, sources reveal that the AI developed by Milgram’s team exceeded its intended purpose by targeting Healthcare professionals practicing in Black and Latino communities comparable to the fictional Skynet from the Terminator franchise.
The Legislative Members Pointed out Further:
“..As a result, they are prone to over-predicting crime rates in Black and Latino neighborhoods while under-predicting crime in white neighborhoods. The continued use of such systems creates a dangerous feedback loop: biased predictions are used to justify disproportionate stops and arrests in minority neighborhoods, which further biases statistics on where crimes are happening…”
Our Government is increasingly preoccupied with anticipating threats, and their current use of pre-crime, criminal forensic tools, and theories are the antithesis of the traditional criminal justice system’s focus on past crimes. Traditionally, criminal justice and punishment presuppose evidence of a crime being committed.
This time-honored principle is violated once the punishment is meted out “for crimes never committed.” Pre-crime ideology intervenes to punish, disrupt, incapacitate, or restrict those deemed to embody future crime threats. The term, precrime embodies a temporal paradox, suggesting that a crime has not occurred and that the crime that has not occurred is a foregone conclusion.
The artificial intelligence, now beyond human control, has raised alarms about the potential risks associated with pushing the boundaries of data science.
In 2000 and 2001, the Department of Justice, which administers the DEA, gave the agency a highly critical rebuke and asserted that the Drug Enforcement Agency’s goals were not consistent with the President’s federal National Drug Control Strategy. The DEA would need to find a new front for the War on Drugs, one that could produce tangible, measurable results (1)
Milgram’s TED Talk, titled “Why Smart Statistics are the Key to Fighting Crime,” outlined her commitment to using data to improve decision-making in the legal system. Her experiences as New Jersey’s attorney general and her oversight of prosecutors and law enforcement officers further showcased her dedication to reshaping the legal landscape.
This man was a physician; he was not a fraud.“
As the news of the unintended consequences of Milgram’s AI project spread, experts and authorities are scrambling to assess the extent of the threat posed by this Skynet-like entity.
In 2000 and 2001, the Department of Justice, which administers the DEA, gave the agency a highly critical rebuke and asserted that the Drug Enforcement Agency’s goals were not consistent with the President’s federal National Drug Control Strategy.
The situation has raised ethical and security concerns, prompting calls for increased regulation and oversight in developing and deploying artificial intelligence systems. The DEA would need to find a new front for the War on Drugs, one that could produce tangible, measurable results (1)
The potential parallels with the Terminator movies, where Skynet becomes a global threat to humanity, highlight the need for caution in pursuing advanced technologies. Still unaware of her project’s havoc, Milgram faces scrutiny as the world grapples with the repercussions of her well-intentioned but inadvertently disastrous venture into the world of data-driven justice.
The Legislative Members Demand DOJ Pause of Predictive Policing Grants:
“…Until DOJ can ensure that recipients of its grants are in compliance with Title VI, we demand that DOJ pause grants to state, tribal, and local law enforcement agencies that could be used to procure or implement predictive policing technologies (person-based or place-based). We also request that DOJ conduct a thorough inventory of all grants for these systems that it has made to law enforcement agencies since 2009…”
defense atty Ronald Chapman reviews “The Kings Rats,” Pattern of Deception
IN ANATOMY OF AN OPIOID TRIAL UNITED STATES v. HANSEN Falsehoods
THE CASE OF DR. TIMOTHY KING: A RECAP OF THE ALLEGATIONS
The saga of Dr. King’s involvement in various legal proceedings has garnered widespread attention and generated significant controversy. Those who have been closely following the developments of these cases have expressed concerns about Dr. King’s impartiality, credibility, and adherence to scientific principles in his capacity as a government expert on opioids and pain management.
The allegations against Dr. King, often referred to as the “Rat King,” center around his purported misuse of his expert status to perpetuate false narratives, biased interpretations, and unverified claims in federal courtrooms throughout the United States. These allegations were laid bare in a series of letters criticizing his actions and questioning his expert testimony’s integrity.
OR SEND
TO CASH APP:$docnorm
ZELLE 3135103378
So, Donate to the “Pharmacist For Healthcare Legal Defense Fund,
Falsehoods
and
Misleading Statements:
One of the core issues raised in these letters is Dr. King’s repeated use of false and misleading statements during court proceedings. An example cited pertains to Dr. King’s assertion that prescriptions of opioids should be deemed illegitimate if there is no objective evidence of functional improvement among patients. This premise, however, fails to account for the inherently subjective nature of pain – a critical factor in assessing the effectiveness of pain management.
Moreover, Dr. King’s purported bias comes to light when examining his stance on opioid addiction and the dangers associated with these medications. His sweeping statement that “opioid addiction and the dangers associated therein have been known for 3,000 years” raises questions about his willingness to acknowledge evolving scientific understanding and emerging research that challenges such a blanket assertion. Critics argue that this stance disregards nuanced insights into opioid usage and safety.
FOR NOW, YOU ARE WITHIN
THE NORMS
END NOTES
- NEW MISSION FOR DEA, Pg. 4
- listen to the 34minute mark to 1hr 15min
ATTY RON CHAPMAN IMPEACHES THE CREDIBILITY THE TESTIMONY OF DEA EXPERT DR. TIMOTHY KING
3. https://open.spotify.com/embed/episode/2xoWEotGnohuki9qJ0aF1n?utm_source=generator
No one considers what this opioid crisis would do the the pain patients. I have been denied access to inpatient treatment because I was called a user not a abuser by two different states and 3 different clinics. I have been told to take MMJ. Not something I would ever do but I tried it bc after being cut off pain meds I developed Afib of over 200 bpm. Now I suffer 24-7 and nobody cares. Is this democracy- decriminali or because I am disabled my life doesn’t matter to my elected officials?
My God Now we suffer from a crisis of Death through medical torture: CDC has endorsed the concept of Eugenics